Difference between revisions of "Team:Georgia State/Collaborations"

Line 183: Line 183:
 
<a class="cbox-gallary1 cboxElement" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/15/EmoryPictures_GSUiGEM_%289%29.jpeg" title="JBroth Materials">
 
<a class="cbox-gallary1 cboxElement" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/15/EmoryPictures_GSUiGEM_%289%29.jpeg" title="JBroth Materials">
  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/82/Blank_image_GSUiGEM.png" style="float: left; height: 300px;">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/15/EmoryPictures_GSUiGEM_%289%29.jpeg" style="float: left; height: 300px;">
  
 
</a>
 
</a>

Revision as of 23:47, 16 September 2015

IGEM Team:GSU


Collaborations


Backyard Biology @ Emory University: Project JBroth

Low Cost LB and Competent Cells!

Our interest in our topic began when we were researching possible projects. What we found most interesting was a research paper from the Journal of Pakistan Medical Association that tested the efficacy of microwaving LB rather than autoclaving. Also, a project that inspired us was the project from the University of Calgary (2014) that tested the efficacy of a homemade wash for competent cells. From these projects, we asked ourselves: Could one conduct a synthetic biology project without access to a professional laboratory?

This summer, we created a cost effective alternative to lab grade Luria Broth (LB). To compare our homemade broth, J-Broth, and lab grade LB we compared optical densities of liquid cultures and transformation efficiency of competent cells. For each method of testing, we compared autoclaved LB, microwaved LB, and microwaved J-Broth.

Materials/Methods

We grew XL1-Blue E. coli cells in liquid culture of lab grade luria broth and J-broth. The media was either autoclaved or microwaved for 8 minutes at 650 Watts before the cells were added.
We then made competent cells using XL1-Blue e. coli cells that were grown in each type of media following the Inoue method (Inoue, 1990) and calculated the transformation efficiency for comparison.

Results