Difference between revisions of "Team:William and Mary/Interlab Study"
(Created page with " <html lang="en"> <cfheader name="X-XSS-Protection" value="1"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8" /> <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="https://2015.igem.org/wiki/im...") |
|||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
<ul class="nav navbar-nav navbar-right navbar-uppercase"> | <ul class="nav navbar-nav navbar-right navbar-uppercase"> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
| + | <li> | ||
| + | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary"> | ||
| + | Home | ||
| + | </a> | ||
| + | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary/Description"> | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary/Description"> | ||
| Line 69: | Line 74: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
| − | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary | + | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary#parts"> |
Parts | Parts | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</a> | </a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
| Line 111: | Line 101: | ||
<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary/Practices"> | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary/Practices"> | ||
Human Practices | Human Practices | ||
| + | </a> | ||
| + | </li> | ||
| + | <li> | ||
| + | <a href="http://issuu.com/wmigem/docs/wmigemsynbiodraft150806"> | ||
| + | Curriculum on ISSUU.com | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 17 September 2015
Interlab Study Some note about interlab study here. The William & Mary iGEM team would like to extend special thanks to the following individuals: We participated in the Interlab Measurement Study! We created are fluorescent constructs using DNA synthesis and Gibson Assembly. The constructs we measured were J23101 + I13504, J23106 + I13504, and J23117 + I13504. Results are reported below. After we transformed our constructs into cells, we inoculated individual colonies in separate inoculation tubes. We then performed a series of spins and washes to remove the LB media and resuspend the cells in water. Finally we imaged them and obtained fluorescence values using confocal microscopy. In order to analyze the data, we applied a binary definition of what a cell was to our confocal images. We confirmed that the binary definition was picking up as many of the cells on the image as was reasonably possible. Our software determined the average fluorescence measurement for all the pixels inside the binary 'cells' and we reported the average of these measurements for each sample.