Difference between revisions of "Team:Reading/Safety"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
<h4>Potential risk to human health</h4> | <h4>Potential risk to human health</h4> | ||
| − | <p>Our project poses very little risk to human health. Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is a safety category 1 organism, and has no known interaction with humans. Several species of cyanobacteria are known to produce a range of toxins, called cyanotoxins, which can be fatal to wildlife and | + | <p>Our project poses very little risk to human health. <i>Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803</i> is a safety category 1 organism, and has no known interaction with humans. Several species of cyanobacteria are known to produce a range of toxins, called cyanotoxins, which can be fatal to wildlife and humans<sup>3</sup>. However, <i>Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803</i> does not produce any of these toxins<sup>4</sup>, so is one of the safest cyanobacteria in regards to human health.</p> |
<p>Risk to human health due to our proposed modifications is minimal. Many of our modifications target the photosynthetic electron transport chain, or involve knockouts of the terminal oxidase complexes. None of our modifications encode any toxin substances, or any substances harmful to human health.</p> | <p>Risk to human health due to our proposed modifications is minimal. Many of our modifications target the photosynthetic electron transport chain, or involve knockouts of the terminal oxidase complexes. None of our modifications encode any toxin substances, or any substances harmful to human health.</p> | ||
| − | <p>If the genes we propose to insert into Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 were to be transferred horizontally into an organism hazardous to humans, for example to a waterborne pathogen such as Vibrio cholerae, there would be few potential dangers. Many of our insertions encode components of the photosynthetic electron transport chain, which certainly would not increase the virulence of such a pathogen. The DNA would probably be ejected from the bacterium which had acquired it after a few generations, as it would confer no selective advantage, and would simply consume the resources needed to replicate and express the gene.</p> | + | <p>If the genes we propose to insert into <i>Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803</i> were to be transferred horizontally into an organism hazardous to humans, for example to a waterborne pathogen such as <i>Vibrio cholerae</i>, there would be few potential dangers. Many of our insertions encode components of the photosynthetic electron transport chain, which certainly would not increase the virulence of such a pathogen. The DNA would probably be ejected from the bacterium which had acquired it after a few generations, as it would confer no selective advantage, and would simply consume the resources needed to replicate and express the gene.</p> |
| − | <p>One of our modifications however has the potential to increase the virulence of waterborne pathogens as well as other pathogens. A major step in bacterial pathogenesis is for the bacterium to adhere to and colonise the host. We propose to induce hyperpilation in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, by inserting another copy of pilA1, the gene for the pilus subunit, pilin. If this gene was transferred to a pathogenic bacterium, it could increase the virulence of the pathogen by aiding in biofilm formation and adhesion to host cells.</p> | + | <p>One of our modifications however has the potential to increase the virulence of waterborne pathogens as well as other pathogens. A major step in bacterial pathogenesis is for the bacterium to adhere to and colonise the host. We propose to induce hyperpilation in <i>Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803</i>, by inserting another copy of pilA1, the gene for the pilus subunit, pilin. If this gene was transferred to a pathogenic bacterium, it could increase the virulence of the pathogen by aiding in biofilm formation and adhesion to host cells.</p> |
<p>Finally, our inserted genes will be carried on the plasmid pSB1K3, which contains the gene for Kanamycin resistance. If pathogenic bacteria acquire this plasmid, this would produce new strains of antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria.</p> | <p>Finally, our inserted genes will be carried on the plasmid pSB1K3, which contains the gene for Kanamycin resistance. If pathogenic bacteria acquire this plasmid, this would produce new strains of antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria.</p> | ||
| + | <hr> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 24 August 2015
Safety in iGEM
Safety is of paramount importance in Synthetic biology. People have always had concerns about the impact genetically modified organisms can have on the natural environment and on human health, and this concern rightly extends to the genetic modifications and synthetic functions engineered in synthetic biology. Much thought has already been put into safety in synthetic biology1, and many biosafety measures which can be engineered into cells have been designed2.
However, almost all of the literature on biosafety in synthetic biology focuses on E.coli. Here we shall consider the safety aspect of our project, and our use of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.
Potential risk to human health
Our project poses very little risk to human health. Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is a safety category 1 organism, and has no known interaction with humans. Several species of cyanobacteria are known to produce a range of toxins, called cyanotoxins, which can be fatal to wildlife and humans3. However, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 does not produce any of these toxins4, so is one of the safest cyanobacteria in regards to human health.
Risk to human health due to our proposed modifications is minimal. Many of our modifications target the photosynthetic electron transport chain, or involve knockouts of the terminal oxidase complexes. None of our modifications encode any toxin substances, or any substances harmful to human health.
If the genes we propose to insert into Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 were to be transferred horizontally into an organism hazardous to humans, for example to a waterborne pathogen such as Vibrio cholerae, there would be few potential dangers. Many of our insertions encode components of the photosynthetic electron transport chain, which certainly would not increase the virulence of such a pathogen. The DNA would probably be ejected from the bacterium which had acquired it after a few generations, as it would confer no selective advantage, and would simply consume the resources needed to replicate and express the gene.
One of our modifications however has the potential to increase the virulence of waterborne pathogens as well as other pathogens. A major step in bacterial pathogenesis is for the bacterium to adhere to and colonise the host. We propose to induce hyperpilation in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, by inserting another copy of pilA1, the gene for the pilus subunit, pilin. If this gene was transferred to a pathogenic bacterium, it could increase the virulence of the pathogen by aiding in biofilm formation and adhesion to host cells.
Finally, our inserted genes will be carried on the plasmid pSB1K3, which contains the gene for Kanamycin resistance. If pathogenic bacteria acquire this plasmid, this would produce new strains of antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria.