Difference between revisions of "Team:Gifu/result-page"

Line 78: Line 78:
 
<a name="descri" style="text-decoration:none;"></a> <br>
 
<a name="descri" style="text-decoration:none;"></a> <br>
 
<hr width="100%" > <h4> <font size="5" face="Century"> RESULT </font> </h4>
 
<hr width="100%" > <h4> <font size="5" face="Century"> RESULT </font> </h4>
 +
<font size="4" face="Century"><b> EFFICIENCY </b></font>
 
<font size="3">
 
<font size="3">
 
<p> &nbsp;&nbsp; Ct is a value that the more the gene template in PCR increases, the more Ct value decreases. If there is a difference between “C” and “D”, there is a difference in the quantity of template geneThus, the difference between “C” and “D” is small; the cyclization may be efficiency.As a result, Ct in 2014 was 2.31, but “outside”, “inside①”, “inside②” were 1.28, 2.02, 1.89 collectively. From these things, it can be said that the efficiency of cyclization rose with all devices which we designed in this time. Especially, in the case of “outside”, there was a difference with Ct more than 1 point than “2014”. When we think that a quantity of the gene doubles for 1 cycle in PCR simply, it can be said that the cyclic efficiency of “outside” was twice as high as that of “2014”. <br>
 
<p> &nbsp;&nbsp; Ct is a value that the more the gene template in PCR increases, the more Ct value decreases. If there is a difference between “C” and “D”, there is a difference in the quantity of template geneThus, the difference between “C” and “D” is small; the cyclization may be efficiency.As a result, Ct in 2014 was 2.31, but “outside”, “inside①”, “inside②” were 1.28, 2.02, 1.89 collectively. From these things, it can be said that the efficiency of cyclization rose with all devices which we designed in this time. Especially, in the case of “outside”, there was a difference with Ct more than 1 point than “2014”. When we think that a quantity of the gene doubles for 1 cycle in PCR simply, it can be said that the cyclic efficiency of “outside” was twice as high as that of “2014”. <br>

Revision as of 07:51, 15 September 2015


https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d8/Logo_HOME.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a4/Logo_PROJECT.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/archive/b/b9/20150720104417%21Logo_TEAM.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/86/Logo_NOTE.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/87/Logo_RESULT.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/28/Logo_MORE.png


PROJECT



RESULT

EFFICIENCY

   Ct is a value that the more the gene template in PCR increases, the more Ct value decreases. If there is a difference between “C” and “D”, there is a difference in the quantity of template geneThus, the difference between “C” and “D” is small; the cyclization may be efficiency.As a result, Ct in 2014 was 2.31, but “outside”, “inside①”, “inside②” were 1.28, 2.02, 1.89 collectively. From these things, it can be said that the efficiency of cyclization rose with all devices which we designed in this time. Especially, in the case of “outside”, there was a difference with Ct more than 1 point than “2014”. When we think that a quantity of the gene doubles for 1 cycle in PCR simply, it can be said that the cyclic efficiency of “outside” was twice as high as that of “2014”.
  After all, it is thought that it fitted this splice site because it is a complementarity chain derived from the creature.





   MENU
  1. DESCRIPTION  
  2. Self-Splicing  
  3. PIE Method  
  4. EXPERIMENTS  
  5. RESULT  
  6. MODELING  
  7. FUTURE WORKS  
  8. CONCLUSIONS  
  9. REFERENCES