Team:NAIT Edmonton/Trial11
Section 1
Mauris mauris ante, blandit et, ultrices a, suscipit eget, quam. Integer ut neque. Vivamus nisi metus, molestie vel, gravida in, condimentum sit amet, nunc. Nam a nibh. Donec suscipit eros. Nam mi. Proin viverra leo ut odio. Curabitur malesuada. Vestibulum a velit eu ante scelerisque vulputate.
Section 2
Sed non urna. Donec et ante. Phasellus eu ligula. Vestibulum sit amet purus. Vivamus hendrerit, dolor at aliquet laoreet, mauris turpis porttitor velit, faucibus interdum tellus libero ac justo. Vivamus non quam. In suscipit faucibus urna.
Section 3
Nam enim risus, molestie et, porta ac, aliquam ac, risus. Quisque lobortis. Phasellus pellentesque purus in massa. Aenean in pede. Phasellus ac libero ac tellus pellentesque semper. Sed ac felis. Sed commodo, magna quis lacinia ornare, quam ante aliquam nisi, eu iaculis leo purus venenatis dui.
- List item one
- List item two
- List item three
Section 4
Cras dictum. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aenean lacinia mauris vel est.
Suspendisse eu nisl. Nullam ut libero. Integer dignissim consequat lectus. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.
Background
The structural and functional study of the proteins expressed by a genome is called proteomics. This relatively novel science uses different methodologies in order to separate and identify specific proteins of interest. Among these techniques, SDS-PAGE plays an essential role due to its high sensitivity, low sample volume requirement, and high popularity. Negatively charged proteins migrate towards the positive electrode according to their size and charge. Smaller proteins migrate further in a given amount of time. As proteins are separated in this manner, users load molecular weight standards to estimate the size (in kDa) of the proteins present in their sample. Once the proteins of a single sample have been isolated and are embedded in the polyacrylamide (PA) gel matrix, staining procedures are used to visualize them.
Organic dyes, such as Coomassie blue, can be used for this purpose; nevertheless, their low sensitivity and a detection range that goes from 1 to 50 ng can be a challenge for detecting low abundance proteins (Jin, Huang, Yoo, & Choi, 2006). A higher sensitivity can be achieved by fluorescent staining techniques (from 0.1 to 10 ng.); however, UV instruments are necessary in order to read the data (Jin et al., 2006). The most sensitive method up to date is radiolabeling, but the requirement of hazardous isotopes and their complex management makes it a complicated procedure (Jin et al., 2006). Silver staining is a method that offers great sensitivity and an easy to handle protocol, thus making it one of the most commonly used staining methods.
The Problem
Difficulties with silver staining arise when the molecular weight markers are re- colored golden-brown in the staining process. Markers offer evenly distributed proteins that show bands of equal intensity and known size. Researchers can compare these bands with their sample and identify the protein they are looking for based on its size. A subset of these markers has color-coded standard proteins to facilitate the identification of each band. Post-silver staining, the users lose the ability to use the color code as a reference.