Difference between revisions of "Demo Judging Expectations 2016"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<div class="fourColumns_feature"> | <div class="fourColumns_feature"> | ||
<h3>Team UMaryland</h3> | <h3>Team UMaryland</h3> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>text</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<div class="fourColumns_feature"> | <div class="fourColumns_feature"> | ||
<h3>Team BABS UNSW Australia</h3> | <h3>Team BABS UNSW Australia</h3> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>Text</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 14:57, 30 October 2015
×
Loading ...
Judging Expectations
Understanding and fairly evaluating the various aspects of the projects that iGEM teams carry out can be difficult for both novice and experienced judges. We therefore provide judges with a Judging Handbook to provide some guidance on how to navigate this process. For 2016, we will also provide a wide range of example projects from previous years that judges are welcome to look through before and during the main competition months. Our goal is to provide this content by January 2016, so please check back for updates!
Examples from 2015 iGEM
test
Examples from 2014 iGEM
test
Team UMaryland
text
Team BABS UNSW Australia
Text
2014 team 1
Text.
2014 team 2
Text
2014 team 3
Text.
2014 team 4
Text
2015 team 3
Text.
2015 team 4
Text