Difference between revisions of "Team:Brasil-USP/LcpBioinformatics"
Laisribovski (Talk | contribs) |
Laisribovski (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<div class="wikicontent"> | <div class="wikicontent"> | ||
| − | < | + | <h2>Iterative Threading ASSEmbly Refinement (I-TASSER) prediction method</h2> |
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
<p>Thinking a little more about Lcp (Latex clearing protein), our team applied some bioinformatic tools to try and get more information about this protein’s properties and structure. Unlike RoxA (Rubber oxygenase A), Lcp crystallographic structure has not been solved yet (RoxA PDB: 4B2N). It has been indeed shown that Lcp is able to link itself to a prosthetic heme group in a non-covalent way (b-type), unlike what happens in RoxA (c-type)<sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Using prediction methods, such as Iterative Threading ASSEmbly Refinement (I-TASSER)<sup>2</sup>, we attempt to predict Lcp structure based on its amino acid sequence but results did not show good structure models using I-TASSER (Figure 1). Although, it is possible to observe that secondary structure prediction reveals that Lcp could consist of many loops and unstructured regions that are also observed in RoxA (32% helical and 7% beta sheet)<sup>3</sup>, which might suggest some similarity between these two proteins. For RoxA, a complex structure composed by three large loops forming a tower (each loop formed by helices and non-structured regions) was proposed to determine the exo-cleavage rubber polymer (Figure 3).<sup>3</sup> Such difficulty predicting a model might be due to Lcp high complexity, distinctly from RoxA which performs exo-cleavage while Lcp performs endo-cleavage. Notice that I-TASSER was not able to predict even an heme ligand.</p> | <p>Thinking a little more about Lcp (Latex clearing protein), our team applied some bioinformatic tools to try and get more information about this protein’s properties and structure. Unlike RoxA (Rubber oxygenase A), Lcp crystallographic structure has not been solved yet (RoxA PDB: 4B2N). It has been indeed shown that Lcp is able to link itself to a prosthetic heme group in a non-covalent way (b-type), unlike what happens in RoxA (c-type)<sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Using prediction methods, such as Iterative Threading ASSEmbly Refinement (I-TASSER)<sup>2</sup>, we attempt to predict Lcp structure based on its amino acid sequence but results did not show good structure models using I-TASSER (Figure 1). Although, it is possible to observe that secondary structure prediction reveals that Lcp could consist of many loops and unstructured regions that are also observed in RoxA (32% helical and 7% beta sheet)<sup>3</sup>, which might suggest some similarity between these two proteins. For RoxA, a complex structure composed by three large loops forming a tower (each loop formed by helices and non-structured regions) was proposed to determine the exo-cleavage rubber polymer (Figure 3).<sup>3</sup> Such difficulty predicting a model might be due to Lcp high complexity, distinctly from RoxA which performs exo-cleavage while Lcp performs endo-cleavage. Notice that I-TASSER was not able to predict even an heme ligand.</p> | ||
Revision as of 15:59, 3 October 2015
Lcp Bioinformatics
Iterative Threading ASSEmbly Refinement (I-TASSER) prediction method
Thinking a little more about Lcp (Latex clearing protein), our team applied some bioinformatic tools to try and get more information about this protein’s properties and structure. Unlike RoxA (Rubber oxygenase A), Lcp crystallographic structure has not been solved yet (RoxA PDB: 4B2N). It has been indeed shown that Lcp is able to link itself to a prosthetic heme group in a non-covalent way (b-type), unlike what happens in RoxA (c-type)1.
Using prediction methods, such as Iterative Threading ASSEmbly Refinement (I-TASSER)2, we attempt to predict Lcp structure based on its amino acid sequence but results did not show good structure models using I-TASSER (Figure 1). Although, it is possible to observe that secondary structure prediction reveals that Lcp could consist of many loops and unstructured regions that are also observed in RoxA (32% helical and 7% beta sheet)3, which might suggest some similarity between these two proteins. For RoxA, a complex structure composed by three large loops forming a tower (each loop formed by helices and non-structured regions) was proposed to determine the exo-cleavage rubber polymer (Figure 3).3 Such difficulty predicting a model might be due to Lcp high complexity, distinctly from RoxA which performs exo-cleavage while Lcp performs endo-cleavage. Notice that I-TASSER was not able to predict even an heme ligand.
Figure 1 - The best model predicted by I-TASSER. It is composed of helices present in sequence and approximately in the same plan, not looking like a center that can receive a heme group. The C-score and TM scores are under acceptable values (-3.22 and 0.35±0.12 respectively).
Figure 2 - RoxA structure is a complex globular protein that contains two heme groups in its core. The catalysis happens in group heme 13. The heme groups are surrounded by alpha helices as it is characteristic of this kind of protein. The oxygen responsible for attacking the polyisoprene chain is shown in red, the helices are shown in cyan and in purple, is the beta sheet.
Figure 3 - The RoxA structure simplifying helices and loops. In this figure, loop 1 is highlighted in dark blue, loop 2 in green and loop 3 in yellow.