Difference between revisions of "Team:WashU StLouis"

2014 Igem Project

Fixing Nitrogen and Sensing Light

What was our goal?

There were two key components of our project:

Richard and Caroline were working in the Pakrasi lab, and had been using genes from cyanobacteria to get nitrogen fixation working in E. coli. They were testing nitrogen fixation by running acetylene reduction assays and designing experiments to test the optimal criteria (ie. E. coli strains, temperature, pH, nitrogen source) to get maximal results.

Read more here

Ben and Jeffery have been working in the Moon lab, and have been busy cloning plasmids to create a system that represses and expresses a fluorescent protein with the presence and absense of light, and were running experiments to test the induction levels compared to various positive and negative controls.

Read more here
Close Project

Mission Statement

tl;dr Fix Nitrogen

The goal of this year's project is to take the nitrogen fixing nif cluster from cyanotheses, a cyanobacteria, minify it, and make it work in E. Coli.

• Designing the plasmid
• Making it work in E. Coli

Close Project

Summary of the project to date

Phase 1: Electro-Transformation of plasmid pNif51142 into E. Coli strains

- 2014

To successfully transform pNif51142, we used Electro-Transformation, also known as Electroporation. Electroporation provides a method of transforming E. coli to efficiencies greater than are possible with the best chemical methods. By subjecting mixtures of cells and DNA to exponentially decaying fields of very high initial amplitude, we were able to deliver the plasmid into all of E. coli strains that were tested in the project.

Results

According to the gel running and antibiotic testing, bands in the gel and the survival of all strains transformed in antibiotic Kanamycin (there was an cluster of Kanamycin-resistant marker gene in sequence of pNif51142) both prove that the Electro-Transformation was successful.

Phase 2: Determine the optimal conditions for cell survival with plasmid pNif51142 in E. Coli

- 2014

Due to the oxidative properties of oxygen, most nitrogenases are irreversibly inhibited by dioxygen, which degradatively oxidizes the Fe-S cofactors. This requires mechanisms for nitrogen fixers to protect nitrogenase from oxygen in vivo. Hence in our experiment, we firstly selected anaerobic condition as part of preparation step for the nitrogenase activity testing

• Testing Media: Minimal M9
• Carbon Source: Glucose(1mM, 10mM, 100mM)
• Nitrogen Source: Glutamine(1mM, 10mM, 100mM), Glutamate(1mM, 10mM, 100mM), NH4Cl(1mM, 10mM, 100mM)
• Temperature: 30°C, 37°C, 40°C
• pH:6,7,8
• O₂ level:Anaerobic or Aerobic
• Strains of e. Coli: JM109, BL21(DE3), WM1788, Top 10 DH5Α

Target Strain	JM109	BL21(DE3)	WM1788	Top 10	DH5Α
Experimental Plates	JM 109 strain w/ plasmid Antibiotic	BL21(DE3) strain w/ plasmid Antibiotic	WM1788 strain w/ plasmid Antibiotic	Top 10 strain w/ plasmid Antibiotic	DH5α strain w/ plasmid Antibiotic
Positive Control	JM 109 strain w/o plasmid No antibiotic	BL21(DE3) strain w/o plasmid No antibiotic	WM1788 strain w/o plasmid No antibiotic	Top 10 straing w/o plasmid No Antibiotic	DH5α strain w/o plasmid No antibiotic
Negative Control	JM 109 strain w/o plasmid Antibiotic	BL21(DE3) strain w/o plasmid Antibiotic	WM1788 strain w/o plasmid Antibiotic	Top 10 strain w/o plasmid Antibiotic	DH5α strain w/out plasmid Antibiotic

Results

In the minimal M9 media, all possible combinations of parameters listed above were tested. None of the concentrations of glucose had any affect on the growth of E. coli. It was expected that as the concentration of glucose increased, the growth of E. coli also increased. However, the variation between the concentrations of glucose may have been too small for a noticeable increase in E. coli growth as the concentration of glucose increased. Also, even the maximum concentration of glucose tested, 100mM, may have been too low to affect the growth of E. coli to an observable extent. Eventually, 10mM was determined to be the optimal glucose concentration for the purpose of least interference possible in solution. NH4Cl as minimal nitrogen source was proven to be not suitable for E. coli growth at any concentration as the OD600 testing results showed that cell density didn’t change throughout the time. It was probably due to the permeability of cell membrane was limited for NH4+ and Cl- ions. Eventually Glutamate at concentration of 10mM supported cell growth the best and thus chosen as part of optimal environment condition. With CASAmino solution’s buffering utility, the pH was controlled little bit below 7 but close to 7. To protect the iron core of the nitrogenase, temperature of 30°C and Anaerobic were both determined not for cell growth but for nitrogenase activity testing, which is the next phase.

Phase 3: Measurign nitrogen fixation activity under determined optimal conditions in E. Coli Strains.

-2014

We used an Acetylene Reduction Assay to examine the nitrogenase activity for JM109, BL21(DE3), Top10, DH5α at different cell density referred by OD600 values. Acetylene (C2H2) has an triple bond similar to that of atmospheric nitrogen (N2). Because of this structural similarity, the nitrogenase enzyme can cleave the triple bond in acetylene just as it would cleave the triple bond in N2. Ethylene (C2H4) is produced from this enzymatic activity, so a gas chromatograph can be used to detect the presence of ethylene and, consequently, nitrogenase activity.

Results

1. Of the five E. coli strains tested, JM109 and WM1788 showed strongest nitrogenase activity.
2. The linear relationship between nitrogen fixation activity and time matches that seen in nature.
3. Optimal conditions determined:
   • Glucose as carbon-source
   • glutamate as nitrogen source
   • LB as inoculating media
   • minimal M9 as testing media for GC assay
   • anaerobic enviornment
   • 30°C during the overnight preperation

Phase 4/5 Computationally Modelling an E. Coli system that has Nitrogen Fixation (Penn) and Targeting Nif genes for Overexpression and Silencing (WashU)

-2015 TODO write up this section. Close Project

The Big Picture

Haber-Bosch is so 1909

Why are we doing this project

Synthetic biology is an exciting area of research that aims to genetically improve organisms to make them more efficient and hopefully more useful to us as well. The human population in 1950 was 2.5 billion, yet it is predicted to surpass 9 billion by 2050. Even with population growth slowing, increasing life spans and standards of living will soon tax our natural resources. One of the most concerning is our food supply. The agriculture industry needs a revolution in order to keep up with our expected growth rates. Currently about 80% of chemically fixated nitrogen is used as agricultural fertilizers, the majority in developed lands [1]. Intracellular nitrogen fixation in crops could help to sustain the burgeoning world population, especially in areas with less fertile soil without taxing the planet’s waterways. The exponential increase in nitrogen fertilizer has led to more runoff into rivers and oceans. Fertilizers then provide nutrition for algal blooms that result in hypoxia and form oceanic dead zones. These dead zones lead to the death of marine species and have potentially large economic consequences. The ramifications of nitrogen fertilizer runoff can be averted by genetically engineering plant crops to fix their own nitrogen. Some cyanobacteria fix nitrogen for nutritional needs, while most organisms can only acquire it from the food it consumes. Synthetic biology allows us to transfer this ability to fix nitrogen to a heterologous host that has many genetic tools, Escherichia coli, so that we can learn how to give single cell organisms, and eventually chloroplasts the ability to create their own nitrogen fertilizer. Diazotrophic (organisms that fix nitrogen) cyanobacteria such Nostoc Punctiforme or Anabaena use heterocysts (specialized nitrogen fixing cells) to create a mini-anaerobic environment to aid nitrogen fixation. However, Cyanothece 51142, a non-heterocyst, fixes nitrogen in the same cell as photosynthesis by relying on a circadian metabolic process, when there is less oxygen byproduct from photosynthesis. This process is both fascinating and necessary since the key enzyme in nitrogen fixation, nitrogenase, is poisoned by oxygen. Our goal this summer is to engineer the regulation of the proteins necessary for nitrogen fixation so that they are highly repressed when activated by broad spectrum light (such as the sun), and are highly active when there is no light around, mimicking the cycle where photosynthesis occurs during the day and nitrogen fixation occurs at night. Close Project

Methods and Materials

How we did what we did

TODO impement this page Close Project

Discussion

Where do we go from here

TODO implement this Close Project