Difference between revisions of "Team:UCLA/Notebook/Spider Silk Genetics/14 August 2015"

(08/14/2015)
(Miniprep samples from yesterday)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
=08/14/2015=
 
=08/14/2015=
 +
 +
==Miniprep samples from [https://2015.igem.org/Team:UCLA/Notebook/Spider_Silk_Genetics/13_August_2015 yesterday]==
 +
 +
Sequencing results:
 +
 +
M1-9(T7)
 +
* Colony 1,2 and 4 have the correct sequence
  
 
==PCR amplify M1-12==
 
==PCR amplify M1-12==
Line 65: Line 72:
  
 
Ran samples on 1% gel
 
Ran samples on 1% gel
 +
 +
[[File:2015-08-14 15hr 23min.jpg| 600px]]
  
 
Sample 1 with had no band  
 
Sample 1 with had no band  

Latest revision as of 22:39, 15 August 2015

iGEM UCLA




08/14/2015

Miniprep samples from yesterday

Sequencing results:

M1-9(T7)

  • Colony 1,2 and 4 have the correct sequence

PCR amplify M1-12

Since previous PCRs using ICA elution as template did not work very well, first M1-12 PCR product was also tested as a template

ICA elution PCR product
Q5 buff 10 uL 10 uL
dNTPs 1 uL 1 uL
F-03 2.5 uL 2.5 uL
G-03 2.5 uL 2.5 uL
ddH2O 32.5 uL 33.3 uL
Template 1 uL 0.2 uL
Q5 Polymerase 0.5 uL 0.5 uL
98C 30 sec
98C 10 sec
66C 20 sec
x23
72C 45 sec
72C 2 min
12C Hold

Ran samples on 1% gel

2015-08-14 15hr 23min.jpg

Sample 1 with had no band Sample 2 had a very bright band close to the expected size

Maybe it was the ICA elution that was no longer in good condition?

Gel purified the band from sample 2

  • 39.69 ng/uL; 260/280: 2.47

Double Digestion of M1-12 PCR product with EcoRI and PstI

EcoRI 1 uL
Pst I 1 uL
Template 11 uL
Buffer 2.1 5 uL
ddH2) 32 uL

37C for 1.5 hr, 65C for 20 min