Difference between revisions of "Team:HKUST-Rice/Expression"
Stephanieyiu (Talk | contribs) |
Stephanieyiu (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<h1>Experiments performed</h1> | <h1>Experiments performed</h1> | ||
| − | <p>For all experiments, the | + | <p>For all experiments, the bacteria were first grown overnight, then a 25-fold dilution was carried out using M9 minimal medium with specific inducers and concentrations. Afterthat, they were transferred into a 96-well deep well plate for overnight induction. The samples were then further diluted ten-fold the next day. The cells were allowed to grow from lag phase to log phase for several hours. Ultimately, the result was gathered with the help of EnVision® Multilabel Reader. All data were plotted as graphs for further analysis. |
<br><br>Please visit <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_Signal_Co.pdf"target="_blank">co-expression experiments</a> for more details. | <br><br>Please visit <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_Signal_Co.pdf"target="_blank">co-expression experiments</a> for more details. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 13:16, 3 September 2015
Signal Co-expression
Expression platform
To examine the possible effects of co-expression, comparison between dose dependent fluorescence response expressed by one construct in a single plasmid and two constructs in a single plasmid was conducted . The purpose of the comparison relates to the design of potassium ion, phosphate ion and nitrate ion (KPN) sensor, which aims to combine three constructs characterised by different outputs within one plasmid.
The construction of a double construct araBADp-lacZp allowed for a comparison between GFPmut3b and mRFP measurements while changing concentrations of the individual inducers. Graphs of changes in fluorescence according to different inducer concentrations for both single and double constructs could be analysed and compared.
The construction of a double construct araBADp-GFPmut3b-lacZp-mRFP allowed for a comparison between GFPmut3b and mRFP measurements while changing concentrations of inducers. Dose response curve for both single and double constructs could then be analysed and compared.
Constructs
Constructs were built by digestion and ligation method.
Experiments performed
For all experiments, the bacteria were first grown overnight, then a 25-fold dilution was carried out using M9 minimal medium with specific inducers and concentrations. Afterthat, they were transferred into a 96-well deep well plate for overnight induction. The samples were then further diluted ten-fold the next day. The cells were allowed to grow from lag phase to log phase for several hours. Ultimately, the result was gathered with the help of EnVision® Multilabel Reader. All data were plotted as graphs for further analysis.
Please visit co-expression experiments for more details.
Results
After obtaining characterization data for the araBADp-GFPmut3b single construct, the dose response curve was compared with that expressed in a double construct (with lacZp-mRFP) .
From figure 5a, it can be observed that in a double construct, the maximum expression of the reporter decreases for the L-Arabinose inducible araBADp system. Furthermore, from figure 5b, it is shown that when the coexpressed system is under full induction, the curve for the double construct araBADp shifts to the right compared to both the single construct and double construct without induction, indicating a decrease in sensitivity.
In order to further investigate the effect of induction level of the coexpressed lacZp-mRFP construct on the GFPmut3b expression of the double construct araBADp system, experiments were carried out varying the IPTG induction concentrations.
Figure 6 exhibits that varying the induction level of the coexpressed lacZp-mRFP construct seems to have an effect on the expression level of araBADp-GFPmut3b in a double construct. At a higher IPTG concentration, the maximum expression of GFPmut3b decreases. However, no trend can be observed for the horizontal shift of the curve, though at the highest IPTG concentration the graph observed to shift right, no significant shift was obtained at lower IPTG concentrations.
Conclusion
By using the araBADp-GFPmut3b and lacZp-mRFP inducible systems, the possible difference of dose dependent fluorescence expression in a double construct and single construct was investigated. In a double construct, the maximal expression was decreased compared to the single construct induced araBADp-GFPmut3b, whether the coexpressed construct was induced or not. We conjecture that it is possibly due to the limited cellular resources(eg. aminoacids, enzymes required for gene translation/transcription) and the synthesised proteins (eg.lacI, mRFP) that could increase the cell load and affects its growth. However, since the investigation was done focusing only on one combination of inducible constructs(araBADp-GFPmut3b and lacZp-mRFP) it may not be used to generalise the effect of expressing a charactered construct in a double construct, including that for the K,P and N construct. Thus further improvements should be made.
Further Improvements
Since characterization data from one combination of double construct cannot be applied to all double constructs in general, characterisation of more combinations of inducible reporter systems (eg. luxRp-GFPmut3- lacZp-mRFP, tetOp-GFPmut3b- lacZp-mRFP) is required.
Charaterize araBADp-GFPmut3b lacZp-mRFP with a third construct (i.e. tetOp and luxRp)
This will give a more reliable comparison for a triple construct KPN promoter system, as
opposed to a double system.
Coexpress potassium with phosphate and nitrate sensors with their respective inducers.