Difference between revisions of "Team:Bordeaux/Description"
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
− | <br> <p align="justify" style="text-indent: 3vw;">More precisely, applied to grapevine plants, <b> sulfated ß-glucan </b> induces the <b> accumulation of phytoalexins </b> (organic antimicrobial substances) and the <b> expression of a set of Pathogenesis-Related proteins </b>. In plants, the fact that oligosaccharides must carry crucial sulfates for their biological function suggests that chemical sulfation of oligosaccharides can improve their biological properties. In recents studies, compared to Laminarin (ß-glucan), its sulfated derivative triggered an enhanced immunity against <i>P. viticola</i> in <i>V. vinifera</i> and a stronger immunity against TMV in <i>Nicotiana tabacum</i>. The results indicate that the chemical modification of an elicitor, such as sulfated derivative of ß-glucan, could improve its resistance-inducer efficiency. Moreover, if ß-glucan is a substrate for plant ß-1,3 glucanase, its sulfation clearly protectsthe molecule from its enzymatic degradation. Thus, a basal activity of plant glucanases can degrade ß-glucan and consequently releases short inactive ß-glucans whereas sulfated derivatives still remain active molecules during a longer period. This might explain the higher resistance induced by ß-glucan sulfate compared to ß-glucan. </p> | + | <br> <p align="justify" style="text-indent: 3vw;">More precisely, applied to grapevine plants, <b> sulfated ß-glucan </b> induces the <b> accumulation of phytoalexins </b> (organic antimicrobial substances) and the <b> expression of a set of Pathogenesis-Related proteins </b>. In plants, the fact that oligosaccharides must carry crucial sulfates for their biological function suggests that <b>chemical sulfation</b> of oligosaccharides <b>can improve their biological properties.</b> In recents studies, compared to Laminarin (ß-glucan), its sulfated derivative triggered an enhanced immunity against <i>P. viticola</i> in <i>V. vinifera</i> and a stronger immunity against TMV in <i>Nicotiana tabacum</i>. The results indicate that the chemical modification of an elicitor, such as sulfated derivative of ß-glucan, could improve its resistance-inducer efficiency. Moreover, if ß-glucan is a substrate for plant ß-1,3 glucanase, its sulfation clearly protectsthe molecule from its enzymatic degradation. Thus, a basal activity of plant glucanases can degrade ß-glucan and consequently releases short inactive ß-glucans whereas sulfated derivatives still remain active molecules during a longer period. This might explain the higher resistance induced by ß-glucan sulfate compared to ß-glucan. </p> |
<p align="justify"style="text-indent: 3vw;"> However, non-sulfated Curdlan doesn't trigger the hypersensitive response [3] characterized by the rapid death of cells in the local region surrounding an infection, avoiding a complete contamination of the plant. This response has been studied in Arabidopsis thaliana through a <b> mutant gene: pmr4 </b>. This mutant is resistant to mildew infections but is <b> unable to induce Pathogenesis-Related proteins expression </b>. Also, activation of a Pathogenesis-Related protein called PR1 in grapevine is regulated by the <b> salicylic acid signaling pathway </b>. The lack of PR1 expression in non-sulfated Curdlan-treated grapevine could be explained by a negative feedback of glucan. This is demonstrated by the study of a double mutant of pmr4 which restore the susceptibility to mildew. It suggests that linear β-1,3 glucan negatively regulates the salicylic acid pathway. So, sulfation of the glucan would counteract the negative feedback effect. </p> | <p align="justify"style="text-indent: 3vw;"> However, non-sulfated Curdlan doesn't trigger the hypersensitive response [3] characterized by the rapid death of cells in the local region surrounding an infection, avoiding a complete contamination of the plant. This response has been studied in Arabidopsis thaliana through a <b> mutant gene: pmr4 </b>. This mutant is resistant to mildew infections but is <b> unable to induce Pathogenesis-Related proteins expression </b>. Also, activation of a Pathogenesis-Related protein called PR1 in grapevine is regulated by the <b> salicylic acid signaling pathway </b>. The lack of PR1 expression in non-sulfated Curdlan-treated grapevine could be explained by a negative feedback of glucan. This is demonstrated by the study of a double mutant of pmr4 which restore the susceptibility to mildew. It suggests that linear β-1,3 glucan negatively regulates the salicylic acid pathway. So, sulfation of the glucan would counteract the negative feedback effect. </p> |
Revision as of 18:34, 4 September 2015