Difference between revisions of "Team:TCU Taiwan/Modeling/Protein structure"
Phoebe chen (Talk | contribs) |
Phoebe chen (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div id="st1" class="st"> | ||
+ | <div class="inner"> | ||
+ | <table width="95%" align="center"> | ||
+ | <tr><td><h1><span style="font-family:Calibri;text-align:justify;"><font size="5"></br> | ||
+ | The first column shows the amino acid sequence we predict. | ||
+ | The second column shows that AMPs corresponding secondary structure state are still -helix. | ||
+ | The third column shows the probability of correct prediction. | ||
+ | </br></br> | ||
+ | </font></span></h1></td></tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div id="st1" class="st"> | ||
+ | <div class="inner"> | ||
+ | <table width="95%" align="center"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td width="90%" align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/10/2015tcutaiwanigemModelingepi-1withA1.jpg" align=center width="100%" title="Result 3"></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div id="st1" class="st"> | ||
+ | <div class="inner"> | ||
+ | <table width="95%" align="center"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td width="45%" align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/82/2015tcutaiwanModelingepi-1withoutA1.jpg" align=center width="100%" title="Result 4"></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div id="st1" class="st"> | ||
+ | <div class="inner"> | ||
+ | <table width="95%" align="center"> | ||
+ | <tr><td><h1><span style="font-family:Calibri;text-align:justify;"><font size="5"></br> | ||
+ | The first column shows the amino acid sequence we predict. | ||
+ | The second column shows that AMPs corresponding secondary structure state are still -helix. | ||
+ | The third column shows the probability of correct prediction. | ||
+ | </br></br> | ||
+ | </font></span></h1></td></tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<div id="st1" class="st"> | <div id="st1" class="st"> |
Revision as of 05:50, 8 September 2015
|
In order to have more efficient to get our AMPs, we treated signal peptide upstream of the N-terminal of mature antimicrobial peptides. This signal peptide is comes from chitinase C of S.lividans (MGFRHKAAALAATLALPLAGLVGLASPAQA). When the pre-mature peptides go through the periplasmic space, peptidase will identified the cleavage site Ala-Gln-Ala and cut at the double Ala between the signal and mature peptide. To make sure the secretion system is work we attach an Ala at the N-terminal of AMPs. We used protein secondary structure prediction software base on the known peptide structure to analysis whether the attached Ala affect the peptide folding process or not. |
The first column shows the amino acid sequence we predict. The second column shows that AMPs corresponding secondary structure state are still -helix. The third column shows the probability of correct prediction. |
The first column shows the amino acid sequence we predict. The second column shows that AMPs corresponding secondary structure state are still -helix. The third column shows the probability of correct prediction. |
|
Through the secondary structure predicted. The result shows whatever Signiferin or Epinecidin-1 the attached of Ala didn’t affect peptide-folding process. They are still a-helix structure. |
Contact us tcutaiwan@gmail.com No.701, Sec. 3, Zhongyang Rd. Hualien 97004, Taiwan |