Difference between revisions of "Team:Freiburg/Labjournals/irif/August"
(Created page with " {{Freiburg/CSS}} {{Freiburg/Menubar}} {{Freiburg/LabjournalCSS}} <html> <div id="banner_labjournal"> </div> </html> {{Freiburg/wiki_content_start}} <html> <!-- Labjournal conten...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
{{Freiburg/CSS}} | {{Freiburg/CSS}} | ||
{{Freiburg/Menubar}} | {{Freiburg/Menubar}} | ||
{{Freiburg/LabjournalCSS}} | {{Freiburg/LabjournalCSS}} | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
{{Freiburg/wiki_content_start}} | {{Freiburg/wiki_content_start}} | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
− | <!-- | + | <style> |
− | + | .content_box { | |
+ | background-color: #F9F9F9; | ||
+ | padding: 3em; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | /*========= BEGIN: style for navigation bar ==========*/ | ||
+ | #notebook { | ||
+ | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/cd/Freiburg_icon_notebook_active_yellow.png) no-repeat; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #notebook a { | ||
+ | color: #ecdc18; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #runningchip { | ||
+ | left: 85.5%; | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | /*========= END: style for navigation bar ==========*/ | ||
+ | </style> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!--========= BEGIN: GoBack button ==========--> | ||
+ | <div class="button_back"> | ||
+ | <a style="color:#FFF" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Labjournals#irif_lab"> << Back</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <!--========= END: GoBack button ==========--> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="content_box"> | ||
<h1 class="sectionedit1">iRIf Labjournal August</h1> | <h1 class="sectionedit1">iRIf Labjournal August</h1> | ||
Line 2,295: | Line 2,319: | ||
<!-- EDIT70 SECTION "Measuring HIV,HCV,Tet,Sal with polyclonal and monoclonal ABs" [33259-] --> | <!-- EDIT70 SECTION "Measuring HIV,HCV,Tet,Sal with polyclonal and monoclonal ABs" [33259-] --> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
<!-- Labjournal content ends here --> | <!-- Labjournal content ends here --> | ||
{{Freiburg/wiki_content_end}} | {{Freiburg/wiki_content_end}} |
Latest revision as of 08:13, 10 September 2015
iRIf Labjournal August
Distinguish between different antigen/antibody interaction (GFP, mouse, rabbit) (on PDITC) [finished]
31.08.2015 (spotted)
spotting pattern:
slides: 424, 012
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1 | GFP | 0.5 mg/ml |
2 | anti HCV (rabbit) | 0.5 mg/ml |
3 | anti Tetanus (mouse) | 0.5 mg/ml |
slide: 254
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1 | GFP | 1 mg/ml |
2 | anti HCV (rabbit) | 1 mg/ml |
3 | anti Tetanus (mouse) | 1 mg/ml |
01.09.2015 (measured)
Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti- rabbit | 6 | 30 | 600 | |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti- mouse | 8 | 30 | 600 | |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Affibody (Stockholm cooporation)
30.08.2015 (spotted)
slide-#:315
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1-3 | rhErbB2/Fc | 100 µg/ml |
4 | GFP (desalt) | 1 mg/ml |
5 | Tetanus antigene | 100 µg/ml |
31.08.2015 (measured)
Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 1,5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Affibody | 6 | 20 | 900 | 1:3 diluted |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Affibody | 8 | 20 | 900 | undiluted |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-His | 10 | 30 | 600 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 11 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
As can be seen in the evaluation of the binding curves (slide 315), the affibody did not bind to the antigen or it is too small to be detected with iRIf. Anti-His confirmed antigen presence on the slides.
Measuring own blood (Tet (-) / Tet (+)) on PDITC
30.08.2015 (spotted) Slides: 2 slides, 303, 466 Tet (-): 303, 466
Spotting pattern:
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1 | pos. control (GFP) | 0.5 mg/ml |
2 | neg. con (Salmonella) | (1.24 mg/ml) desalt 1:3 diluted |
3 | Tetanus | (0.46 mg/ml) desalt undiluted |
31.08.2015 (measured)
Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 1.5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Serum SIG002 (-) | 6 | 20 | 900 | 1:10 (466) 1:20 (303) |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Distinguish between different antigen/antibody interaction (Salmonella) (on PDITC)
29.08.2015 (spotted)
Spotting pattern:
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1 | pos. control (GFP) | 1 mg/ml |
2 | neg. control (mCherry) | 1mg/ml |
3 | Salmonella Antigen (15) | undiluted |
Slides: 208, 216, 423, 500
208: with PBS 423: with TBS 216: with TBS 500: with TBS (changed flush protocol: 1 ug/ml a-GFP; and used anti-Salmonella lysate 1:2 diluted in 5 mg/ml BSA in TBS)
30.08.2015 (measured)
Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti-Salmonella (13, desalt) | 6 | 30 | 900 | 1:2 Dilution in 5 mg/ml BSA in PBS |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Measuring own blood (Tetanus unimmunized vs. immunized) on PDITC
29.08.2015 (spotted) Slides: 24, 287, 426, 443
Spotting pattern:
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1 | pos. control (GFP) | 1 mg/ml |
2 | neg. con (Salmonella) | desalt 1:3 |
3 | Tetanus | desalt undiluted |
30.08.2015 (measured)
Slides: 287, 24 (with Serum (-)) #287: Serum (-) was diluted only 1:10; changed to 1:30 because Serum(-) quite high Signal at negative control and Tetanus spot Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 1,5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Serum (-) Sig002 | 6 | 30 | 900 | 1:30 diluted in 5 mg/ml BSA in PBS |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Slides: 426,443 (with Serum (+)) Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 1,5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Serum (+) Sig002 | 6 | 30 | 900 | 1:30 diluted in 5 mg/ml BSA in PBS |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Note: Slide 426 looked nicest
Measuring on-slide cellfree expressed GFP (Kokos Mix, AG Roth Mix, Reticolozytes Mix)
#254: retikulozyte #12: roth #423: koko
27.08.2015 (spotted) Check out surface chemistry: Experiment 61: DNA on PDMS 6.0 for previous treatment
28.08.2015 (measured)
Flush Protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 450 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 450 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 450 | 1x |
anti-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
strep-cy5 | 6 | 60 | 300 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Plateready after iRIf showed cy5 signal at some spots on every slide. This means (probably) that the biotinylated a-GFP bound to GFP. Looking at the cy5 spots, analogous areas in RIfs were taken for spot evaluation. Spot evaluation showed anti-GFP binding (but less signal) to GFP in every case. → On slide expression of GFP at least seemed to work to a little amount
Measuring on-slide cellfree expressed GFP
25.08.2015 (spotted) spotting pattern:
slide-#: 429, 424
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1-3 | MM + DNA | |
4-5 | MM - DNA) | |
6 | GFP (off-slide cell free expressed) | |
7 | His-GFP desalt. | ~1 mg/mL |
8 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
slide-#: 500
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1-3 | MM + DNA | |
4-6 | MM - DNA | |
7-8 | MM + DNA (off-slide cell free expressed, 15 µl reachtion ) | |
10 | His-GFP desalt. | ~1 mg/mL |
11 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
26.08.2015 (measured)
Flush Protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 450 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 450 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 450 | 1x |
Anti-GFP (goat, biotinylated) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 6 | 30 | 300 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Only slide 500 was evaluated. Slide 424 and 429 showed very bad surface during measurements which was wiped off → Difficult to evaluate Slide 500: spots 4 and 8 had to be excluded from evaluation.
Measuring cellfree expressed Tetanus antigen
25.08.2015 (spotted) spotting pattern:
slide-#: 216
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1 | B+ (1) | |
2 | B+ (2) | |
3 | B+ (3) | |
4 | B- (1) | |
5 | B- (2) | |
6 | K+ (1) | |
7 | His-GFP desalt. | ~0.5 mg/mL |
8 | His-GFP lysate | |
9 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
10 | K- | |
11 | BSA |
slide-#: 208
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1 | K+ (1) | |
2 | K+ (2) | |
3 | K+ (3) | |
4 | K- (1) | |
5 | K- (2) | |
6 | B+ (1) | |
7 | His-GFP desalt. | ~0.5 mg/mL |
8 | His-GFP lysate | |
9 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
10 | B- | |
11 | BSA |
26.08.2015 (measured)
Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer (PBS) | 1 | 60 | 450 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 450 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 3 | 60 | 450 | 1x |
Anti-Tetanus (goat, pk) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 25 ug/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-GFP (biotinylated, Goat) | 6 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Goat | 8 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 10 | 30 | 300 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 11 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Slide 208: Only 5 spots (spot 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9) could be evaluated.
Measuring own blood: not vaccinated / vaccinated Tetanus samples
21.08.2015 (spotted) spotting pattern:
slide-#: 287, 504
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1-2 | Tetanus (11) desalt | 460 µg/mL |
3-4 | Tetanus (11) desalt | 100 µg/mL |
5-6 | Tetanus (11) desalt | 20 µg/mL |
7-8 | His-GFP desalt. | ~0.5 mg/mL |
9 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
10-11 | Tetanus (11) lysate |
22.08.2015 (measured)
Flush protocol slide 287
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer (PBS) | 1 | 60 | 720 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 900 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Serum rabbit Anti-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 1:330 |
Buffer (PBS) | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Serum (+) SIG002 | 6 | 30 | 600 | 1:10 |
Buffer (PBS) | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Human | 8 | 60 | 300 | 1,5 ug/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
no Strep-Cy5 was flushed over slide –> no scanner Pictures
Flush protocol slide 504
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer (PBS) | 1 | 60 | 720 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 900 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Serum (-) SIG002 | 4 | 30 | 600 | 1:10 |
Buffer (PBS) | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Serum (+) SIG002 | 6 | 30 | 600 | 1:10 |
Buffer (PBS) | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Human | 8 | 60 | 300 | 1 ug/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-GFP (biotinylated, Goat) | 10 | 60 | 300 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 11 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Strep-Cy5 | 12 | 60 | 300 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (PBS) | 13 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
→ detection of Tetanus antibodys from blood serum after vaccination is possible
→ huge cross reactivity with bBSA spot
Measuring with rabbit serum (immunized with GFP)
18.08.2015 (spotted) 19.08.2015 (measured)
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1-2 | His-GFP (cellfree expressed)) | |
3 | His-GFP desalt. | 0.2 mg/ml |
4-5 | neg. control (cellfree Expression without DNA) | |
6-7 | His-mCherry lysate | 1:10 |
8-9 | His-GFP lysate | 1:10 |
10 | BSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
11 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
5 Slides Ni-NTA
- 3X (Slide 208,216,504) Serum(-)/Serum(+),
- 2x (Slide 500,424) Serum (-)/a-GFP)
2 Slides (315 & 502) PDITC (2x Serum(-)/Serum(+))
Flush protocol Measuring with Serum (-) [not immunized] and Serum (+) [immunized]/a-GFP:
Reagent | # | Flowrate | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 780 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 780 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Serum (-) | 4 | 30 | 600 | |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Serum (+)/a-GFP | 6 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-Rabbit | 8 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Strep Cy5 | 10 | 30 | 6000 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 11 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
* 2 ul volume of serum (-) and serum (+) was used for the experiments on PDITC * 5 ul volume of serum (-) and serum (+) was used for the experiments on Ni-NTA
His-GFP lysate quite weak intensity –> maybe too much diluted Kokos cell free expressed GFP works fine on Ni-NTA; does not work on PDITC –> thats good → specific surface
Evaluation (not all slides are shown here):
Ni-NTA Serum (-) / Serum (+)
PDITC Serum (-) / Serum (+)
Ni-NTA (control) Serum (-) / a-GFP
The relative intensity shift for the three approaches (Serum(-)Serum(+) on Ni-NTA ; Serum(-)Serum(+) on PDITC; Serum(-)a-GFP on Ni-NTA) were compared. As expected and seen in the binding curves cellfree expression Mix (His-GFP) shows no signal on PDITC (other proteins within the mix bind to the surface) but on specific Ni-NTA surface. Taken amount of serum performs less (2-3 fold) than 3 ug/ml a-GFP.
Measuring cellfree expressed GFP
Spot | Protein | Number of spots | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | BK foil 1 | 2 | unknown |
3-4 | neg foil 1 | 2 | unknown |
5-6 | BK 1 | 2 | unknown |
7 | GFP-His (Max) | 1 | 0.5 mg/ml |
8 | GFP-His desalt | 1 | 0.5 mg/ml |
9 | bBSA | 1 | 0.2 mg/ml |
10-11 | neg 1 | 1 | unknown |
Spot | Protein | Number of spots | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | BK foil 2 | 2 | unknown |
3-4 | neg foil | 2 2 | unknown |
5-6 | BK 2 | 2 | unknown |
7 | GFP-His (Max) | 1 | 0.5 mg/ml |
8 | GFP-His lysate | 1 | ~0.2 mg/ml |
9 | bBSA | 1 | 0.2 mg/ml |
10-11 | neg 2 | 1 | unknown |
Measuring Halo Slides (GFP dilution series)
Spot | Protein | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1-2 | Halo GFP | 0.5 mg/ml |
3-4 | Halo GFP | 0.1 mg/ml |
5-6 | Halo GFP | 0.02 mg/ml |
7 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
8 | Halo mCherry | 0.5 mg/ml |
9 | His-GFP (Max) | 0.5 mg/ml |
10 | His Halo GFP (Piehler, pos. control) | 0.25 mg/ml |
11 | His GFP (Piehler, neg. control) | 0.25 mg/ml |
Flush protocol:
Reagent | # | Flowrate | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 720 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 720 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-GFP (goat, biot.) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 6 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
For Evaluation see labjournal surface chemistry
Measuring Kokos cellfree expressed His-GFP on Ni-NTA
14.08.2015
# | spot | Concentration |
---|---|---|
1-3 | HA-GFP-2x6His (cellfree expressed)) | |
4-6 | neg. control (cellfree Expression without DNA) | |
7-8 | His-GFP Lysate | |
9 | n. T. GFP Lysate) | |
10 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml |
11 | Max GFP | 0.5 mg/ml |
Flush protocol:
Reagent | # | Flowrate | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 780 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 780 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti HA | 4 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti GFP | 6 | 40 | 450 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Strep Cy5 | 8 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Spot 11 couldnt be evaluated due to air on it. Spot 1-3 show a-HA binding (weak but clear) and good a-GFP binding → successful cellfree expression No strepcy5 binding can be detected: Tube to flowchamber pulled off just before that step….
Antigens on Ni-NTA
13.08.2015
Dilute antigens in TBS (if necessary)!
Dilute antibodies in TBS –> BSA in TBS
2 replicates on PDITC: (024 & 502)
Spot | Protein | Number of spots | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | pET_1003 (HCV) desalt | 2 | ~0.33 mg/ml |
3-4 | pET_1703 (HIV) desalt | 2 | ~0.62 mg/ml |
5-6 | pIG_1501 (Salmonella) desalt | 2 | ~1,24 mg/ml (1:2) ~0.62mg/ml |
7 | GFP-His (Max) | 1 | 0.5 mg/ml |
8 | GFP-His desalt | 1 | 0.5 mg/ml |
9 | GFP-His lysate | 1 | ~0.2 mg/ml |
10 | bBSA | 1 | 0.2 mg/ml |
11 | BSA | 1 | 0.2 mg/ml |
2 Replicates on NiNTA (501&500)
Spot | Protein | Number of Spots | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | pET_1003 (HCV) lysate | 2 | ~0.08 mg/ml |
3-4 | pET_1003 (HCV) desalt | 2 | ~0.33 mg/ml |
5 | pET_1703 (HIV) lysate | 1 | ~0.15 mg/ml |
6 | pET_1703 (HIV) desalt | 1 | ~0.62 mg/ml |
7 | His-GFP (Max) | 1 | 0.5 mg/ml |
8 | His-GFP lysate | 1 | ~0.2 mg/ml |
9 | bBSA | 1 | 0.2 mg/ml |
10-11 | His-GFP aufgereinigt | 2 | ~0.5 mg/ml |
2 Replicates on NiNTA (216 & 467)
Spot | Protein | Number of Spots | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | pET_1703 (HIV) lysate | 2 | ~0.15 mg/ml |
3-4 | pET_1703 (HIV) desalt | 2 | ~0.62 mg/ml |
5 | pET_1003 (HCV) lysate | 1 | ~0.08 mg/ml |
6 | pET_1003 (HCV) desalt | 1 | ~0.33 mg/ml |
7 | His-GFP (Max) | 1 | 0.5 mg/ml |
8 | His-GFP desalt | 1 | ~0.5 mg/ml |
9 | bBSA | 1 | 0.2 mg/ml |
10-11 | His-GFP lysate | 2 | ~0.2 mg/ml |
Flush protocol (for Ni-NTA slides):
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 1 | 60 | 720 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HIV (polyclonal,rabbit) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 5 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HCV (polyclonal,rabbit) | 6 | 30 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 7 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Rabbit (from mouse) | 8 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HIV (monoclonal,mouse) | 10 | 30 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 11 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HCV (monoclonal,mouse) | 12 | 30 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 13 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Mouse | 14 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 15 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-GFP (biotinylated, goat) | 16 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 17 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 18 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 19 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
one Ni-NTA slide 1 anti-mouse was changed against anti-his!!! one Ni-NTA slide could not be measured due to hydrophobicity problems
Flush protocol (for PDITC slide 502):
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 1 | 60 | 720 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HIV (polyclonal,rabbit) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 5 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HCV (polyclonal,rabbit) | 6 | 30 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Rabbit (from mouse) | 8 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Salmonella desalt (13) | 10 | 30 | 600 | ~60 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 11 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-GFP (biotinylated, goat) | 12 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 13 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 14 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 15 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
No antigen/antibody binding (HIV/HCV) was detected on the Ni-NTA slides. Controls worked fine.
Flush protocol (for PDITC slide 24):
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 1 | 60 | 720 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HIV (polyclonal,rabbit) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 5 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HCV (polyclonal,rabbit) | 6 | 30 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Rabbit (from mouse) | 8 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Salmonella desalt (13) | 10 | 30 | 600 | ~60 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 11 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Salmonella lysate (13) | 12 | 30 | 600 | ~70 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 13 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-His | 14 | 30 | 600 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 15 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-GFP (biotinylated, goat) | 16 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 17 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 18 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer (TBS!!!) | 19 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Results: We have specific antibody/antigen binding for Salmonella! (a-HIV/HCV do not bind…) Slide 502: During measurement within the first buffer step/blocking step most of the second Salmonella spot was washed away. Related to this the spot behaves strange. Slide 24: Also anti-salmonella lysate was tested. Here we see (as expected) stronger unspecific binding at other spots (nevertheless greatest binding for the salmonella spots). The unspecific/transient binding proteins get mostly washed away during the following buffer step.
Cellfree expressed YFP; different GFPs on Ni-NTA
11.08.2015
# | spot | concentration |
---|---|---|
1 | His-tYFP-Spy KK | |
2 | His-tYFP-Spy KK + Mg | |
3 | His-tYFP-Spy BK | |
4 | His-tYFP-Spy BK + Mg | |
5 | His-tYFP-Spy neg. | |
6 | bBSA | 200 µg/ml |
7 | Max His-GFP | 0.5 mg/mL |
8 | His-GFP Lysate | ~1 mg/mL |
9 | His-GFP Lysate | ~1 mg/mL |
10 | Max His-GFP | 1 mg/mL |
11 | nT-GFP Lysate | ~1 mg/mL |
Reagent | # | spot | Elution no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 780 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 420 | 1x |
anti-tYFP (rabbit) | 4 | 40 | 450 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti-GFP (goat, biotinylated) | 6 | 40 | 450 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-Rabbit | 8 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 10 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 11 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
PhyA-Testing auf PDITC
11.08.2015
# | spot | Elution no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | PhyA-GFP | ||
3-4 | His-PhyA-GST selbst aufgereinigt | 2 | 6.6 mg/ml → 1:10 |
5 | His-PhyA-GST in AntigenSolution (17) | 2 | 1:1 (1:10 His-PhyA-GST in 5mg/ml BSA : AntigenSolution (1:5) |
6 | GFP (Max) | 1 mg/ml | |
7 | GFP-Lysate-NT | ||
8 | His-GFP-Halo (Konstrukt von AG-Roth) - selbst aufgereinigt | ? | |
9 | bBSA | 0.2 mg/ml | |
10 | GFP (Max) in AntigenSolution (17) | diluted to 1 mg/ml GFP | 1:1 (2.0 mg/ml GFP in 5mg/ml BSA (165 ul) : AntigenSolution (1:5) (165 ul)) |
11 | GFP (Max) in Elutionspuffer | diluted to 1 mg/ml GFP | 1:1 (2.0 mg/ml GFP in 5mg/ml BSA (165ul) : Elutionsbuffer) (165 ul) |
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 780 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 420 | 1x |
anti-phyA (N-term) | 4 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti-phyA (rabbit, polyclonal) | 6 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti-GFP (goat, biotinylated) | 8 | 40 | 450 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti-GST | 10 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 11 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
anti-Rabbit (mouse) | 12 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 13 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
anti-goat | 14 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 15 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 16 | 40 | 450 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 17 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Duplicates were prepared (Slide 12 and slide 121) but only 1 could be measured, because slide 121 broke ( 8[ ) → Only slide 12 was evaluated.
Antigen/Antibody
All spots diluted to proteinconcentration of ~0.4-0.5 mg/ml. Antigens were spinned before spotted.
# | spot | Elution no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | HIV(17) | 2 | 0.4-0.5 mg/ml |
3-4 | HCV(10) | 2 | 0.4-0.5 mg/ml |
5-6 | Tetanus(11) | 2 | 0.4-0.5 mg/ml |
7 | GFP | ||
8 | PhyA | 0.4-0.5 mg/ml | |
9 | bBSA | 0.1 mg/ml | |
10-11 | Salmonella(15) | 2 | 0.4-0.5 mg/ml |
Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HIV (polyclonal,rabbit) | 4 | 45 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HCV (polyclonal,rabbit) | 6 | 45 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-phyA (N-term) (rabbit) | 8 | 45 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Rabbit | 10 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 11 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HIV (monoclonal,mouse) | 12 | 45 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer | 13 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-HCV (monoclonal,mouse) | 14 | 45 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer | 15 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Tetanus (monoclonal,mouse) | 16 | 45 | 600 | 10 ug/ml |
Buffer | 17 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-GFP (biotinylated, goat) | 18 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 19 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 20 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 21 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Mouse | 22 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 23 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Again no antibody-binding was detected → We confirmed that in this manner the experiment does not work Binding curves were evaluated, but revealed no further information. Due to the large protocol and some (air)problems (see binding curves of slide 465) during measurement in both cases, curves do not look neat.
Testing Halo Slides
06.08.2015
# | spot | concentration |
---|---|---|
1-2 | Halo-GFP | 1:20 |
3-4 | Halo-GFP | 1:10 |
5-6 | Halo-mCHERRY | 1:20 |
7 | His-Halo-GFP Piehler | |
8 | His-GFP Piehler | |
9 | bBSA | 100 µg/ml |
10-11 | Halo-mCHERRY | 1:10 |
Slide 426 - measured in old setup
- slide wasn't blocked before measurement
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
a-GFP | 4 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 6 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Slide 424 - measured in old setup (Strep-Cy5 and a-GFP step were accidently switched)
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
a-His | 4 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
StrepCy | 8 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
a-GFP | 6 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
Slide 423 - measured in new setup
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
a-His (from AG Roth) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
a-GFP | 6 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
StrepCy | 8 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Slide 466 - measured in old setup
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
a-His (from iGEM Lab) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
a-GFP | 6 | 30 | 600 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
StrepCy | 8 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
For evaluation of Halo-Experiment → look up in labjornal of the surface chemistry
Spotting antibodies to flush with purified antigen lysate
04.08.2015
# | spot (AB) | AB-Concentration [µg/mL] |
---|---|---|
1-2 | HIV: gp41 DDX1306 (mouse) | 100 |
3-4 | HCV: HCV-AB (mouse) | 100 |
5-6 | Tetanus: HYB 278-01 (mouse) | 100 |
7-8 | His-GFP | 1000 |
9 | bBSA | 100 mg/mL |
10-11 | a-Salmonella-(pIG15_1301) | 100 |
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 940 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 30 | 900 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
HIV (17) | 4 | 20 | 900 | 0.25 mg/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
HCV (10) | 6 | 20 | 900 | 0.25 mg/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
Tetanus (11) | 8 | 20 | 900 | 0.25 mg/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-Mouse | 10 | 20 | 900 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 11 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-GFP | 12 | 20 | 900 | 3 ug/ml |
Buffer | 13 | 30 | 600 | 1x |
Only 1 slide was measured. Second slide syringe didnt suck solutions. Results: Antigens didnt bind to the immobilized antibodies. Strangely, anti-mouse only bound to a-Tetanus spot, and not to a-HIV and a-HCV spots, even though they are from mice, too.
Measuring HIV,HCV,Tet,Sal with polyclonal and monoclonal ABs
31.07.2015
In contrast to the previous experiments 15 (Salmonella) and 11 (Tetanus) were heatshocked just before spotting (to denature the antigens → maybe AB binds better to the denatured antigens (the primary structure)!?)
# | spot | Elution no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | HIV(17) | 1 | 1.0 mg/ml |
3-4 | HCV(10) | 1 | 0.74 mg/ml |
5-6 | Tetanus(11) | 1 | 3.75 mg/ml |
7-8 | GFP | 1.0 mg/ml | |
9 | bBSA | 0.1 mg/ml | |
10-11 | Salmonella(15) | 1 | 6.7 mg/ml |
Flush protocol (Slide 208):
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 80 | 940 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 45 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-GFP(goat;biotinylated) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-HIV (monoclonal) | 6 | 20 | 900 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-HCV (monoclonal) | 8 | 20 | 900 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Tetanus (monoclonal) | 10 | 30 | 600 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 11 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-HIV (polyclonall) | 12 | 20 | 900 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 13 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-HCV (polyclonal) | 14 | 20 | 900 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 15 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Salmonella (1301 Elu1) | 16 | 20 | 900 | 1:3 |
Buffer | 17 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
….further steps were skipped |
For second slide flush protocol was changed→ added anti-His step and further dilutions of anti-Salmonella (but threw out a-HIV/a-HCV/anti-Tet) Flush protocol (Slide 12):
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 60 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-GFP(goat;biotinylated) | 4 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-His | 6 | 30 | 600 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Salm (Elu 3) | 8 | 20 | 900 | 1:5 |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Salm (Elu 3) | 10 | 30 | 600 | 1:2 |
Buffer | 11 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Salm (Elu 1) | 12 | 30 | 600 | 1:10 |
Buffer | 13 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Salm (Elu 1) | 14 | 20 | 900 | 1:3 |
Buffer | 15 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 16 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 17 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Results: Anti-His at least confirmed that something with a His-Tag is within the HIV and HCV spots (see binding curves of slide 12).
03.08.2015 Flush protocol:
Reagent | Step | Flow rate (ul/min) | Priming time | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer | 1 | 80 | 940 | 1x |
BSA | 2 | 45 | 600 | 10 mg/ml |
Buffer | 3 | 60 | 600 | 1x |
Anti-GFP(goat;biotinylated) | 4 | 25 | 720 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 5 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-tYFP (rabbit) | 6 | 15 | 1200 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 7 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-PhyA (rabbit) | 8 | 20 | 900 | 20 ug/ml |
Buffer | 9 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Anti-Rabbit | 10 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 11 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
StrepCy5 | 12 | 30 | 600 | 5 ug/ml |
Buffer | 13 | 60 | 300 | 1x |
Results: Binding of anti-phyA to phyA was not observed in RIfs. Yet, at both measurements was faced some problems: much of the protein was washed away from the spotted spot. → We have to take lower concentrations for spotting (100-400 ug/ml) Anti-tYFP to YFP binding could not be detected aswell: Actually, this wont work on PDITC since all of the expression mix proteins also bind to the spot, compete with the (already low concentration) YFP for binding → almost no YFP can bind to the spot. We have to repeat experiment for cellfree expressed YFP/GFP with specific surface (e.g. Ni-NTA)