Difference between revisions of "Team:Leicester/Description"

Line 8: Line 8:
 
<ul class="nav nav-pills nav-stacked" style="margin-left:0px;">
 
<ul class="nav nav-pills nav-stacked" style="margin-left:0px;">
 
         <li class="active"><a href="#">Project</a></li>
 
         <li class="active"><a href="#">Project</a></li>
         <li><a href="#Int">Introduction</a></li>
+
         <li><a href="#ProEx">Project Explanation</a></li>
         <li><a href="#Col">Colonisation</a></li>
+
         <li><a href="#YNAD">Why NAD?</a></li>
        <li><a href="#NAD">NAD Transport</a></li>
+
         <li><a href="#Practical">Practical Components</a></li>
         <li><a href="#kswitch">Kill Switch</a></li>
+
 
       </ul>
 
       </ul>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
     <div class="col-sm-8">  
 
     <div class="col-sm-8">  
 
<div style="color:#fff; background-color: #3498db; border-radius: 50px; border-top-right-radius: 0px; border-bottom-left-radius: 0px; padding-left:30px; padding-right:30px; padding-top:30px; padding-bottom:20px; box-shadow: 10px 10px 50px #000000;">
 
<div style="color:#fff; background-color: #3498db; border-radius: 50px; border-top-right-radius: 0px; border-bottom-left-radius: 0px; padding-left:30px; padding-right:30px; padding-top:30px; padding-bottom:20px; box-shadow: 10px 10px 50px #000000;">
       <h2 id="Int"> Introduction </h2>
+
       <h2 id="ProEx"> Project Explanation</h2>
  
<p>Due to the allotted lab time for the iGEM project, and various other constraints this project would not go to completion. Knowing this in advance required important decisions to be made in the early phases of the project's design, meaning sections that would be theoretical and those that were feasible for a lab based approach had to be defined. At this point decisions were made that determined the overall direction of the project, with the most important factor being what was possible within the timescale all the while ensuring the parts that were created were those which were most associated with the fundamental aim of the project. This page describes the theoretical sections of the project, taking into consideration why they would be required, ethical implications for their use  as well as the steps and process that would have taken place to create them were the time available for a complete product. The reason as to why these particular components could not advance onto lab work stage will also be described.</P>
+
<p>For our project we wanted to look at a universal issue, something that affects every person indiscriminately. This lead us to aging as one such issue. Because the aging process is a highly dynamic and complex process intrinsic to our physiology, we knew that it was practically impossible to treat the condition, so we started looking at the symptoms. As we age our muscle strength declines, we become susceptible to a host of neurodegenerative diseases, and our overall physiological health declines. One common denominator to these conditions appears to be mitochondrial dysfunction (Gomes et al., 2013). We are hoping to address a few of the proximate aging symptoms, such as senescence of muscle tissue and neurones within the brain. One of the attributes of senescence is the gradual breakdown of the circadian clock of human physiology (Zamporlini et al., 2014).</p>
 +
<p>Through research we identified the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) – widely accepted as a mediator of redox reactions – as a suitable candidate for our purposes. Literature has identified the interplay of NAD+ and SIRT1 working in concert to modulate metabolism and circadian rhythm (Zamporlini et al., 2014) which are closely linked to the mitochondria (Gomes et al., 2013). A hallmark of aging is the loss on NAD+ with age (Gomes et al., 2013; Zamporlini et al., 2014), as well as mitochondrial dysfunction; It has been shown that these two phenomenon are correlated, but a causal link is still tenuous.</p>
 +
<p>Our project, simply put, is a self-sustaining integrated pharmacy for patients – a pseudo-organ in effect. Our ultimate goal for our project results would be to integrate an as yet undetermined strain Escherichia coli into the human gut microbiome. The purpose of the non-native bacteria is to produce a specified chemical compound – in this case NAD+ – into the gut. We speculate that due to the large surface area and blood flow of the microvilli, as well as the low molecular weight of NAD+ (Zamporlini et al., 2014), and proven uptake by mammalian cells (Billington et al., 2008), the NAD+ will enter the blood stream and be transported rapidly and uniformly across the entire body. We predict that this will over time, re-establish the circadian rhythms of metabolic processes, restore oxidative metabolism –  especially in muscles –  and possibly have a neuroprotective effect against neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.</p>
 +
<p>For our project, we aim to develop several BioBricks with the purpose of increasing net extracellular NAD+/NAD(H) levels of the host organism – in this case it would be E.coli – the purpose being to allow transfer of NAD into the gut microbiome for absorption into the bloodstream of patients.</p>
 +
<p>We believe this approach will enable a long term, and with further development, full integration of a bacterial pseudo-organ into people that suffer from deleterious conditions such as weaker muscle strength with age, as well as the neurodegenerative diseases that more common with aging. The end goal of this integration would be to ameliorate the symptoms of aging, possibly increasing longevity as a side-effect. This would have a tremendous impact as it could potentially restore the quality of life and self-sufficiency to the elderly and neurodegenerative sufferers relying on carers.</p>
  
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 26: Line 29:
  
  
<h2 id="Col"> Colonisation </h2>
+
<h2 id="YNAD"> Why NAD? </h2>
<p>Maximising NAD uptake by mammalian cells is an essential aim of the project and also a requirement for the efficacy of the final product. It was therefore essential that the GM E. coli were capable of colonising the intestine, the reason being so they could be maintained in the environment for a longer period of time and therefore have a longer lasting effect, ideally permanently. However colonisation also minimises NAD waste by reducing diffusion into the intestinal lumen by reducing the physical distance between the GM E. coli and intestinal cells, another point to consider is that by doing this it may also prevent the gut microbiome from utilising this additional NAD pool. To determine the most effective site of colonisation different regions of the intestine that could provide optimum NAD uptake via colonisation were investigated, the regions consisted of the mucosal layer and the epithelial layer. </p>
+
<p>
  
<p>Once the investigation began it became apparent that the mucosal layer was unsuitable for our purposes, as it is associated with the same issues that the investigation intends to avoid. Therefore the epithelial layer </p>
 
  
<p>The potential genes we selected were cofA, fibronectin and BFP. </p>
+
</div>
 +
<div style="padding-top: 20px;"><p> </p></div>
  
 +
<div style="color:#fff; background-color: #2ecc71; border-radius: 50px; border-top-right-radius: 0px; border-bottom-left-radius: 0px; padding-left:30px; padding-right:30px; padding-top:30px; padding-bottom:20px; box-shadow: 10px 10px 50px #000000;">
  
<p>However the lab space we were working in was category one and the utilisation of the selected colonisation factor operon, the Bundle Forming Pilus (BFP) required a category two lab. There were various colonisation factors which had potential however, BFP was ideal for gut colonisation as it had the least ethical implications, but also would enable optimum NAD uptake.</p>
 
  
 +
<h2 id="Practical">Practical Components</h2>
 +
<h5><i><b>pncB</b></i></h5>
 +
<p>We identified one gene called pncB which encodes nicotinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase (NAPRTase) (Liang et al., 2013), as seen in figure (from Zhou et al., 2011) is responsible for the conversion of NA into NAMN. We selected this gene as experiments have shown that cooverexpression with another gene, nadE, increased the NAD(H) by 7-fold. This was of particular use to us as the shuttling mechanisms, among others, as mentioned previously are able to oxidise the NAD(H) into NAD+ (White and Schenk, 2012). From this we can deduce that whilst the NAD(H)/NAD+ axis is perturbed in favour of NAD(H) the net concentration of NAD+ increases in vivo over time due to the oxidative actions of the shuttles and other mechanisms (Liang et al., 2013).</p>
  
</div>
 
<div style="padding-top: 20px;"><p> </p></div>
 
  
<div style="color:#fff; background-color: #2ecc71; border-radius: 50px; border-top-right-radius: 0px; border-bottom-left-radius: 0px; padding-left:30px; padding-right:30px; padding-top:30px; padding-bottom:20px; box-shadow: 10px 10px 50px #000000;">
+
<h5><i><b>nadD and nadE</b></i></h5>
 +
<p>The second and third gene sequences we were interested in were nadD, which encodes the NAMN adenylyltransferase and nadE which codes for NAD Synthetase in the NAD(H) biosynthetic pathway responsible for the interconversion of NAD+ and NMN (Zhou et al., 2011, Zamporlini et al., 2014). This is of particular use to us as we wish, as a secondary objective, to increase NMN levels for reasons discussed previously. We believe this will be feasible due to the increase in NAD+ in cells, potentially reducing a limiting factor of NMN production (see figure 4 NadD).</p>
  
 +
<p>Experiments have shown that individually upregulating pncB, nadE and nadD increases the NAD(H) pool (Liang et al., 2013). Despite this extremely promising theoretical increase for single genes we decided to maximise the output by using all three. We did this as we were concerned that very high concentrations of NAD+ may be required to enter cells in useful concentrations, as some may be lost to other gut fauna, the gut environment itself, or not be concentrated enough in the blood to enter cells. Further experiments would be required to ascertain the efficiency of uptake whereupon we would regulate the NAD+ output.</p>
  
<h2 id="NAD">NAD Transport</h2>
 
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 54: Line 59:
 
<h2 id=kswitch> Kill Switch </h2>
 
<h2 id=kswitch> Kill Switch </h2>
  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/2b/Kill_Switch_Fig1.jpg" align="right">
 
<p>There are two kill switch systems in the genetically engineered bacteria: One, a kill switch which causes the bacteria to die upon addition of an inducer; the other, a maintenance kill switch whereupon the bacteria die if they leave the gut. This dual containment system allows for the reduction in bacterial escape and horizontal gene transfer as well as the death of the bacteria as a backup option if it goes wrong. </p>
 
<br>
 
<p>Potentially could use a toxin-antitoxin system but with a modified antitoxin protein which incorporates a nonstandard amino acid that is vital for the toxin function. Therefore upon induction of the nonstandard amino acid the toxin will have the right amino acids needed for its correct synthesis and thus will kill the cell. It is easier and simpler than the altering 22 essential enzymes like Rovner et al, 2015 but more effective than toxin-antitoxin systems. However, this approach will need to add a stop codon for the nonstandard amino acid in a key hydrophobic region (if the nonstandard amino acid is hydrophobic) (Rovner et al, 2015) so that without the non-natural amino acid the protein cannot fold correctly and thus be subject to proteolysis. This results in cell death upon the addition of the non-standard amino acid. However this would require the changing of the stop codon used to another stop codon in all other genes as well as engineering a tRNA synthase that charges the non-natural amino acid to an edited tRNA molecule that is cognate for the stop codon used.</p>
 
<br>
 
<p>The CCDA/CCDB kill switch is in an operon system with CCDA under the control of a temperature sensitive RBS (Part BBa_K115002) whereas the CCDB is under the control of a generic RBS (Part BBa_K581008). This means that at under 37<sup>O</sup>C (i.e. not in the human body) the translation rate  of the CCDA will dramatically decrease relative to other genes in the bacteria at the same temperature, whilst CCDB will remain the same in respect to the fundamental decrease in rate due to the lower temperature. Thus there will be a high enough ratio of CCDB (once translated) to kill the cell. Summed up: When the temperature is too cold, the antitoxin (CCDA) doesn’t work, so the toxin (CCDB) kills the cell.</p>
 
<br>
 
<p>However, CCDB is patented so another toxin/antitoxin system would be preferred such as MazF/MazE. If no antitoxin is available then the antitoxin in the system described above could be replaced with a polymerase gene (e.g. T7 Polymerase) and the desired toxin under the control of a promoter for that polymerase (i.e. a T7 consensus promoter). This would give higher levels of transcription and would be perhaps a more sure system. For our iGEM team however, due to time requirements, the simpler the system the better.</p>
 
<br>
 
<p>Another Kill Switch which could be used to selectively kill the bacteria would be to use the X and Y expansion of the genetic code by Malyshev, et al 2014. This would use a toxin (Such as MazF toxin) that is dependent on the bases X and Y. This can be done by using long-range PCR for the MazF inside pUC19 but leaving a few bases in between the forward and the reverse primer. Then synthesis and PCR amplify an oligonucleotide which contains the primers and the X (dNaM)/Y (d5SICS) codon (Malyshev, et al 2014) for the non-natural amino acid for that codon (assuming there is a tRNA synthase for this). This can then be inserted into the PCR amplified pUC19 plasmid (with the gaps) through Gibson Assembly to then be transformed (Malyshev, et al 2014) as can be seen in figure 1. Proof will be needed for the incorporation of the X/Y through testing whether the transformed cells only die through addition of the X and/or Y base in a medium lacking these. This would significantly reduce the likelihood of the bacterium kill switch being activated naturally in the human microbiome. However, like through the addition of a nonstandard amino acid via stop codons, a tRNA molecule will be needed that can recognise the synthetic bases as well as a tRNA synthase which can accurately charge the nonstandard amino acid to this tRNA. As such this method can only be used in theory for our iGEM team. This will be a very useful application of synthetic biology once these key tRNA’s and tRNA synthases are ready. </p> 
 
 
<h4> References: </h4>
 
  
<ul>
 
<li>Malyshev.D., Dhami, K., Lavergne, T., Chen, T., Dai,N., Foster,J., Correa,I. & Romesberg, F. 2014. A semi-synthetic organism with an expanded genetic alphabet. Nature 509 (7500) 385-388. </li>
 
<br>
 
<li>Rovner,A., Haimovich, A., Katz,S., Li, Z., Grome, M., Gassaway, B., Amiram,M., Patel,J., Gallagher,R., Rinehart,J. & Isaacs, F. 2015. Recoded organisms engineered to depend on synthetic amino acids. Nature, <b>518</b> (7537), 89-93. </li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>

Revision as of 14:58, 14 September 2015

Live Preview

Project Explanation

For our project we wanted to look at a universal issue, something that affects every person indiscriminately. This lead us to aging as one such issue. Because the aging process is a highly dynamic and complex process intrinsic to our physiology, we knew that it was practically impossible to treat the condition, so we started looking at the symptoms. As we age our muscle strength declines, we become susceptible to a host of neurodegenerative diseases, and our overall physiological health declines. One common denominator to these conditions appears to be mitochondrial dysfunction (Gomes et al., 2013). We are hoping to address a few of the proximate aging symptoms, such as senescence of muscle tissue and neurones within the brain. One of the attributes of senescence is the gradual breakdown of the circadian clock of human physiology (Zamporlini et al., 2014).

Through research we identified the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) – widely accepted as a mediator of redox reactions – as a suitable candidate for our purposes. Literature has identified the interplay of NAD+ and SIRT1 working in concert to modulate metabolism and circadian rhythm (Zamporlini et al., 2014) which are closely linked to the mitochondria (Gomes et al., 2013). A hallmark of aging is the loss on NAD+ with age (Gomes et al., 2013; Zamporlini et al., 2014), as well as mitochondrial dysfunction; It has been shown that these two phenomenon are correlated, but a causal link is still tenuous.

Our project, simply put, is a self-sustaining integrated pharmacy for patients – a pseudo-organ in effect. Our ultimate goal for our project results would be to integrate an as yet undetermined strain Escherichia coli into the human gut microbiome. The purpose of the non-native bacteria is to produce a specified chemical compound – in this case NAD+ – into the gut. We speculate that due to the large surface area and blood flow of the microvilli, as well as the low molecular weight of NAD+ (Zamporlini et al., 2014), and proven uptake by mammalian cells (Billington et al., 2008), the NAD+ will enter the blood stream and be transported rapidly and uniformly across the entire body. We predict that this will over time, re-establish the circadian rhythms of metabolic processes, restore oxidative metabolism – especially in muscles – and possibly have a neuroprotective effect against neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.

For our project, we aim to develop several BioBricks with the purpose of increasing net extracellular NAD+/NAD(H) levels of the host organism – in this case it would be E.coli – the purpose being to allow transfer of NAD into the gut microbiome for absorption into the bloodstream of patients.

We believe this approach will enable a long term, and with further development, full integration of a bacterial pseudo-organ into people that suffer from deleterious conditions such as weaker muscle strength with age, as well as the neurodegenerative diseases that more common with aging. The end goal of this integration would be to ameliorate the symptoms of aging, possibly increasing longevity as a side-effect. This would have a tremendous impact as it could potentially restore the quality of life and self-sufficiency to the elderly and neurodegenerative sufferers relying on carers.

Why NAD?

Practical Components

pncB

We identified one gene called pncB which encodes nicotinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase (NAPRTase) (Liang et al., 2013), as seen in figure (from Zhou et al., 2011) is responsible for the conversion of NA into NAMN. We selected this gene as experiments have shown that cooverexpression with another gene, nadE, increased the NAD(H) by 7-fold. This was of particular use to us as the shuttling mechanisms, among others, as mentioned previously are able to oxidise the NAD(H) into NAD+ (White and Schenk, 2012). From this we can deduce that whilst the NAD(H)/NAD+ axis is perturbed in favour of NAD(H) the net concentration of NAD+ increases in vivo over time due to the oxidative actions of the shuttles and other mechanisms (Liang et al., 2013).

nadD and nadE

The second and third gene sequences we were interested in were nadD, which encodes the NAMN adenylyltransferase and nadE which codes for NAD Synthetase in the NAD(H) biosynthetic pathway responsible for the interconversion of NAD+ and NMN (Zhou et al., 2011, Zamporlini et al., 2014). This is of particular use to us as we wish, as a secondary objective, to increase NMN levels for reasons discussed previously. We believe this will be feasible due to the increase in NAD+ in cells, potentially reducing a limiting factor of NMN production (see figure 4 NadD).

Experiments have shown that individually upregulating pncB, nadE and nadD increases the NAD(H) pool (Liang et al., 2013). Despite this extremely promising theoretical increase for single genes we decided to maximise the output by using all three. We did this as we were concerned that very high concentrations of NAD+ may be required to enter cells in useful concentrations, as some may be lost to other gut fauna, the gut environment itself, or not be concentrated enough in the blood to enter cells. Further experiments would be required to ascertain the efficiency of uptake whereupon we would regulate the NAD+ output.

Kill Switch