Difference between revisions of "Team:MIT/Coculture"
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<br></br> | <br></br> | ||
+ | <div class = "text" align = "center"> | ||
+ | Table 1 | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<table style="width:100%" class = "text"> | <table style="width:100%" class = "text"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 60: | Line 63: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<div class = "subtitle"> | <div class = "subtitle"> |
Revision as of 00:25, 16 September 2015
Preliminary Co-Culture
Methods for Preliminary Coculture
The preliminary co-culture experiment served to determine how unmodified C. hutchinsonii and E. coli grow in mono-cultures versus co-cultures over time. Five cultures with co-culture media, filter paper as a carbon source, and variations of E. coli and C. hutchinsonii populations were prepared, with replicates of each, as shown in Table 1. The conditioned media was co-culture media that had contained filter paper and C. hutchinsonii for three days. The cultures were incubated in a 30ºC incubator shaking at 250 rpm. Samples were taken before incubation and then every 3 hours for the first 12 hours and once every 24 hours on days 4-8. Cells from each sample were isolated from the samples and the supernatant via the co-culture protocol. We use the flow cytometer to measure the size of cell populations from the glycerol stocks of the cells, as detailed in Measuring Relative Populationed.
Table 1
Contamination control in unconditioned media | Only E. coli in unconditioned media | Only C. hutchinsonii in unconditioned media | E. coli and C. hutchinsonii in conditioned media | E. coli and C. hutchinsonii in unconditioned media | |
Media | 20ml unconditioned co-culture media and filter paper | 20ml unconditioned co-culture media and filter paper | 20ml unconditioned co-culture media and filter paper | 8ml conditioned co-culture media, 12ml unconditioned co-culture media, and filter paper | 20ml unconditioned co-culture media and filter paper |
C. hutchinsonii | None | None | |||
E. coli | None | None |
Results
The data from the preliminary coculture showed the sugar levels (from the conditioned media) initially sharply dropping and the E Coli population increasing and overtaking the C Hutch population. This is expected, because E Coli naturally divides more quickly than C Hutch. However, the E Coli population levels out after around 10 hours, due to running out of sugars, meanwhile the C Hutch population begins to increase around this time as it starts breaking down the filter paper and consuming the sugars it releases from that. C Hutch soons overtakes the E Coli and the carbohydrate level increases again as the filter paper gets degraded into polysaccharides and simple . The E Coli population then increases more slowly, as it is able to feed off the simple sugars that escape the C Hutch, but it cannot consume the polysaccharides.
These results show that the C Hutch is very efficient at consuming the sugars it generates before it can diffuse into the media, leaving little left for the E Coli.