Difference between revisions of "Team:Penn/Sender"
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
/* Section - Block */ | /* Section - Block */ | ||
/**************************/ | /**************************/ | ||
− | #parallax-world-of-ugg .block {background: white; padding: 60px; width: | + | #parallax-world-of-ugg .block {background: white; padding: 60px; width:1020px; margin:0 auto; text-align:justify;} |
#parallax-world-of-ugg .block-gray {background: #f2f2f2;padding: 60px;} | #parallax-world-of-ugg .block-gray {background: #f2f2f2;padding: 60px;} | ||
#parallax-world-of-ugg .section-overlay-mask {position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; background-color: black; opacity: 0.70;} | #parallax-world-of-ugg .section-overlay-mask {position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; background-color: black; opacity: 0.70;} |
Revision as of 00:52, 17 September 2015
PENN iGEM 2015
SENDER
IS THE LIGHT PRODUCED BY THE SENDER CELL SUFFICIENT TO ACTIVATE THE RECEIVER CELL?
INTRODUCTION
An effective light-based communication system rests on the bioluminesence generated by the “sender cell.” In order to design a well-functioning system, the Penn 2015 iGEM team worked to optimize the light output of various E.coli “sender cells” transformed with the lux operon (BBa_K325909).
Lux operon expression is responsible for bioluminescence. The operon is initiated by a constitutive promoter (BBa_J23100) followed by an RBS + lux box. The box contains the following: LuxC, D, A, B, E and G. LuxA and B encode two subunits of bacterial luciferase. The genes LuxC, D, and E drive expression of the substrate for the light-emitting reaction, tetradecanal. The function of the luxG gene is yet to be fully elucidated; however, inclusion of the gene is known to increase light output (CITATION). The circuit is completed with a stop codon and a terminator sequence.
Our sender cell characterization was founded on determining the photons/second trends for luminescing cell populations. This information was important in order to determine if light produced by the lux box is sufficient to activate the light-activated transcription factor of the receiver cell population. Following this, we measured luminescence output in different strains (BL21, NEB10 and HNS BW25113 Dhns::kan strain). We wanted to see which strain would drive the most sustained luminescence output at the highest photon/second value. We also tested the light output of a "split-lux" system to decrease the genetic payload controlled by a single promoter. Gene expression of lux AB was placed under control of the sulA inducible promoter, and lux CDE expression was placed under a constitutive promoter (CP25/CP38). Further characterization involved adding more substrate to the reaction and concentrating cell samples to increase output. The project plan is illustrated in the flow diagram below