Difference between revisions of "Team:HUST-China/InterLab Study"

Line 329: Line 329:
 
  <div align="center"  class="description"><a name="1"></a><br><div  class="dongxi"></div>
 
  <div align="center"  class="description"><a name="1"></a><br><div  class="dongxi"></div>
 
   
 
   
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Interlab Study</b></h2><br><br><br>
+
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Interlab Study</b></h2>
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> SectionⅠ: Introduction </b></h2><br>
+
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> SectionⅠ: Introduction </b></h2>
 
<p> This year, iGEM invited and encouraged all teams to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. We were required to measure the expression level of GFP when using three different promoters. Although It was the first time for our team to take part in Interlab Study, we successfully conducted the experiment and obtained the fluorescence data. Now, we are hoping that we can make contributions to Interlab Study.  
 
<p> This year, iGEM invited and encouraged all teams to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. We were required to measure the expression level of GFP when using three different promoters. Although It was the first time for our team to take part in Interlab Study, we successfully conducted the experiment and obtained the fluorescence data. Now, we are hoping that we can make contributions to Interlab Study.  
 
</p><br><br><br>
 
</p><br><br><br>
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅱ: Provenance and Release</b></h2><br>
+
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅱ: Provenance and Release</b></h2>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study:</b></h3><br>
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study:</b></h3>
 
<p> Create the devices: Zhi Zeng
 
<p> Create the devices: Zhi Zeng
 
Conduct measurements: Guozhao Wu, Shuyan Tang and Zhi Zeng
 
Conduct measurements: Guozhao Wu, Shuyan Tang and Zhi Zeng
 
Process data: Shuyan Tang and Yee Zhan
 
Process data: Shuyan Tang and Yee Zhan
 
</p><br><br><br>
 
</p><br><br><br>
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅲ: Equipment Information </b></h2><br>
+
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅲ: Equipment Information </b></h2>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Date of InterLab Study:</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Date of InterLab Study:</b></h3>
 
<p> The measurement was obtained on August 27, 2015.
 
<p> The measurement was obtained on August 27, 2015.
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
      <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did your team participate in the Extra Credit?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did your team participate in the Extra Credit?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> No.
 
<p> No.
 
(Details can be found here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study)
 
(Details can be found here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study)
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Do all persons involved consent to the inclusion of this data in publications derived from the iGEM interlab study?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Do all persons involved consent to the inclusion of this data in publications derived from the iGEM interlab study?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> Yes.
 
<p> Yes.
</p>
+
</p><br><br><br>
 
+
 
+
 
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅳ: Protocol </b></h2><br><br><br>
 
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅳ: Protocol </b></h2><br><br><br>
 
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅴ: Measurement results for Interlab Study</b></h2><br><br><br>
 
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅴ: Measurement results for Interlab Study</b></h2><br><br><br>
 
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅵ: Appendix </b></h2><br><br><br>
 
     <h2 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅵ: Appendix </b></h2><br><br><br>
   
+
      <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What type of incubator did you use to grow your cells?</b></h3>
   
+
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What type of incubator did you use to grow your cells?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> THZ-D desktop constant temperature oscillator
 
<p> THZ-D desktop constant temperature oscillator
</p>
+
</p><br>
  
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> If known, what was your incubator's throw (shaking diameter)?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> If known, what was your incubator's throw (shaking diameter)?</b></h3>
 
<p> Oscillation frequency: 20~350rpm
 
<p> Oscillation frequency: 20~350rpm
 
Amplitude: 26mm
 
Amplitude: 26mm
Line 377: Line 370:
 
Input power: 350w
 
Input power: 350w
 
Size (mm): 650x500x480
 
Size (mm): 650x500x480
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What piece of equipment did you use to measure the devices?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What piece of equipment did you use to measure the devices?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader
 
<p> FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> When was this equipment last calibrated?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> When was this equipment last calibrated?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
<p> August 1st, 2015</p><br>
<p> August 1st, 2015</p>
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Who calibrated the equipment?</b></h3>
 
+
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Who calibrated the equipment?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> Tengteng Gong
 
<p> Tengteng Gong
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the wavelength of light you used to excite the cells?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the wavelength of light you used to excite the cells?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> 485nm
 
<p> 485nm
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the filter/channel you used to capture the light emission from the cells?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the filter/channel you used to capture the light emission from the cells?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> Monochromators, tunable in 1.0 nm increments Wavelength range 400–750 nm
 
<p> Monochromators, tunable in 1.0 nm increments Wavelength range 400–750 nm
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the sampling frequency?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the sampling frequency?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p>50 times per second
 
<p>50 times per second
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did you fill in the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did you fill in the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> Yes
 
<p> Yes
 
(The InterLab Protocol is provided here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/InterLab_Protocol)
 
(The InterLab Protocol is provided here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/InterLab_Protocol)
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did you follow the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?</b></h3>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did you follow the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> Yes
 
<p> Yes
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> How did you determine the final dataset that you are reporting?</b></h3>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> How did you determine the final dataset that you are reporting?</b></h3><br><br><br>
+
 
<p> Since theoretically the emission wavelength of GFP is up to 518nm and the test data showed 518nm got the peak signal, we chose Em518 data. We also tested LB medium as blank and the data was minus the blank.
 
<p> Since theoretically the emission wavelength of GFP is up to 518nm and the test data showed 518nm got the peak signal, we chose Em518 data. We also tested LB medium as blank and the data was minus the blank.
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Units Reported:</b></h3><br><br><br>
 
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Units Reported:</b></h3><br><br><br>
 
<p>
 
<p>
<p> RFUs </p>
+
<p> RFUs </p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> We measured the three specific devices required by Interlab Study, using E.coli DH5α as our chassis.</b></h3><p>
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> We measured the three specific devices required by Interlab Study, using E.coli DH5α as our chassis.</b></h3><br><br><br><p>
+
 
1.Device 1: BBa_J23101 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
 
1.Device 1: BBa_J23101 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
 
2.Device 2: BBa_J23106 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
 
2.Device 2: BBa_J23106 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
 
3.Device 3: BBa_J23117 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
 
3.Device 3: BBa_J23117 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
<p> We diluted each of our samples to an OD600 of 0.5 and we started measuring fluorescence when OD600 was within 5% of 0.5. We measured each sample in biological triplicates.
 
<p> We diluted each of our samples to an OD600 of 0.5 and we started measuring fluorescence when OD600 was within 5% of 0.5. We measured each sample in biological triplicates.
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
<p> We obtained the fluorescence data by using 485nm as the excitation wavelength and 518nm as the emission wavelength. Measurement data were collected as relative fluorescence units.
 
<p> We obtained the fluorescence data by using 485nm as the excitation wavelength and 518nm as the emission wavelength. Measurement data were collected as relative fluorescence units.
</p>
+
</p><br>
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Final fluorescence data were collected on August 27, 2015.</b></h3><p> All the data below has been minus our blank control, LB medium.
 
+
<h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Final fluorescence data were collected on August 27, 2015.</b></h3><br><br><br><p> All the data below has been minus our blank control, LB medium.
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<img class="picture" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5d/HUST_interlab_Fig_2.jpg
 
<img class="picture" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5d/HUST_interlab_Fig_2.jpg

Revision as of 12:08, 17 September 2015

Team:HUST-China:Modeling



Interlab Study

SectionⅠ: Introduction

This year, iGEM invited and encouraged all teams to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. We were required to measure the expression level of GFP when using three different promoters. Although It was the first time for our team to take part in Interlab Study, we successfully conducted the experiment and obtained the fluorescence data. Now, we are hoping that we can make contributions to Interlab Study.




Section Ⅱ: Provenance and Release

Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study:

Create the devices: Zhi Zeng Conduct measurements: Guozhao Wu, Shuyan Tang and Zhi Zeng Process data: Shuyan Tang and Yee Zhan




Section Ⅲ: Equipment Information

Date of InterLab Study:

The measurement was obtained on August 27, 2015.


Did your team participate in the Extra Credit?

No. (Details can be found here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study)


Do all persons involved consent to the inclusion of this data in publications derived from the iGEM interlab study?

Yes.




Section Ⅳ: Protocol




Section Ⅴ: Measurement results for Interlab Study




Section Ⅵ: Appendix




What type of incubator did you use to grow your cells?

THZ-D desktop constant temperature oscillator


If known, what was your incubator's throw (shaking diameter)?

Oscillation frequency: 20~350rpm Amplitude: 26mm Maximum capacity(each layer): 1000mlx6 or 500mlx9 or 250mlx12 Standard configuration: Spring rack Dimension of the tray (mm): 400x340 Time range: 0~999minutes Control temperature: (Environment temperature)Room temp+5℃~60℃ Temperature increment: 0.1℃ Inner temperature error: ±0.5℃ Display: LED Input power: 350w Size (mm): 650x500x480


What piece of equipment did you use to measure the devices?

FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader


When was this equipment last calibrated?

August 1st, 2015


Who calibrated the equipment?

Tengteng Gong


What was the wavelength of light you used to excite the cells?

485nm


What was the filter/channel you used to capture the light emission from the cells?

Monochromators, tunable in 1.0 nm increments Wavelength range 400–750 nm


What was the sampling frequency?

50 times per second


Did you fill in the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?

Yes (The InterLab Protocol is provided here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/InterLab_Protocol)


Did you follow the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?

Yes


How did you determine the final dataset that you are reporting?

Since theoretically the emission wavelength of GFP is up to 518nm and the test data showed 518nm got the peak signal, we chose Em518 data. We also tested LB medium as blank and the data was minus the blank.


Units Reported:




RFUs


We measured the three specific devices required by Interlab Study, using E.coli DH5α as our chassis.

1.Device 1: BBa_J23101 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone 2.Device 2: BBa_J23106 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone 3.Device 3: BBa_J23117 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone


We diluted each of our samples to an OD600 of 0.5 and we started measuring fluorescence when OD600 was within 5% of 0.5. We measured each sample in biological triplicates.


We obtained the fluorescence data by using 485nm as the excitation wavelength and 518nm as the emission wavelength. Measurement data were collected as relative fluorescence units.


Final fluorescence data were collected on August 27, 2015.

All the data below has been minus our blank control, LB medium.




The fluorescence results that we submitted to Interlab Study are below:




We divided fluorescence by relevant OD600 and used the results to draw the graph above. According to the graph, all the samples seemed to be normal except Device3: J23117+I13504. Sadly Device3 didn’t express GFP while Device1 had the highest fluorescence intensity, revealing that J23101 is a relative high strength promoter compared with J23106 and J23117.

Raw data for our fluorescence measurement