Difference between revisions of "Team:MIT/InterlabStudy"

 
(43 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
<div class = "text" align = "center">
 
<div class = "text" align = "center">
 +
 +
<a href = "http://www.lucigen.com/E.-cloni-10G-and-10GF-Chemically-Competent-Cells/">E coli Strain : Lucigen 10G </a>
 +
                        <br>
 
Device 1 : J23101 + I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) -> backbone:PSB1C3 (3 biological replicates)
 
Device 1 : J23101 + I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) -> backbone:PSB1C3 (3 biological replicates)
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 38: Line 41:
 
Negative Control: BBa_R0040
 
Negative Control: BBa_R0040
 
                         <br>
 
                         <br>
−
Negative Control : NEB 10 B Competent Cells
+
Negative Control : Lucigen 10G Competent Cells
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 57: Line 60:
 
• Add 5mL LB using a seriological pipette
 
• Add 5mL LB using a seriological pipette
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
• Add 5uL of 1000x antibiotic (Chloramphenicol.)
+
• Add 5uL of 1000x antibiotic (Chloramphenicol).
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
• Pick colony using a 10 ul pipette tip on a p2. Eject tip into tube (tip should remain in tube).
 
• Pick colony using a 10 ul pipette tip on a p2. Eject tip into tube (tip should remain in tube).
Line 73: Line 76:
  
 
<a href = "https://www.neb.com/~/media/NebUs/Files/Application%20Notes/appNoteM0486.pdf">Colony PCR (selecting transformants from the transformation plates)</a>
 
<a href = "https://www.neb.com/~/media/NebUs/Files/Application%20Notes/appNoteM0486.pdf">Colony PCR (selecting transformants from the transformation plates)</a>
−
<br>
+
<br>  <br>
−
Making Liquid Culture (see above)
+
<img width = 400 src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/ed/Colony_PCRPlate.jpg"> <br>
 +
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 86: Line 90:
 
<li> Grow with shaking at desired temperature until desired OD (0.3 for exponential phase, 1.0ish for steady phase)
 
<li> Grow with shaking at desired temperature until desired OD (0.3 for exponential phase, 1.0ish for steady phase)
 
</li>
 
</li>
−
<li> Dilute 10 uL into 990 uL 1X PBS
+
<li> Dilute 10 uL into 990 uL 1X PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline) Solution
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
<li> Interrogate by flow cytometry
 
<li> Interrogate by flow cytometry
Line 122: Line 126:
  
 
<div class = "text" align = "left">
 
<div class = "text" align = "left">
−
<ol> <li> measured beads
+
<ol> <li> measured beads(Spherotech RCP(Rainbow Calibration Particles)-30-5A). (These  are used "for the routine calibration of the channels in flow cytometers"(Spherotech)).
  
 
</li>
 
</li>
Line 149: Line 153:
 
<div class = "subtitle">
 
<div class = "subtitle">
 
Results
 
Results
−
<p/> <h4>J23117 + GFP</h4>
+
</div>
−
<img width=300 height=300 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4b/J23117_1.jpg">
+
<div class = "text" align = "center">
−
<p/><h4>J23106 + GFP</h4>
+
<p/> <h4>
 +
Flow Cytometer Data
 +
</h4>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/Flow_cytometry_data.jpg">
 +
</div>
 +
<div class = "text" align = "center">
 +
<p/> <h4>
 +
Sample Graphs </h4>
 +
<table border=5 >
 +
<tr align = center>
 +
<td><font color=white> <b >J23101+ GFP</b></font> </td>
 +
<td><font color=white> <b>J23106 + GFP</b></font></td>
 +
<td><font color=white> <b>J23117 + GFP</b></font> </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>
 +
<img width=300 height=300 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fa/J23101_1.jpg">
 +
</td>
 +
<td>
 
<img width=300 height=300 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/df/J23106_1.jpg">
 
<img width=300 height=300 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/df/J23106_1.jpg">
−
<p/> <h4>J23101+ GFP</h4>
+
</td>
−
<img width=300 height=300 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fa/J23101_1.jpg">
+
<td>
 +
<img width=300 height=300 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4b/J23117_1.jpg">
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div class = "subtitle">
 +
Conclusion
 +
</div>
 +
<div class = "text" align = "left">
 +
  Our study showed that among the 3 promoters (J23101, J23106, J23117), the J23101 Promoter was the strongest as it had the highest GFP fluorescence associated with it. In order of strength, the J23101 Promoter was the highest, the J23106 Promoter was moderate, and the J23117 Promoter was the lowest. This is in alignment with the 2006 UC Berkeley "Anderson Promoter" Study (which measured RFP fluorescence). Also, we noticed that the J23117 promoter's output was close to that of the same promoter in the Anderson Promoter Study. It was striking that the output was close for the two given that both of the studies were performed under different conditions. We also noticed that our study's fluorescence difference between J23101 and J23106 was about 3X greater than that of the Anderson Study and the  fluorescence difference between J23106 and J23117 was about 6X greater than that of the Anderson Study.
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 17:22, 17 September 2015


Introduction
The iGEM Interlab Study's aim is "to obtain fluorescence data for three specific genetic devices expressing GFP from iGEM teams around the world”. It is an opportunity for teams throughout the world to build and characterize parts. The purpose of the study as a whole is to be able to “test the consistency of the teams’ data of the measured devices”.
Devices Built and Measured: (Chassis : E coli)
E coli Strain : Lucigen 10G
Device 1 : J23101 + I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) -> backbone:PSB1C3 (3 biological replicates)
Device 2 : J23106 + I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) -> backbone:PSB1C3 (3 biological replicates)
Device 3 : J23117 + I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) -> backbone: PSB1C3 (3 biological replicates)
Measurement Controls:
Positive Control: I20270 PSB1C3 -> J23151 + I20270(B0032-E0040-B0010-B0012)
Negative Control: BBa_R0040
Negative Control : Lucigen 10G Competent Cells
Protocols:
DNA Kit Plate Instructions (http://parts.igem.org/Help:2015_DNA_Distribution)
Transformation (http://parts.igem.org/Help:Protocols/Transformation)
Making Liquid cultures:
• Prepare culture in a 15 mL, round bottom tube.
• Add 5mL LB using a seriological pipette
• Add 5uL of 1000x antibiotic (Chloramphenicol).
• Pick colony using a 10 ul pipette tip on a p2. Eject tip into tube (tip should remain in tube).
• if growing from another liquid culture, 100 uL should be plenty (replacing the 1 colony). Almost no amount is too small, just ensure that you get cells.
Miniprep – using Qiagen protocol
3 Antibiotic Assembly protocol
Transformation
Colony PCR (selecting transformants from the transformation plates)




Generalized E coli Flow Cytometry Protocol( created by Nicholas Delateur Weiss Lab MIT)
  1. Grow an overnight in rich media with appropriate antibiotic from a single colony (in previous step)
  2. Subculture 125 uL of saturated culture into 5 mL of M9 Minimal Media (below) supplemented with Glycerol, add appropriate antibiotic
  3. Grow with shaking at desired temperature until desired OD (0.3 for exponential phase, 1.0ish for steady phase)
  4. Dilute 10 uL into 990 uL 1X PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline) Solution
  5. Interrogate by flow cytometry

M9 Min w/ Glycerol Recipe

  • 20 mL 5X m9
  • 3.4 mL 10mg/mL thiamine
  • 0.8 mL 50% glycerol
  • 2 mL 10% cas AA
  • 0.2 mL  1 M MgSO4
  • 10 uL 1 M CaCl2
Mix, and then add DI water until the total volume is 100 mL (for a total of 100 mL)
Measuring in flow cytometer
  1. measured beads(Spherotech RCP(Rainbow Calibration Particles)-30-5A). (These are used "for the routine calibration of the channels in flow cytometers"(Spherotech)).
  2. measured 3 types of devices
  3. measured positive control : I20270 (GFP construct)
  4. measure negative controls : Untransformed competent cell and R0040
Sequencing
Final Data
Results

Flow Cytometer Data

Sample Graphs

J23101+ GFP J23106 + GFP J23117 + GFP
Conclusion
Our study showed that among the 3 promoters (J23101, J23106, J23117), the J23101 Promoter was the strongest as it had the highest GFP fluorescence associated with it. In order of strength, the J23101 Promoter was the highest, the J23106 Promoter was moderate, and the J23117 Promoter was the lowest. This is in alignment with the 2006 UC Berkeley "Anderson Promoter" Study (which measured RFP fluorescence). Also, we noticed that the J23117 promoter's output was close to that of the same promoter in the Anderson Promoter Study. It was striking that the output was close for the two given that both of the studies were performed under different conditions. We also noticed that our study's fluorescence difference between J23101 and J23106 was about 3X greater than that of the Anderson Study and the fluorescence difference between J23106 and J23117 was about 6X greater than that of the Anderson Study.