Difference between revisions of "Team:CAU China/Practices"

 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 580: Line 580:
  
 
                 <li class="Project navitem2">
 
                 <li class="Project navitem2">
−
                     <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Project" title="">Project<span> ▼</span></a>
+
                     <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Project" title="">Project</a>
−
                     <ul class="subnav" style="display: none;">
+
                      
−
                        <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Project/Biobricks">Biobricks</a></li>
+
−
                    </ul>
+
 
                 </li>
 
                 </li>
  
Line 591: Line 589:
  
 
                 <li class="Notebook navitem4">
 
                 <li class="Notebook navitem4">
−
                     <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Notebook">Notebook<span> ▼</span></a>
+
                     <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Notebook">Notebook</a>
−
                     <ul class="subnav" style="display: none;">
+
                      
−
                        <li><a href="">Labnote</a></li>
+
−
                        <li><a href="">Protocols</a></li>
+
−
                    </ul>
+
 
                 </li>
 
                 </li>
  
 
                 <li class="Human_Practice navitem5">
 
                 <li class="Human_Practice navitem5">
 
                     <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Practices">Practices</a>
 
                     <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Practices">Practices</a>
−
                   
+
                 
 
                 </li>
 
                 </li>
  
−
                 <li class="Judging navitem5">
+
                 <li class="Collaborations navitem5">
−
                     <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Judging">Judging</a>
+
                     <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Collaborations">Collaborations</a>
 
                 </li>
 
                 </li>
  
Line 611: Line 606:
 
    <ul class="subnav" style="display: none;">
 
    <ul class="subnav" style="display: none;">
 
                         <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Team/Gallery.html">Gallery</a></li>
 
                         <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Team/Gallery.html">Gallery</a></li>
−
                         <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Team/Attribution.html">Attributions</a></li>
+
                         <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Attributions">Attributions</a></li>
 
                     </ul>
 
                     </ul>
 
                 </li>
 
                 </li>
Line 620: Line 615:
  
 
             </ul>
 
             </ul>
 +
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 643: Line 639:
 
<p style="color:#FFFF00; text-align: left;">
 
<p style="color:#FFFF00; text-align: left;">
 
Question 1. Have you heard of genetically modified food?</p>
 
Question 1. Have you heard of genetically modified food?</p>
−
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1c/CAU_practices_1.PNG" ></p>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1c/CAU_practices_1.PNG" width="200px" ></p>
  
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
Line 652: Line 648:
 
Question 2. Where did you learn about genetically modified food?
 
Question 2. Where did you learn about genetically modified food?
 
</p>
 
</p>
−
<p></p>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/78/CAU_practices_2.PNG"width="400px"  ></p>
−
<p style="color:#000000; text-align: left;">
+
 
−
In the survey, 80% students choose paper and the results of the study, which is connected to the discipline they major in, within which more students choose to read papers, reports and the results of the specific researches based on the background of their own studies. And 40% choose to learn something about the development of the research of biology and concentrate on the macro aspects. Only 20% choose to learn something about the conjecture and something else of biology-lover, such as blogs and so on and the result is accommodated with question 1 with respect of the interest.
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
Line 663: Line 658:
 
Question 3. Which one(s) is(are) commonly genetically modified according to your knowledge?  
 
Question 3. Which one(s) is(are) commonly genetically modified according to your knowledge?  
 
</p>
 
</p>
−
<p></p>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e2/CAU_practices_3.PNG" width="600px" ></p>
−
<p style="color:#000000; text-align: left;">
+
 
−
According to the investigation, papers and academic reports are the main access to the biology research for a freshman in college. Nevertheless, few students read the paper thoroughly. For most time, they just roughly get the message conveyed by the paper when they are finishing their class assignments. At the same time, academic reports seldom gets proper feedbacks from them. The popular science literature and the news on the websites also play an important role and reveal the degree of participation among the freshmen. Moreover, it is suitable for their knowledge deposits. It can be quite intriguing and it can in turn spread the researching message to a certain extent.
+
−
</p>
+
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
Line 672: Line 665:
  
 
<p style="color:#FFFF00; text-align: left;">
 
<p style="color:#FFFF00; text-align: left;">
−
Question 4. Which of the following magazines introducing biology have you read?
+
Question 4. The proportion of GM food in your daily consumption
−
</p>
+
−
<p></p>
+
−
<p style="color:#000000; text-align: left;">
+
−
Most choose Scientific American, which is famous for the introduction of the latest research, for its friendly style and fool-proof introduction.
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
 +
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/40/CAU_practices_4.PNG" width="400px" ></p>
 +
 +
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
Line 685: Line 677:
 
Question 5. What is your attitude towards GM food, and why?
 
Question 5. What is your attitude towards GM food, and why?
 
</p>
 
</p>
−
<p></p>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/87/CAU_practices_5.PNG" width="400px" ></p>
−
<h1 align= "left">Analysis </hi>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d0/CAU_practices_6.PNG" width="400px" ></p>
−
<p>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/26/CAU_practices_7.PNG" width="400px" ></p>
−
Media preference dominant public opinion on GM food.</p>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/2f/CAU_practices_8.PNG" width="400px" ></p>
 +
<h1 align= "left">Analysis </h1>
 +
<p style="color:#000000; text-align: left;">
 +
Media preference dominant public opinion on GM food.As can be seen in the pictures, a rather large proportion of the participants receive information concerning GM food through TV programs, magazines, newspapers, and the internet, which means the news agencies behind these information terminals have a large role to play in terms of public awareness.</p>
  
−
<p>The competitiveness of GM food mainly comes from its price and quality.</p>
+
<p style="color:#000000; text-align: left;">The competitiveness of GM food mainly comes from its price and quality.According to the GM food supporters, the main competitiveness of GM food come from its prices and its nutritional advantages due to genetic engineering. These people have a deeper understanding of GM food, and they even can tell me why GM food can be sold at a much cheaper price (like the reduction on the use of pesticides).</p>
−
 
+
<p style="color:#000000; text-align: left;">Logic trap -- Harmful till proven safe.Not a single scientist have the courage to make a universal affirmative judgment on the safety of GM food, leaving it to a suspended problem so that media can build their ‘imaginations’ upon. And to the public the best way possible is to assume GM food to be harmful until clearly proven safe. </p>
−
<p>Logic trap -- Harmful till proven safe.
+
<p style="color:#000000; text-align: left;">When we look at the survey as a whole, we still find the general public very concerned about the safety of GM food, and they're not worrying about nothing. The genetic drift is literally an issue we have to deal with if we are to develop GM food. So this problem gave us inspirations in the future of our project. We should care more about the genetic drift issue. And this is where exactly our idea about the gene safe box idea come from. So special thanks to the lovely people who were really kind and sweet to spare their time to help us with our survey!
−
 
+
−
</p>
+
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
Line 701: Line 694:
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
 
</tbody></table>
 
</tbody></table>
 +
.
  
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>

Latest revision as of 19:08, 17 September 2015

Team:CAU China/Human Practice/Survey - 2014.igem.org

 

Team:CAU China/Human Practice/Survey

From 2014.igem.org


A survey on the public knowledge of genetically modified food

Question 1. Have you heard of genetically modified food?

Question 2. Where did you learn about genetically modified food?

Question 3. Which one(s) is(are) commonly genetically modified according to your knowledge?

Question 4. The proportion of GM food in your daily consumption

Question 5. What is your attitude towards GM food, and why?

Analysis

Media preference dominant public opinion on GM food.As can be seen in the pictures, a rather large proportion of the participants receive information concerning GM food through TV programs, magazines, newspapers, and the internet, which means the news agencies behind these information terminals have a large role to play in terms of public awareness.

The competitiveness of GM food mainly comes from its price and quality.According to the GM food supporters, the main competitiveness of GM food come from its prices and its nutritional advantages due to genetic engineering. These people have a deeper understanding of GM food, and they even can tell me why GM food can be sold at a much cheaper price (like the reduction on the use of pesticides).

Logic trap -- Harmful till proven safe.Not a single scientist have the courage to make a universal affirmative judgment on the safety of GM food, leaving it to a suspended problem so that media can build their ‘imaginations’ upon. And to the public the best way possible is to assume GM food to be harmful until clearly proven safe.

When we look at the survey as a whole, we still find the general public very concerned about the safety of GM food, and they're not worrying about nothing. The genetic drift is literally an issue we have to deal with if we are to develop GM food. So this problem gave us inspirations in the future of our project. We should care more about the genetic drift issue. And this is where exactly our idea about the gene safe box idea come from. So special thanks to the lovely people who were really kind and sweet to spare their time to help us with our survey!

.

Retrieved from "https://2014.igem.org/Team:CAU_China/Human_Practice/Survey"