Difference between revisions of "Team:UCSF/Description"
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
$('.part2').click(function () { | $('.part2').click(function () { | ||
$('#contentProject').html( | $('#contentProject').html( | ||
| − | "<p class='headerProjectSub'>BASIC CIRCUIT</p><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><b style='color:#368E8C;font-size:1.5em'>Individual Response: GFP</b></br></br><img style='float:right;margin-right:0px;margin-top:-80px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/27/UCSF_Basic_Circuit_Diagram_Part_2-01.png' alt='Circuit Part 2' height='210' width='350'><b>Cells produce GFP in response to doxcycline.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> pTET inducible promoter drives production of GFP.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Something here about why we do this.</br></p></br>"); | + | "<p class='headerProjectSub'>BASIC CIRCUIT</p><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><b style='color:#368E8C;font-size:1.5em'>Individual Response: GFP</b></br></br><img style='float:right;margin-right:0px;margin-top:-80px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/27/UCSF_Basic_Circuit_Diagram_Part_2-01.png' alt='Circuit Part 2' height='210' width='350'><b>Cells produce GFP in response to doxcycline.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> pTET inducible promoter drives production of GFP.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Something here about why we do this.</br></p></br><div class='seeData'><a href='https://2015.igem.org/Team:UCSF'>See Our Data <img class='readMoreArrow' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/68/UCSF_Read_More_Arrow.png' alt='Next Arrow' height='35' width='35'></a></div>"); |
$('#set1').css('display','none'); | $('#set1').css('display','none'); | ||
$('#set2').css('display','block'); | $('#set2').css('display','block'); | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
$('.part4').click(function () { | $('.part4').click(function () { | ||
$('#contentProject').html( | $('#contentProject').html( | ||
| − | "<p class='headerProjectSub'>BASIC CIRCUIT</p><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><b style='color:#368E8C;font-size:1.5em'>Community Response: RFP</b></br></br><img style='float:right;margin-right:0px;margin-top:-80px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b7/UCSF_Basic_Circuit_Diagram_Part_5-01.png' alt='Circuit Part 3' height='210' width='350'><b>Cells produce RFP and LexADBD in response to mFα.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> pAga inducible promoter drives production of RFP and LexADBD.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Something here about why we do this.</br></p></br>"); | + | "<p class='headerProjectSub'>BASIC CIRCUIT</p><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><b style='color:#368E8C;font-size:1.5em'>Community Response: RFP</b></br></br><img style='float:right;margin-right:0px;margin-top:-80px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b7/UCSF_Basic_Circuit_Diagram_Part_5-01.png' alt='Circuit Part 3' height='210' width='350'><b>Cells produce RFP and LexADBD in response to mFα.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> pAga inducible promoter drives production of RFP and LexADBD.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Something here about why we do this.</br></p></br><div class='seeData'><a href='https://2015.igem.org/Team:UCSF'>See Our Data <img class='readMoreArrow' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/68/UCSF_Read_More_Arrow.png' alt='Next Arrow' height='35' width='35'></a></div>"); |
$('#set3').css('display','none'); | $('#set3').css('display','none'); | ||
$('#set4').css('display','block'); | $('#set4').css('display','block'); | ||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
$('#senseCircuit').click(function () { | $('#senseCircuit').click(function () { | ||
$('#contentProject').html( | $('#contentProject').html( | ||
| − | "<p class='headerProjectSub'>CAN YOU SENSE ME NOW?</p><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><b style='color:#368E8C;font-size:1.5em'>Positive Feedback</b></br></br><img style='float:right;margin-right:100px;margin-top:0px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/UCSF_Increased_Secretion.png' alt='Increased Secretion' height='250' width='250'><b>Increased Secretion: Generating more alpha factor signal to increase communication range and amplify local concentrations.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> LexA transcription factor inducible promoter driving production of mFα.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Activated cells will up-regulate mFα, which will produce and secrete more alpha factor signal to the community. This will generate a positive feedback loop that will amplify both communication range and local concentrations of signal, essentially generating local communities of activated cells. We believe that this motif is essential for community decision making because increased secretion will allow cells to “talk” to individuals farther away in the community. However, through diffusion mechanisms, alpha factor will create a concentration gradient, allowing local cells to sense the community signal more strongly.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Inspiration:</b> T Cells, through sensing and secreting the community signal IL2, will upregulate secretion of IL2 and “talk” to neighboring T Cells better <sup>[6, 11]</sup>.</br></p></br><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><img style='float:right;margin-right:100px;margin-top:0px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8c/UCSF_Increased_Receptor.png' alt='Increased Receptor' height='250' width='250'><b>Increased Reception: Production of more alpha factor receptor to sense more alpha factor and polarize communities.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> LexA transcription factor inducible promoter driving production of Ste2.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Activated cells will up-regulate Ste2, an integral ligand receptor of alpha factor in the mating pathway. This will allow cells to sense more alpha factor, producing a selfish feedback loop and amplifying the gap between “ON” and “OFF” states. Due to proximity of signal and receptor, cells with high Ste2 expression will engage in asocial behavior, and sense signal produced themselves. This selfish feedback will sharpen concentration gradients and create stronger local concentrations of alpha factor.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Inspiration:</b> Similar to the positive feedback of IL2 secretion in T Cells, sensing IL2 will upregulate the production of IL2 receptor. This allows cells to “listen” to their neighbors better <sup>[4, 10, 11]</sup>.</br></p></br>"); | + | "<p class='headerProjectSub'>CAN YOU SENSE ME NOW?</p><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><b style='color:#368E8C;font-size:1.5em'>Positive Feedback</b></br></br><img style='float:right;margin-right:100px;margin-top:0px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/UCSF_Increased_Secretion.png' alt='Increased Secretion' height='250' width='250'><b>Increased Secretion: Generating more alpha factor signal to increase communication range and amplify local concentrations.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> LexA transcription factor inducible promoter driving production of mFα.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Activated cells will up-regulate mFα, which will produce and secrete more alpha factor signal to the community. This will generate a positive feedback loop that will amplify both communication range and local concentrations of signal, essentially generating local communities of activated cells. We believe that this motif is essential for community decision making because increased secretion will allow cells to “talk” to individuals farther away in the community. However, through diffusion mechanisms, alpha factor will create a concentration gradient, allowing local cells to sense the community signal more strongly.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Inspiration:</b> T Cells, through sensing and secreting the community signal IL2, will upregulate secretion of IL2 and “talk” to neighboring T Cells better <sup>[6, 11]</sup>.</br></p></br><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><img style='float:right;margin-right:100px;margin-top:0px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8c/UCSF_Increased_Receptor.png' alt='Increased Receptor' height='250' width='250'><b>Increased Reception: Production of more alpha factor receptor to sense more alpha factor and polarize communities.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> LexA transcription factor inducible promoter driving production of Ste2.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Activated cells will up-regulate Ste2, an integral ligand receptor of alpha factor in the mating pathway. This will allow cells to sense more alpha factor, producing a selfish feedback loop and amplifying the gap between “ON” and “OFF” states. Due to proximity of signal and receptor, cells with high Ste2 expression will engage in asocial behavior, and sense signal produced themselves. This selfish feedback will sharpen concentration gradients and create stronger local concentrations of alpha factor.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Inspiration:</b> Similar to the positive feedback of IL2 secretion in T Cells, sensing IL2 will upregulate the production of IL2 receptor. This allows cells to “listen” to their neighbors better <sup>[4, 10, 11]</sup>.</br></p></br><div class='seeData'><a href='https://2015.igem.org/Team:UCSF'>See Our Data <img class='readMoreArrow' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/68/UCSF_Read_More_Arrow.png' alt='Next Arrow' height='35' width='35'></a></div>"); |
$('#basicCircuit').css('opacity','0.5'); | $('#basicCircuit').css('opacity','0.5'); | ||
$('#senseCircuit').css('opacity','1'); | $('#senseCircuit').css('opacity','1'); | ||
| Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
$('#hotspotsCircuit').click(function () { | $('#hotspotsCircuit').click(function () { | ||
$('#contentProject').html( | $('#contentProject').html( | ||
| − | "<p class='headerProjectSub'>CELLULAR HOTSPOTS</p><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><b style='color:#368E8C;font-size:1.5em'>Feedback: Activated Clustering</b></br></br><img style='float:right;margin-right:100px;margin-top:0px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e7/UCSF_Activated_Clustering.png' alt='Clustering' height='250' width='423'><b>Maintaining activated cells in local clusters to strengthen communication.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> LexA transcription factor inducible promoter driving production of Aga-Mgfp5.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Repurposing parts from UCSF 2011, we are using modified surface display proteins in yeast to induce cell adhesion through gene specific heterodimers. Particularly, we are utilizing a yeast surface display system using a fusion protein with a cell wall anchoring protein (Aga1 and Aga2) and a bioadhesive endogenously found in mussels (Mgfp5). In closer proximity, cells should be able to communicate with their local community more efficiently. This will essentially polarize cellular communities into their local clusters.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Inspiration:</b> We know from natural systems that distance between individuals in a community is a crucial factor in how well they communicate with one another. T Cells, after being activated by an antigen, will be maintained in lymph nodes by a protein, CD69. This spatial retention of activated cells will allow them to talk better to one another since they are all within a small range of communication <sup>[9]</sup>.</br>This motif is also found in quorum sensing V. fischeri, who sense and secrete a species specific autoinducer that allows individuals to measure population size. These organisms are found in the light organs of the Hawaiian Bobtail Squid, and, when in an enclosed space with a high cell density, are able to communicate together their decision to bioluminesce. This is due to the limited diffusion of the signaling molecule, and thus, more effective communication <sup>[12]</sup>.</br></p></br>"); | + | "<p class='headerProjectSub'>CELLULAR HOTSPOTS</p><div class='headerBreakSub' style='width:100%'></div></br><p class='content1'><b style='color:#368E8C;font-size:1.5em'>Feedback: Activated Clustering</b></br></br><img style='float:right;margin-right:100px;margin-top:0px' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e7/UCSF_Activated_Clustering.png' alt='Clustering' height='250' width='423'><b>Maintaining activated cells in local clusters to strengthen communication.</b></br></br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Design:</b> LexA transcription factor inducible promoter driving production of Aga-Mgfp5.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Purpose:</b> Repurposing parts from UCSF 2011, we are using modified surface display proteins in yeast to induce cell adhesion through gene specific heterodimers. Particularly, we are utilizing a yeast surface display system using a fusion protein with a cell wall anchoring protein (Aga1 and Aga2) and a bioadhesive endogenously found in mussels (Mgfp5). In closer proximity, cells should be able to communicate with their local community more efficiently. This will essentially polarize cellular communities into their local clusters.</br><b style='color:#368E8C'>Inspiration:</b> We know from natural systems that distance between individuals in a community is a crucial factor in how well they communicate with one another. T Cells, after being activated by an antigen, will be maintained in lymph nodes by a protein, CD69. This spatial retention of activated cells will allow them to talk better to one another since they are all within a small range of communication <sup>[9]</sup>.</br>This motif is also found in quorum sensing V. fischeri, who sense and secrete a species specific autoinducer that allows individuals to measure population size. These organisms are found in the light organs of the Hawaiian Bobtail Squid, and, when in an enclosed space with a high cell density, are able to communicate together their decision to bioluminesce. This is due to the limited diffusion of the signaling molecule, and thus, more effective communication <sup>[12]</sup>.</br></p></br><div class='seeData'><a href='https://2015.igem.org/Team:UCSF'>See Our Data <img class='readMoreArrow' src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/68/UCSF_Read_More_Arrow.png' alt='Next Arrow' height='35' width='35'></a></div>"); |
$('#basicCircuit').css('opacity','0.5'); | $('#basicCircuit').css('opacity','0.5'); | ||
$('#senseCircuit').css('opacity','0.5'); | $('#senseCircuit').css('opacity','0.5'); | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 17 September 2015
BACKGROUND
Cells in a population can have varied responses to a stimulus, but are able to coordinate their responses through communication motifs. Chemical signaling to neighbors in a community can allow populations to make more robust and effective decisions as a collective whole.T Cells, for instance, need to know whether or not to proliferate to attack a given antigen. If too many proliferate, an autoimmune disorder is generated. If too little proliferate, the antigen continues to attack the body. By sensing the antigen at varying levels and communicating with the population, each T Cell knows whether or not it should activate and what level to activate at, in order to carry on their function properly. But, how do these cells communicate and how do they understand their role as part of the collective? How do these genetically identical cells in the same population differentiate themselves from others? What motifs are necessary to elicit a bimodal response, in which high activating cells stay ON and low activating cells stay OFF? Our goal this year is to understand these questions and to take advantage of the natural variation found within cells of the same population in order to amplify that difference and create two divergent responses. Our genetic circuit will utilize a stimulus that activates a fluorescent readout for individual response (GFP) and the secretion of a communication signal that is sensed and secreted by all members of the community. This community signal will in turn activate a fluorescent readout for community response (RFP).
SYNTHETIC MODEL
Click on the part of our circuit you are interested in learning about in the image above.
REFERENCES
- Balázsi, Gábor, Alexander Van Oudenaarden, and James J. Collins. "Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals." Cell 144.6 (2011): 910-25.
- Cotari, Jesse W., Guillaume Voisinne, and Grégoire Altan-Bonnet. "Diversity Training for Signal Transduction: Leveraging Cell-to-cell Variability to Dissect Cellular Signaling, Differentiation and Death." Current Opinion in Biotechnology 24.4 (2013): 760-66.
- Diener, Christian, Gabriele Schreiber, Wolfgang Giese, Gabriel Del Rio, Andreas Schröder, and Edda Klipp. "Yeast Mating and Image-Based Quantification of Spatial Pattern Formation." PLoS Comput Biol PLoS Computational Biology 10.6 (2014).
- Feinerman, O., J. Veiga, J. R. Dorfman, R. N. Germain, and G. Altan-Bonnet. "Variability and Robustness in T Cell Activation from Regulated Heterogeneity in Protein Levels." Science 321.5892 (2008): 1081-084.
- Höfer, Thomas, Oleg Krichevsky, and Grégoire Altan-Bonnet. "Competition for IL-2 between Regulatory and Effector T Cells to Chisel Immune Responses." Front. Immun. Frontiers in Immunology 3 (2012).
- Huberman, L. B., and A. W. Murray. "Genetically Engineered Transvestites Reveal Novel Mating Genes in Budding Yeast." Genetics 195.4 (2013): 1277-290.
- Jahn, Michael, Annett Mölle, Gerhard Rödel, and Kai Ostermann. "Temporal and Spatial Properties of a Yeast Multi-Cellular Amplification System Based on Signal Molecule Diffusion." Sensors 13.11 (2013): 14511-4522.
- López, Daniel, and Roberto Kolter. "Extracellular Signals That Define Distinct and Coexisting Cell Fates in Bacillus Subtilis." FEMS Microbiology Reviews FEMS Microbiol Rev 34.2 (2010): 134-49.
- Shiow, Lawrence R., David B. Rosen, Naděžda Brdičková, Ying Xu, Jinping An, Lewis L. Lanier, Jason G. Cyster, and Mehrdad Matloubian. "CD69 Acts Downstream of Interferon-α/β to Inhibit S1P1 and Lymphocyte Egress from Lymphoid Organs." Nature 440.7083 (2006): 540-44.
- Tkach, Karen, and Grégoire Altan-Bonnet. "T Cell Responses to Antigen: Hasty Proposals Resolved through Long Engagements." Current Opinion in Immunology 25.1 (2013): 120-25.
- Tkach, Karen E., Debashis Barik, Guillaume Voisinne, Nicole Malandro, Matthew M. Hathorn, Jesse W. Cotari, Robert Vogel, Taha Merghoub, Jedd Wolchok, Oleg Krichevsky, and Grégoire Altan-Bonnet. "T Cells Translate Individual, Quantal Activation into Collective, Analog Cytokine Responses via Time-integrated Feedbacks." ELife 3 (2014).
- Waters, Christopher M., and Bonnie L. Bassler. "QUORUM SENSING: Cell-to-Cell Communication in Bacteria." Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21.1 (2005): 319-46.
- Youk, H., and W. A. Lim. "Secreting and Sensing the Same Molecule Allows Cells to Achieve Versatile Social Behaviors." Science 343.6171 (2014): 1242782.
