Difference between revisions of "Team:Lethbridge HS/Notebook"
Line 1,764: | Line 1,764: | ||
<p>The same procedure was implemented that had been used in previous trials.<br><br> | <p>The same procedure was implemented that had been used in previous trials.<br><br> | ||
<p>Results:</p> | <p>Results:</p> | ||
+ | <table class="table table-striped table-bordered"> | ||
+ | <thead> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Oxalic Acid Concentration %</th> | ||
+ | <th>OD528</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </thead> | ||
+ | <tbody> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.977</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.808</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.2</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.713</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.3</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.562</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.4</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.636</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.787</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.6</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.851</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.7</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.804</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.8</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.736</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>0.9</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.493</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>1.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.634</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tbody> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </li><li> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> |
Revision as of 23:36, 17 September 2015
Notebook
Record of our work
Please click on the different events on the lab to read more about them. Also, feel free to click on the months on the sidebar to reveal a list of lab dates.
April
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
May
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
June
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
July
August
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
September
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
-
June
-
2015-June-06
Lab book june 6
Names: Jon and Kieran
We stained inoculated biofilms and performed the Crystal Violet assay. Left in 37 C for 36 hours. We did 4 trials 100uL, 4 trials 200uL, and 4 trials 300uL. Biofilm formation was successful, with varying band thickness. We also replicated this with two 5mL LB petri dish inoculated with 20uL E.coli. We added 5mL of crystal violet each to the petri dishes to cover the whole plate.
We also performed an oxalic acid gradient with 0%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, and 2.0% oxalic acid to give a final volume of 6mL. We added 20uL of E.coli to each 6mL tube. Left in 37 C.
We did a 1/100 dilution of E.coli into LB media, and left it in 37 C for (hopefully) 24 hours. We did 4 trials 100uL, 4 trials 200uL, and 4 trials 300uL.2015-June-08
Lab book june 8
Names: Kieran
Biofilm produced on 24h 96 well plate.
Testing to see if biofilm will produce on 12h 96 well plate (1 in 100 culture dilution).
And also doing 24h 96 well biofilm formation testing to see what detergents and chemical impacts have on the decrease in biofilm production.
*Biofilms placed at 8:00pm
Oxalic acid test run for 12 hours (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.5, 2.0%)
*Oxalic acid placed at 7:30pm
Tested the production of parafilm sacs for in vitro Varroa feeding. (using kimwipes and 2mL tubes as containment methods) .2015-June-10
Lab book june 10
Names: Kieran
Performed oxalic acid testing of E.coli growth in LB media at (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.5, 2.0%) concentrations. Placed at 6:50pm.
Produced more biofilms.
Had mites and created pouches including Water, LB, Supernatent, E.coli, E.coli RFP. Placed at room temperature and in chris’s drawer.
Took 48 and 24 hour biofilms and performed a bleach treatment on them (0.252%) for 30 minutes. .2015-June-16
Lab book june 16
Names: Kieran
Took oxalic acid readings after 23 hours of incubation
.Title for table Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD600 0.0 1.745 0.01 1.771 0.05 1.882 0.1 0.980 0.15 0.125 0.2 0.104 0.3 0.118 0.4 0.174 0.5 0.1456 2.0 0.017 Readings are unrealiable as the cultures were left in the shaking incubator for over 23 hours. Still show the same general trend as past gradients.
2015-June-17
Lab book june 17
Names: Kieran
Make oxalic acid samples again.
.
Make 24h biofilms.Title for table Biofilm test (30 minutes contact) (24 hour biofilm) Result Windex Negative Bleach Negative Tilex Biofilm remained 2015-June-19
Lab book june 19
Names: Chris and Tiffany D
Objective:Determine if we have successfully cultured mites in vitro using either paraffin pouches or bee pupae.
Table 2. Experimental design showing each of the treatments applied to the mites.
After 24 hours, all mites were found to be dead. Pupae showed some signs of black bacteria growth or browning on body. Will need to repeat or find another method of culturing mites in vitro.2015-June-22
Lab book june 22
Names: Sydnee, Tiffany D, and Kieran
Biofilm test performed on
Fantastic = Biofilm remained
Windex = Biofilm remained
Bleach = didn’t remain
Made overnight cultures for oxalic acid testing2015-June-23
Lab book june 23
Names: Kieran
13 hours left in shaker
Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD600 0.0 1.945 0.01 1.875 0.05 1.763 0.1 0.710 0.15 0.114 0.2 0.146 0.3 0.183 0.4 0.170 0.5 0.092 2.0 0.015 2015-June-25
Lab book june 25
Names: Chris and Ross
Objective:Determine if the concentration of oxalic acid that kills bacteria will kill bees.
Procedure:Bees were obtained from the “Mighty Hive” near the penitentiary at 4:00 and placed into 5ml centrifuge tubes. The bees were transported to the University of Lethbridge and stored at room temperature until 8:00. Prior to experimentation, the tubes were supplemented with a sugar water solution to ensure that the bees would not starve. Following feeding, 2ml of each treatment were added to the 5ml tubes containing the bees and set horizontally along the bench. The abdomen of each bee was immersed in the treatment no matter what orientation the bee took. The bees were observed for 1 hour and subsequently euthanized in 70% EtOH.Treatment Before After none Somewhat lethargic. Drank when prompted. Appeared tired but otherwise unaffected. 0.00% Most lethargic, did not eat when offered. Wet, and slow moving. 0.05% Very vigorous; ran around inside the tube. Fed. Very energetic. Unaffected by treatment. 0.20% Very vigorous; ran around inside the tube. Fed. Slightly less energetic than the 0.05% bee. Table 1. Observations of the bees following 60 minutes of exposure.
Discussion:The bees showed that they could survive well in concentrations of oxalic acid that were above the point where E.coli would die. Further tests must be done to determine the exact contact toxicity. Additionally, the contact toxicity to mites will need to be addressed.
Conclusion:The bees will be able to survive all of the oxalic acid that the E.coli can produce.
2015-June-29
Oxalic Acid Gradient and Continued Growth of Biofilms
Names: Sydnee, Dinula,Tiffany D, and Kieran
Bee: A More Specific Oxalic Acid Gradient
Objective: Determine a more specific concentration of oxalic acid that will prevent cell growth. Already we know that oxalic acid prevents cell growth between 0.05% and 0.2%. Now we want to determine a more specific concentration of oxalic acid that will prevent cell growth.
Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD600 0.05 0.07 0.1 0.125 0.13 0.17 0.185 0.2 Cells were left in the shaker for 23 hours accidently. ODs were not taken because they had been left in the shaker too long.
Biofilms: Continued Growth of Biofilms.
Objective: Continue to determine what cleaners will destroy/degrade biofilms. Instead of using crystal violet dye, we are using E.coli DH5α cells with RFP (PSB4K5). 2 μL of KAN was added to 2 mL centrifuge tubes along with 1980 μL LB and 20 μL of culture.
300 μL of mix was pipetted into wells of 96 well plate. Biofilms left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
Results: The biofilms did not grow on any of the plates as there was no red ring. Using fresh RFP cultures might fix this issue because the cultures we had used were prepared earlier in the month.
2015-June-30
Lab book june 30
Names: Kieran, Sydnee, Dinula, Tiffany D, and Marissa
Objective: Due to the oxalic acid gradient from yesterday being left in the shaker too long, the gradient was repeated again.
Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD600 0.05 1.810 0.07 1.850 0.1 1.816 0.125 0.130 0.13 0.075 0.15 0.271 0.17 0.231 0.185 0.067 0.2 0.180 Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) pH 0.05 7.90 0.07 7.46 0.1 7.32 0.125 4.56 0.13 3.87 0.15 4.11 0.17 4.01 0.185 3.85 0.2 3.79 Cells were left in the shaker for 15 hours and OD’ed the next morning.
Biofilms: Continued Growth of Biofilms
Objective: The biofilms made yesterday did not work, so fresh RFP cultures were prepared tonight for future biofilm testing. Colonies were picked from a streaked plate of RFP and placed in 5 mL of LB. 5 μL of KAN was added to each tube. Two picked colonies were prepared and left overnight in the 37˚C shaker.
July
2015-July-2
Lab book july 2
Names: Kieran, Sydnee, and Ronja
Prepped bee pouches for in vitro mite/bee feeding.
Performed Bleach and Fantastic testing on RFP biofilms and did one with crystal violet to check for biofilm formation.
Made biofilms for July 3.
2015-July-3
Can Bees Ingest Culture?
Names: Dinula and Chris
Objective: Determine if bees can ingest E.coli in liquid culture form with supplementation of sugar. Also, can mites survive on papers that have water and RFP liquid culture?
Procedure: Bees were obtained from the “Mighty Hive” near the penitentiary at 6:50 after a heinous struggle and lack of proper equipment. They were then fed RFP producing E.coli that had been supplemented with both glucose and sucrose sugars. The bees were then observed to determine if they were drinking the solution.
Mites were added to petri dishes following a sugar shake. The dishes had different paper derivatives soaked in treatment; H2O and RFP E. coli. They were then placed in the 27C iGEM incubator. They will be observed in the morning.
The bees were euthanized on EtOH, then surface sterilized in bleach, opened using a razor to expose the gut, and placed in LB to shake at 37C overnight. Problem: 50ul of kanamycin was added instead of 5ul. I suppose that’s what happens when you work a 13 hour day in the sun.
Results:
Treatment Before After none Somewhat lethargic. Drank when prompted. Appeared tired but otherwise unaffected. 0.01% Most lethargic, did not eat when offered. Wet, and slow moving. 0.05% Very vigorous; ran around inside the tube. Fed. Very energetic. Unaffected by treatment. 0.20% Very vigorous; ran around inside the tube. Fed. Slightly less energetic than the 0.05% bee. Table 1. Observations of the bees following 60 minutes of exposure.
Discussion: UPDATE TOMORROW
Conclusion: UPDATE TOMORROW
2015-July-6
Lab book july 6
Names: Sydnee, Andy, Dinula, Ronja, Tiffany D, and Kieran
Objective: To continue growing biofilms and determine if certain cleaners will prevent further growth of the biofilms
Procedure: Same protocol used as June 30. Instead of using crystal violet dye, we are using E.coli DH5α cells with RFP (PSB4K5). 2 μL of KAN was added to 2 mL centrifuge tubes along with 1980 μL LB and 20 μL of culture.
300 μL of mix was pipetted into wells of 96 well plate. Biofilms left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
Bees: Preparing Solutions for Oxalic Acid Gradient using Potassium Permanganate.
Objective: Solutions were prepared to be used for the oxalic acid assay that will see KMnO4 being oxidized by oxalic acid and therefore detect the presence of oxalic acid.
Procedure: To prepare the 1% and 20% Oxalic Acid concentrations, solid oxalic acid was weighed for a solution of 50 mL. 0.5 g of oxalic acid was weighed out and placed in a 50 mL falcon tube. 50 mL of d2H¬2O was added to the falcon tube to dissolve the oxalic acid and create the 1% Oxalic Acid concentration. Two falcon tubes of 1% Oxalic Acid was prepared.
10 g of oxalic acid was then weighed and dissolved in 50 mL of d2H¬2O in a 50 mL falcon tube for the 20% oxalic acid concentration. The 50 mL of 20% oxalic acid was then placed in the 60˚C oven to help dissolve the oxalic acid.
In addition 1 M H2SO4 was created using stock 5 M for the Wieden Lab. Both the 1 M H2SO4 and 1% oxalic acid were stored in the 4˚C fridge in E770.
2015-July-7
Biofilms: Preparing More Biofilms and Reculturing the July 6 Biofilms
Names: Sydnee, Tiffany D, and Kieran
Objective: To continue growing biofilms for future testing and to determine if biofilms can be recultured from previous ones that had been degraded based on the July 6 biofilms.
Procedure: New Biofilms
New biofilms were created for July 7 testing. Same protocol used as June 30. Instead of using crystal violet dye, we are using E.coli DH5α cells with RFP (PSB4K5). 2 μL of KAN was added to 2 mL centrifuge tubes along with 1980 μL LB and 20 μL of culture.
300 μL of mix was pipetted into wells of 96 well plate. Biofilms left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
Procedure: Degrading the July 6 Biofilms
The biofilms created yesterday successfully grew. To degrade the biofilms, bleach, Tilex and Truly cleaner solutions were used that had previously been created. The solutions of biofilms were disposed of in the biohazard waste and the microtiter plates placed in water. They were vigoursly shaken to dry and 300 μL of respective cleaning solution added to each well. Since three plates of biofilms were created, each cleaning solution received its on plate. 15 mins after the solutions was added, they were disposed of in the biohazard waste.
Procedure: Reculturing the July 6 Biofilms
To culture the biofilms from yesterday, 300 μL of LB media was added to one well of a microtiter plate. The media was then pipette up and down to mix with any remnants of the biofilms. The media was then pipetted back into the 5 mL tube of LB media. 5 μL of KAN was added to the 5 mL tube of LB media.
Process was repeated for the remaining two plates that used different cleaners.
Note: Before cultures were degraded using the different cleaners, Kieran had taken a sample of the biofilms and prepared a 5 mL tube of LB to culture the biofilm that would be ensured to grow.
Cultures were left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
2015-July-8
Biofilms: Results of July 6 Recultured Biofilms, Degradation of July 7 Biofilms and Preparation of New Biofilms for Further Testing
Names: Sydnee, Tiffany D, Dinula, Ronja, Kaatje, and Kieran
Biofilms: Results of July 6 Recultured Biofilms, Degradation of July 7 Biofilms and Preparation of New Biofilms for Further TestingObjective: Determine if yesterday’s recultured biofilms were successful. In addition continue to degrade biofilms using the household cleaners brought into lab for testing and see if we can successfully reculture the biofilms created yesterday.
Results: Reculturing of the July 6 Biofilms
We were successful in reculturing the biofilms to varying extents based on the overnight cultures of the degraded RFP biofilms. Based on reference of the biofilm that had been cultured before the cleaners were added, the Truly is the most red in colour. Both bleach and Tilex had a more clear appearncec similar to LB.
PHOTO
Procedure: Degrading the July 7 Biofilms
The biofilms created yesterday successfully grew. To degrade the biofilms, Tilex, Truly and Fantastic cleaner solutions were used that had previously been created. The solutions of biofilms were disposed of in the biohazard waste and the microtiter plates placed in water. They were vigoursly shaken to dry and 300 μL of respective cleaning solution added to each well. Since three plates of biofilms were created, each cleaning solution received its on plate. 15 mins after the solutions was added, they were disposed of in the biohazard waste.
Procedure: Reculturing the July 7 Biofilms
To culture the biofilms from yesterday, 300 μL of LB media was added to one well for one of microtiter plate that had been degraded with cleaner. The media was then pipette up and down to mix with any remnants of the biofilms. The media was then pipetted back into the 5 mL tube of LB media. 5 μL of KAN was added to the 5 mL tube of LB media.
Process was repeated for the remaining two plates that used different cleaners.
Note: Before cultures were degraded using the different cleaners, Kieran had taken a sample of the biofilms and prepared a 5 mL tube of LB to culture the biofilm that would be ensured to grow.
Cultures were left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
Procedure: New Biofilms
New biofilms were created for July 9 testing. Same protocol used as June 30. Instead of using crystal violet dye, we are using E.coli DH5α cells with RFP (PSB4K5). 2 μL of KAN was added to 2 mL centrifuge tubes along with 1980 μL LB and 20 μL of culture.
300 μL of mix was pipetted into wells of 96 well plate. Biofilms left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
Bees: Continued Preparation of Solutions for the Oxalic Acid Gradient Using KMnO4
Objective: Continue preparation of solutions being used for the oxalic acid gradients with KMnO4
Procedure
Solutions of 0.01 M of KMnO4 were prepared from stock. 0.158 g of KMnO4 was dissolved in 100 mL of d2H2O. 0.003 M of KMnO4 was then prepared using the 0.01 M solution.
The oxalic acid gradient was also set up with 10 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes with the following oxalic acid concentrations:0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1.0%.
A 1 mL volume was created for each concentration using 1% oxalic acid and d2H2O
All solutions and the oxalic acid gradient were set aside for tomorrow on the bench.
2015-July-9
Biofilms: Results of July 7 Recultured Biofilms, Degradation of July 8 Biofilms and Preparation of New Biofilms for Further Testing
Names: Sydnee, Tiffany D, Dinula, Ronja, Jonathan, Aum, and Kieran
Objective: Determine if yesterday’s recultured biofilms were successful. In addition continue to degrade biofilms using the household cleaners brought into lab for testing and see if we can successfully reculture the biofilms created yesterday.
Results: Reculturing of the July 7 Biofilms
We were successful in reculturing the biofilms to varying extents based on the overnight cultures of the degraded RFP biofilms. Based on reference of the biofilm that had been cultured before the cleaners were added, the Truly is still the most red in colour. Both Fantastic and Tilex was cloudy with culture but not with the RFP used to originally culture the biofilms.
PHOTO
Procedure: Degrading the July 8 Biofilms
The biofilms created yesterday successfully grew. To degrade the biofilms, Fantastic and bleach cleaner solutions were used that had previously been created. Water was used as a control. 300 μL of respective cleaning solution added to each well. 15 mins after the solutions was added, they were disposed of in the biohazard waste.
Procedure: Reculturing the July 8 Biofilms
To culture the biofilms from yesterday, 300 μL of LB media was added to one well for one of microtiter plate that had been degraded with cleaner. The media was then pipette up and down to mix with any remnants of the biofilms. The media was then pipetted back into the 5 mL tube of LB media. 5 μL of KAN was added to the 5 mL tube of LB media.
Process was repeated for the remaining two plates that used different cleaners.
Cultures were left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
Procedure: New Biofilms
New biofilms were created for July 10 testing. 2 μL of KAN was added to 2 mL centrifuge tubes along with 1980 μL LB and 20 μL of culture (E.coli DH5α cells with RFP (PSB4K5)).
300 μL of mix was pipetted into wells of 96 well plate. Biofilms left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
Bees: Oxalic Acid Gradient Using KMnO4 –July 9
Object: To determine for the presence and concentration of oxalic acid present in solution using the oxidation of KMnO4
Procedure
1.Standard oxalic acid solution (1 mg/mL) was prepared with distilled water
2.100 mL of 0.003 M KMnO4 was prepared from appropriate dilution of 0.01 M KMnO4 in distilled water
3.500 mL of 2 N H2SO4 was prepared in distilled water
4.Assay mixtures contained different concentrations of oxalic acid ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 mg of oxalic acid (we had 1 mL samples of different percentage concentrations of oxalic acid), 5 mL 2 N H2SO4, and 2 mL of 0.003 M KMnO4
5.This mixture was incubated for 10 mins at room temperature (27˚C)
6.After 10 mins absorbance was recorded at 528 nm on the spec in E720
7.Reagent blank was prepared with distilled water
8.The calibration curve obtained is linear in concentration range of 0.1 mg to 1 mg/mL of oxalic acid
9.The regression equation is ∆A = 0.966C -0.027 with correlation coefficient 0.983 where C is the concentration of oxalic acid in mg/mL and ∆A is Ab-As
Data
Title for table Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD528 0.1% 1.487 0.2 -0.005 0.3 -0.005 0.4 -0.003 0.5 0.6 -0.006 0.7 -0.007 0.8 -0.004 0.9 -0.005 1.0 -0.008 2015-July-10
Biofilms: Degradation of July 9 Biofilms and Reculturing of July 9 Biofilms
Names: Sydnee, Tiffany D, Dinula, Ronja, and Kieran
Objective: Continue to degrade biofilms using the household cleaners brought into lab for testing and to see if we can successfully reculture the biofilms.
Procedure: Degrading the July 8 Biofilms
The biofilms created yesterday successfully grew. To degrade the biofilms, Fantastic and Lysol solutions were used that had previously been created. Water was used as a control. 300 μL of respective cleaning solution added to each well. 30 mins after the solutions was added, they were disposed of in the biohazard waste.
Procedure: Reculturing the July 9 Biofilms
To culture the biofilms from yesterday, 300 μL of LB media was added to one well for one of microtiter plate that had been degraded with cleaner. The media was then pipette up and down to mix with any remnants of the biofilms. The media was then pipetted back into the 5 mL tube of LB media. 5 μL of KAN was added to the 5 mL tube of LB media.
Process was repeated for the remaining two plates that used different cleaners.
Cultures were left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
2015-July-11
Biofilms: Results of July 10 Recultured Biofilms
Names: Tiffany D
Objective: Determine if yesterday’s recultured biofilms were successful in being cultured again.
Results: Reculturing of the July 10 Biofilms
We were not successful in reculturing the based on the overnight cultures of the degraded RFP biofilms. All overnight cultures remained clear as the control with water using the Lysol and Fantastic cleaning solutions.
PHOTO
2015-July-13
Bees: Oxalic Acid Gradient using KMnO4. Bioflims: Creation of Biofilms
Names: Tiffany D, Sydnee, David, Marissa, Dinula, Sunny, and Kieran
Objective: To determine the concentration of oxalic acid present in solution using the oxidation of oxidation of KMnO4
Procedure: same procedure as on July 9
Data:
Title for table Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD528 0.1% 1.643 0.2 0.268 0.3 -0.001 0.4 -0.002 0.5 -0.003 0.6 -0.002 0.7 -0.002 0.8 -0.002 0.9 -0.003 1.0 -0.003 Biofilms: Creating Biofilms
Objective: to create biofilms to continue testing on them with household cleaners brought into the lab.
Procedure: Creating Biofilms
Biofilms were created in 5 35x10 mm Petri dishes and in 4 wells of a 28-well plate by putting 3000 µL of LB media, 3 µL of KAN, and 20 µL of RFP into each dish and well.
These were left in the 37 ˚C incubator for 24 hours in order for the biofilms to grow.
2015-July-14
Biofilms: Degradation of July 13 Biofilms and Reculturing of July 13 Biofilms
Names: Tiffany D, Sydnee, Ronja, Dinula, and Kieran
Objective: Continue to degrade biofilms using household cleaners brought into to the lab to see if we can successfully reculture the biofilms.
Procedure: Degrading the July 13 Biofilms
The biofilms created on July 13 grew successfully. The solutions used to degrade the biofilms were Mr. Clean, Lysol, Tilex, and Fantistik. Water was used as a control. 3200 μL of solution was added to each well and Petri dish. 30 mins after the solutions were added, they were disposed of in the biohazard waste.
Procedure: Reculturing July 13 Biofilms
To reculture the biofilms from yesterday, 200 μL of LB media was added to two of the wells in the 28-well plate and to the Petri dishes that had been degraded with cleaner. The media was moved around the rim to where the biofilm had formed. Then the media was pipette back into the 5 mL tube of LB media. 5 μL of KAN was added to the 5 mL tube of LB media.
This process was repeated for each of the cleaners and the control listed above in the procedure for degradation of the biofilms.
The Petri dishes and the 28-well plate were left to air out on a sheet of paper towel.
Procedure: Creating Biofilms
Biofilms were made in 5 35x10 mm Petri dishes and 4 wells in a 28-well plate by putting 3000 μL of LB media, 3 μL of KAN, and 20 μL of RFP in to each Petri dish and well.
These were left in the 37 ˚C incubator for 24 hours so that they could grow.
2015-July-15
Biofilms: Degradation of July 14 Biofilms and Reculturing of July 14 Biofilms
Names: Tiffany D, Sydnee, Ronja, Eryam, Anileen and Kieran
Objective: Continue to degrade biofilms using the household cleaners brought into the lab for testing and to see if they can be successfully recultured.
Results: Reculturing the July 13 Biofilms
The recultured biofilms did not produce any RFP cultures as the cultures were more yellow than red. Water and Lysol were both cloudy but could have been contamination. The remaining cleaning soltuons of Mr. Clean, Tiklex and Fantastik were clear.
PHOTO
Procedure: Degrading the July 14 Biofilms
The biofilms created on July 14 grew successfully. The solutions used to degrade the biofilms were Mr. Clean, Lysol, Fantistik, Tilex, and GreenWorks cleaner. Water was used as a control. 3200 μL of solution was added to each well and Petri dish. 30 mins after the solutions were added, they were disposed of in the biohazard waste.
Procedure: Reculturing July 14 Biofilms
To reculture the biofilms from yesterday, 200 μL of LB media was added to one well for each Petri dish that had been degraded with cleaner. The media was moved around the rim to where the biofilm had formed. Then the media was pipette back into the 5 mL tube of LB media. 5 μL of KAN was added to the 5 mL tube of LB media.
This process was repeated for each of the cleaners and the control listed above in the procedure for degradation of the biofilms.
The Petri dishes were left to air out on a sheet of paper towel.
Procedure: Creating Biofilms.
Biofilms were made in 5 35x10 mm Petri dishes by putting 14.85 mL of LB media, 15 μL of KAN, and 150 μL of RFP into a 15 mL falcon tube. 3 mL of this solution was then pipetted into each Petri dish.
These were left in the 37 ˚C incubator for 24 hours so that they could grow.
2015-July-16
Results of the Reculturing of July 14 Biofilms
Names: Sydnee, Anileen and Kieran
From the overnight cultures of the July 14 biofilms, the ones recultured after the use of water and Tilex were red confirming we had recultured the two cultures. The one recultured from GreenWorks was also successful. Although not very red, it had an orange tinge indicating the presence of RFP. The Lysol reculture was more yellow in culture colour but might have been successful. The same results as previous for Fantastik showed no culture growth.
PHOTO
2015-July-17
Making More Biofilms and Running Another Oxalic Acid Gradient
Names: Sydnee, Ronja, Sunny, and Kieran
Biofilms
In one 15 mL falcon tube, 15 mL of LB media, 150 µL of RFP, and 15 µL of KAN were added. Then 3 mL of the solution was pipetted into 5 separate 35x10 mm Petri dishes.
The Petri dishes were then incubated in the 37 ˚C incubator.
Bee: Oxalic Acid Gradient Oxalic Acid Concentration (mg/mL) OD528 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.169 0.2 -0.013 0.3 -0.063 0.4 0.113 0.5 0.191 0.6 0.055 0.7 -0.035 0.8 0.052 0.9 -0.114 1.0 -0.209 2015-July-20
Degrading and Reculturing the July 17 Biofilms and a Oxalic Acid Gradient
Names: Anileen Pageni, Sydnee Calhoun, Dinula De Silva, Tiffany Dang and Kieran McCormack
Biofilms
Procedure: Degrading the July 17 Biofilms
The biofilms created on July 17 grew successfully. The solutions used to degrade the biofilms were Mr. Clean and Lysol. 3200 μL of solution was added to each Petri dish. 30 mins after the solutions were added, they were disposed of in the biohazard waste.
Two of the Petri dishes had been degraded. The other three from July 17 were washed with water once before being placed back in the 37 ˚C incubator. The goal of these three biofilms is to see if they can still grow and maintain the RFP biofilms.
Procedure: Reculturing July 17 Biofilms
To reculture the biofilms, 200 μL of LB media was added to one well for each Petri dish that had been degraded with cleaner.
The media was moved around the rim to where the biofilm had formed. Then the media was pipette back into the 5 mL tube of LB media. 5 μL of KAN was added to the 5 mL tube of LB media.
This process was repeated for each of the cleaners listed above in the procedure for degradation of the biofilms. Cultures left in the 37 ˚C shaking incubator
Bee: Oxalic Acid Gradient
Procedure: The procedure for the gradient remains the same as July 9. The concentrations of oxalic acid were quickly added to their respective tubes to minimize differences in time of oxidation.
Bee: Oxalic Acid Gradient Oxalic Acid Concentration (mg/mL) OD528 0.0 1.892 0.01 1.817 0.1 1.731 0.5 1.647 1.0 1.516 1.5 0.983 2.0 0.000 2.5 -0.010 3.0 -- 3.5 -- 4.0 -- 4.5 -- 5.0 -- 2015-July-21
Making New Biofilms
Names: Sydnee Calhoun, Tiffany Dang, Dinula De Silva, Ronja Kothe, and Kieran McCormack
Objective: Make new biofilms
Biofilms: In a 50 mL falcon tube, 21 mL of LB media, 210 µl of RFP, and 21 µL KAN were pipetted into it and the solution was mixed. 3 mL of the solution was then pipetted into 7 35x10 mm Petri dishes.
These were then put into the incubator for 24 hours at 37˚C.
2015-July-22
Lab book July 22
Names: Eyram Asem, Sydnee Calhoun, Tiffany Dang, Dinula De Silva, Ronja Kothe, and Kieran McCormack
Results: Reculture of one of the July 17, 2015 biofilms –Day 4
The 5 mL tube of LB media labeled “before” when bleach was not added had RFP cultures growing at the bottom of the tube. This showed that we were able to reculture the biofilm. The 5 mL LB media tube labeled “After” which had been washed with bleach contained no biofilm growth indicating that the bleach had degraded the 4 day old biofilms.
PHOTO
Biofilms: Growing new biofilms
Objective: To growth new biofilms for future testing with various means
Procedure: In a 50 mL falcon tube, 21 mL of LB media, 210 µl of RFP, and 21 µL KAN were pipetted into it and the solution was mixed. 3 mL of the solution was then pipetted into 7 35x10 mm Petri dishes.
These were then put into the incubator for 24 hours at 37˚C.
Biofilms: Bleach Concentration Gradient
Objective: From our work we are able to determine how effective different cleaners are in degrading biofilms. To test the resilience of the biofilms in another mean, we will test how well the biofilms are degraded at different concentrations of bleach
Procedure:
1.Standard solution of 0.252% bleach was made from the stock bottle for a 50 mL volume
2.The following concentrations had been made from the standard solution of bleach and water. Each concentration was diluted by two folds of the previous solution.
• 0.252% • 0.126% • 0.063% • 0.0315% • 0.01575% • 0.007875% • 0.0039375%3.The dilutions were made for a 15 mL falcon tube using water and standard bleach solution
4.3.2 mL of one of the bleach dilutions were placed in one the Petri dishes containing biofilms from the previous day. This process was repeated for the other six dilutions.
5.The biofilms were then allowed to degrade for 15 mins.
6.The bleach solutions in each of the Petri dishes was emptied and rinsed once with Milli-Q water.
7.LB media tubes were labeled with one of the bleach solutions. 5 µL of KAN was added to each labeled tube.
8.20 µL of LB from one tube was taken out and placed on the edge of one of the Petri dishes.
9.The media was then placed back into the tube it was taken out of.
10.This process (Steps 8-9) was repeated for the remaining six tubes
11.LB media tubes were placed in the 37˚C incubator for 24 hours.
Bee: Oxalic Acid Gradient
Objective: Continue to test the specificity of the oxalic acid gradient using KMnO4
Procedure: The procedure for the gradient remains the same as July 9. The concentrations of oxalic acid were quickly added to their respective tubes to minimize differences in time of oxidation.
Oxalic Acid Concentration (mg/mL) OD528 0.0 1.832 0.15 1.599, 1.652 0.25 1.473, 1.566 0.35 1.696 0.45 1.737 0.55 1.666 0.65 1.674 0.75 1.597 0.85 1.533 1.0 1.388 2015-July-23
Lab book July 23
Names: Kieran McCormack
Biofilms: Results
The biofilm gradient using different concentrations of bleach was taken out at 8:13 and observed for visible signs of RFP growth. All seven LB media tubes seem to have visible signs of RFP growth. The 1/16 bleach dilution however does not seem to have any RFP growth. Cultures will be left in the 4˚C fridge overnight to allow the cells to precipitate at the bottom.
2015-July-24
Lab book July 24
Names: Sydnee Calhoun, Tiffany Dang, Dinula De Silva, Ronja Kothe and Kieran McCormack
Biofilms: Bleach Concentration Gradient
Objective: The previous biofilm gradient using the different concentrations of oxalic acid may not have been successful. A repeat of the gradient is needed to verify results of the previous trials.
Procedure: Protocol the same as on July 22, 2015 with the previous concentrations of bleach used.
1.The dilutions were made for a 15 mL falcon tube using water and standard bleach solution
2.3.2 mL of one of the bleach dilutions were placed in one the Petri dishes containing biofilms from the previous day. This process was repeated for the other six dilutions.
3.The biofilms were then allowed to degrade for 15 mins.
4.The bleach solutions in each of the Petri dishes was emptied and rinsed once with Milli-Q water.
5.LB media tubes were labeled with one of the bleach solutions. 5 µL of KAN was added to each labeled tube.
6.20 µL of LB from one tube was taken out and placed on the edge of one of the Petri dishes.
7.The media was then placed back into the tube it was taken out of.
8.This process (Steps 8-9) was repeated for the remaining six tubes
9.LB media tubes were placed in the 37˚C incubator for 24 hours.
Biofilms: Making New Biofilms
Objective: to make new biofilms to continue testing.
Procedure: In a 50 mL falcon tube, 21 mL of LB media, 210 µL of RFP culture, and 21 µL of KAN were pipetted into it. 3 mL of the solution was then pipetted into 7 35x10 mm Petri dishes.
The Petri dishes were then put into the incubator at 37˚C for 24 hours.
Biofilms: Reculturing 6 Day sample
Objective: testing to see if there are any bacteria left
Procedure: A before and an after tube were made with the 6 day sample. In the before tube, a sample was taken and put into an LB media tube to test if there are any bacteria alive on it. In the after tube, a standard solution of bleach was put on the Petri dish for 15 minutes.
The tubes were then put into the incubator at 37 ˚C for 24 hours.
2015-July-27
Lab book July 27
Names: Sydnee Calhoun, Ronja Kothe, Jonathan Kwan, Anileen Pageni, Aum Patel, and Kieran McCormack
Biofilms:
Objective: To make new biofilms to be able to continue lab work, reculture old biofilms to continue to see if we can successfully reculture and degrade them, and try a new method of testing using different antibiotics.
Procedure: New Biofilms
In a 50 mL falcon tube, 21 mL of LB media, 210 µL of RFP, and 21 µL of KAN was pipetted into it. 3 mL of the solution was then pipetted into 7 35x10 mm Petri dishes.
The Petri dishes were then put in the incubator for 24 hours at 37 ˚C.
Procedure: Reculturing Biofilms
The Day 9 biofilm was recultured by pipetting a proper amount of LB media onto the side of the Petri dish. This was then pipetted back into the 5 mL LB media tube along with 5 µL of KAN.
This was then incubated in the shaker for 24 hours at 37 ˚C.
The biofilms that were washed with the cleaners Tilex, Mr. Clean, Fantastik, and water was used as a control were recultured 24 hours after the cleaner had been removed. They were recultured in the same manner as mentioned above.
These were then also incubated in the shaker for 24 hours at 37˚C.
Bees:
Objective: Continue trials of the oxalic acid gradient.
Procedure:
The same procedure was implemented that had been used in previous trials.
Results:
Oxalic Acid Concentration % OD528 0.0 1.977 0.1 1.808 0.2 1.713 0.3 1.562 0.4 1.636 0.5 1.787 0.6 1.851 0.7 1.804 0.8 1.736 0.9 1.493 1.0 1.634 2015-July-10
Ligation
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin sed commodo dui, id ultricies massa. Aliquam erat volutpat. Proin maximus, nibh eu luctus tincidunt, libero dui euismod ex, a pellentesque sem nulla ac lorem. Pellentesque sagittis leo eget ornare efficitur. Nullam vulputate rutrum eros, quis mollis ipsum tempus eu. Integer porttitor quam vitae finibus blandit. Nulla vulputate dolor dui, et cursus dolor ullamcorper nec. Nunc dictum scelerisque purus, ut pulvinar sapien tristique eget. Donec feugiat risus vel nibh pellentesque auctor id id neque. Aenean facilisis dui vitae massa finibus, et condimentum dui consectetur. Pellentesque tempus imperdiet posuere. Sed ornare urna in dictum dictum. Vestibulum suscipit, tortor sit amet finibus bibendum, dui nunc semper enim, eget pulvinar sem justo nec risus. Integer justo ex, aliquet sit amet massa at, aliquam vestibulum dolor. Sed dictum nunc eu sem finibus eleifend.
2015-July-10
Ligation
We did this stuff...
2015-July-10
Ligation
We did this stuff...
2015-July-10
Ligation
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Etiam maximus erat vitae orci rutrum finibus. Nullam quis nunc tincidunt, sodales risus id, dignissim neque. Pellentesque efficitur, sem non lobortis euismod, justo mi laoreet turpis, sed fringilla enim diam non massa. Suspendisse imperdiet vel enim a elementum. Nam pretium diam vel metus rhoncus ullamcorper. Suspendisse in consectetur tortor. Nulla diam justo, lobortis suscipit erat quis, rhoncus accumsan tellus. Cras rutrum, lorem ac sodales accumsan, ante diam ornare tellus, in tincidunt metus magna quis lacus. Ut auctor metus sed lectus auctor volutpat. Aliquam ac nulla maximus, congue sem a, feugiat mauris.
2015-July-10
Ligation
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Etiam maximus erat vitae orci rutrum finibus. Nullam quis nunc tincidunt, sodales risus id, dignissim neque. Pellentesque efficitur, sem non lobortis euismod, justo mi laoreet turpis, sed fringilla enim diam non massa. Suspendisse imperdiet vel enim a elementum. Nam pretium diam vel metus rhoncus ullamcorper. Suspendisse in consectetur tortor. Nulla diam justo, lobortis suscipit erat quis, rhoncus accumsan tellus. Cras rutrum, lorem ac sodales accumsan, ante diam ornare tellus, in tincidunt metus magna quis lacus. Ut auctor metus sed lectus auctor volutpat. Aliquam ac nulla maximus, congue sem a, feugiat mauris.