Difference between revisions of "Team:Stanford-Brown/Collaboration"
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
<div class="jumbotron oridomiLeft"> | <div class="jumbotron oridomiLeft"> | ||
<div class="container"> | <div class="container"> | ||
| − | <h1> | + | <h1>Collaboration<small> Working across the Atlantic<small></h1> |
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
</div><!--end container--> | </div><!--end container--> | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
<div class="row featurette"> | <div class="row featurette"> | ||
| − | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Stanford-Brown/Vision"> | + | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Stanford-Brown/Vision"></a> |
<div class="col-md-7 well" id="be1"> | <div class="col-md-7 well" id="be1"> | ||
| − | <h2 class="featurette-heading"> | + | <h2 class="featurette-heading">Collaboration<span class="small"> with the University of Edinburgh</span></h2> |
| − | <p class="lead"> | + | <p class="lead">The <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh">University of Edinburgh iGEM 2015</a> team is creating a paper-based biosensor to detect purity of and contaminants in illicit drugs. In an effort to increase the applications of the proof-of-concept biosensor, the team wanted to incorporate microbial cellulose as an alternative to filter paper. This could decrease the cost of the biosensor as well as making the disposal easier. By using microbial cellulose that our team provided, the University of Edinburgh team was able to check the binding affinities of a cellulose binding domain (CBD) to the cellulose to see whether microbial cellulose-based biosensors are feasible. Our bioHYDRA project involved testing processed and unprocessed cellulose, and we sent the Edinburgh team a sample of each. This allowed the Edinburgh team to see if there is an advantage to the processing for their applications, and, since our future work includes expressing CBDs on spore coats, the processed sheets will be better for our applications as well. The data (see figure) shows that less protein dissociation occurred from the processed sheets. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
<div class="col-md-5"> | <div class="col-md-5"> | ||
| − | <img class="featurette-image img-responsive center-block img-rounded" src=" | + | <img class="featurette-image img-responsive center-block img-rounded" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/2d/SB2015_Collaboration_graph_3.jpg" alt="Generic placeholder image"> |
| − | + | For the collaboration, the Edinburg IGEM 2015 used the BBa_K321357, which is an sfGFP fused to the cellulose binding domain CBDcex transcriptionally activated by Lacl. Since the CBDcex is attached to a fluorescence, sfGFP, the strength of the binding affinity is correlated with the absorbance level. The y-axis measures the absorbance in relative fluorescent unit while the x-axis is the time incubation. Although there is large error bar, there is a distinguishable difference between the binding affinity of the CBD onto the cellulose unprocessed and processed sheet. The high absorbance for the processed sheet indicates that the CBD binds more effectively than the unprocessed sheet. This experiment will be repeated in the near future. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</div><!-- /.container --> | </div><!-- /.container --> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:13, 18 September 2015
Collaboration Working across the Atlantic
Collaboration with the University of Edinburgh
The University of Edinburgh iGEM 2015 team is creating a paper-based biosensor to detect purity of and contaminants in illicit drugs. In an effort to increase the applications of the proof-of-concept biosensor, the team wanted to incorporate microbial cellulose as an alternative to filter paper. This could decrease the cost of the biosensor as well as making the disposal easier. By using microbial cellulose that our team provided, the University of Edinburgh team was able to check the binding affinities of a cellulose binding domain (CBD) to the cellulose to see whether microbial cellulose-based biosensors are feasible. Our bioHYDRA project involved testing processed and unprocessed cellulose, and we sent the Edinburgh team a sample of each. This allowed the Edinburgh team to see if there is an advantage to the processing for their applications, and, since our future work includes expressing CBDs on spore coats, the processed sheets will be better for our applications as well. The data (see figure) shows that less protein dissociation occurred from the processed sheets.
For the collaboration, the Edinburg IGEM 2015 used the BBa_K321357, which is an sfGFP fused to the cellulose binding domain CBDcex transcriptionally activated by Lacl. Since the CBDcex is attached to a fluorescence, sfGFP, the strength of the binding affinity is correlated with the absorbance level. The y-axis measures the absorbance in relative fluorescent unit while the x-axis is the time incubation. Although there is large error bar, there is a distinguishable difference between the binding affinity of the CBD onto the cellulose unprocessed and processed sheet. The high absorbance for the processed sheet indicates that the CBD binds more effectively than the unprocessed sheet. This experiment will be repeated in the near future.