Difference between revisions of "Team:HKUST-Rice/Nitrate Sensor PdcuS"
Margaret.lie (Talk | contribs) |
Stephanieyiu (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (40 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<head> | <head> | ||
| − | <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2015.igem.org/Template:HKUST-Rice/ | + | <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2015.igem.org/Template:HKUST-Rice/CSS?action=raw&ctype=text/css" type="text/css" /> |
<style type= "text/css"> | <style type= "text/css"> | ||
| + | img#HKUSTlogo{ | ||
| + | opacity: 0.3; | ||
| − | + | } | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 17: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<div class= "project_superrow"> | <div class= "project_superrow"> | ||
| − | <div id= "page_title"><h1>Nitrate Sensor - <i> | + | <div id= "page_title"><h1>Nitrate Sensor - <i>P<sub>dcuS</sub></i></h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="MYicon1"> | <div id="MYicon1"> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 25: | ||
<div id="MYicon2"> | <div id="MYicon2"> | ||
<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Rice/Nitrate_Sensor_PyeaR"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/7a/HKUST-Rice15_rightarrow.png"> | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Rice/Nitrate_Sensor_PyeaR"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/7a/HKUST-Rice15_rightarrow.png"> | ||
| − | <p style="color:#5570b0; font-size: 130%"> Nitrate sensor (<i> | + | <p style="color:#5570b0; font-size: 130%"> Nitrate sensor (<i>P<sub>yeaR</sub></i>) </p></a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="project_content"> | <div class="project_content"> | ||
<div class="project_row"> | <div class="project_row"> | ||
<h1>Nitrate as a Macro-nutrient</h1> | <h1>Nitrate as a Macro-nutrient</h1> | ||
| − | + | <p>Nitrate is an important nutrient for plant growth, as it allows them to make amino acids and in turn, proteins. To ensure good crop yield, farmers must ensure that their soil has sufficient nitrates. They often do this by adding (often too much) fertilizer to their soils. | |
| − | + | <br><br>Here we characterize a native <i>E. coli</i> nitrate sensor that can be used as a biological sensor on the field to detect soil nitrate levels, and thus prevent the overfertilization of fields and the negative environmental effects associated with that practice. <br></p> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="project_row"> | <div class="project_row"> | ||
<hr class="para"> | <hr class="para"> | ||
| − | <h1>Nitrate | + | <h1>Nitrate Sensor Design</h1> |
| − | + | <p>In order to develop and characterize a nitrate sensing system for <i>E. coli</i>, we utilized the native NarX-NarL two-component system. NarX is a sensory histadine kinase that selectively phosphorylates NarL, the cognate response regulator, in the presence of extracellular NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>. Phosphorylated NarL, in turn can bind to promoters to regulate downstream gene expression.</p> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | <div class="project_image"> | |
| − | + | <img style="width:65%;"src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/43/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_dcusss.PNG" alt="image caption"> | |
| − | + | </div> | |
| − | + | ||
| + | <p><br><br>Although many promoters have been characterized and the consensus DNA-binding sequence is identified, most promoters also contain FNR sites and are regulated by other systems (Darwin & Tyson, 1997). We identified the promoter region upstream of DcuS as a potential promoter that recognizes NarL and is independent of other systems (Goh & Bledsoe et al., 2005). Based on the protein-DNA interactions described in Goh, we selected a 73bp region directly upstream of the +1 promoter site as a potential repressible promoter in the presence of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br><br>pND16 was constructed based on pRS334 (courtesy of Tabor Lab, Rice University), a high-copy (ColE1 origin) plasmid in which expression of sfGFP is controlled by the <i>dcuS</i> promoter (P<sub>dcuS</sub>) and expression of NarL can be controlled via an aTc-inducible TetR-P<sub>tet</sub> one-component system. This allows us to regulate levels of cellular NarL compared to native NarL and NarX to tune the sensitivity and dynamic range of the sensor. Since NarL is chromosomally expressed in <i>E. coli</i>, this plasmid was transformed into a NarL knockout strain of BW29655. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | <div class="project_image"> | ||
| + | <img style="width:80%;"src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/6d/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_pdcusplas.PNG" alt="image caption"> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 64: | Line 54: | ||
<div class="project_row"> | <div class="project_row"> | ||
<hr class="para"> | <hr class="para"> | ||
| − | <h1> | + | <h1>Experiments and Results</h1> |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | <p><strong>Finding the proper aTc induction level to activate the sensor</strong></p> | |
| − | + | <p>We wished to see at what levels of aTc the sensor performed at. Thus, we characterized the sensor’s fluorescent output for 5 different aTc concentrations. The data below indicates that at even our lowest nonzero aTc level, the system was saturated with NarL and thus was performing at its highest sensitivity. | |
| − | + | <br><br>We also noticed that there was a marked difference in fold change and in the K1/2 parameter for the system between 0 and 20 ng/mL aTc. This indicates that we may have built a sensor with tunable sensitivity, and was the inspiration for experiment 3.</p> | |
| − | + | <div class="project_image"> | |
| − | + | <img style="width:50%;height:350px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8d/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_ricenitrate1.PNG" alt="image caption"> | |
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | <p><strong>In depth-characterization of sensor</strong></p> | ||
| + | <p>At this point, we chose our lowest saturating aTc value (20 ng/mL) and created a 12-point NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> - fluorescence transfer function in order to better determine the system parameters. | ||
| + | <br><br>A sigmoidal fit on the data below suggests that our system’s half-maximum occurs at .02 mM, equivalent to 1.25 ppm NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> in the soil. The system also has a fold change of 7.15.</p> | ||
| + | <div class="project_image"> | ||
| + | <img style="width:45%;height:320px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/68/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_e2.PNG" alt="image caption"> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <p><strong>Tuning Sensitivity and Fold-Change</strong></p> | ||
| + | <p>Taking information from experiments 1 and 2, we decided to try changing the sensitivity and fold change of the system by picking aTc values between zero and 20 ng/mL, the previous saturating value. | ||
| + | <br><br>We picked 6 different aTc values and 6 different nitrate levels for this characterization and arrived at the results below</p> | ||
| + | <div class="project_image"> | ||
| + | <img style="width:60%;height:380px;"src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/15/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_nite3_2.PNG" alt="image caption"> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="project_row"> | <div class="project_row"> | ||
<hr class="para"> | <hr class="para"> | ||
| − | <h1> | + | <h1>Conclusion</h1> |
| − | <p> | + | <p>Our sensor works! It is sensitive enough to detect levels of nitrate below the typical levels in soil. By simply adding a chromophore as the reporter protein, thus system could be converted into a colorimetric nitrate sensor. |
| − | + | </p> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | <!--<div class="project_image"> | |
| − | <div class="project_image"> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f2/Nitrate_Transfer_Correct_Rice.png" alt="image caption"> |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | </div>--></div><br><br><br> |
| − | </div> | + | <div class="project_row"> |
| − | <p> | + | <hr class="para"> |
| − | + | <h2>References</h2> | |
| − | + | <p style="font-size:125%">Darwin, A., & Tyson, K. (1997). Differential regulation by the homologous response regulators NarL and NarP of Escherichia coli K12 depends on DNA binding site arrangement. Molecular …, 25, 583–595. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4971855.x/full | |
| − | + | <br><br>Goh, E. B., Bledsoe, P. J., Chen, L. L., Gyaneshwar, P., Stewart, V., & Igo, M. M. (2005). Hierarchical control of anaerobic gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12: The nitrate-responsive NarX-NarL regulatory system represses synthesis of the fumarate-responsive DcuS-DcuR regulatory system. Journal of Bacteriology, 187(14), 4890–4899.</p></div> | |
| + | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
| + | {{HKUST-Rice Directory}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 18 September 2015
Nitrate Sensor - PdcuS
Nitrate as a Macro-nutrient
Nitrate is an important nutrient for plant growth, as it allows them to make amino acids and in turn, proteins. To ensure good crop yield, farmers must ensure that their soil has sufficient nitrates. They often do this by adding (often too much) fertilizer to their soils.
Here we characterize a native E. coli nitrate sensor that can be used as a biological sensor on the field to detect soil nitrate levels, and thus prevent the overfertilization of fields and the negative environmental effects associated with that practice.
Nitrate Sensor Design
In order to develop and characterize a nitrate sensing system for E. coli, we utilized the native NarX-NarL two-component system. NarX is a sensory histadine kinase that selectively phosphorylates NarL, the cognate response regulator, in the presence of extracellular NO3-. Phosphorylated NarL, in turn can bind to promoters to regulate downstream gene expression.
Although many promoters have been characterized and the consensus DNA-binding sequence is identified, most promoters also contain FNR sites and are regulated by other systems (Darwin & Tyson, 1997). We identified the promoter region upstream of DcuS as a potential promoter that recognizes NarL and is independent of other systems (Goh & Bledsoe et al., 2005). Based on the protein-DNA interactions described in Goh, we selected a 73bp region directly upstream of the +1 promoter site as a potential repressible promoter in the presence of NO3-
pND16 was constructed based on pRS334 (courtesy of Tabor Lab, Rice University), a high-copy (ColE1 origin) plasmid in which expression of sfGFP is controlled by the dcuS promoter (PdcuS) and expression of NarL can be controlled via an aTc-inducible TetR-Ptet one-component system. This allows us to regulate levels of cellular NarL compared to native NarL and NarX to tune the sensitivity and dynamic range of the sensor. Since NarL is chromosomally expressed in E. coli, this plasmid was transformed into a NarL knockout strain of BW29655.
Experiments and Results
Finding the proper aTc induction level to activate the sensor
We wished to see at what levels of aTc the sensor performed at. Thus, we characterized the sensor’s fluorescent output for 5 different aTc concentrations. The data below indicates that at even our lowest nonzero aTc level, the system was saturated with NarL and thus was performing at its highest sensitivity.
We also noticed that there was a marked difference in fold change and in the K1/2 parameter for the system between 0 and 20 ng/mL aTc. This indicates that we may have built a sensor with tunable sensitivity, and was the inspiration for experiment 3.
In depth-characterization of sensor
At this point, we chose our lowest saturating aTc value (20 ng/mL) and created a 12-point NO3- - fluorescence transfer function in order to better determine the system parameters.
A sigmoidal fit on the data below suggests that our system’s half-maximum occurs at .02 mM, equivalent to 1.25 ppm NO3- in the soil. The system also has a fold change of 7.15.
Tuning Sensitivity and Fold-Change
Taking information from experiments 1 and 2, we decided to try changing the sensitivity and fold change of the system by picking aTc values between zero and 20 ng/mL, the previous saturating value.
We picked 6 different aTc values and 6 different nitrate levels for this characterization and arrived at the results below
Conclusion
Our sensor works! It is sensitive enough to detect levels of nitrate below the typical levels in soil. By simply adding a chromophore as the reporter protein, thus system could be converted into a colorimetric nitrate sensor.
References
Darwin, A., & Tyson, K. (1997). Differential regulation by the homologous response regulators NarL and NarP of Escherichia coli K12 depends on DNA binding site arrangement. Molecular …, 25, 583–595. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4971855.x/full
Goh, E. B., Bledsoe, P. J., Chen, L. L., Gyaneshwar, P., Stewart, V., & Igo, M. M. (2005). Hierarchical control of anaerobic gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12: The nitrate-responsive NarX-NarL regulatory system represses synthesis of the fumarate-responsive DcuS-DcuR regulatory system. Journal of Bacteriology, 187(14), 4890–4899.