Difference between revisions of "Team:Aalto-Helsinki/Design"
m (Typo) |
m |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<h2>Propane production</h2> | <h2>Propane production</h2> | ||
− | <p>Because of the time limit, our propane producing <i>E.coli</i> strain wasn't competely constructed. We decided to try small scale and chemostat production with <i>E.coli</i> BL21 (DE3 ΔyjgB ΔyqhD, pET-TPC4 + pCDF-cAD + pACYC-Fdx-Fpr) made by | + | <p>Continuous biopropane production would be economical choice for large-scale processes as the gas product can be easily separated. Therefore, the product would not disturb increased cell growth levels which are needed for continuous processes. Product's purification and liquefaction could be also added next to a gas stream outline. Continuous manufacturing needs smaller equipment as the volumetric productivity is greater than for the regular batch processes. First step for scaling up with a production strain is to test it in a chemostat.</p> |
+ | |||
+ | <p>Because of the time limit, our propane producing <i>E.coli</i> strain wasn't competely constructed. We decided to try small scale and chemostat production with <i>E.coli</i> BL21 (DE3 ΔyjgB ΔyqhD, pET-TPC4 + pCDF-cAD + pACYC-Fdx-Fpr) made by Pauli Kallio's research group which differs from our own strain by two enzymes at the beginning of the reaction pathway. Thus, experiments with Kallio's strain largely revealed how our own strain would have behaved. More information available at the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Aalto-Helsinki/Project">Project page</a>.</p> | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
− | <section id=" | + | <section id="continuous" data-anchor="continuous"> |
<h3>Continuous production</h3> | <h3>Continuous production</h3> | ||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
<figure style="margin-bottom:2%;margin-top:4%"> | <figure style="margin-bottom:2%;margin-top:4%"> | ||
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3d/Aalto-Helsinki_figure_for_continuous_Growth_and_Glucose_pH.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3d/Aalto-Helsinki_figure_for_continuous_Growth_and_Glucose_pH.png" style="max-width:100%;" /></a> | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3d/Aalto-Helsinki_figure_for_continuous_Growth_and_Glucose_pH.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3d/Aalto-Helsinki_figure_for_continuous_Growth_and_Glucose_pH.png" style="max-width:100%;" /></a> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figures 1 & 2:</b> Diagrams for reactor's cell population density, dissolved oxygen, glucose concentration and pH.</figcaption> | + | <figcaption><center><b>Figures 1 & 2:</b> Diagrams for reactor's cell population density, dissolved oxygen, glucose concentration and pH.</center></figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
<p>IPTG induction started with 2mM concentration and the population growth started to react to changed process conditions. New steady state was achieved 40 h later and the population density became 9.28 g/l. Thus, there was a 0.57 g/l difference of the biomass between the normal growth and the growth with propane production. For some reason, the growth started to decrease again and the second steady state didn't continue, when the feed stock was changed to a bigger container containing the same terrific broth because the old one was running out.</p> | <p>IPTG induction started with 2mM concentration and the population growth started to react to changed process conditions. New steady state was achieved 40 h later and the population density became 9.28 g/l. Thus, there was a 0.57 g/l difference of the biomass between the normal growth and the growth with propane production. For some reason, the growth started to decrease again and the second steady state didn't continue, when the feed stock was changed to a bigger container containing the same terrific broth because the old one was running out.</p> | ||
− | <p>Propane samples weren't gathered from the second steady state during that day because of the time limit, so we had to wait over the weekend until the third steady state had settled. At this point the cell density was 2,625 g/l. Reactor's glucose consentration decreased from original 20 g/l to zero during the exponential grow phase as the cells used it as a carbon and energy source. However, it was hard to recognize whether | + | <p>Propane samples weren't gathered from the second steady state during that day because of the time limit, so we had to wait over the weekend until the third steady state had settled. At this point the cell density was 2,625 g/l. Reactor's glucose consentration decreased from original 20 g/l to zero during the exponential grow phase as the cells used it as a carbon and energy source. However, it was hard to recognize whether glucose or oxygen limited more the growth. During the first steady state, glucose concentration increased when the need for the anabolism of biomass was lower. Glucose analyses were done with liquid chromatography which data is gathered <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e2/Aalto-Helsinki_IGEM_liquid_chromatography_standards_information_diagrams.xls" target="_blank">here</a>. </p> |
<p>Before starting to feed fresh media, the end of batch phase was determined from decreased pH-level when the cells produced acids as a response to nutrient deficiency. TB-media used for cultivation contained phosphates which had buffer capacity but it wasn't enough. pH-control was assembled in order to maintain pH-values above 5.0. </p> | <p>Before starting to feed fresh media, the end of batch phase was determined from decreased pH-level when the cells produced acids as a response to nutrient deficiency. TB-media used for cultivation contained phosphates which had buffer capacity but it wasn't enough. pH-control was assembled in order to maintain pH-values above 5.0. </p> |
Latest revision as of 15:45, 18 September 2015