Difference between revisions of "Team:Minnesota/SMM"
Line 780: | Line 780: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
+ | This was innovative because we were encouraged to consider <b>multiple dimensions of public engagement with science </b>(PES) as described by McCallie et al. (2009). This study emphasizes collaboration and equal contributions of public and scientific opinions regarding institutional policy, and most importantly rejects the common heuristic that superior scientific knowledge confers superior judgment in which initiatives should be pursued and defended within synthetic biology. Team members helped design three different activity modules encompassing microbial diversity, prioritizing applications of synthetic biology, and comparing vaccine advancements achievable through synthetic biology and conventional science. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Revision as of 19:13, 18 September 2015