{{BNU-CHINA/article | Modeling | Starts from the minor|b/bf/Bnubgh}}
−
{{Team:BNU-CHINA/js/jquery.min}}
+
−
{{Team:BNU-CHINA/js/mathjax}}
+
−
{{Team:BNU-CHINA/head}}
+
−
+
<html>
<html>
−
<div class="content container">
+
<h2 id="modeling">Introduction</h2>
−
<sidebar class="col-md-3 bs-docs-sidebar">
+
<p>Our modeling consists of the following three parts:</p>
−
<ul id="sidebar" class="nav nav-stacked fixed">
+
<ol>
−
<li>
+
<li>To make the project applicable in real life, we designed a device with modified engineering bacteria inside, which can be placed in soil to attract and kill nematodes.
−
<a href="#section-1">Modeling<br/>
+
</li>
−
Introduction</a>
+
<li>Assuming there is a farmland, we took advantage of gas diffusion and nematodes’ movement analogue simulation to find the best position for the device to be placed.
−
</li>
+
</li>
−
<li>
+
<li>We established a database to broaden the scope of our applications, combined with our methods, to kill more different pests. We hope this new environment-friendly method, based on principles of synthetic biology, could be shared with and improved by the researchers all over the world.
−
<a href="#section-2">Device</a>
+
</li>
−
<ul class="nav nav-stacked">
+
</ol>
−
<li><a href="#section-2-1">Device 1.0</a></li>
+
−
<li><a href="#section-2-2">Device 2.0</a></li>
+
−
</ul>
+
−
</li>
+
−
<li>
+
−
<a href="#section-3">Modeling in<br/>
+
−
Farmland</a>
+
−
</li>
+
−
</ul>
+
−
</sidebar>
+
+
<h2 id="design">Design</h2>
+
<h3>Device 1.0</h3>
+
<p>In order to enable our project to be applied in real environment, we designed and made Device 1.0. Because the productivity of attracting substance by <em>E.coli</em> is limited and the price of man-made attracting substance is quite high. We choose low-cost CO<sub>2</sub> as our assistant attracting substance since it was demonstrated that carbon dioxide has a function of attracting nematodes<sup><a href="#ref-1-3">[1-3]</a></sup>.
+
</p>
+
<p>Our device has four areas. The first area is CO<sub>2</sub> generating area. We produce CO<sub>2</sub> by mixing limestone and dilute hydrochloric acid together, which is widely used in industry. The second area is <em>E.coli</em> culturing area. It includes a medium inside the device - to culture modified engineering bacteria. The third area is light controlling area, which includes a LED light. When it is turned on, red emission will activate the promoter and bacterial cells will express attracting substance; while the LED light is turned off, toxalbumin will be produced. The fourth area is made up of a cuboid outer shell, which can support the device.
+
</p>
+
<figure class="text-center">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/41/BNU-MODELING1.png" alt="loss a fig" height='335px' />
+
<figcaption>Fig.1 Our real product – Device 1.0
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
<p>The figure above shows our product – Device 1.0. We have simulated our device in the lab and our results show that our system is able to work under real-world conditions.
<h1>Modeling <small>Beijing Normal University</small>
+
</video>
−
</h1>
+
−
</header>
+
−
<section id="section-1" class="group">
+
−
<h3>1. Modeling Introduction</h3>
+
−
<p>Our modeling can be divided into four parts. Firstly, in order to enable our project to be applied in life, we design a device placed in soil, which can attract and kill nematodes by modified engineering bacteria inside. Secondly, assuming there is a farmland, we take advantage of nematodes’ movement analogue simulation to find the best position where the device should be placed and the best concentration of attracting substance. Thirdly, according to this concentration, we obtain the best size of the device by calculating. At last, we establish a database to enlarge applied range of our method to kill other pests. We would appreciate that new synthetic biological and environment-friendly methods can be shared and improved with the science researchers all over the world.</p>
+
−
</section>
+
−
<br/>
+
−
<hr/>
+
−
<section id="section-2" class="group">
+
−
<h3>2. Device</h3>
+
−
<div id="section-2-1" class="subgroup">
+
−
<h4>2.1 Device 1.0</h4>
+
−
<p>In order to enable our project to be applied in actual environment, we design a device and make an entitative product. Considering the production of attracting substance is low which attracts nematodes produced by E.coli. It was demonstrated that carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) has a function to attract nematodes [1-3]. Therefore, we choose CO<sub>2</sub> as a low-cost and assistant attracting substance.</p>
+
−
<p>Our device has four sections. The first one is CO<sub>2</sub> generator adopting calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) and diluted hydrochloric acid which is widely used in industry. The second section is a medium inside to culture modified engineering bacteria. Thirdly, there is a LED light; after turning on it, red emission will activate the promoter and bacterial cells will expression the toxic proteins. </p>
+
−
<figure class="text-center">
+
−
<img src="File:MODEL-DEVICE" alt="example" />
+
−
<figcaption>figure 1
+
−
</figcaption>
+
−
</figure>
+
−
<p>In the meantime, we designed a simple experiment to check the feasibility of our device in lab condition.</p>
+
<p>There are 8 steps to apply our device in farmland as shown in the video above. And the procedures below were conducted in a fume hood.
−
</div>
+
</p>
−
<br/>
+
−
<div id="section-2-2" class="subgroup">
+
−
<h4>2.2 Device 2.0</h4>
+
−
<p>After device 1.0 being designed and made, our teammates discussed together about it and found out device 1.0 exists lots of shortages. For instance, the raw materials (diluted hydrochloric acid and CaCO<sub>3</sub>) this device can hold is limited restricted by its size. Therefore, if we want persistent CO<sub>2</sub> as assist to attract nematodes, we have to change raw materials frequently, and in this way the cost of device would increase largely. Secondly, the design that put the culture medium on the glass slide result in a low usage of space, which means the amount of attractant and toxic proteins would be relatively small. The third shortage is that the LED light tube is too large and needs power to charge, so it’s not so suitable for agricultural use. Also, the utilization of light is expected to improve. However, we make changes against the three insufficient mentioned above in the device 2.0, and we are looking forward to push our device more and more efficient in the edition 3.0 and 4.0.
+
−
<br/>
+
−
<br/> We have come up with an improving blue print against the shortages mentioned above, yet we haven’t make out the physical device 2.0 restricted by time and the experimental condition now available. Also, the blue print we raised is just under the identical condition. Firstly, we suppose that the E.coli transformed as engineering bacteria can produce identical concentrated attractant and toxic proteins which is in a reasonable range (we estimated preliminarily by literature review and the concrete quantitative value will be work out by the third part of modeling). Secondly, we change the place covered by cultural medium to sphere to achieve the biggest usage of surface area and meanwhile the whole device will be changed to sphere as well. Furthermore, for the sake of a better usage of LED light, we put the LED light tube at the center of the sphere medium so that its whole surface can be exposed to the light of the same intensity. This kind of design can allow us to choose smaller LED light tube at the same time, together with the change that we use the solar power instead of battery, the device 2.0 can reduce cost and save energy, which means it would be more economical and environmental friendly.
+
−
</p>
+
−
</div>
+
−
</section>
+
−
<br/>
+
−
<hr/>
+
−
<section id="section-3" class="group">
+
−
<h3>3. Modeling in Farmland</h3>
+
−
<p>After our device has been designed, we are willing to figure out that how can we put our device into practice in the farmland, especially that whether or not our device would be more sufficient and economical than the killing nematodes methods for now (crop-dusting mostly). In order to answer those questions, we need to do analogue simulation of the movement of nematodes to determine the best place in the farmland to put our device. Our modeling in farmland in based on the following assumptions:</p>
+
−
<ol>
+
−
<li>Nematodes do sine shaped movement towards the direction of the highest odor concentration after attracted by the limonene and linalool smell [4].
+
−
</li>
+
−
<li>The creeping speed of nematode is fixed to 500μm/ s. (According to the literature An imaging system for standardized quantitative analysis of C.elegans behavior)</li>
+
−
<li>8.5d-10.5d[5]supposing that the effective attractive period of our device is 10d, the Meloidogyne needs 8.5d-10.5d to develop into second instar larvae from monoplast egg according to an exiting literature[5].</li>
+
−
<li>Only if the attraction concentration of limonene is higher than the lowest attractant concentration (or 50% of the higher attractant concentration), it will attract the nematode.</li>
+
−
<li>When the gas diffuses in space, the concentration isn’t affected by temperature, wind or other factors.</li>
+
−
<li>The device emit the gas continuously and the concentration is fixed everywhere.</li>
+
−
</ol>
+
−
<p>Allowing that we are supposed to control the density of nematodes under a relatively low range, we hope to kill all the adult nematodes in certain period of timeunder the identical condition. And as nematodes need 3 days to develop into adults, we are supposed to kill them within 3 days. Adding that it takes some time for nematodes to reach the device, we can determine the distance between the devices we place according this 3 days period and the crawl speed of nematodes.</p>
+
−
<p> the longest distance between nematodes and the equipment=nematodes’ crawl speed×time nematodes need to develop into adult.</p>
+
−
<p> Firstly, we consider regular square farmland, to minimize the number of equipment we use, the arrangement mode of equipment is as follows.(first, we consider the situation with four equipment)
+
−
</p>
+
−
<figure class="text-center">
+
−
<img src="img/modeling2.png" alt="example" />
+
−
<figcaption>figure 2
+
−
</figcaption>
+
−
</figure>
+
−
<p>As shown in the picture,represents the equipment of colon bacillus, while circle represents diffusion, with the same odorousness in a circle. What’s more, square ABCD is the simplified farmland. It’s obvious that in this farmland(don’t consider points on the sides of the square ) point F is the farthest point away from the four equipment. Based on the longest distance between nematodes and the equipment which is accumulated in the 1) question, we obtain:
+
−
</p>
+
−
<p align='center'>EF = the longest distance between nematodes and the equipment =
+
−
</p>
+
−
<p>$$AB = {2\sqrt{2}EF} = D$$</p>
+
<ul>
+
<li>Step 1. We gathered a box of soil from our farmland.</li>
+
<li>Step 2. We applied culture medium onto slide glasses.</li>
+
<li>Step 3. We gathered several small stones used as CaCO<sub>3</sub> and put them into the test tube.</li>
+
<li>Step 4. We added HCl into the separating funnel.</li>
+
<li>Step 5. We opened the faucet of the separating funnel in order to let HCl flow into the test tube under the atmospheric pressure. Then small stones reacted with HCl to liberate CO<sub>2</sub>. We also demonstrated how to use red LED light in the video.</li>
+
<li>Step 6. We put the device into the soil. </li>
+
<li>Step 7. After 3 hours of incubation, we took out the device and removed the slide glasses.</li>
+
<li>Step 8. Finally, we tested the results using a microscope. In the video, we showed the movement of a nematode that we separated from soil from Hebei Province, China.
+
</li>
+
</ul>
−
<p>We obtain that there should be N/2 between two equipment.
+
<h3>Device 2.0</h3>
−
</p>
+
<p>After discussion among team members about device 1.0, we found several deficiencies. First of all, the size of our device is so limited that the reaction substrate (limestone and diluted hydrochloric acid) is not enough to generate CO<sub>2</sub> constantly. Replenishing the reaction substrate frequently will greatly increase the cost. Secondly, the space utilization percentage is low on the slide medium; as a result, the production of both attractant and toxalbumin is low. Lastly, LED tube is sizable and needed to be powered constantly, thus not suitable for farmland. In device 2.0, we improved device 1.0 in those three aspects mentioned above. Indeed, we need to further improve our device.
−
<p>Considering that odorousness will be reduced with longer distance away from the equipment, we should only considering the superposed odorousness in point F(considering four equioment now) to reach the lowest attractant concentration. Thus we obtain:
+
</p>
−
</p>
+
<p>Firstly, we assume that engineering bacteria can produce ideal concentration of attractant and toxalbumin (the ideal concentration is in reasonable range). Then, considering the problem of space utilization rate and the fact that <em>E.coli</em> can only grow on the surface of the medium, we changed the medium’s shape to sphericity to reach the highest space utilization percentage. Meanwhile, our device has been shaped to sphericity too, and the LED light has been moved to the center so that the whole surface can get the radiation evenly. A design like this enable us to use mini LED light bulb, and use solar energy instead of electricity as our power resource. This change fulfills our aim to save money and energy, which is also more economical and enviromentally friendly.
−
<p>the superposed odorousness in point F diffused from device E= the lowest attractant concentration÷4
+
</p>
−
</p>
+
<figure class="text-center">
−
<p>We get the 3-D gas diffusion model according to Fick Law, and then we simplify the question into 1-D situation according to isotropy.
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/50/BNU-MODELING2.png" alt="loss a fig" />
<p>Then we can obtain the arithmetic solution.</p>
+
−
<!--VDEIO-->
+
−
</section>
+
<p>As shown above, device 2.0 has two shells – an outer shell and an inner shell. There are tiny holes on the outer shell, which allow nematodes to enter the device. The holes are biosynthetically designed to prevent other soil organisms from entering. The red LED light can be supplied with the power from solar power pane, which will be put on the surface of the farmland. And we can achieve remote control by using radio technology.
<p>With these improvements to our device, we want to figure out how we can put our technology into practice in farmland, and whether our device would be more efficient and economical than the methods used currently used in killing nematodes (crop-dusting mostly). In order to answer these two questions, especially the second one, we need to conduct a simulation of the movement of nematodes to determine the most suitable place in the farmland to place our device. Our modeling process is given below:
−
</div>
+
</p>
+
<h3>Modeling assumptions
+
</h3>
+
<ol>
+
<li>Nematodes can be attracted if the attraction concentration of limonene is higher than the lowest attractant concentration and then can move towards the direction of the highest odor concentration after attracted by the limonene smell<sup><a href="#ref-4">[4]</a></sup>.
+
</li>
+
<li>Engineering bacteria in our device are able to produce enough limonene as we need.
+
</li>
+
<li>The creeping speed of nematode is fixed.
+
</li>
+
<li>Nematodes move on a 2D plane. Because the movement range of nematodes is within 10cm and the distance between two devices is much longer than 10cm, we can ignore the depth.
+
</li>
+
<li>When the gas diffuses in space, the concentration is not affected by temperature, aerodynamics or other factors.
+
</li>
+
<li>The device emits gas continuously and the concentration is uniform in space. And after the gas diffusion, the attractant concentration will stabilize.
+
</li>
+
</ol>
−
</footer>
+
<h3>Explanation of symbols
−
<script>
+
</h3>
−
$(document).ready(function(){
+
<center><h5>Table 1. Explanation of symbols</h5></center>
<p>Considering that we need to control the density of nematodes in a proper range, we hope to do this by killing all the mature nematodes within certain period of time under the identical condition. Because different species of nematodes have different life cycles, our attraction times vary. And we found that the Meloidogyne needs 8.5d-10.5d to develop into second instar larvae from monoplast egg according to an exiting literature<sup><a href="#ref-9">[9]</a></sup>. We define <em>d</em> as the half time of which nematodes grow from eggs to larvae. We plan to apply our “attract – and – kill” process in two rounds. We will attract nematodes into our device in time <em>d</em> and kill them in time <em>d</em>. We found that all nematodes are killed after two “slaughters”. Additionally, it takes time for nematodes to reach the device, so we can determine the distance between the devices we place according to the three-day-period and the crawl speed of nematodes.
+
</p>
+
+
</p>
+
<p>$$L = V \times {T}$$</p>
+
+
<p>Let <em>L</em> be the longest distance between nematodes and the equipment, V is nematodes’ crawl speed, and T is time nematodes need to develop into adult.
+
</p>
+
<p>Firstly, we considered a square farmland, to minimize the number of equipment we use, the arrangement mode of equipment is as follows (firstly, we consider the situation with four devices arranged together).
<figcaption>Fig.4 The schematic diagram of how we plan to put our device in farmland
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
<p>As shown above, the white circles represent the devices of colon bacillus, while the bigger circles represent diffusion, with the same odorousness in a circle. What’s more, squares ABCD are the simplified farmland. It’s obvious that in this farmland (do not consider points on the sides of the square), point F is the farthest point away from the four equipment. Based on the longest distance between nematodes and the equipment which has been acquired in the first question, we obtain:
+
</p>
+
<p>$$AB = {2\sqrt{2}EF} = N$$</p>
+
<p><em>N</em> is the distance between two equipment.
+
</p>
+
+
<center><h5>Table.3 The results of the relationship between attraction time and distance</h5></center>
<p>Considering that odorousness will be reduced with the increase of distance away from the device, we should only consider about the superposed odorousness at point F(considering four equipment now) to reach the lowest attractant concentration. Thus we obtain:
+
</p>
+
+
<p>$$C_1 = C_0/4$$</p>
+
+
<p>Where <em>C<sub>1</sub></em> is the superposed odorousness diffused from the device, <em>C<sub>0</sub></em> is the lowest attractant concentration.
+
</p>
+
+
<p>According to Fick's Law, We obtain a 3-D gas diffusion model. Since the three dimensions have no difference between each other, we simplify the question into a 1-D situation according to isotropy.
+
</p>
+
+
<p>According to Fick's Law, points out that during the process of unsteady diffusion, at a distance of <em>x</em> Since the three dimension has no difference between each other, we simplify the question into 1-D situation according to isotropy.
+
</p>
+
<p>A brief introduction to the Fick's Law: It points out that during the process of unsteady diffusion, at a distance of <em>X</em>, the change rate of concentration to time is equal to the negative value of the change rate of diffusion flux to distance. Its mathematical expression is as follows:
<p class="text-center">Boundary value condition is: <em>C(t,0)== C<sub>2</sub></em>
+
</p>
+
+
<p><em>C(x,t)</em> is the concentration at the distance of <em>X</em> from gas source in <em>t</em>, <em>N<sub>0</sub></em> is the concentration of gas source, <em>D</em> is the diffusion coefficient.
+
</p>
+
+
<p>According to the model above, we obtain the gas diffusion model in 3D. And according to the principle of isotropy, we simplify the problem in 1D.
<p>We build a gas diffusion model to calculate the gas concentration at each point in matrices. In matrix A, we assume that the device is put on row i and column j (i, j). The distance between any point (m, n) in any matrix and point (i, j) is:
+
</p>
+
+
<p>$$x = \sqrt{(m-1)^2 + (n-j)^2}$$</p>
+
+
<p>The concentration at the point at time t is: </p>
<figcaption>Fig.5 The schematic diagram of Device 2.0 placement in farmland
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
<p>This is the schematic diagram of our device in a 300m × 300m farmland according to results of simulation. We set the attraction time as 3 days and the distance between two devices is 100 m. As the evenly distribution of nematodes is from 5 cm to 15 cm underground, we put the device into the place which is 10 cm underground. In order to meet the lowest attractant concentration, the concentration of limonene produced by every device should be \(24.8 g/cm^3\).
<p>The explanations of simulation: In the video above, we built up a simulation model of the movement of nematodes using the cellular automaton in MATLAB. It shows how nematode moves in a real farmland with the device. We built up a 301×301 matrix in MATLAB, in place of a 20m×20m piece of farmland. The proportion of virtual nematode and real nematode is 0.0084.</p>
+
<p>The nematodes is distributed randomly at the beginning. The rules of the movement are as follows:
+
</p>
+
<ol>
+
<li>The nematodes move towards 4 different directions: front, behind, right and left;
+
</li>
+
<li>Every time the nematode choose one of the 4 directions randomly and the probability of these 4 directions are the same;
+
</li>
+
<li>If the nematode move to the place where the gas concentration is lower than the previous position, then the nematode will move back to the previous position.
+
</li>
+
</ol>
+
<p>We did the different simulation experiments with one device in the farmland and four devices in the farmland separately.
<figcaption>Fig 6. Homepage of our database website
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
<p>In order to apply our hypothesis and methodology to more agricultural pests control, we established a database. We hope to take a better use of this new environmental-friendly method from the context synthetic biology and share it with researchers all over the world. Our database contains 3 daughter databases: attractant, pests and toxalbumins bases. We will update relevant information about the engineering bacteria we designed to kill the pests in our database. Currently, our database contains the biobrick we established in this project and the one established by team ZJU-CHINA.
+
</p>
+
<p>All the users have the permission to edit and add new contents, and we welcome everyone to use and enrich our database!
+
</p>
+
<p class="text-center">
+
Our link address is: <a href="http://fwpz.github.io/BNU-Database/">http://fwpz.github.io/BNU-Database/</a>
+
</p>
+
<p class="text-center">All the users have the permission to edit and add new contents, and we welcome everyone to use and enrich our database!
<li id="ref-1-3">Liang W, Li Q, Chen L, et al. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> on nematode trophic groups in a Chinese paddy-field ecosystem[J]. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao= The journal of applied ecology/Zhongguo sheng tai xue xue hui, Zhongguo ke xue yuan Shenyang ying yong sheng tai yan jiu suo zhu ban, 2002, 13(10): 1269-1272.
+
</li>
+
<li id="ref-1-3">Gaugler R, Lebeck L, Nakagaki B, et al. Orientation of the entomogenous nematode Neoaplectana carpocapsae to carbon dioxide[J]. Environmental Entomology, 1980, 9(5): 649-652.
+
</li>
+
<li id="ref-1-3">Yeates G W, Newton P C D, Ross D J. Response of soil nematode fauna to naturally elevated CO<sub>2</sub> levels influenced by soil pattern[J]. Nematology, 1999, 1(3): 285-293.
+
</li>
+
<li id="ref-4"> Ye H Y, Ye B P, Wang D Y. Molecular control of memory in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans[J]. Neuroscience bulletin, 2008, 24(1): 49-55.</li>
+
<li id="ref-5">Xu J X, Deng X. Biological modeling of complex chemotaxis behaviors for <em>C. elegans</em> under speed regulation—a dynamic neural networks approach[J]. Journal of computational neuroscience, 2013, 35(1): 19-37.
+
</li>
+
<li id="ref-6">Zhang Junli. The Study on Identification and Distribution of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes on Soybean, Vegetable and Sweet Potato in Hebei Province[D]. Diss. 2004.
<li id="ref-8">Limm W, Begley T H, Lickly T, et al. Diffusion of limonene in polyethylene[J]. Food additives and contaminants, 2006, 23(7): 738-746.
+
</li>
+
<li id="ref-9">Li SQ. Biological characters and control banana root-knot nematode[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2002. 1-35
+
</li>
+
</ol>
+
</div>
−
});
−
</script>
</html>
</html>
Latest revision as of 20:01, 18 September 2015
Team:BNU-CHINA - 2015.igem.org
Modeling Starts from the minor
Introduction
Our modeling consists of the following three parts:
To make the project applicable in real life, we designed a device with modified engineering bacteria inside, which can be placed in soil to attract and kill nematodes.
Assuming there is a farmland, we took advantage of gas diffusion and nematodes’ movement analogue simulation to find the best position for the device to be placed.
We established a database to broaden the scope of our applications, combined with our methods, to kill more different pests. We hope this new environment-friendly method, based on principles of synthetic biology, could be shared with and improved by the researchers all over the world.
Design
Device 1.0
In order to enable our project to be applied in real environment, we designed and made Device 1.0. Because the productivity of attracting substance by E.coli is limited and the price of man-made attracting substance is quite high. We choose low-cost CO2 as our assistant attracting substance since it was demonstrated that carbon dioxide has a function of attracting nematodes[1-3].
Our device has four areas. The first area is CO2 generating area. We produce CO2 by mixing limestone and dilute hydrochloric acid together, which is widely used in industry. The second area is E.coli culturing area. It includes a medium inside the device - to culture modified engineering bacteria. The third area is light controlling area, which includes a LED light. When it is turned on, red emission will activate the promoter and bacterial cells will express attracting substance; while the LED light is turned off, toxalbumin will be produced. The fourth area is made up of a cuboid outer shell, which can support the device.
The figure above shows our product – Device 1.0. We have simulated our device in the lab and our results show that our system is able to work under real-world conditions.
There are 8 steps to apply our device in farmland as shown in the video above. And the procedures below were conducted in a fume hood.
Step 1. We gathered a box of soil from our farmland.
Step 2. We applied culture medium onto slide glasses.
Step 3. We gathered several small stones used as CaCO3 and put them into the test tube.
Step 4. We added HCl into the separating funnel.
Step 5. We opened the faucet of the separating funnel in order to let HCl flow into the test tube under the atmospheric pressure. Then small stones reacted with HCl to liberate CO2. We also demonstrated how to use red LED light in the video.
Step 6. We put the device into the soil.
Step 7. After 3 hours of incubation, we took out the device and removed the slide glasses.
Step 8. Finally, we tested the results using a microscope. In the video, we showed the movement of a nematode that we separated from soil from Hebei Province, China.
Device 2.0
After discussion among team members about device 1.0, we found several deficiencies. First of all, the size of our device is so limited that the reaction substrate (limestone and diluted hydrochloric acid) is not enough to generate CO2 constantly. Replenishing the reaction substrate frequently will greatly increase the cost. Secondly, the space utilization percentage is low on the slide medium; as a result, the production of both attractant and toxalbumin is low. Lastly, LED tube is sizable and needed to be powered constantly, thus not suitable for farmland. In device 2.0, we improved device 1.0 in those three aspects mentioned above. Indeed, we need to further improve our device.
Firstly, we assume that engineering bacteria can produce ideal concentration of attractant and toxalbumin (the ideal concentration is in reasonable range). Then, considering the problem of space utilization rate and the fact that E.coli can only grow on the surface of the medium, we changed the medium’s shape to sphericity to reach the highest space utilization percentage. Meanwhile, our device has been shaped to sphericity too, and the LED light has been moved to the center so that the whole surface can get the radiation evenly. A design like this enable us to use mini LED light bulb, and use solar energy instead of electricity as our power resource. This change fulfills our aim to save money and energy, which is also more economical and enviromentally friendly.
As shown above, device 2.0 has two shells – an outer shell and an inner shell. There are tiny holes on the outer shell, which allow nematodes to enter the device. The holes are biosynthetically designed to prevent other soil organisms from entering. The red LED light can be supplied with the power from solar power pane, which will be put on the surface of the farmland. And we can achieve remote control by using radio technology.
Simulation
Modeling in farmland
With these improvements to our device, we want to figure out how we can put our technology into practice in farmland, and whether our device would be more efficient and economical than the methods used currently used in killing nematodes (crop-dusting mostly). In order to answer these two questions, especially the second one, we need to conduct a simulation of the movement of nematodes to determine the most suitable place in the farmland to place our device. Our modeling process is given below:
Modeling assumptions
Nematodes can be attracted if the attraction concentration of limonene is higher than the lowest attractant concentration and then can move towards the direction of the highest odor concentration after attracted by the limonene smell[4].
Engineering bacteria in our device are able to produce enough limonene as we need.
The creeping speed of nematode is fixed.
Nematodes move on a 2D plane. Because the movement range of nematodes is within 10cm and the distance between two devices is much longer than 10cm, we can ignore the depth.
When the gas diffuses in space, the concentration is not affected by temperature, aerodynamics or other factors.
The device emits gas continuously and the concentration is uniform in space. And after the gas diffusion, the attractant concentration will stabilize.
Considering that we need to control the density of nematodes in a proper range, we hope to do this by killing all the mature nematodes within certain period of time under the identical condition. Because different species of nematodes have different life cycles, our attraction times vary. And we found that the Meloidogyne needs 8.5d-10.5d to develop into second instar larvae from monoplast egg according to an exiting literature[9]. We define d as the half time of which nematodes grow from eggs to larvae. We plan to apply our “attract – and – kill” process in two rounds. We will attract nematodes into our device in time d and kill them in time d. We found that all nematodes are killed after two “slaughters”. Additionally, it takes time for nematodes to reach the device, so we can determine the distance between the devices we place according to the three-day-period and the crawl speed of nematodes.
$$L = V \times {T}$$
Let L be the longest distance between nematodes and the equipment, V is nematodes’ crawl speed, and T is time nematodes need to develop into adult.
Firstly, we considered a square farmland, to minimize the number of equipment we use, the arrangement mode of equipment is as follows (firstly, we consider the situation with four devices arranged together).
As shown above, the white circles represent the devices of colon bacillus, while the bigger circles represent diffusion, with the same odorousness in a circle. What’s more, squares ABCD are the simplified farmland. It’s obvious that in this farmland (do not consider points on the sides of the square), point F is the farthest point away from the four equipment. Based on the longest distance between nematodes and the equipment which has been acquired in the first question, we obtain:
$$AB = {2\sqrt{2}EF} = N$$
N is the distance between two equipment.
Table.3 The results of the relationship between attraction time and distance
Attraction time(Day)
Distance between two divices(m)
0.5
17.7137
1
35.4345
1.5
53.1518
2
70.8691
2.5
88.5863
3
106.3036
Considering that odorousness will be reduced with the increase of distance away from the device, we should only consider about the superposed odorousness at point F(considering four equipment now) to reach the lowest attractant concentration. Thus we obtain:
$$C_1 = C_0/4$$
Where C1 is the superposed odorousness diffused from the device, C0 is the lowest attractant concentration.
According to Fick's Law, We obtain a 3-D gas diffusion model. Since the three dimensions have no difference between each other, we simplify the question into a 1-D situation according to isotropy.
According to Fick's Law, points out that during the process of unsteady diffusion, at a distance of x Since the three dimension has no difference between each other, we simplify the question into 1-D situation according to isotropy.
A brief introduction to the Fick's Law: It points out that during the process of unsteady diffusion, at a distance of X, the change rate of concentration to time is equal to the negative value of the change rate of diffusion flux to distance. Its mathematical expression is as follows:
We build a gas diffusion model to calculate the gas concentration at each point in matrices. In matrix A, we assume that the device is put on row i and column j (i, j). The distance between any point (m, n) in any matrix and point (i, j) is:
This is the schematic diagram of our device in a 300m × 300m farmland according to results of simulation. We set the attraction time as 3 days and the distance between two devices is 100 m. As the evenly distribution of nematodes is from 5 cm to 15 cm underground, we put the device into the place which is 10 cm underground. In order to meet the lowest attractant concentration, the concentration of limonene produced by every device should be \(24.8 g/cm^3\).
The explanations of simulation: In the video above, we built up a simulation model of the movement of nematodes using the cellular automaton in MATLAB. It shows how nematode moves in a real farmland with the device. We built up a 301×301 matrix in MATLAB, in place of a 20m×20m piece of farmland. The proportion of virtual nematode and real nematode is 0.0084.
The nematodes is distributed randomly at the beginning. The rules of the movement are as follows:
The nematodes move towards 4 different directions: front, behind, right and left;
Every time the nematode choose one of the 4 directions randomly and the probability of these 4 directions are the same;
If the nematode move to the place where the gas concentration is lower than the previous position, then the nematode will move back to the previous position.
We did the different simulation experiments with one device in the farmland and four devices in the farmland separately.
Database
In order to apply our hypothesis and methodology to more agricultural pests control, we established a database. We hope to take a better use of this new environmental-friendly method from the context synthetic biology and share it with researchers all over the world. Our database contains 3 daughter databases: attractant, pests and toxalbumins bases. We will update relevant information about the engineering bacteria we designed to kill the pests in our database. Currently, our database contains the biobrick we established in this project and the one established by team ZJU-CHINA.
All the users have the permission to edit and add new contents, and we welcome everyone to use and enrich our database!
All the users have the permission to edit and add new contents, and we welcome everyone to use and enrich our database!
Liang W, Li Q, Chen L, et al. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on nematode trophic groups in a Chinese paddy-field ecosystem[J]. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao= The journal of applied ecology/Zhongguo sheng tai xue xue hui, Zhongguo ke xue yuan Shenyang ying yong sheng tai yan jiu suo zhu ban, 2002, 13(10): 1269-1272.
Gaugler R, Lebeck L, Nakagaki B, et al. Orientation of the entomogenous nematode Neoaplectana carpocapsae to carbon dioxide[J]. Environmental Entomology, 1980, 9(5): 649-652.
Yeates G W, Newton P C D, Ross D J. Response of soil nematode fauna to naturally elevated CO2 levels influenced by soil pattern[J]. Nematology, 1999, 1(3): 285-293.
Ye H Y, Ye B P, Wang D Y. Molecular control of memory in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans[J]. Neuroscience bulletin, 2008, 24(1): 49-55.
Xu J X, Deng X. Biological modeling of complex chemotaxis behaviors for C. elegans under speed regulation—a dynamic neural networks approach[J]. Journal of computational neuroscience, 2013, 35(1): 19-37.
Zhang Junli. The Study on Identification and Distribution of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes on Soybean, Vegetable and Sweet Potato in Hebei Province[D]. Diss. 2004.