Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Project/VitaminA"
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
<div class="column-left" align="justify"> | <div class="column-left" align="justify"> | ||
<h1 class="date one" id="overview">Improvement??? (help to find cool title!)</h1> | <h1 class="date one" id="overview">Improvement??? (help to find cool title!)</h1> | ||
+ | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
+ | <div class="column-left" align="justify"> | ||
<b>An optimized polycistron</b> | <b>An optimized polycistron</b> | ||
<br>The amount of ß-carotene produced by the polycistronic strain is not enough to meet the daily requirement if the idli fermented with the engineered strain is the only source of vitamin A eaten in a day; which is why we aimed to strongly increase the ß-carotene yield of those yeast. | <br>The amount of ß-carotene produced by the polycistronic strain is not enough to meet the daily requirement if the idli fermented with the engineered strain is the only source of vitamin A eaten in a day; which is why we aimed to strongly increase the ß-carotene yield of those yeast. | ||
Line 70: | Line 72: | ||
<div class="column-right" align="justify"> | <div class="column-right" align="justify"> | ||
<b>An optimized HMG gene</b> | <b>An optimized HMG gene</b> | ||
− | <br>Additionally, we codon-optimized for <i>S. cerevisiae</i> the HMG-CoA reductase gene | + | <br>Additionally, we codon-optimized for <i>S. cerevisiae</i> the HMG-CoA reductase gene from <i>S. aureus</i> that had been used by Li & al. in 2013. Indeed, their study had shown that <i>S. cerevisiae</i> transformed with this gene had a better ß-carotene yield than the ones transformed by the tHMG1 from <i>S. cerevisiae</i>; it is highly probable than a codon-optimized version of this gene from <i>S. aureus</i> would produce even more ß-carotene. |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | <br><br> | + | <br><br><b>Chromosomal integration</b> |
− | < | + | <br>In the strain containing the polycistron designed by Beekwilder, the polycistronic construct is on a plasmid (pUDC082). But since in our final product we would like our yeast to grow on non selective media and to keep the polycistron, we designed a way to integrate the construct in the yeast chromosome. Our plan was to use the HO-Poly-KanMX4-HO plasmid (AddGene plasmid #51662) as a backbone for our construct: it's a yeast plasmid for chromosomal integration into the HO locus, with a selection marker for yeast (KanMX4). This plasmid also has an origin of replication for <i>E. coli</i> and a selection marker for bacteria (Ampicillin). |
− | < | + | |
− | + | ||
− | <br>< | + | <br><br>HO-Poly-KanMX4-HO plasmid + optimized polycistron |
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 194: | Line 188: | ||
</plasmidtrack> | </plasmidtrack> | ||
</plasmid> | </plasmid> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
+ | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> |
Revision as of 20:47, 18 September 2015