Difference between revisions of "Team:Amoy/Description"

 
(14 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 58: Line 58:
 
   </li>
 
   </li>
  
   <li class="top"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Amoy/Project" id="products" class="top_link"><span class="down">PROJECT</span></a>
+
   <li class="top"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Amoy/Project" id="products" class="top_link"><span class="down active">PROJECT</span></a>
 
     <ul class="sub">
 
     <ul class="sub">
 
       <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Amoy/Project/Background">Background</a></li>
 
       <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Amoy/Project/Background">Background</a></li>
Line 131: Line 131:
 
<div id="title" style="width: 70%; margin-left: 25%;">
 
<div id="title" style="width: 70%; margin-left: 25%;">
 
<p id="title_p">DESCIPTION</p>
 
<p id="title_p">DESCIPTION</p>
<p class="main_p">L-<i>tert</i>-leucine is an unnatural amino acid which plays an important role in various industrial products, especially in pharmaceuticals. </br>
+
<p class="main_p">L-<i>tert</i>-leucine is an unnatural amino acid which plays an important role in various industrial products, especially in pharmaceuticals. </br></br>
  
With its application, many methodologies were developed for its preparation in the past decades. Some of them show low conversion ratio and poor chiral selectivity.Thirty years ago, scientists developed enzymatic reductive amination to produce L-<i>tert</i>-leucine by using leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase. This technology greatly improved the yield and excellent enantiomeric excess value of L-<i>tert</i>-leucine. It is regarded to be one of the most efficient routes. But due to the different activity of leucine dehydrogenase and format dehydrogenase, this method are not perfect (Figuer 1)[1]. The cofactor regeneration mei be broken in the reaction process.</br></p>
+
With its application, many methods were developed for its preparation in the past decades. Some of them have low conversion rate and poor chiral selectivity.Thirty years ago, scientists developed enzymatic reductive amination to produce L-<i>tert</i>-leucine by using leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase. This technology greatly improved the yield and excellent enantiomeric excess value of L-<i>tert</i>-leucine. It is regarded to be one of the most efficient routes. But due to the different activity of leucine dehydrogenase and format dehydrogenase, this method is not perfect(Figuer 1) [1]. The cofactor regeneration may be broken in reaction processes.</br></p>
  
 
<img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/bd/Amoy-Project_Description_fig4.png" style="width: 100%;" />
 
<img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/bd/Amoy-Project_Description_fig4.png" style="width: 100%;" />
Line 139: Line 139:
 
<p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 1</strong> The enzymatic reductive amination for synthesizing L-<i>tert</i>-leucine and the bug of this method</p>  
 
<p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 1</strong> The enzymatic reductive amination for synthesizing L-<i>tert</i>-leucine and the bug of this method</p>  
  
<p class="main_p"></br></br>In order to solve this problem, we put forward many methods. The basic idea is variable control. We constructed plasmids which bear leucine dehydrogenase gene (<i>leudh</i>) and formate dehydrogenase gene (<i>fdh</i>). One plasmid which contains both leucine dehydrogenase gene and format dehydrogenase gene controls the copy numbers and the transformation efficiency. And the only variable is efficiency of ribosome binding sites or strength of promoters. So the first methord is changing different ribosome binding sites. because of the weak activity of formate dehydrogenase, we connected <i>fdh</i> with the strongest ribosome binding site from iGEM registry, which is numbered BBa_B0034. Then, we changed the ribosome binding site of <i>leudh</i> (Figure 2).   
+
<p class="main_p"></br></br>In order to solve this problem, we put forward many methods. The basic idea is variable control. We constructed plasmids which bear leucine dehydrogenase gene (<i>leudh</i>) and formate dehydrogenase gene (<i>fdh</i>). One plasmid which contains both leucine dehydrogenase gene and format dehydrogenase gene controls the copy numbers and the transformation efficiency. And the only variable is efficiency of ribosome binding sites or strength of promoters. So the first method is changing different ribosome binding sites. Because of the weak activity of formate dehydrogenase, we connected <i>fdh</i> with the strongest ribosome binding site from iGEM registry, which is numbered BBa_B0034. Then, we changed the ribosome binding site of <i>leudh</i>(Figure 2) [2].   
 
</br></p>
 
</br></p>
  
<img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0f/Amoy-Project_Description_fig3.png" style="width: 100%;" />
+
<img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/7b/Amoy-Project_Description_figure21.png" style="width: 100%;" />
  
<p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 2</strong> The circuit constructed</p>
+
<p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 2</strong> Method 1: changing ribosome binding site to regulate the activity of leucine dehydrogenase</p>
  
<p class="main_p"></br></br>However, owing to different activity of leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase, the NADH consumption rate does not equal to its regeneration. Therefore, it is necessary to add excess NADH. The cofactor-NADH is a pretty expensive raw material, which will make the mass production of L-<i>tert</i>-leucine not cost-effective.</br></p>
+
<p class="main_p"></br></br>Optimizing L-<i>tert</i>-leucine synthesis by changing the promoter is an alternative method. Promoter is also an important factor of translation process. So the second method is changing different promoters and finding out the optimal promoter.</br></br>
  
<img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/bd/Amoy-Project_Description_fig4.png" style="width: 100%;" />
+
However, the parts of different ribosome binding sites and promoters which we got from the iGEM authority cannot meet our demands, because these parts are not continuously adjustable. That means we may not be able to get optimal RBS or promoter for <i>leudh</i>. However, we were illuminated by the project did by Peking University in 2011. We get the idea that we could use genetic rheostats as RBS regulators. Then, we could get the excellent RBS efficiency and use RBS calculators to edit the RBSs' sequence to a suitable efficiency(Figure 3) [3,4].</br></p>
  
<p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 3</strong> Different activities of leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase</p>
+
<img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3f/Amoy-Project_Description_figure31.png" style="width: 100%;" />
  
<p class="main_p"></br></br>The whole plan is to regulate the efficiency of ribosome binding site. In other words, RBS, to control the strength of <i>leudh</i> and <i>fdh</i>. With the help of mathematical modeling, the most suitable efficiency of RBS of leucine dehydrogenase will be obtained. Consequently, the cofactor NADH can be self-sufficient as shown in this cycle. We have investigated lots of RBSs and tried to choose the most probable pair of RBS and we chose B0032, B0030 and B0034 for plasmid construction. Through this way, it is quite easier to control RBS strength in one circuit.</br></p>
+
<p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 3</strong> Method 3: Using genetic rheostat to regulate the activity of leucine dehydrogenase </p>
  
 +
<h1 class="main_h1">Reference:</h1>
  
 +
<p class="main_p">[1] Li, J., Pan, J., Zhang, J. & Xu, H., J. Stereoselective synthesis of L-<i>tert</i>-leucine by a newly cloned leucine dehydrogenase from Exiguobacterium sibiricum. <i>J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym</i>. <strong>105</strong>, 11-17 (2014)</br>
 +
[2] <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Warsaw/Stage1"> http://https://2010.igem.org/Team:Warsaw/Stage1</a></br>
 +
[3] <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking_R/Project/RNAToolkit"> https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking_R/Project/RNAToolkit</a></br>
 +
[4] Reeve, B., Hargest, T., Gilbert, C. & Ellis T. Predicting translation initiation rates for designing synthetic biology. <i>Mini Review Article</i>. <strong>2</strong>, 1-6 (2014)
 +
</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<!--end_ main-->
 
<!--end_ main-->

Latest revision as of 03:00, 19 September 2015

Aomy/Project

DESCIPTION

L-tert-leucine is an unnatural amino acid which plays an important role in various industrial products, especially in pharmaceuticals.

With its application, many methods were developed for its preparation in the past decades. Some of them have low conversion rate and poor chiral selectivity.Thirty years ago, scientists developed enzymatic reductive amination to produce L-tert-leucine by using leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase. This technology greatly improved the yield and excellent enantiomeric excess value of L-tert-leucine. It is regarded to be one of the most efficient routes. But due to the different activity of leucine dehydrogenase and format dehydrogenase, this method is not perfect(Figuer 1) [1]. The cofactor regeneration may be broken in reaction processes.

Figure 1 The enzymatic reductive amination for synthesizing L-tert-leucine and the bug of this method



In order to solve this problem, we put forward many methods. The basic idea is variable control. We constructed plasmids which bear leucine dehydrogenase gene (leudh) and formate dehydrogenase gene (fdh). One plasmid which contains both leucine dehydrogenase gene and format dehydrogenase gene controls the copy numbers and the transformation efficiency. And the only variable is efficiency of ribosome binding sites or strength of promoters. So the first method is changing different ribosome binding sites. Because of the weak activity of formate dehydrogenase, we connected fdh with the strongest ribosome binding site from iGEM registry, which is numbered BBa_B0034. Then, we changed the ribosome binding site of leudh(Figure 2) [2].

Figure 2 Method 1: changing ribosome binding site to regulate the activity of leucine dehydrogenase



Optimizing L-tert-leucine synthesis by changing the promoter is an alternative method. Promoter is also an important factor of translation process. So the second method is changing different promoters and finding out the optimal promoter.

However, the parts of different ribosome binding sites and promoters which we got from the iGEM authority cannot meet our demands, because these parts are not continuously adjustable. That means we may not be able to get optimal RBS or promoter for leudh. However, we were illuminated by the project did by Peking University in 2011. We get the idea that we could use genetic rheostats as RBS regulators. Then, we could get the excellent RBS efficiency and use RBS calculators to edit the RBSs' sequence to a suitable efficiency(Figure 3) [3,4].

Figure 3 Method 3: Using genetic rheostat to regulate the activity of leucine dehydrogenase

Reference:

[1] Li, J., Pan, J., Zhang, J. & Xu, H., J. Stereoselective synthesis of L-tert-leucine by a newly cloned leucine dehydrogenase from Exiguobacterium sibiricum. J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym. 105, 11-17 (2014)
[2] http://https://2010.igem.org/Team:Warsaw/Stage1
[3] https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking_R/Project/RNAToolkit
[4] Reeve, B., Hargest, T., Gilbert, C. & Ellis T. Predicting translation initiation rates for designing synthetic biology. Mini Review Article. 2, 1-6 (2014)

CONTACT US

Email: igemxmu@gmail.com

Website: 2015.igem.org/Team:Amoy

Address: Xiamen University, No. 422, Siming South Road, Xiamen, Fujian, P.R.China 361005