Difference between revisions of "Team:UI Indonesia/Practices"

 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 237: Line 237:
 
                                                         <a  onclick="bkkbn()"><li>BKKBN</li></a>
 
                                                         <a  onclick="bkkbn()"><li>BKKBN</li></a>
 
<a onclick="ourcampaign()"><li>Our Campaign</li></a>
 
<a onclick="ourcampaign()"><li>Our Campaign</li></a>
                                                        <a onclick="ourcampaign()"><li>Family Planing in Action</li></a>
 
 
 
 
 
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
Line 313: Line 312:
 
function biosecurity() {
 
function biosecurity() {
 
document.getElementById("judul").innerHTML = "Biosecurity";
 
document.getElementById("judul").innerHTML = "Biosecurity";
     document.getElementById("isi").innerHTML = "In our project, many of people ask us about “how if your product use by irresponssible people who use it for threatening purpose?” that question trigerring us that our product could have biosecurity issue in the future if we don’t do an assessment to prevent it. Furthermore, we try to make a resolution to overcome and the idea that we purpose are:<br><br><b>Patent</b><br>We choose to use patent protectionin the future because this give us a right to determine who allowed to use the product in such a certain time (based on Indonesia Constitution number 14, 2001) we want that the user who allowed to use our product is:<br>a. Clinician<br>b. Pharmacist<br>c. Scientist<br>d. Midwife <br>But, we do know that patent is not permanent, which that mean we could lose mandatory to our product. The solution that we could provide is to advocate government a protection to restricted sell the contraception freely for the safety issue.";
+
     document.getElementById("isi").innerHTML = "In our project, many of people ask us about “how if your product use by irresponssible people who use it for threatening purpose?” that question trigerring us that our product could have biosecurity issue in the future if we don’t do an assessment to prevent it. Furthermore, we try to make a resolution to overcome and the idea that we purpose are:<br><br><b>Patent</b><br>We choose to use patent protectionin the future because this give us a right to determine who allowed to use the product in such a certain time (based on Indonesia Constitution number 14, 2001) we want that the user who allowed to use our product is:<br>a. Clinician<br>b. Pharmacist<br>c. Scientist<br>d. Midwife <br>But, we do know that patent is not permanent, which that mean we could lose mandatory to our product. The solution that we could provide is to advocate government a protection to restricted sell the contraception freely for the safety issue.Our bacon can become bioweapon, more discussion you can click <a href='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/cc/Bio_weapon.pdf' target='_blank'>(UI_Indonesia_Bioweapon)</a>";
 
}
 
}
 
</script>
 
</script>

Latest revision as of 03:45, 19 September 2015

End User Consideration Of Bacterial Contraception (BaCon)

A. Society View Toward the Existing Contraceptive and Bacterial Contraception (BaCon)
• About 55% respondents feel neutral with their current contraceptives

• Altough some of them feel neutral on their current contraceptives, They still find some disadvantages in their current contraceptive. 3 major disadvantages are : Inconvenient, Troublesome & Ineffectivity

.....See More:Click Here To Download The Full Document (It Will Open In New Window)