Difference between revisions of "Team:NCTU Formosa/Safety"

 
(71 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
<head>
 
<head>
<link href='https://2015.igem.org/Team:NCTU_Formosa/source/contentcss?action=raw&ctype=text/css' rel="stylesheet">
+
<style type=text/css>
<style>
+
/* v1.0 | 20080212 */
.logo{
+
 
background-image:url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/53/2015_NCTU_Formosa_11897155_889492047791513_1100794190_n.jpg");
+
html, body, div, span, applet, object, iframe,
position:absolute;
+
h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p, blockquote, pre,
background-size:80%;
+
a, abbr, acronym, address, big, cite, code,
background-repeat: no-repeat;
+
del, dfn, em, font, img, ins, kbd, q, s, samp,
height:50vh;
+
small, strike, strong, sub, sup, tt, var,
width:20vw;
+
b, u, i, center,
right:0vw;
+
dl, dt, dd, ol, ul, li,
 +
fieldset, form, label, legend,
 +
table, caption, tbody, tfoot, thead, tr, th, td {
 +
    margin: 0;
 +
    padding: 0;
 +
    border: 0;
 +
    outline: 0;
 +
    vertical-align: baseline;
 +
    background: transparent;
 +
}
 +
body {
 +
    line-height: 1;
 +
}
 +
ol, ul {
 +
    list-style: none;
 +
}
 +
blockquote, q {
 +
    quotes: none;
 +
}
 +
blockquote:before, blockquote:after,
 +
q:before, q:after {
 +
    content: '';
 +
    content: none;
 +
}
 +
 
 +
/* remember to define focus styles! */
 +
:focus {
 +
    outline: 0;
 +
}
 +
 
 +
/* remember to highlight inserts somehow! */
 +
ins {
 +
    text-decoration: none;
 +
}
 +
 
 +
del {
 +
    text-decoration: line-through;
 +
}
 +
 
 +
/* tables still need 'cellspacing="0"' in the markup */
 +
table {
 +
    border-collapse: collapse;
 +
    border-spacing: 0;
 +
}
 +
.p01{
 +
background-color: #33CCFF;
 +
position:relative;
 +
height:70vh;
 +
width:100%;
 +
left:0vw;
 +
opacity:0.8;
 +
}
 +
.p02{
 +
background-color: #FCFCDE;
 +
position:relative;
 +
width:100%;
 +
}
 +
.background1{
 +
background-image:url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1b/NCTU_Formosa_Safety_logo.png");
 +
background-repeat:no-repeat;
 +
background-position:12vh 12vh;
 +
position:relative;
 +
height:70vh;
 +
width:40vw;
 +
background-size:65%;
 
top:0vh;
 
top:0vh;
 +
left:10vw;
 +
opacity:1.0;
 +
float:left;
 +
}
 +
.title{
 +
font-family:Arial;
 +
font-size:33pt;
 +
position:relative;
 +
right:20vw;
 +
top:33vh;
 +
color:#fff;
 +
z-index:100;
 +
float:right;
 +
text-align:center;
 +
}
 +
 +
 +
.content{
 +
font-family:Arial;
 +
font-size:20pt;
 +
width:60vw;
 +
margin:0 auto;
 +
left:20vw;
 +
right:20vw;
 +
top:9vh;
 +
color:#000;
 +
text-align: justify;
 +
padding-top:6vh;
 +
padding-bottom:8vh;
 +
}
 +
.goto{
 +
position:relative;
 +
padding-left:20vw;
 +
padding-top:3vh;
 +
float:left;
 +
z-index:100;
 +
}
 +
.goto a{
 +
text-decoration:none;
 +
color:#000;
 +
}
 +
.goto1{
 +
position:relative;
 +
padding-left:76vw;
 +
padding-top:3vh;
 +
}
 +
.goto1 a{
 +
text-decoration:none;
 +
color:#000;
 +
}
 +
 +
p{
 +
text-indent: 40px;
 +
font-family:Arial;
 +
font-size:14pt;
 +
position:relative;
 +
color:#000;
 +
text-align: justify;
 +
LINE-HEIGHT:25pt;
 +
}
 +
h1{
 +
font-size:25pt;
 +
}
 +
h2{
 +
font-size:20pt;
 +
padding-top:2vh;}
 +
.image{
 +
mragin:0 auto;
 +
width:auto;
 +
text-align:center;
 +
font-size:11pt;
 +
padding-top:50px;
 +
padding-bottom:50px;
 +
}
 +
.reference{
 +
font-size:10pt;
 +
position:relative;
 +
border-top:#999 1px solid;
 
}
 
}
 
</style>
 
</style>
  </head>
 
  <body>
 
<div class="logo"></div>
 
  <div class="side"></div>
 
  
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
<div class="p01">
 +
<div class="background1"></div>
 +
<div class="title">Safety</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="p02">
 +
<div class="content">
 +
<div style="text-align:justify;">
 +
    <p>This year Apollo designed a product to mainly detect antigens. Our users include scientific researchers, clinical scientists and so on. We believe these people all have the expertise. On the other hand, our product contains <i>E. coli</i> so when applying our product, basic protective gear, lab coat and gloves, are required. Objects that come into contact with our product, for instance, tips, need to be sterilized and thrown away, in case of non-natural gene outflow. We will hand out our product to others after our safety procedure. Hence lowering the possibility of bio-contamination. </P>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>We designed a safety mechanism for our E.Cotector allowing it to be friendlier to users and to the environment. Our main objective is to <font color="#AC1F4A">maintain the fluorescence</font> but <font color="#AC1F4A">kill the bacteria</font>, which means that treated <i>E.coli</i> cannot grow in nutritious conditions such as LB.</p></div>
 +
<br><br>
  
  <div class="project">
+
<h2>Antibiotic</h2>
<div class="Background"><a class="link link--kukuri" href="#" data-letters="Safety"> Safety</a></div>
+
+
+
+
<div class="project_text">
+
    <p>This year Apollo designed a product mainly to detect antigens. Our users include scientific researchers, clinical scientist and so on. We believe these people all have the expertise, but we would like to once again remind everyone that our product contains E.coli. Therefore when applying our product, basic protective gear (lab coat, gloves and so on) are needed. Objects that come into contact with our product (for example: tips) need to be sterilized and thrown away, in case of non-natural gene outflow. We’ll hand our product to others after our safety procedure. Hence lowering the possibility of bio-contamination. </P>
+
<p>We designed a safety mechanism for our E.Cotector allowing it to be friendlier to users and environment. Our main objective is to maintain the fluorescence but kill the bacteria, which means that treated E.coli cannot grow in nutritious conditions such as LB.</p></div>
+
<div class="project_title">
+
<strong>Choice</strong></div>
+
<div class="project_text">
+
<p><B>Paraformaldehyde</B></p>
+
<p>At first, we treated our E.Cotector, displayed scFv(anti-EGFR) and green fluorescence protein(GFP), by paraformaldehyde. Paraformaldehyde is a chemical substance that is toxic for organism. It can fix the cell structure and all of the proteins.<br>
+
According to the result, we found that paraformaldehyde-treated E.coli can grow in the LB broth at 37℃ incubated.</p>
+
<p><B>Antibiotic</B></p>
+
<p>We tried antibiotics to achieve our goal. We used three kinds of antibiotics. The first one is tetracycline. It can bind to 30S subunit of ribosomes and then inhibit the synthesis of proteins. The second one is ampicillin. It can inhibit the formation of the cell wall. The third one is sulfonamide (p-Aminobenzenesulfonamide). It competitively inhibits the synthesis of folate, which connects to the purine synthesis and the DNA synthesis [3] [4].</p>
+
<p><B>Result</B></p>
+
<p>We mixed the antibiotic and bacteria together. Then we observed the growth and the fluorescence of bacteria. There will be more details in the protocol.
+
The category and testing concentration of antibiotic are bellowed.</p>
+
<p>In the experiment where we add Tetracycline and Ampicillin, we discovered the more antibiotics we added the less the fluorescence(Fig.1). Tetracycline reduces the fluorescence at a higher rate than Ampicillin. But when we cultivate the bacteria on LB plate, we noticed that the whether we add Ampicillin or not, the bacteria still grows on the plate. On the other hand, bacteria added with Tetracycline won’t grow on the LB plate(Fig.2). </p>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1c/NCTU_Formosa_Safety1.png" width="760px" height="529.5px">
+
<p>Figure 1. Impacted by ampicillin and tetracycline,there were the expression of fluorescence during 12 hours.</p>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/26/NCTU_Formosa_Safety3.png" width="618.7px" height="360px">
+
<p>Figure 2. The result of incubated the E.Cotector on the LB plate treated by ampicillin or tetracycline.<p>
+
<p>
+
In the next experiment where we add sulfonamide, we observed that the fluorescence is more or less the same amount as the original bacteria(Fig.3). Correspondingly, we also cultivated the cell on LB plate. We discovered the inhibition of growth doesn’t steadily change with the concentration of Sulfonamide. Some bacteria still grow and some don’t(Fig.4). </p>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3c/NCTU_Formosa_Safety2.png" width="760px" height="529.5px">
+
<p>Figure 3. Impacted by sulfulnamide,there were the expression of fluorescence during 12 hours.</p>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/6c/NCTU_Formosa_Safety4.png" width="618.7px" height="352px">
+
<p>Figure 4. The result of incubated the E.Cotector on the LB plate treated by sulfonamide.<p>
+
  
 +
<p> We tried antibiotics to achieve our goal. We used three kinds of antibiotics. The first one is <font color="#AC1F4A">tetracycline</font>. It can bind to 30S subunit of ribosomes and then inhibit the synthesis of proteins. The second one is  <font color="#AC1F4A">ampicillin</font>. It can inhibit the formation of the cell wall. The third one is <font color="#AC1F4A">sulfonamide (p-Aminobenzenesulfonamide)</font>. It competitively inhibits the synthesis of folate, which connects to the purine synthesis and the DNA synthesis. </p>
 +
<br><br>
  
</div>
+
<h2>Method and Result<br><br></h2>
    </div>
+
<p> We mixed the antibiotics and bacteria together. We used E.Cotector expressing both anti-VEGF and red fluorescence protein to do the test. After we added different concentrations of different antibiotics, we observed the <font color="#AC1F4A">fluorescence intensity</font> and the  <font color="#AC1F4A">bacterial growth</font> on LB plate every hour. We extracted 100 µL of bacterial liquid from each sample and added it to 96 well to detect the fluorescence. There will be more details on this in the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:NCTU_Formosa/Protocol">protocol</a>.</p><br>
 +
<p> In the experiments, after adding tetracycline, Ampicillin, we discovered that the fluorescence <font color="#AC1F4A">remains</font> close to the <font color="#AC1F4A">original</font> value (Figure 1.) . We also used sulfonamide. However, the solubility decreased causing the concentration of sulfonamide to distribute unequally. This may be due to the fact that sulfonamide’s solubility is highly related to the solution’s pH value. The lower the pH value, the better the solubility of sulfonamide. This also means that sulfonamide creates more  <font color="#AC1F4A">damage</font> to the structure of protein, causing the fluorescence to <font color="#AC1F4A">disappear</font>. </p><br>
 +
<div class="image"><img style="margin:0 auto;width:95%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/66/NCTU_Formosa_safety2.png" ><br><br>
 +
Figure 1. Fluorescence of antibiotics treated E.Cotector are <font color="#AC1F4A">as large as</font> untreated E.Cotector.</div><br>
  
        <div style=float:left;> <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:NCTU_Formosa/Design" class="btn btn-sm animated-button thar-three">Go to Design</a> </div>
+
<p>The second step, after the addition of tetracycline, we extracted bacterial liquid from each sample and added it on to the LB plate each hour, and cultivate them at 37℃. Once there were bacterial colonies, we determined that the antibiotics did not fully kill the bacteria. Experimental results showed that when we added Ampicillin to the bacteria, bacteria could still grow on LB plate as untreated ones. On the other hand, bacteria added with Tetracycline <font color="#AC1F4A">will not grow</font> on the LB plate (Figure 2.) . </p><br>
<div style=float:left;> <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:NCTU_Formosa/Project" class="btn btn-sm animated-button thar-three-two">Back to project</a> </div>
+
<p>According to Figure 3., we can found that the growth of our E.Cotector treated by tetracycline is inhibited (OD600 nm didn’t increase after incubated under 37℃ in the LB). On the other hand, the OD600 nm of E.Cotector not treated by tetracycline increased. As a result, we proved that the tetracycline will  <font color="#AC1F4A">inhibit the growth</font> of E.Cotector.</p>
           
+
<div class="image"><img style="margin:0 auto;width:60%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a6/NCTU_Formosa_safety3.png" ><br><br>
  <div style="position:relative;bottom:0;">
+
Figure 2.  Our E.Cotector treated by tetracycline (100µg/mL) cannot grow on the LB plate after 37℃ incubated.</div><br>
    <div style="width:30vw;height:5vh;position:absolute;left:2vw;float:left;background-color:#00171F;color:#fff;font-family:Myriad Pro;font-size:2em;padding:7vh 0vw 7vh 5vw;">contact us<BR> NCTU_Formosa APOllO &nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/NCTU_Formosa-IGEM-team/267841893250331?fref=ts" target="_blank"><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/ab/NCTU_FORMOSA_Facebook_LINK.png width=40vw></a> </div>
+
<div class="image"><img style="margin:0 auto;width:95%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f8/NCTU_Formosa_safety1.png" ><br><br>
        <div style="width:58.85vw;height:5vh;position:absolute;right:0;float:left;background-color:#263A40;color:#fff;font-family:Myriad Pro;font-size:2em;padding:7vh 0vw 7vh 6vw;">
+
Figure 3. The growth of E.Cotector were  <font color="#AC1F4A">inhibited</font> by tetracycline.</div><br>
        <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/nqUy6" target="_blank"><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/10/NCTU_Formosa_footer_location.png width=40vw></a>
+
<p> We put the results of adding different antibiotics in Table 1. Collectively, <font color="#AC1F4A">Tetracycline performed best</font> at killing the bacteria and conserving the fluorescence. From the LB plate result, we observed that the higher the concentration of antibiotics, the less time it would take to fully kill the bacteria. In  <font color="#AC1F4A">4 hours</font> of sterilization, tetracycline (<font color="#AC1F4A">100µg/mL</font>) performed better than tetracycline (30µg/mL). Therefore, we chose tetracycline (100µg/mL) as our final safety means. </p><br>
            &nbsp;&nbsp;Engineering Building 6 EF455, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan, ROC. </div>
+
<div class="image"><img style="margin:0 auto;width:95%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/60/NCTU_Formosa_safety4.png" ><br><br>
    </div>
+
Table 1. Comparison of different antibiotics affected on the E.Cotector.</div><br>
 +
<p>How do we know how long it takes for tetracycline to kill all of the E.cotector? After we added tetracycline, we spread the treated bacteria on the LB plate each hour and incubated under 37℃. By counting the number of colonies, we can know the growth situation of E.Cotector. After adding tetracycline for 4 hours, there were <font color="#AC1F4A">no</font> colonies formed (Figure 4.) . So we concluded that it took <font color="#AC1F4A">4</font> hours for the tetracycline to kill the bacteria. In other words, our E.Cotector will <font color="#AC1F4A">not grow</font> anywhere after tetracycline treatment for 4 hours.</p><br>
 +
<div class="image"><img style="margin:0 auto;width:95%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4a/NCTU_Formosa_safety5.png" ><br><br>
 +
Figure 4. In the beginning, tetracycline did not play a significant role. After 4 hours though, there were no colonies formed on the LB plate.</p></div><br>
 +
<p>After our E.Cotector was treated by tetracycline, we stored the bacteria in the -80℃ refrigerator, and found that the fluorescence was maintained for <font color="#AC1F4A">six days</font> (Figure 5.) . </p>
 +
<div class="image"><img style="margin:0 auto;width:95%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/ac/NCTU_Formosa_safety6.png" ><br><br>
 +
Figure 5. The fluorescence maintained in the -80℃ refrigerator.</div><br>
 +
</div>
  
+
 
 
+
 
  </body>
+
 
  </html>
+
<div class="goto">
 +
<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:NCTU_Formosa/Project"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3c/%E7%AE%AD%E9%A0%AD1.png"; width=50vw;><br><br>Back to Navigation</a>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="goto1">
 +
<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:NCTU_Formosa/Parts"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c2/%E7%AE%AD%E9%A0%AD2.png"; width=50vw;><br><br>Go to Parts</a>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
 +
{{Team:NCTU_Formosa/footer}}

Latest revision as of 03:55, 19 September 2015

Safety

This year Apollo designed a product to mainly detect antigens. Our users include scientific researchers, clinical scientists and so on. We believe these people all have the expertise. On the other hand, our product contains E. coli so when applying our product, basic protective gear, lab coat and gloves, are required. Objects that come into contact with our product, for instance, tips, need to be sterilized and thrown away, in case of non-natural gene outflow. We will hand out our product to others after our safety procedure. Hence lowering the possibility of bio-contamination.


We designed a safety mechanism for our E.Cotector allowing it to be friendlier to users and to the environment. Our main objective is to maintain the fluorescence but kill the bacteria, which means that treated E.coli cannot grow in nutritious conditions such as LB.



Antibiotic

We tried antibiotics to achieve our goal. We used three kinds of antibiotics. The first one is tetracycline. It can bind to 30S subunit of ribosomes and then inhibit the synthesis of proteins. The second one is ampicillin. It can inhibit the formation of the cell wall. The third one is sulfonamide (p-Aminobenzenesulfonamide). It competitively inhibits the synthesis of folate, which connects to the purine synthesis and the DNA synthesis.



Method and Result

We mixed the antibiotics and bacteria together. We used E.Cotector expressing both anti-VEGF and red fluorescence protein to do the test. After we added different concentrations of different antibiotics, we observed the fluorescence intensity and the bacterial growth on LB plate every hour. We extracted 100 µL of bacterial liquid from each sample and added it to 96 well to detect the fluorescence. There will be more details on this in the protocol.


In the experiments, after adding tetracycline, Ampicillin, we discovered that the fluorescence remains close to the original value (Figure 1.) . We also used sulfonamide. However, the solubility decreased causing the concentration of sulfonamide to distribute unequally. This may be due to the fact that sulfonamide’s solubility is highly related to the solution’s pH value. The lower the pH value, the better the solubility of sulfonamide. This also means that sulfonamide creates more damage to the structure of protein, causing the fluorescence to disappear.




Figure 1. Fluorescence of antibiotics treated E.Cotector are as large as untreated E.Cotector.

The second step, after the addition of tetracycline, we extracted bacterial liquid from each sample and added it on to the LB plate each hour, and cultivate them at 37℃. Once there were bacterial colonies, we determined that the antibiotics did not fully kill the bacteria. Experimental results showed that when we added Ampicillin to the bacteria, bacteria could still grow on LB plate as untreated ones. On the other hand, bacteria added with Tetracycline will not grow on the LB plate (Figure 2.) .


According to Figure 3., we can found that the growth of our E.Cotector treated by tetracycline is inhibited (OD600 nm didn’t increase after incubated under 37℃ in the LB). On the other hand, the OD600 nm of E.Cotector not treated by tetracycline increased. As a result, we proved that the tetracycline will inhibit the growth of E.Cotector.



Figure 2. Our E.Cotector treated by tetracycline (100µg/mL) cannot grow on the LB plate after 37℃ incubated.



Figure 3. The growth of E.Cotector were inhibited by tetracycline.

We put the results of adding different antibiotics in Table 1. Collectively, Tetracycline performed best at killing the bacteria and conserving the fluorescence. From the LB plate result, we observed that the higher the concentration of antibiotics, the less time it would take to fully kill the bacteria. In 4 hours of sterilization, tetracycline (100µg/mL) performed better than tetracycline (30µg/mL). Therefore, we chose tetracycline (100µg/mL) as our final safety means.




Table 1. Comparison of different antibiotics affected on the E.Cotector.

How do we know how long it takes for tetracycline to kill all of the E.cotector? After we added tetracycline, we spread the treated bacteria on the LB plate each hour and incubated under 37℃. By counting the number of colonies, we can know the growth situation of E.Cotector. After adding tetracycline for 4 hours, there were no colonies formed (Figure 4.) . So we concluded that it took 4 hours for the tetracycline to kill the bacteria. In other words, our E.Cotector will not grow anywhere after tetracycline treatment for 4 hours.




Figure 4. In the beginning, tetracycline did not play a significant role. After 4 hours though, there were no colonies formed on the LB plate.


After our E.Cotector was treated by tetracycline, we stored the bacteria in the -80℃ refrigerator, and found that the fluorescence was maintained for six days (Figure 5.) .



Figure 5. The fluorescence maintained in the -80℃ refrigerator.