Difference between revisions of "Team:BostonU"
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
padding: 10px; | padding: 10px; | ||
height: 300px; | height: 300px; | ||
+ | margin-right: auto; | ||
+ | margin-left: auto; | ||
box-shadow: 5px 5px 2px #888888; | box-shadow: 5px 5px 2px #888888; | ||
border-radius: 10px; | border-radius: 10px; | ||
Line 55: | Line 57: | ||
*/ | */ | ||
− | + | </style> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</header> | </header> | ||
<body bgcolor="#DBDBFF"> | <body bgcolor="#DBDBFF"> | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
<div id="contentpage"> | <div id="contentpage"> | ||
<div id="mainpage"> | <div id="mainpage"> | ||
− | <h2 style="font-color:#000000;">Developing conditionally dimerizable split protein systems for genetic logic and genome editing applications </h2> | + | <h2 style="font-color:#000000; margin-left:50px;">Developing conditionally dimerizable split protein systems for genetic logic and genome editing applications </h2> |
− | <p style="padding-bottom | + | <p style="padding-bottom:50px;">The field of synthetic biology seeks to engineer desirable cellular functionalities by developing molecular technologies that enable precise genetic manipulation. A promising solution is to reliably control proteins that naturally execute genetic modifications. Current strategies to regulate activity of such proteins primarily rely on modulating protein expression level through transcriptional control; however, these methods are susceptible to slow response and leaky expression. In contrast, strategies that exploit post-translational regulation of activity, such as conditional dimerization of split protein halves, have been demonstrated to bypass these limitations. Here, we compare the relative efficiency of previously characterized dimerization domains in regulating activities of three important genetic manipulation proteins - integrases and recombination directionality factors for genetic logic applications, and saCas9 for in vivo genome editing applications. We also establish guidelines to rationally identify promising protein split sites. Our characterization of these systems in mammalian cells ultimately paves way for important biomedical applications.</p> |
<center> | <center> | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><h3 align="center" style="padding-bottom:50px;">Controlling Protein Activity</h3></td> | <td><h3 align="center" style="padding-bottom:50px;">Controlling Protein Activity</h3></td> | ||
− | <td><h3 align="center" style="padding-bottom:50px;"> | + | <td><h3 align="center" style="padding-bottom:50px;">Controlling Integrases and RDFs</h3></td> |
− | <td><h3 align="center" style="padding-bottom:50px;">saCas9</h3></td> | + | <td><h3 align="center" style="padding-bottom:50px;">Controlling saCas9</h3></td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
<td><center><a align="center" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:BostonU/Education/Building_with_Biology"><img style="height:95%; width:95%; padding-left:30px; padding-right:30px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c5/Building_w_biology.jpg" /></a></center></td> | <td><center><a align="center" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:BostonU/Education/Building_with_Biology"><img style="height:95%; width:95%; padding-left:30px; padding-right:30px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c5/Building_w_biology.jpg" /></a></center></td> | ||
<td><center><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:BostonU/Attributions"><img style="height:200px; width:200px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/39/Thank_you_attributions.png"/></a></center></td> | <td><center><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:BostonU/Attributions"><img style="height:200px; width:200px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/39/Thank_you_attributions.png"/></a></center></td> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 99: | Line 100: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> | ||
+ | <h4 style="font-size:25px; text-align:center;">iGEM Jamboree 2015 Results</h4> | ||
+ | <ol style="font-size:23px;text-align:center">Medal Received: Gold.<br>Nominated for Best Foundational Advance Project</li> | ||
− | + | <br><br><br> | |
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 20:30, 3 October 2015
Developing conditionally dimerizable split protein systems for genetic logic and genome editing applications
The field of synthetic biology seeks to engineer desirable cellular functionalities by developing molecular technologies that enable precise genetic manipulation. A promising solution is to reliably control proteins that naturally execute genetic modifications. Current strategies to regulate activity of such proteins primarily rely on modulating protein expression level through transcriptional control; however, these methods are susceptible to slow response and leaky expression. In contrast, strategies that exploit post-translational regulation of activity, such as conditional dimerization of split protein halves, have been demonstrated to bypass these limitations. Here, we compare the relative efficiency of previously characterized dimerization domains in regulating activities of three important genetic manipulation proteins - integrases and recombination directionality factors for genetic logic applications, and saCas9 for in vivo genome editing applications. We also establish guidelines to rationally identify promising protein split sites. Our characterization of these systems in mammalian cells ultimately paves way for important biomedical applications.
Controlling Protein Activity |
Controlling Integrases and RDFs |
Controlling saCas9 |
Mammalian Synthetic Biology |
Education and Outreach |
Attributions |
iGEM Jamboree 2015 Results
- Medal Received: Gold.
Nominated for Best Foundational Advance Project