Difference between revisions of "Demo Judging 2016"

 
(35 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
−
 
+
<div class="oneColumn">
−
 
+
<h1>Judging Hub</h1>
−
 
+
</div>
−
 
+
−
 
+
  
  
 
<div class="oneColumn">
 
<div class="oneColumn">
−
<h1>Judging Hub</h1>
+
<h2> General Information </h2>
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
−
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, solum dicunt vel an, in pri fabellas salutandi. Cu alienum intellegam qui, ut qui fabulas deleniti, labore iisque impedit mei te. Vis an ridens accusam, te sit sale autem omittam, eu per dolore primis.
+
Welcome to the Judging Hub! This page will help guide you through all of the information relevant to judging at iGEM. Information on this page includes: how teams are evaluated for awards and prizes, the expectations we have for our judges, how to apply to be considered for the 2016 judging panel, and information that we hope will help judges carry out their duties.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 +
<div class="oneColumn">
 +
<center>
  
−
<div class="oneColumn">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/95/HQposter_judging.jpg" width=312>
−
<h2> General Information </h2>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/ae/HQactive_listening.jpg" width=312>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3b/HQasking_questions.jpg" width=312>
 
</div>
 
</div>
−
 
  
 
<div class="threeColumns">
 
<div class="threeColumns">
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
<h3>Being a Judge</h3>
 
<h3>Being a Judge</h3>
−
<p> iGEM teams follow a high standard of safe and responsible biological engineering. Because you are members of the synthetic biology community, you are responsible for living up to the trust placed in you to design, build, and share biological devices safely.</p>
+
<p>Judging during iGEM focuses on evaluating team projects and presentations, while providing constructive and positive feedback to the teams. It is a challenging yet rewarding experience. Judges are each asked to evaluate teams during the Jamoree, which includes scoring the following: team projects, team wikis, team presentations and posters, medal criteria, and special awards. This requires a serious commitment from each judge and we expect every member of our judging panel to fulfill their duties to the best of their ability.</p>
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
<a href="">2016.igem.org/Safety/What is Safety?</a>
+
  
 +
<br>
 +
<a href="">2016.igem.org/Judging/Being a Judge</a>
 
</div>
 
</div>
−
 
  
  
 
<div class="threeColumns">
 
<div class="threeColumns">
 
<h3>Judging Expectations</h3>
 
<h3>Judging Expectations</h3>
−
<p> The iGEM Safety Committee is a group of experts in biosafety, biosecurity, and risk assessment. Its members come from diverse areas of industry, academia, and government. </p>
+
<p>Understanding and fairly evaluating the various aspects of the projects that iGEM teams carry out can be difficult for both novice and experienced judges. We therefore provide judges with a Judging Handbook to provide some guidance on how to navigate this process. For 2016, we will also provide a wide range of example projects from previous years that judges are welcome to look through before and during the main competition months. Our goal is to provide this content by January 2016, so please check back for updates!</p>
  
−
<br><br>
+
<br>
−
<a href=""> 2016.igem.org/Safety/Committee</a>
+
<a href="">2016.igem.org/Judging/Expectations</a>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
  
 
<div class="threeColumns">
 
<div class="threeColumns">
−
<h3>Judging Application</h3>
+
<h3>Apply to be a Judge!</h3>
−
<p>All participants are responsible for working safely in the laboratory, and for ensuring that your project complies with local laws and university/institutional guidelines.</p>
+
<p>People interested in being an iGEM judge are asked to fill out an application. The application asks perspective judges to explain their motivation for judging iGEM, describe any experience they have with iGEM or judging, and clearly state any conflicts of interest with the current teams. Our goal is to create a diverse and balanced judging panel in terms of nationality, gender, and career path. The judging application for 2016 is currently under development. Please check back for updates in January 2016!</p>
  
−
<br><br>
+
<br>
−
<a href=""> 2016.igem.org/Safety/Responsibility</a>
+
<a href="">2016.igem.org/Judging/Application</a>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 58: Line 56:
  
  
 +
 +
<div class="oneColumn">
 +
<center>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/24/HQjudging_room.jpg" width=312>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/06/HQunder_winners.jpg" width=312>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/09/HQjudges_listening2.jpg" width=312>
 +
</center>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div class="oneColumn">
 +
<p><center>
 +
<h3>This page is under active development. Please check back often for updates as we prepare for the 2016 season!</h3>
 +
</p></center>
 +
</div>
  
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
{{2016Demo_bottom}}
 
{{2016Demo_bottom}}

Latest revision as of 16:11, 29 October 2015

×

Loading ...

Judging Hub

General Information

Welcome to the Judging Hub! This page will help guide you through all of the information relevant to judging at iGEM. Information on this page includes: how teams are evaluated for awards and prizes, the expectations we have for our judges, how to apply to be considered for the 2016 judging panel, and information that we hope will help judges carry out their duties.

Being a Judge

Judging during iGEM focuses on evaluating team projects and presentations, while providing constructive and positive feedback to the teams. It is a challenging yet rewarding experience. Judges are each asked to evaluate teams during the Jamoree, which includes scoring the following: team projects, team wikis, team presentations and posters, medal criteria, and special awards. This requires a serious commitment from each judge and we expect every member of our judging panel to fulfill their duties to the best of their ability.


2016.igem.org/Judging/Being a Judge

Judging Expectations

Understanding and fairly evaluating the various aspects of the projects that iGEM teams carry out can be difficult for both novice and experienced judges. We therefore provide judges with a Judging Handbook to provide some guidance on how to navigate this process. For 2016, we will also provide a wide range of example projects from previous years that judges are welcome to look through before and during the main competition months. Our goal is to provide this content by January 2016, so please check back for updates!


2016.igem.org/Judging/Expectations

Apply to be a Judge!

People interested in being an iGEM judge are asked to fill out an application. The application asks perspective judges to explain their motivation for judging iGEM, describe any experience they have with iGEM or judging, and clearly state any conflicts of interest with the current teams. Our goal is to create a diverse and balanced judging panel in terms of nationality, gender, and career path. The judging application for 2016 is currently under development. Please check back for updates in January 2016!


2016.igem.org/Judging/Application

This page is under active development. Please check back often for updates as we prepare for the 2016 season!