Difference between revisions of "Team:Aalto-Helsinki/Practices"

m
m
Line 7: Line 7:
 
   color: gray;
 
   color: gray;
 
}
 
}
 +
/* Background pic */
 +
.hpbackground {
 +
    background-repeat: repeat-y;
 +
    background-image: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/07/Aalto-Helsinki_HP_background.png");
 +
    background-size: 100%;
 +
}
 
</style>
 
</style>
  
Line 12: Line 18:
 
</p></div>
 
</p></div>
  
 +
<div class="hpbackground">
 
<div class="inner-container">
 
<div class="inner-container">
  
Line 40: Line 47:
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 
</div></div></div> <!--These are the closing tags for div id="mainContainer" and div id="contentContainer". The corresponding opening tags appear in the template that is {{included}} at the top of this page.-->
 
</div></div></div> <!--These are the closing tags for div id="mainContainer" and div id="contentContainer". The corresponding opening tags appear in the template that is {{included}} at the top of this page.-->
  
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 18:33, 9 September 2015

Human practices

Combining modeling and experimentation in iGEM

Mathematical modeling is a key component of synthetic biology. However, efficient collaboration between modelers and experimentalists is not always easy. We launched a questionnaire to get some insight on how iGEM teams tackle this issue. We were interested in how the teams were able to integrate their wetlab and modeling efforts, what kind of problems they faced in this and how they approached these problems.

As we found the share of respondents with a mathematical background surprisingly low compared to our own team, we decided to go through teams from 2014 to find what study fields iGEM participants are coming from. We then compared the results to professional synthetic biology groups to see whether there were any differences.

To read more about the questionnaire and its results, see our page for Combining modeling and experimentation in iGEM.

Outreach

On top of the Human Practices study, we also wanted to spread the word of synthetic biology. As the only iGEM team in Finland, we reached out to both high schools and universities across the country, giving presentations on synthetic biology and iGEM, in hopes of inspiring students to start teams of their own. To increase the layperson’s knowledge on synthetic biology, iGEM and our project, we held a talk and workshops on a Science picnic mainly aimed at families. We were also active on social media and featured on several media outlets. While looking for partners in the scientific community, business and industry in Finland, we also increased awareness of synthetic biology.