Difference between revisions of "Team:TCU Taiwan/Modeling/Protein structure"
Phoebe chen (Talk | contribs) |
Phoebe chen (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
} | } | ||
.st { | .st { | ||
− | color: | + | color: black; |
height: 100%; | height: 100%; | ||
width: 100%; | width: 100%; | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<table width="95%" align="center"> | <table width="95%" align="center"> | ||
<h1> | <h1> | ||
− | <td align="center"><span style="font-family:Arial Black;"><font size="7"><font-weight: 700;> About our modeling</font></span></td><td><span style="font-family:Calibri;text-align:justify;"><font size="5"></br></br>為了能夠使我們更有效地拿到我們的指定抗菌肽,我們在設計序列時在AMPs的N-terminal加上了來自S. | + | <tr><td align="center"><span style="font-family:Arial Black;"><font size="7"><font-weight: 700;> About our modeling</font></span></td></tr><tr><td><span style="font-family:Calibri;text-align:justify;"><font size="5"></br></br>為了能夠使我們更有效地拿到我們的指定抗菌肽,我們在設計序列時在AMPs的N-terminal加上了來自S.lividans幾丁質酶C的signal peptide (附上氨基酸序列)。這個pre-mature peptide在經過periplasmic space時會被peptidase辨認並且做切割。Peptidase會辨認signal peptide 上Ala-Gln-Ala序列,並且從signal和mature peptide中間的兩個Ala間將之分開。為了使peptidase能夠順利辨認並且切割,我們在AMP的N-terminal多加了一個Ala氨基酸,以確保整個系統能順利運作。 |
− | 我們利用模擬技術,利用原本的已知結構,去推測在我們多加了一個Ala的情況下,是否會影響AMPs的蛋白結構折疊。</br></br> | + | 我們利用模擬技術,利用原本的已知結構,去推測在我們多加了一個Ala的情況下,是否會影響AMPs的蛋白結構折疊。 |
+ | </br></br> | ||
− | In order to | + | In order to have more efficient to get our AMPs, we treated signal peptide upstream of the N-terminal of mature antimicrobial peptides. This signal peptide is comes from chitinase C of S.lividans (MGFRHKAAALAATLALPLAGLVGLASPAQA). When the pre-mature peptides go through the periplasmic space, peptidase will identified the cleavage site Ala-Gln-Ala and cut at the double Ala between the signal and mature peptide. </br></br> |
− | + | To make sure the secretion system is work we attach an Ala at the N-terminal of AMPs. We used protein secondary structure prediction software base on the known peptide structure to analysis whether the attached Ala affect the peptide folding process or not. | |
− | We | + | </br></br> |
</font></span></td> | </font></span></td> | ||
</tr></h1> | </tr></h1> | ||
Line 74: | Line 75: | ||
</tr> </table> | </tr> </table> | ||
<table width="95%" align="center"> | <table width="95%" align="center"> | ||
− | <tr><td ><span style="font-family:Calibri;text-align:justify;"><font size="5">The | + | <tr><td ><span style="font-family:Calibri;text-align:justify;"><font size="5">The first column shows the amino acid sequence we predict. |
− | + | The second column shows that AMPs corresponding secondary structure state are still a-helix. | |
+ | The third column shows the probability of correct prediction. | ||
+ | </font></span> | ||
</td></tr> | </td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 85: | Line 88: | ||
<table width="95%" align="center"> | <table width="95%" align="center"> | ||
<h1> | <h1> | ||
− | <td align="center"><span style="font-family:Arial Black;"><font size="7"><font-weight: 700;> Conclusion</font></span></td><td><span style="font-family:Calibri;text-align:justify;"><font size="5"></br></br>Signiferin以及Epinicidin-1都是由 a | + | <tr><td align="center"><span style="font-family:Arial Black;"><font size="7"><font-weight: 700;> Conclusion</font></span></td><td></tr><tr><span style="font-family:Calibri;text-align:justify;"><font size="5"></br></br>Signiferin以及Epinicidin-1都是由 a helix結構所構成,在我們的模擬分析後,不管是signiferin還是Epinecidin-1在N-terminal多加了一個Ala後並不影響蛋白的摺疊結構。</br></br> |
− | Through the | + | Through the secondary structure predicted. The result shows whatever Signiferin or Epinecidin-1 the attached of Ala didn’t affect peptide-folding process. They are still a-helix structure. |
− | + | ||
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
</font></span></td> | </font></span></td> |
Revision as of 02:04, 8 September 2015
為了能夠使我們更有效地拿到我們的指定抗菌肽,我們在設計序列時在AMPs的N-terminal加上了來自S.lividans幾丁質酶C的signal peptide (附上氨基酸序列)。這個pre-mature peptide在經過periplasmic space時會被peptidase辨認並且做切割。Peptidase會辨認signal peptide 上Ala-Gln-Ala序列,並且從signal和mature peptide中間的兩個Ala間將之分開。為了使peptidase能夠順利辨認並且切割,我們在AMP的N-terminal多加了一個Ala氨基酸,以確保整個系統能順利運作。 我們利用模擬技術,利用原本的已知結構,去推測在我們多加了一個Ala的情況下,是否會影響AMPs的蛋白結構折疊。 In order to have more efficient to get our AMPs, we treated signal peptide upstream of the N-terminal of mature antimicrobial peptides. This signal peptide is comes from chitinase C of S.lividans (MGFRHKAAALAATLALPLAGLVGLASPAQA). When the pre-mature peptides go through the periplasmic space, peptidase will identified the cleavage site Ala-Gln-Ala and cut at the double Ala between the signal and mature peptide. To make sure the secretion system is work we attach an Ala at the N-terminal of AMPs. We used protein secondary structure prediction software base on the known peptide structure to analysis whether the attached Ala affect the peptide folding process or not. |
The first column shows the amino acid sequence we predict. The second column shows that AMPs corresponding secondary structure state are still a-helix. The third column shows the probability of correct prediction. |
Contact us tcutaiwan@gmail.com No.701, Sec. 3, Zhongyang Rd. Hualien 97004, Taiwan |