Difference between revisions of "Team:KU Leuven/InterLabStudy/Protocol"
Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="summarytext1"> | ||
+ | <div class="part"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2> | ||
+ | Introduction | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | We began our experiments by constructing devices that contained constitutive | ||
+ | promoters with low (J23117), medium (J23106) and higher (J23101) levels of GFP | ||
+ | expression. Each device contains the biobrick I13504, necessary for GFP | ||
+ | expression. We transformed the above mentioned biobrick and the promoters in E. | ||
+ | cloni competent cells. The cells were grown on a LB (from Sigma) 1.5% agar (from | ||
+ | VWR Chemicals) plates with chloramphenicol (from Acros Organics) as a selection | ||
+ | marker. As a positive control, we transformed the cells with pUC19 plasmid and | ||
+ | plated them on LB plates containing ampicillin. We also plated cells without any | ||
+ | plasmid as a negative control on LB plates containing chloramphenicol. We | ||
+ | performed transformation of the biobricks twice by using chemically competent | ||
+ | cells. The first time, we did not obtain any colonies of the four biobricks. The | ||
+ | second time we got very few colonies. Nevertheless, the positive controls were | ||
+ | correct every time, and we did double check the efficiency of the cells that | ||
+ | proved to be very high. We concluded that our constructs were not easy to | ||
+ | transform the bacteria. Therefore, to have more effective transformation, we | ||
+ | switched to electroporation. This technique gave a higher efficiency and enough | ||
+ | colonies for our experiments. | ||
+ | <br></br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thereafter we proceeded using the Biobrick Assembly Method to assemble the DNA. | ||
+ | Subsequently we performed transformation using electrocompetent E.cloni cells, | ||
+ | plated them in LB agar plates with antibiotic selection markers, and the plates | ||
+ | were illuminated with blue/UV-light to check for the presence of GFP, and thus | ||
+ | the functioning device. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the fluorescent measurements we inoculated liquid cultures(3 | ||
+ | mL-LB+Antibiotic) in polypropylene round-bottom tubes and incubated them for 16 | ||
+ | to 18 hours in a shaking incubator (200 rpm) at 37 degrees. We recorded the | ||
+ | fluorescent data from cells grown to an OD of ~0.5 (if the OD is higher bring it | ||
+ | in the range 0.48-0.52) at 300 nm. Finally, the fluorescence data were collected | ||
+ | from the overnight cultures of the constructed devices with an excitation and | ||
+ | emission wavelengths of 483 nm and 525 nm respectively, in a 96-well plate by an | ||
+ | Tecan Safire2 monochromator MTP Reader. Also, the absorbance measurements at 600 | ||
+ | nm were repeated in the plate reader. This is important because the absorbance | ||
+ | depends on the path length. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 17:25, 10 September 2015
Protocol
Introduction
We began our experiments by constructing devices that contained constitutive
promoters with low (J23117), medium (J23106) and higher (J23101) levels of GFP
expression. Each device contains the biobrick I13504, necessary for GFP
expression. We transformed the above mentioned biobrick and the promoters in E.
cloni competent cells. The cells were grown on a LB (from Sigma) 1.5% agar (from
VWR Chemicals) plates with chloramphenicol (from Acros Organics) as a selection
marker. As a positive control, we transformed the cells with pUC19 plasmid and
plated them on LB plates containing ampicillin. We also plated cells without any
plasmid as a negative control on LB plates containing chloramphenicol. We
performed transformation of the biobricks twice by using chemically competent
cells. The first time, we did not obtain any colonies of the four biobricks. The
second time we got very few colonies. Nevertheless, the positive controls were
correct every time, and we did double check the efficiency of the cells that
proved to be very high. We concluded that our constructs were not easy to
transform the bacteria. Therefore, to have more effective transformation, we
switched to electroporation. This technique gave a higher efficiency and enough
colonies for our experiments.
Thereafter we proceeded using the Biobrick Assembly Method to assemble the DNA.
Subsequently we performed transformation using electrocompetent E.cloni cells,
plated them in LB agar plates with antibiotic selection markers, and the plates
were illuminated with blue/UV-light to check for the presence of GFP, and thus
the functioning device.
For the fluorescent measurements we inoculated liquid cultures(3
mL-LB+Antibiotic) in polypropylene round-bottom tubes and incubated them for 16
to 18 hours in a shaking incubator (200 rpm) at 37 degrees. We recorded the
fluorescent data from cells grown to an OD of ~0.5 (if the OD is higher bring it
in the range 0.48-0.52) at 300 nm. Finally, the fluorescence data were collected
from the overnight cultures of the constructed devices with an excitation and
emission wavelengths of 483 nm and 525 nm respectively, in a 96-well plate by an
Tecan Safire2 monochromator MTP Reader. Also, the absorbance measurements at 600
nm were repeated in the plate reader. This is important because the absorbance
depends on the path length.
Methodology
Preparing electrocompetent cells
Electroporation
Biobrick Assembly Method
Restriction mapping
This is example five
tiralalala
tiralalala
Introduction
We began our experiments by constructing devices that contained constitutive
promoters with low (J23117), medium (J23106) and higher (J23101) levels of GFP
expression. Each device contains the biobrick I13504, necessary for GFP
expression. We transformed the above mentioned biobrick and the promoters in E.
cloni competent cells. The cells were grown on a LB (from Sigma) 1.5% agar (from
VWR Chemicals) plates with chloramphenicol (from Acros Organics) as a selection
marker. As a positive control, we transformed the cells with pUC19 plasmid and
plated them on LB plates containing ampicillin. We also plated cells without any
plasmid as a negative control on LB plates containing chloramphenicol. We
performed transformation of the biobricks twice by using chemically competent
cells. The first time, we did not obtain any colonies of the four biobricks. The
second time we got very few colonies. Nevertheless, the positive controls were
correct every time, and we did double check the efficiency of the cells that
proved to be very high. We concluded that our constructs were not easy to
transform the bacteria. Therefore, to have more effective transformation, we
switched to electroporation. This technique gave a higher efficiency and enough
colonies for our experiments.
Thereafter we proceeded using the Biobrick Assembly Method to assemble the DNA.
Subsequently we performed transformation using electrocompetent E.cloni cells,
plated them in LB agar plates with antibiotic selection markers, and the plates
were illuminated with blue/UV-light to check for the presence of GFP, and thus
the functioning device.
For the fluorescent measurements we inoculated liquid cultures(3
mL-LB+Antibiotic) in polypropylene round-bottom tubes and incubated them for 16
to 18 hours in a shaking incubator (200 rpm) at 37 degrees. We recorded the
fluorescent data from cells grown to an OD of ~0.5 (if the OD is higher bring it
in the range 0.48-0.52) at 300 nm. Finally, the fluorescence data were collected
from the overnight cultures of the constructed devices with an excitation and
emission wavelengths of 483 nm and 525 nm respectively, in a 96-well plate by an
Tecan Safire2 monochromator MTP Reader. Also, the absorbance measurements at 600
nm were repeated in the plate reader. This is important because the absorbance
depends on the path length.
Contact
Address: Celestijnenlaan 200G room 00.08 - 3001 Heverlee
Telephone n°: +32(0)16 32 73 19
Mail: igem@chem.kuleuven.be