Difference between revisions of "Team:NEFU China/Software"
m |
m |
||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
background: linear-gradient(#7BAABE,#969AC6); | background: linear-gradient(#7BAABE,#969AC6); | ||
} | } | ||
− | .section | + | .section .himg{ |
width:100%; | width:100%; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="sub-container"> | <div class="sub-container"> | ||
− | <div class="col-xs-6 col-md-6" style="text-align:center;"> | + | <div class="col-xs-6 col-md-6" style="text-align:center;"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/64/NEFU_China_0E792055-5CA4-4CE3-8638-93AC5988AC34.png" /></div> |
− | + | ||
− | + | <div class="col-xs-6 col-md-6 msg"> | |
− | + | <p>About half of teams we surveyed hold the opinion that creating a wiki requires superior skills in programming (29/56), which lead them feel hard about it. We sincerely invite you to click the right arrow and discover what giant changes Flight iGEM can make.</p> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 185: | Line 183: | ||
<p>To create a wiki, a HTML template is necessary neither with Flight iGEM nor without Flight iGEM.</p> | <p>To create a wiki, a HTML template is necessary neither with Flight iGEM nor without Flight iGEM.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 07:54, 13 September 2015
Attitudes towards creating a wiki
According to a survey conducted by us, we found that most teams agrees the thesis that creating wiki is a difficult or tedious work to finish with high quality, especially when time is very limited. So, we’d like to make some changes.
*You can see all raw data by click this.
A typical iGEM wiki can be divided into no less than 8 sections (like the home page, project, safety, team, and so on). Under each section, there are a lot of issues which you want to present. Just like the ‘Project’ section, you may need to tell others about your background information, design, etc. Tedious as it is, we, the same as other 52 teams (52/56), believe that online collaboration can improve the efficiency of creating a wiki.