Difference between revisions of "Team:Lethbridge HS/Notebook"
Line 771: | Line 771: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | <p>Cells were left in the shaker for 23 hours accidently. ODs were not taken because they had been left in the shaker too long.<br><br> | ||
+ | <p>Biofilms: Continued Growth of Biofilms.<br><br> | ||
+ | <p>Objective: Continue to determine what cleaners will destroy/degrade biofilms. Instead of using crystal violet dye, we are using E.coli DH5α cells with RFP (PSB4K5). 2 μL of KAN was added to 2 mL centrifuge tubes along with 1980 μL LB and 20 μL of culture.<br><br> | ||
+ | <p>300 μL of mix was pipetted into wells of 96 well plate. Biofilms left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.<br><br> | ||
+ | <p>Results: The biofilms did not grow on any of the plates as there was no red ring. Using fresh RFP cultures might fix this issue because the cultures we had used were prepared earlier in the month. </p> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 23:26, 15 September 2015
Notebook
Record of our work
Please click on the different events on the lab to read more about them. Also, feel free to click on the months on the sidebar to reveal a list of lab dates.
April
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
May
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
June
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
July
August
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
September
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
- Date
-
June
-
2015-June-06
Lab book june 6
Names: Jon and Kieran
We stained inoculated biofilms and performed the Crystal Violet assay. Left in 37 C for 36 hours. We did 4 trials 100uL, 4 trials 200uL, and 4 trials 300uL. Biofilm formation was successful, with varying band thickness. We also replicated this with two 5mL LB petri dish inoculated with 20uL E.coli. We added 5mL of crystal violet each to the petri dishes to cover the whole plate.
We also performed an oxalic acid gradient with 0%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, and 2.0% oxalic acid to give a final volume of 6mL. We added 20uL of E.coli to each 6mL tube. Left in 37 C.
We did a 1/100 dilution of E.coli into LB media, and left it in 37 C for (hopefully) 24 hours. We did 4 trials 100uL, 4 trials 200uL, and 4 trials 300uL.2015-June-08
Lab book june 8
Names: Kieran
Biofilm produced on 24h 96 well plate.
Testing to see if biofilm will produce on 12h 96 well plate (1 in 100 culture dilution).
And also doing 24h 96 well biofilm formation testing to see what detergents and chemical impacts have on the decrease in biofilm production.
*Biofilms placed at 8:00pm
Oxalic acid test run for 12 hours (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.5, 2.0%)
*Oxalic acid placed at 7:30pm
Tested the production of parafilm sacs for in vitro Varroa feeding. (using kimwipes and 2mL tubes as containment methods) .2015-June-10
Lab book june 10
Names: Kieran
Performed oxalic acid testing of E.coli growth in LB media at (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.5, 2.0%) concentrations. Placed at 6:50pm.
Produced more biofilms.
Had mites and created pouches including Water, LB, Supernatent, E.coli, E.coli RFP. Placed at room temperature and in chris’s drawer.
Took 48 and 24 hour biofilms and performed a bleach treatment on them (0.252%) for 30 minutes. .2015-June-16
Lab book june 16
Names: Kieran
Took oxalic acid readings after 23 hours of incubation
.Title for table Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD600 0.0 1.745 0.01 1.771 0.05 1.882 0.1 0.980 0.15 0.125 0.2 0.104 0.3 0.118 0.4 0.174 0.5 0.1456 2.0 0.017 Readings are unrealiable as the cultures were left in the shaking incubator for over 23 hours. Still show the same general trend as past gradients.
2015-June-17
Lab book june 17
Names: Kieran
Make oxalic acid samples again.
.
Make 24h biofilms.Title for table Biofilm test (30 minutes contact) (24 hour biofilm) Result Windex Negative Bleach Negative Tilex Biofilm remained 2015-June-19
Lab book june 19
Names: Chris and Tiffany
Objective:Determine if we have successfully cultured mites in vitro using either paraffin pouches or bee pupae.
Table 2. Experimental design showing each of the treatments applied to the mites.
After 24 hours, all mites were found to be dead. Pupae showed some signs of black bacteria growth or browning on body. Will need to repeat or find another method of culturing mites in vitro.2015-June-22
Lab book june 22
Names: Sydnee, Tiffany and Kieran
Biofilm test performed on
Fantastic = Biofilm remained
Windex = Biofilm remained
Bleach = didn’t remain
Made overnight cultures for oxalic acid testing2015-June-23
Lab book june 23
Names: Kieran
13 hours left in shaker
Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD600 0.0 1.945 0.01 1.875 0.05 1.763 0.1 0.710 0.15 0.114 0.2 0.146 0.3 0.183 0.4 0.170 0.5 0.092 2.0 0.015 2015-June-25
Lab book june 25
Names: Chris and Ross
Objective:Determine if the concentration of oxalic acid that kills bacteria will kill bees.
Procedure:Bees were obtained from the “Mighty Hive” near the penitentiary at 4:00 and placed into 5ml centrifuge tubes. The bees were transported to the University of Lethbridge and stored at room temperature until 8:00. Prior to experimentation, the tubes were supplemented with a sugar water solution to ensure that the bees would not starve. Following feeding, 2ml of each treatment were added to the 5ml tubes containing the bees and set horizontally along the bench. The abdomen of each bee was immersed in the treatment no matter what orientation the bee took. The bees were observed for 1 hour and subsequently euthanized in 70% EtOH.Treatment Before After none Somewhat lethargic. Drank when prompted. Appeared tired but otherwise unaffected. 0.00% Most lethargic, did not eat when offered. Wet, and slow moving. 0.05% Very vigorous; ran around inside the tube. Fed. Very energetic. Unaffected by treatment. 0.20% Very vigorous; ran around inside the tube. Fed. Slightly less energetic than the 0.05% bee. Table 1. Observations of the bees following 60 minutes of exposure.
Discussion:The bees showed that they could survive well in concentrations of oxalic acid that were above the point where E.coli would die. Further tests must be done to determine the exact contact toxicity. Additionally, the contact toxicity to mites will need to be addressed.
Conclusion:The bees will be able to survive all of the oxalic acid that the E.coli can produce.
2015-June-29
Lab book june 29
Names: Sydnee, Dinula,Tiffany D, Kieran
Bee: A More Specific Oxalic Acid Gradient
Objective: Determine a more specific concentration of oxalic acid that will prevent cell growth. Already we know that oxalic acid prevents cell growth between 0.05% and 0.2%. Now we want to determine a more specific concentration of oxalic acid that will prevent cell growth.
Oxalic Acid Concentration (%) OD600 0.05 0.07 0.1 0.125 0.13 0.17 0.185 0.2 Cells were left in the shaker for 23 hours accidently. ODs were not taken because they had been left in the shaker too long.
Biofilms: Continued Growth of Biofilms.
Objective: Continue to determine what cleaners will destroy/degrade biofilms. Instead of using crystal violet dye, we are using E.coli DH5α cells with RFP (PSB4K5). 2 μL of KAN was added to 2 mL centrifuge tubes along with 1980 μL LB and 20 μL of culture.
300 μL of mix was pipetted into wells of 96 well plate. Biofilms left to grow 24 hours in 37˚C incubator.
Results: The biofilms did not grow on any of the plates as there was no red ring. Using fresh RFP cultures might fix this issue because the cultures we had used were prepared earlier in the month.
August
2015-July-10
Ligation
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin sed commodo dui, id ultricies massa. Aliquam erat volutpat. Proin maximus, nibh eu luctus tincidunt, libero dui euismod ex, a pellentesque sem nulla ac lorem. Pellentesque sagittis leo eget ornare efficitur. Nullam vulputate rutrum eros, quis mollis ipsum tempus eu. Integer porttitor quam vitae finibus blandit. Nulla vulputate dolor dui, et cursus dolor ullamcorper nec. Nunc dictum scelerisque purus, ut pulvinar sapien tristique eget. Donec feugiat risus vel nibh pellentesque auctor id id neque. Aenean facilisis dui vitae massa finibus, et condimentum dui consectetur. Pellentesque tempus imperdiet posuere. Sed ornare urna in dictum dictum. Vestibulum suscipit, tortor sit amet finibus bibendum, dui nunc semper enim, eget pulvinar sem justo nec risus. Integer justo ex, aliquet sit amet massa at, aliquam vestibulum dolor. Sed dictum nunc eu sem finibus eleifend.
2015-July-10
Ligation
We did this stuff...
2015-July-10
Ligation
We did this stuff...
2015-July-10
Ligation
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Etiam maximus erat vitae orci rutrum finibus. Nullam quis nunc tincidunt, sodales risus id, dignissim neque. Pellentesque efficitur, sem non lobortis euismod, justo mi laoreet turpis, sed fringilla enim diam non massa. Suspendisse imperdiet vel enim a elementum. Nam pretium diam vel metus rhoncus ullamcorper. Suspendisse in consectetur tortor. Nulla diam justo, lobortis suscipit erat quis, rhoncus accumsan tellus. Cras rutrum, lorem ac sodales accumsan, ante diam ornare tellus, in tincidunt metus magna quis lacus. Ut auctor metus sed lectus auctor volutpat. Aliquam ac nulla maximus, congue sem a, feugiat mauris.
2015-July-10
Ligation
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Etiam maximus erat vitae orci rutrum finibus. Nullam quis nunc tincidunt, sodales risus id, dignissim neque. Pellentesque efficitur, sem non lobortis euismod, justo mi laoreet turpis, sed fringilla enim diam non massa. Suspendisse imperdiet vel enim a elementum. Nam pretium diam vel metus rhoncus ullamcorper. Suspendisse in consectetur tortor. Nulla diam justo, lobortis suscipit erat quis, rhoncus accumsan tellus. Cras rutrum, lorem ac sodales accumsan, ante diam ornare tellus, in tincidunt metus magna quis lacus. Ut auctor metus sed lectus auctor volutpat. Aliquam ac nulla maximus, congue sem a, feugiat mauris.