Difference between revisions of "Team:MIT/Coculture"
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | <div class = "subtitle"> | |
− | Methods for Preliminary Coculture | + | Methods for Preliminary Coculture |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
The preliminary co-culture experiment served to determine how unmodified C. hutchinsonii and E. coli grow in mono-cultures versus co-cultures over time. Five cultures with co-culture media, filter paper as a carbon source, and variations of E. coli and C. hutchinsonii populations were prepared, with replicates of each, as shown in Table 1. The conditioned media was co-culture media that had contained filter paper and C. hutchinsonii for three days. The cultures were incubated in a 30ºC incubator shaking at 250 rpm. Samples were taken before incubation and then every 3 hours for the first 12 hours and once every 24 hours on days 4-8. Cells from each sample were isolated from the samples and the supernatant via the co-culture protocol. We use the flow cytometer to measure the size of cell populations from the glycerol stocks of the cells, as detailed in Measuring Relative Populationed. | The preliminary co-culture experiment served to determine how unmodified C. hutchinsonii and E. coli grow in mono-cultures versus co-cultures over time. Five cultures with co-culture media, filter paper as a carbon source, and variations of E. coli and C. hutchinsonii populations were prepared, with replicates of each, as shown in Table 1. The conditioned media was co-culture media that had contained filter paper and C. hutchinsonii for three days. The cultures were incubated in a 30ºC incubator shaking at 250 rpm. Samples were taken before incubation and then every 3 hours for the first 12 hours and once every 24 hours on days 4-8. Cells from each sample were isolated from the samples and the supernatant via the co-culture protocol. We use the flow cytometer to measure the size of cell populations from the glycerol stocks of the cells, as detailed in Measuring Relative Populationed. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <br></br> | ||
<table style="width:100%" class = "text"> | <table style="width:100%" class = "text"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> |
Revision as of 00:24, 16 September 2015
Preliminary Co-Culture
Methods for Preliminary Coculture
The preliminary co-culture experiment served to determine how unmodified C. hutchinsonii and E. coli grow in mono-cultures versus co-cultures over time. Five cultures with co-culture media, filter paper as a carbon source, and variations of E. coli and C. hutchinsonii populations were prepared, with replicates of each, as shown in Table 1. The conditioned media was co-culture media that had contained filter paper and C. hutchinsonii for three days. The cultures were incubated in a 30ºC incubator shaking at 250 rpm. Samples were taken before incubation and then every 3 hours for the first 12 hours and once every 24 hours on days 4-8. Cells from each sample were isolated from the samples and the supernatant via the co-culture protocol. We use the flow cytometer to measure the size of cell populations from the glycerol stocks of the cells, as detailed in Measuring Relative Populationed.
Contamination control in unconditioned media | Only E. coli in unconditioned media | Only C. hutchinsonii in unconditioned media | E. coli and C. hutchinsonii in conditioned media | E. coli and C. hutchinsonii in unconditioned media | |
Media | 20ml unconditioned co-culture media and filter paper | 20ml unconditioned co-culture media and filter paper | 20ml unconditioned co-culture media and filter paper | 8ml conditioned co-culture media, 12ml unconditioned co-culture media, and filter paper | 20ml unconditioned co-culture media and filter paper |
C. hutchinsonii | None | None | |||
E. coli | None | None |
Table 1
Results
The data from the preliminary coculture showed the sugar levels (from the conditioned media) initially sharply dropping and the E Coli population increasing and overtaking the C Hutch population. This is expected, because E Coli naturally divides more quickly than C Hutch. However, the E Coli population levels out after around 10 hours, due to running out of sugars, meanwhile the C Hutch population begins to increase around this time as it starts breaking down the filter paper and consuming the sugars it releases from that. C Hutch soons overtakes the E Coli and the carbohydrate level increases again as the filter paper gets degraded into polysaccharides and simple . The E Coli population then increases more slowly, as it is able to feed off the simple sugars that escape the C Hutch, but it cannot consume the polysaccharides.
These results show that the C Hutch is very efficient at consuming the sugars it generates before it can diffuse into the media, leaving little left for the E Coli.