Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Darmstadt/Project/Chem/Methods"
Line 553: | Line 553: | ||
<p>A3</p> | <p>A3</p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td> </td> | + | <td> 2.3</td> |
<td> | <td> | ||
<p>-</p> | <p>-</p> | ||
Line 568: | Line 568: | ||
<p>A4</p> | <p>A4</p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td> </td> | + | <td> 1.8</td> |
<td> | <td> | ||
<p>-</p> | <p>-</p> | ||
Line 668: | Line 668: | ||
<p>A11</p> | <p>A11</p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td> </td> | + | <td> 0.5</td> |
<td> | <td> | ||
<p>currugated skin</p> | <p>currugated skin</p> | ||
Line 768: | Line 768: | ||
<p>A12</p> | <p>A12</p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td> </td> | + | <td> 0.5</td> |
<td> | <td> | ||
<p>plain skin</p> | <p>plain skin</p> | ||
Line 858: | Line 858: | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <h1>Appendix</h1> | ||
+ | <p><strong> </strong></p> | ||
+ | <h2>Pictures of prepolymers during and after synthesis</h2> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width="750px" heigh="432px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b2/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_15.jpg" alt="Figure 15"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 15: From left to right A1 – A4 after synthesis</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width="750px" heigh="640px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/54/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_16.jpg" alt="Figure 16"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 16: A5 and A6 after synthesis.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width="503px" heigh="534px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_17.jpg" alt="Figure 17"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 17: From left to right A12 – A11 after synthesis.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width="375px" heigh="660px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/92/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_18l.jpg" alt="Figure 18l"> <img width="329px" heigh="660px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/62/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_18r.jpg" alt="DSC-Plot A18r"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 18: A13 and A14 during (left) and after synthesis (right).</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width="375px" heigh="998px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e5/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_19.jpg" alt="Figure 19"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 19: A15 during heating up. At 131 °C no melt has formed and the white itaconic acid can be seen.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <h2>Pictures of cured prepolymers</h2> | ||
+ | <p><strong> </strong></p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width="750px" heigh="517px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/15/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_20.jpg" alt="Figure 20"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 20: UV-curing of A3 and A4 after 15 min.</p> | ||
+ | <p><strong> </strong></p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width=450px" heigh="512px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/12/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_21.jpg" alt="Figure 21"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 21: UV-curing of A11 after 5, 10 and 15 min.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width="600px" heigh="508px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/84/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_22.jpg" alt="Figure 22"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 22: UV-curing of A12 after 5 and 10 min.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img width="750px" heigh="425px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e0/TU_Darmstadt_Chemie_Figure_23.jpg" alt="Figure 23"> | ||
+ | <html/> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 23: UV-curing of A8 and A15 on glass and on a polystyrene petri dish after 5 min 254 nm. 6 % DAROCURE 1173 was used.</p> |
Revision as of 08:09, 17 September 2015
Contents
Synthesis of prepolymers and characterization
Thermal polyesterification of itaconic acid (IA), polyethylene glycol 400
Polymers were prepared in dependence on the experimental procedures of Barrett et al.[1]
The procedure requires exact masses. Therefore an analytical balance (4 decimal places) was used and if not otherwise stated PEG as well as itaconic acid were pre-dried before use on a high vacuum line (< 10-3 mbar) overnight.
To avoid contamination with oxygen during the reaction and to remove produced water, common Schlenk technique was applied. As inert gas argon was used.
A1
Date: 02/06/15 – 03/06/15
Lab members: AW, SZ
Preparation process:
A 50 mL Schlenk flask was loaded with 1.213 g (3.033 mmol, 1 eq.) PEG-400 and 0.395 g (3.032 mmol, 1 eq.) itaconic acid and flushed with argon. Within 20 minutes the mixture was heated up to 100 °C with an oil bath and stirred under argon atmosphere. As a colorless melt had formed the vacuum was applied (3·10-2 mbar) and the mixture was stirred at 100 °C for 17 h. The slightly yellow viscous liquid was cooled down to room temperature.
For a picture of A1 see appendix.
Analysis:
No further analyses were performed.
A2
Date: 09/06/15 – 10/06/15
Lab members: FR, SJ
Preparation process:
A 25 mL Schlenk tube was loaded with 2.169 g (5.422 mmol, 1 eq.) PEG-400, 0.705 g (5.420 mmol, 1 eq.) itaconic acid and capped with a septum. Within an hour the mixture was heated up to 145 °C with an oil bath and stirred under argon atmosphere. As a colorless melt had formed the vacuum was applied (< 10-3 mbar) and the mixture was stirred at 145 °C for 24 h. The slightly yellow viscous liquid was cooled down to room temperature.
For a picture of A2 see appendix.
Visual Observations:
During the reaction itaconic acid recrystallised on the flask surface which wasn’t dipped into the oil bath. Therefore the ratio between itaconic acid and PEG-400 has changed.
Analysis:
The product was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry DSC to identify the glass transition (Tg) temperature.
The Tg of A2 is -4.7 °C.
Figure 1: DSC- Plot of A2. The Tg of A2 is -4.7 °C
A3
Date: 11/06/15 – 12/06/15
Lab members: FR, SJ, AW, SZ
Preparation process:
A 10 mL Schlenk tube was loaded with 2.675 g (6.688 mmol, 1 eq.) PEG-400, 0.869 g (6.679 mmol, 1 eq.) itaconic acid and capped with a septum. The mixture was heated up to 145 °C with an oil bath on air. No vacuum was applied and the mixture was stirred on air at 145 °C for 24 h. The orange-colored viscous liquid was cooled down to room temperature.
Visual Observations:
The orange-colored product was more viscous than A1 and A2. For a picture of A3 see appendix.
Analysis:
DSC
The product was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry DSC to identify the glass transition (Tg) temperature.
The Tg of A3 is -45.8 °C.
Figure 2: DSC- Plot of A3. The Tg of A3 is -45.8 °C
1H-NMR
The product was analyzed by 1H-NMR to ensure that double bonds are still intact in the product.
Figure 3 shows the spectrum with an enlargement of the olefin region.
Figure 3: 1H-NMR (300 MHz) of A3 in CDCl3
Solubility Tests
Solvent |
Solubility of Product A3 |
H2O |
good |
THF |
very good |
CHCl3 |
very good |
EtOH |
very good |
MeOH |
good |
The solubility of product A3 increases with hydrophobicity of the solvent. But it is still good soluble in water and methanol. This indicates that alkene cross linking during the synthesis not occurred. And the polymer is linear shaped.
A4
Date: 11/06/15 – 12/06/15
Lab members: FR, SJ, AW, SZ
Preparation process:
A 20 mL snap-cap vial was loaded with 1.912 g (4.779 mmol, 1 eq.) PEG-400, 0.622 g (4.781 mmol, 1 eq.) itaconic acid and capped with a septum. The snap-cap vial was flushed with argon for 5 minutes and heated up to 145 °C with an oil bath. The snap-cap vial was almost complete dipped into the oil bath to avoid crystallization on the cold glass surface. The formed colorless melt was then stirred under slight vacuum for 24 h. Afterwards the orange-colored viscous liquid was cooled down to room temperature.
Visual Observations:
The orange-colored product was more viscous than A1 and A2. Viscosity and colour were comparable with A3. For a picture of A4 see appendix.
Analysis:
DSC
The product was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry DSC to identify the glass transition (Tg) temperature.
The Tg of A3 is -49.1 °C.
Figure 4: DSC- Plot of A4. The Tg of A4 is -49.1 °C
1H-NMR
The product was analyzed by 1H-NMR to ensure that double bonds are still intact in the product.
Figure 5 shows the spectrum with an enlargement of the olefin region.
Figure 5: 1H-NMR (300 MHz) of A4 in CDCl3.
A10
Date: 16/07/15 – 17/07/15
Lab members: FR, AW
Preparation process:
A 20 mL snap-cap vial was loaded with 2.2750g (5.688 mmol, 1 eq.) PEG-400, 0.7388 g (5.679 mmol, 1 eq.) itaconic acid and capped with a pierced aluminium foil. The mixture was heated up to 145 °C with an oil bath on air. No vacuum was applied and the mixture was stirred on air at 145 °C for 21 h. The brown-colored viscous liquid was cooled down to room temperature.
Visual Observations:
The brown-colored product was more viscous than A8 but less viscous than A7 and A9.
Analysis:
DSC
The product was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry DSC to identify the glass transition (Tg) temperature.
The Tg of A10 is -46.9 °C.
Figure 6:DSC- Plot of A10. The Tg of A10 is -46.9 °C.
Thermal polyesterification of itaconic acid (IA), polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG-400) and xylitol
Polymers were prepared in dependence on the experimental procedures of Barrett et al.[1]
The procedure requires exact masses. Therefore an analytical balance (4 decimal places) was used and if not otherwise stated PEG as well as itaconic acid and xylitol were pre-dried before use on a high vacuum line (< 10-3 mbar) overnight.
A5
Date: 30/06/15 – 01/07/15
Lab members: FR, SJ, AW, SZ
Preparation process:
A 20 mL snap-cap vial was loaded with 0.997 g (2.491 mmol, 0.43 eq.) PEG-400, 0.3833 g (2.519 mmol, 0.44 eq.) xylitol, 0.7503 g (5.767 mmol, 1 eq.) itaconic acid and capped with a pierced aluminium foil. The mixture was heated up to 145 °C with an oil bath on air. No vacuum was applied and the mixture was stirred on air at 145 °C for 17.5 h. The orange-colored gel was cooled down to room temperature.
Visual Observations:
The orange-colored product was a ductile gel. For a picture of A5 see appendix.
Analysis:
Solubility Tests
Solvent |
Solubility of Product A5 |
H2O |
no |
THF |
no |
Aceton |
no |
EtOH |
no |
MeOH |
no |
The gel wasn’t soluble in any solvent. Even by applying ultrasound no dissolving occurred. This is probably due to high cross linking with xylitol.
A6
Date: 30/06/15 – 01/07/15
Lab members: FR, SJ, AW, SZ
Preparation process:
A 20 mL snap-cap vial was loaded with 1.2775 g (3.194 mmol, 0.58 eq.) PEG-400, 0.2038 g (1.339 mmol, 0.25 eq.) xylitol, 0.7099 g (5.457 mmol, 1 eq.) itaconic acid and capped with a pierced aluminium foil. The mixture was heated up to 145 °C with an oil bath on air. No vacuum was applied and the mixture was stirred on air at 145 °C for 17.5 h. The orange-colored viscous liquid was cooled down to room temperature.
Visual Observations:
The orange-colored product was a ductile gel. For a picture of A6 see appendix.
Analysis:
Solubility Tests
Solvent |
Solubility of Product A6 |
H2O |
no |
THF |
no |
Aceton |
no |
EtOH |
no |
MeOH |
no |
The gel wasn’t soluble in any solvent. Even by applying ultrasound no dissolving occurred. This is probably due to high cross linking with xylitol.
A8
Date: 16/07/15 – 17/07/15
Lab members: FR, AW
Preparation process:
A 20 mL snap-cap vial was loaded with 3.4567 g (8.642 mmol, 0.90 eq.) PEG-400, 0.0973 g (0.640 mmol, 0.067 eq.) xylitol, 1.2492 g (9.602 mmol, 1 eq.) itaconic acid and capped with a pierced aluminium foil. The mixture was heated up to 145 °C with an oil bath on air. No vacuum was applied and the mixture was stirred on air at 145 °C for 21 h. The orange-colored viscous liquid was cooled down to room temperature.
Visual Observations:
The orange-colored product was a viscous liquid. A8 was less viscous than A10, A7 and A9.
Analysis:
DSC
The product was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry DSC to identify the glass transition (Tg) temperature.
The Tg of A8 is -44.8 °C.