Difference between revisions of "Team:Amoy/Project/Results"
ShannonLee (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
<p class="main_p">We found that the concentration of IPTG could have an effect on the expression of our circuit, in order to make a better expression of the protein in the cell, we decided to make a IPTG gradient induction for our gene circuits. After measuring the enzyme activity and ran SDS-PAGE, We found the optimal IPTG concentration . As shown in the graph, the enzyme activity data and SDS-PAGE show the most suitable concentration of the enzyme</p> | <p class="main_p">We found that the concentration of IPTG could have an effect on the expression of our circuit, in order to make a better expression of the protein in the cell, we decided to make a IPTG gradient induction for our gene circuits. After measuring the enzyme activity and ran SDS-PAGE, We found the optimal IPTG concentration . As shown in the graph, the enzyme activity data and SDS-PAGE show the most suitable concentration of the enzyme</p> | ||
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3e/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-1.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;" /> |
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b1/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-2.png" style="margin-bottom: 20px; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;" /> |
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.1 </strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (34+L) from DE3</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.1 </strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (34+L) from DE3</p> | ||
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.2 </strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+L</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.2 </strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+L</p> | ||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
<h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | <h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | ||
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e1/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-3.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;" /> |
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3d/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-4.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;" /> |
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.3 </strong>SDS-PAGE of purified FDH(34+F) from DE3</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.3 </strong>SDS-PAGE of purified FDH(34+F) from DE3</p> | ||
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.4 </strong>Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+F</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.4 </strong>Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+F</p> | ||
Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
<h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | <h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | ||
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/ae/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-5.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;" /> |
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b4/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-6.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;" /> |
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.5</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (30+L)from DE3</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.5</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (30+L)from DE3</p> | ||
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.6</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 30+L</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.6</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 30+L</p> | ||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
<h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | <h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | ||
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/6b/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-7.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;" /> |
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/62/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-8.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;" /> |
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.7</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(30+L) and FDH(34+F) from DE3</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.7</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(30+L) and FDH(34+F) from DE3</p> | ||
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.8</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 30+L+34+</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.8</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 30+L+34+</p> | ||
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
<h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | <h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | ||
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/21/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-9.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;" /> |
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b8/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-10.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;" /> |
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.9</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (34+L)and FDH (34+L)from DE3</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.9</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (34+L)and FDH (34+L)from DE3</p> | ||
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.10</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+L+34+F</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.10</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+L+34+F</p> | ||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
<h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | <h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa;"></h1> | ||
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/cc/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-11.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;" /> |
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a8/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-12.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;" /> |
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.11</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(32+L) and FDH(34+F) from DE3</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.11</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(32+L) and FDH(34+F) from DE3</p> | ||
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.12</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 32+L+34+F</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.12</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 32+L+34+F</p> | ||
Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
<h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa; margin-bottom: 40px;"></h1> | <h1 class="col-md-12" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #aaaaaa; margin-bottom: 40px;"></h1> | ||
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4b/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-13.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;" /> |
− | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/70/Amoy-Project_Result_fig2-14.jpeg" style="margin-bottom: 20px; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;" /> |
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.13</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(32+L) from DE3</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: left; margin-left: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.13</strong> SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(32+L) from DE3</p> | ||
<p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.14</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 32+L</p> | <p class="figure" style="display: block; width: 48%; float: right; margin-right: 1%;"><strong>Figure 2.14</strong> Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 32+L</p> |
Revision as of 14:07, 17 September 2015
RESULTS
Ⅰ. Enzyme and protein assays
1. IPTG Gradient Induction
We found that the concentration of IPTG could have an effect on the expression of our circuit, in order to make a better expression of the protein in the cell, we decided to make a IPTG gradient induction for our gene circuits. After measuring the enzyme activity and ran SDS-PAGE, We found the optimal IPTG concentration . As shown in the graph, the enzyme activity data and SDS-PAGE show the most suitable concentration of the enzyme
Figure 2.1 SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (34+L) from DE3
Figure 2.2 Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+L
Figure 2.3 SDS-PAGE of purified FDH(34+F) from DE3
Figure 2.4 Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+F
Figure 2.5 SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (30+L)from DE3
Figure 2.6 Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 30+L
Figure 2.7 SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(30+L) and FDH(34+F) from DE3
Figure 2.8 Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 30+L+34+
Figure 2.9 SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH (34+L)and FDH (34+L)from DE3
Figure 2.10 Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 34+L+34+F
Figure 2.11 SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(32+L) and FDH(34+F) from DE3
Figure 2.12 Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 32+L+34+F
Figure 2.13 SDS-PAGE of purified LeuDH(32+L) from DE3
Figure 2.14 Different concentrations of IPTG on the Enzyme activity of 32+L
2. HPLC
Under the conditions of optimum concentration, we carried out the next step of catalysis and induction, Apart from taking all three whole circuits into analysis, we detected circuits with LeuDH or FDH separately.
Figure 3.1 The conversion rate of isolated connection
Figure 3.2 The conversion rate of series connection
No matter which kind of RBS, the conversion rate does not show too much of change compared with each other, indicating that RBS control would not make an effect if the whole system is expressed separately. Obviously, the conversion rate of series connected circuits is much higher than the other. As we mentioned on the whole-cell biocatalyst part, our project which make two genes into series connection would largely promote the productivity and conversion rate of L-tert Leucine.we found RBS_B0030 make the best performance among these three kinds of RBSs which indicate that the most suitable strength of RBS is located at this range.
Figure 3.3 The e.e.value of series connection
Enantiomeric excess (e.e.) is a measurement of purity used for chiral substances. It reflects the degree to which a sample contains one enantiomer in greater amounts than the other. A racemic mixture has an ee of 0%, while a single completely pure enantiomer has an ee of 100%. A sample with 70% of one enantiomer and 30% of the other has an ee of 40%. The HPLC results also show the ideal e.e. value of our products. No matter which circuits of our project, the e.e. value all turns to be 99% which means the perfect optical purity of L-tert-leucine.
CONTACT US
Email: igemxmu@gmail.com
Website: 2015.igem.org/Team:Amoy
Address: Xiamen University, No. 422, Siming South Road, Xiamen, Fujian, P.R.China 361005