Difference between revisions of "Team:Warwick/PracticesPerception"

Line 46: Line 46:
  
 
<p>_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
 
<p>_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<br><h5>Interview: John Pickering, Psychologist, University of Warwick, 27/08/2015
+
<br><h5><b>Interview: John Pickering, Psychologist, University of Warwick, 27/08/2015
</h5>
+
</b></h5>
  
  
 
<p>_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
 
<p>_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<br><h5>An examination of the literature on perceptions of gene technologies
+
<br><h5><b>An examination of the literature on perceptions of gene technologies
</h5>
+
</b></h5>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
Following our discussion with John we decided to research the literature regarding the the public’s distrust of gene technologies in the past few decades. For instance a paper examining results from two major studies found that Europeans had a “deeply rooted” negative views of foods that had undergone genetic modification [1]. <br>
 
Following our discussion with John we decided to research the literature regarding the the public’s distrust of gene technologies in the past few decades. For instance a paper examining results from two major studies found that Europeans had a “deeply rooted” negative views of foods that had undergone genetic modification [1]. <br>
Line 87: Line 87:
  
 
<p>_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
 
<p>_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<br><h5>Our survey assessing the public’s current perceptions of gene technologies and bio-technologies
+
<br><h5><b>Our survey assessing the public’s current perceptions of gene technologies and bio-technologies
</h5>
+
</b></h5>
  
 
<p> Informed from our preliminary research and our interview we modelled our survey on a previous survey in order to see what the current public opinion regarding gene technologies is. We were also interested to assess what influence source of information had on an individual’s views as well as the influence of age on opinion.
 
<p> Informed from our preliminary research and our interview we modelled our survey on a previous survey in order to see what the current public opinion regarding gene technologies is. We were also interested to assess what influence source of information had on an individual’s views as well as the influence of age on opinion.
Line 98: Line 98:
 
<p>_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
 
<p>_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
  
<h5>Where do people access information on synthetic biology?</h5>
+
<h5><b>Where do people access information on synthetic biology?</b></h5>
  
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f6/Public_Perception_Pie_Chart_Warwick.png">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f6/Public_Perception_Pie_Chart_Warwick.png">
Line 116: Line 116:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
A scale spanning from ‘Strongly Disagree’ to ‘Strongly Agree’ was assigned to each question with a number scoring pattern. These scores were then added together and a mean was determined to give an overall opinion score that could then be compared with the source of information or the age of participants.  
 
A scale spanning from ‘Strongly Disagree’ to ‘Strongly Agree’ was assigned to each question with a number scoring pattern. These scores were then added together and a mean was determined to give an overall opinion score that could then be compared with the source of information or the age of participants.  
 +
</div>
  
<b>How does the source of information influence the the opinion score?</b>
+
<b>How does the source of information influence the the opinion score?</b>
  
  
</div>
+
 
</div><!-- end main content-->
+
 
 +
 
 +
</div><!-- end main content-->
 
 
 
     <!-- SIDEBAR-->
 
     <!-- SIDEBAR-->

Revision as of 16:16, 17 September 2015

Warwick iGEM 2015