Difference between revisions of "Team:CCA SanDiego/Project/Results"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e0/PotentialEnergy.png"> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e0/PotentialEnergy.png"/> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
This graph shows the potential energy levels of each simulations as it runs. The goal of the simulation is to the stable energy level for each of the conditions. The potential energy level closest to zero is most stable, so based on the graph the simulations run by Olivia are the most stable. Olivia's simulations stabilized around -350,000, where Miya's was around -365,000 and Julia's was -395,000. | This graph shows the potential energy levels of each simulations as it runs. The goal of the simulation is to the stable energy level for each of the conditions. The potential energy level closest to zero is most stable, so based on the graph the simulations run by Olivia are the most stable. Olivia's simulations stabilized around -350,000, where Miya's was around -365,000 and Julia's was -395,000. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:08, 18 September 2015
<img src="
"/>
This graph shows the potential energy levels of each simulations as it runs. The goal of the simulation is to the stable energy level for each of the conditions. The potential energy level closest to zero is most stable, so based on the graph the simulations run by Olivia are the most stable. Olivia's simulations stabilized around -350,000, where Miya's was around -365,000 and Julia's was -395,000.