Difference between revisions of "Team:SCUT-China/Experiments"
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<h4 style="color:#0ea9e2">Vector Map</h4> | <h4 style="color:#0ea9e2">Vector Map</h4> | ||
<p>The vector we used in our experiment was created using scarless golden gate assembly. We cloned the silencing device into a psb1c3 vector after our experiment.</p> | <p>The vector we used in our experiment was created using scarless golden gate assembly. We cloned the silencing device into a psb1c3 vector after our experiment.</p> | ||
− | <img src=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e2/2015-SCUT-China-exp-fig1.png" class="img" /> |
<p class="smallIntroduction">Fig.1 Lentivirus vector cointaing PDE5a silencing device </p> | <p class="smallIntroduction">Fig.1 Lentivirus vector cointaing PDE5a silencing device </p> | ||
<p>In our experiment we designed three PDE5A silencing devices and chose the best one. Before our experiment we made a preliminary experiment. We used 10umol/L sodium nitroprussiate(SNP),a NO donor, to treat HEK 293 cells for different time gradient as the positive control . The results are as followed</p> | <p>In our experiment we designed three PDE5A silencing devices and chose the best one. Before our experiment we made a preliminary experiment. We used 10umol/L sodium nitroprussiate(SNP),a NO donor, to treat HEK 293 cells for different time gradient as the positive control . The results are as followed</p> | ||
− | <img src=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a1/2015-SCUT-China-exp-fig2.png" class="img" /> |
<p class="smallIntroduction">Fig.2 cGMP concentration after treated with 10umol/L SNP</p> | <p class="smallIntroduction">Fig.2 cGMP concentration after treated with 10umol/L SNP</p> | ||
<p>We used RT-PCR method to see whether PDE5a gene was silenced by our shRNA. </p> | <p>We used RT-PCR method to see whether PDE5a gene was silenced by our shRNA. </p> | ||
− | <img src=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/ee/2015-SCUT-China-exp-fig3.png" class="img" /> |
<p class="smallIntroduction">Fig.3 PED5a transcription level after transfection with three different shRNA</p> | <p class="smallIntroduction">Fig.3 PED5a transcription level after transfection with three different shRNA</p> | ||
<p> From the results of Fig.2 we could see that PDE5a was almost silenced by all the three different shRNA. So we could not decide which device was the best one .So we used Elisa Kit to detect cGMP concentration and used the results to select the best silencing device. </p> | <p> From the results of Fig.2 we could see that PDE5a was almost silenced by all the three different shRNA. So we could not decide which device was the best one .So we used Elisa Kit to detect cGMP concentration and used the results to select the best silencing device. </p> | ||
− | <img src=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b7/2015-SCUT-China-exp-fig4.png" class="img" /> |
<p class="smallIntroduction"> Fig.4 cGMP concentration after treated with three different shRNA</p> | <p class="smallIntroduction"> Fig.4 cGMP concentration after treated with three different shRNA</p> | ||
<p>From the results of Fig.3 we choose shRNA3 (part number: BBa_K1720005)as the best PDE5A silencing device.</p> | <p>From the results of Fig.3 we choose shRNA3 (part number: BBa_K1720005)as the best PDE5A silencing device.</p> | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
<h3 style="color:#06afe8">2.sGC Overexpression</h3> | <h3 style="color:#06afe8">2.sGC Overexpression</h3> | ||
<h4>Vector Map of Alpha3 subunit</h4> | <h4>Vector Map of Alpha3 subunit</h4> | ||
− | <img src=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/2015-SCUT-China-exp-fig5.png" class="img" /> |
<p class="smallIntroduction">Fig.5 Lentivirus vector cointaing guanylate cyclase 1 alpha3 subunit gene</p> | <p class="smallIntroduction">Fig.5 Lentivirus vector cointaing guanylate cyclase 1 alpha3 subunit gene</p> | ||
<h4>Vector Map of Bata3 subunit</h4> | <h4>Vector Map of Bata3 subunit</h4> |
Revision as of 08:24, 18 September 2015
Loading
Project
1.PDE5A Silencing Device
Vector Map
The vector we used in our experiment was created using scarless golden gate assembly. We cloned the silencing device into a psb1c3 vector after our experiment.
Fig.1 Lentivirus vector cointaing PDE5a silencing device
In our experiment we designed three PDE5A silencing devices and chose the best one. Before our experiment we made a preliminary experiment. We used 10umol/L sodium nitroprussiate(SNP),a NO donor, to treat HEK 293 cells for different time gradient as the positive control . The results are as followed
Fig.2 cGMP concentration after treated with 10umol/L SNP
We used RT-PCR method to see whether PDE5a gene was silenced by our shRNA.
Fig.3 PED5a transcription level after transfection with three different shRNA
From the results of Fig.2 we could see that PDE5a was almost silenced by all the three different shRNA. So we could not decide which device was the best one .So we used Elisa Kit to detect cGMP concentration and used the results to select the best silencing device.
Fig.4 cGMP concentration after treated with three different shRNA
From the results of Fig.3 we choose shRNA3 (part number: BBa_K1720005)as the best PDE5A silencing device.
2.sGC Overexpression
Vector Map of Alpha3 subunit
Fig.5 Lentivirus vector cointaing guanylate cyclase 1 alpha3 subunit gene
Vector Map of Bata3 subunit
Fig.6 Lentivirus vector cointaing guanylate cyclase 1 beta3 subunit gene
HEK293 cells were transfected by designed vectors. Vectors carrying alpha3 subunit of sGC was inserted mCherry gene as a reporter while vectors carrying beta3 subunit of sGC was inserted EGFP gene as a reporter. Both red fluorescence signal and green fluorescence can be observed under fluorescence microscope. It indicated that the transfection was successful.
Fig.7 Red fluorescence signal after transfection of alpha3 subunit
Fig.8 Green fluorescence signal after transfection of beta3 subunit
sGC alpha3 subunit and beta3 subunit gene expression levels were determined by real-time PCR
Fig.9 Transcription level after transfection with alpha3 and beta3 subunit
Fig.10 △CT vs GAPDH after transfection of alpha3 and beta3 subunit
As we up-regulate the transcriptional level of sGC alpha3 subunit and bata3 subunit, we used sGC Elisa Kit to detect the sGC activity to see whether two subunits combine with each other successfully.
Fig.11 sGC activity after transfection of sGC vectors and shRNA vectors
We used Elisa kit to detect the sGC activity. From the result we can see that the activity of sGC will be improved after overexpression but if we silence PDE5A gene the activity of sGC will be up regulated rapidly.
We used cGMP Elisa kit to detect the cGMP level to see whether cGMP concentration will be up regulated by overexpression of sGC.
Fig.12 cGMP concentration after transfection of sGC vectors and shRNA vectors
From the results (Fig.8 and Fig9)we can see that once the activity of sGC is up regulated the cGMP concentration will be up regulated simultaneously.
3.Hypoxia Responsive Promotor
Vector Map
Fig.13 Vecror containing hypoxia responsive CMV promotor and EGFP reporter
We designed a hypoxia responsive CMV promotor by inserting a hypoxia responsive element (HRE) to CMV promotor. We transiently transfected HEK293 cells with plasmids containing hypoxia-induced promotor and EGFP reporter. The positive control was transiently transfected with plasmids that contain CMV promoter and EGFP reporter. The control group was transiently transfected with plasmids that contain hypoxia responsive promotor and culture under aerobic situation. The experimental group group was transiently transfected with plasmids that contain hypoxia responsive promotor and the cells were treated with sodium hyposulfite, an oxygen cleaner to cause hypoxia situation, for 2 hours.
Fig.14 EGFP signal under the control of CMV promotor
Fig.15 EGFP signal under the regulate of HRE in aerobic situation
Fig.16 EGFP signal under the regulate of HRE in hypoxia situation
From the results above, we can see that hypoxia responsive promotor still working under aerobic situation. So that this promotor is not a strict hypoxia responsive promotor as we expect.