Difference between revisions of "Team:Kent/Results"

Line 17: Line 17:
 
The second samples we imaged were of the same E. coli VS45 strain but were expressing a fusion protein containing CsgAss-SUP35NM fused with cytochrome b562 in the C-terminus (CsgAss-SUP35NM-b562).  When these cells were induced to export the SUP35NM-b562 fusion protein, the fibrils appeared to break off and form smaller curve-linear fibrillar aggregates much more frequently. In addition, it seems the protein assembles frequently as a larger cluster of amyloid rather than distinct fibrils seen in the sample with no cytochrome. Thus, we confirmed that the fusion protein was successfully exported and assembled, but our results show the fusion protein assembled less efficiently compared with their counterparts without the Cytochrome b<sub>562</sub>.  </p>
 
The second samples we imaged were of the same E. coli VS45 strain but were expressing a fusion protein containing CsgAss-SUP35NM fused with cytochrome b562 in the C-terminus (CsgAss-SUP35NM-b562).  When these cells were induced to export the SUP35NM-b562 fusion protein, the fibrils appeared to break off and form smaller curve-linear fibrillar aggregates much more frequently. In addition, it seems the protein assembles frequently as a larger cluster of amyloid rather than distinct fibrils seen in the sample with no cytochrome. Thus, we confirmed that the fusion protein was successfully exported and assembled, but our results show the fusion protein assembled less efficiently compared with their counterparts without the Cytochrome b<sub>562</sub>.  </p>
  
<table class="table table-striped" style="width:75%">
+
<table class="table table-striped" style="width:33%">
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
 
     <th> Plate number</th><th>Day </th><th> Average electric resistance (\(\Omega\))</th>
 
     <th> Plate number</th><th>Day </th><th> Average electric resistance (\(\Omega\))</th>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
     <th rowspan="5">1</th>
+
     <th rowspan="5"><i>Heme </i> innoculated PVS72</th>
 
     <td>1</td><td>13.430</td>
 
     <td>1</td><td>13.430</td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
Line 37: Line 37:
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
     <th rowspan="5"> Negative control sample containing Heme innoculated VS45</th>
+
     <th rowspan="5"> Negative control sample containing <i>heme</i> innoculated VS45</th>
 
     <td>1<td>-</td>
 
     <td>1<td>-</td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
Line 52: Line 52:
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
     <th rowspan="5">heme innoculated PVS72 without cytochrome</th>
+
     <th rowspan="5"><i>Heme</i> innoculated PVS72 without cytochrome</th>
 
     <td>1<td>-</td>
 
     <td>1<td>-</td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
Line 67: Line 67:
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
     <th rowspan="5">Negative control sample containing Heme innoculated VS45</th>
+
     <th rowspan="5">Negative control sample containing <i>heme</i> innoculated VS45</th>
 
     <td>1<td>-</td>
 
     <td>1<td>-</td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
Line 97: Line 97:
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
<p align="justify"> Table 1: The average resistance calculated for our main heme innoculated PVS72 sample and other control samples over the period of 5 days. For each day, several repeat resistance measurements were taken (maximum 5). Average electrical resistances were calculated for each measurement. </p>
+
<p align="justify"> Table 1: The average resistance calculated for our main <i>heme</i> innoculated PVS72 sample and other control samples over the period of 5 days. For each day, several repeat resistance measurements were taken (maximum 5). Average electrical resistances were calculated for each measurement. </p>
  
  

Revision as of 14:56, 18 September 2015


iGEM Kent 2015


Project Results

AFM
Validation

Atomic force microscopy (AFM)

AFM is a form of scanning probe microscopy, which can be used to image biological specimen to high resolution and magnification. AFM was used to image cells expressing amyloid nano-wires. Colonies taken from agar plates were suspended and then placed onto a sample stage from which the scanning probe could operate, as described in the protocols section.
The first samples imaged were of the E. coli VS45 cells expressing CsgAss-SUP35NM protein, which had been induced to express and export the Sup35NM protein capable of forming amyloid fibrils. The cells exhibited long, distinct fibrils which had a tendency to overlap and form a larger mass once they had detached from the cell. The nano-wires that assembled were around 20Å wide and varied in length. This shows that the protein could be exported and form part of a longer nano-wire. The second samples we imaged were of the same E. coli VS45 strain but were expressing a fusion protein containing CsgAss-SUP35NM fused with cytochrome b562 in the C-terminus (CsgAss-SUP35NM-b562). When these cells were induced to export the SUP35NM-b562 fusion protein, the fibrils appeared to break off and form smaller curve-linear fibrillar aggregates much more frequently. In addition, it seems the protein assembles frequently as a larger cluster of amyloid rather than distinct fibrils seen in the sample with no cytochrome. Thus, we confirmed that the fusion protein was successfully exported and assembled, but our results show the fusion protein assembled less efficiently compared with their counterparts without the Cytochrome b562.

Plate numberDay Average electric resistance (\(\Omega\))
Heme innoculated PVS72 113.430
2229.200
3202.960
4804.253
5763.960
Negative control sample containing heme innoculated VS45 1-
212.100
3993.36
4917.367
5875.925
Heme innoculated PVS72 without cytochrome 1-
213
312.500
4487.594
5359.250
Negative control sample containing heme innoculated VS45 1-
212.500
31049.680
4313.260
5844.925
5 1-
213.2
312.620
41013.026
5799.550

Table 1: The average resistance calculated for our main heme innoculated PVS72 sample and other control samples over the period of 5 days. For each day, several repeat resistance measurements were taken (maximum 5). Average electrical resistances were calculated for each measurement.