|
|
Line 806: |
Line 806: |
| <br><br> | | <br><br> |
| | | |
− |
| |
− | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>Why are we expressing human Insulin?</u></i>
| |
− | <br>
| |
− | The ability to produce recombinant human Insulin cheaply has long been a lucrative goal. There are millions of people worldwide who are dependent on Insulin derived from production methods that make the product expensive -and further yet- potentially dangerous.Our team thinks that the current production methods for human Insulin are inefficient and can be optimized by being expressed in Pichia pastoris.
| |
− | <br><br>
| |
− |
| |
− | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>What is the current method for Human Insulin production?</u></i>
| |
− | <br>
| |
− | Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli have historically been the preferred host cells to produce recombinant human insulin; however, each one of these organisms has great disadvantages. E. coli lack secretory mechanisms, thus the cells must be lysed and processed to isolate the insulin. Another concern with E.coli is the lactose operon acting as an inducible system to control gene expression. S. cerevisiae, on the other hand, have the necessary secretory machinery to secrete insulin, but they produce it at very low yields compared to E. coli.
| |
− | <br><br>
| |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 823: |
Line 813: |
| <br><br> | | <br><br> |
| | | |
− | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>What are some risks associated with this design?</u></i>
| |
− | <br>
| |
− | Our system poses a hopeful future for diabetes sufferers, but, as with any medical breakthrough there are some risks to be aware of. Although the risk of allergy or rejection will be reduced, there may still be adverse side effects that we cannot foresee despite careful testing in the laboratory, until the synthetically secreted protein is actually trial tested in humans. Although great caution can be taken to solidify the safety of our synthetic system, unpredictable mutations may still occur that, again, cannot be foreseen until human trials are conducted. The proposal of human trials alone poses a dilemma for ethical reasons.
| |
− | <br><br><br>
| |
| </p> | | </p> |
| | | |
Line 832: |
Line 818: |
| <br> | | <br> |
| | | |
− | <p>
| |
− | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>What is PCSK1?</u></i>
| |
− | <br>
| |
− | PCSK1 encodes for preprotein convertase type I, which is regarded as the most important enzyme in the first step of insulin processing in humans. Since our model organism P. pastoris lacks this enzyme it is hypothesized that its addition will increase efficiency of Insulin over the lineage.</p>
| |
| | | |
− | </p>
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | <br>
| |
− | <p><b>Methods</b><br><br>
| |
− | Insulin and PCSK1 Open Reading Frame Design
| |
− | Sequences for insulin and its chaperone PCSK1 were obtained through NCBI. Both insulin and PCSK1 were codon optimized for expression in P. pastoris using the online Codon Optimization tool from IDT. The BioBrick consensus sequence was added to both insulin and PCSK1 in preparation for cloning into the shipping vector. Restriction sites that were incompatible with the BioBrick standard, as well as our Pichia pastoris expression system pMNBB were eliminated by altering single nucleotides while maintaining the proper amino acid sequence. Both genes were synthesized by IDT. Insulin was obtained as one 333 bp fragment, while the longer PCSK1 was split into three, roughly 750 bp fragments.
| |
− | <br><br>
| |
− | Fragments for insulin and PCSK1 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Insulin was cloned into the shipping vector. The three PCSK1 fragments were joined into the the full 2300 bp product using overlap extension PCR. The full PCSK1 product was cloned into the shipping vector. Cloning primers were not designed for PCSK1 with flanking BioBrick consensus sequences. PCSK1 was cloned into the pCR®Blunt II-TOPO® vector, provided by Invitrogen.
| |
− | <br><br>
| |
− | E. coli C2566 cultures were transformed with PCSK1- pCR®Blunt II-TOPO®. PCSK1- pCR®Blunt II-TOPO® was isolated from transformation cultures and used as a template for PCR amplification of PCSK1 with our insulin primers that contained the BioBrick consensus sequence.
| |
− | <br><br>
| |
− | Two transformations were performed using Escherichia coli C2566, one with pSB1C3-Insulin and another with pSB1C3-PCSK1. Both constructs were submitted for sequencing.
| |
− | <br><br>
| |
− | <b>Results</b>
| |
− | <br><br>
| |
− | The products that were cloned into the shipping vector were verified by gel electrophoresis (Figure 1).
| |
− | <br><br>
| |
− | Several colonies were identified in colony screens for PCSK1 and insulin in transformants containing the shipping vector. Seen below are verification gels for PCSK1 and insulin.
| |
| <br><br> | | <br><br> |
| <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/1/10/MN_Biobrick_Network.zip/800px-MN_Biobrick_Network.zip.png" width=100% height=100%> | | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/1/10/MN_Biobrick_Network.zip/800px-MN_Biobrick_Network.zip.png" width=100% height=100%> |