Difference between revisions of "Team:Oxford/Experiments"
Weikongquee (Talk | contribs) |
Weikongquee (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
<div class="section" id="biofilm"> | <div class="section" id="biofilm"> | ||
<div class="slim"> | <div class="slim"> | ||
− | <h2 style="text-align:left">Biofilm | + | <h2 style="text-align:left">Biofilm-degrading Enzymes</h2> |
<p> | <p> | ||
According to the design requirements, our genetic constructs coding for biofilm-degrading enzymes need to achieve the following: | According to the design requirements, our genetic constructs coding for biofilm-degrading enzymes need to achieve the following: | ||
Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="section" id="antibiofilm"> | ||
+ | <h3>Biofilm Degradation</h3> | ||
+ | <p>To study the effects of the secreted enzymes on <i>E. coli</i> biofilms, we conducted two types of experiments:</p> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Biofilm viability assays which investigated whether the secretion of the biofilm-degrading enzymes can prevent the gene expression hosts, which are <i>E. coli</i> strains themselves, from forming biofilms.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Biofilm inhibition assays which investigated whether the enzyme-secreting cells can inhibit control cells which do not secrete the enzymes from forming biofilms.</li> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="section" id="biofilmviability"> | ||
+ | <h4>Biofilm viability assay</h4> | ||
+ | <div class="image image-full" style="object-align:center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/13/Oxford-cvstain.jpeg"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 151: | Line 172: | ||
<li><a href="#cloning">Plasmid Construction & Gene Cloning</a></li> | <li><a href="#cloning">Plasmid Construction & Gene Cloning</a></li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
− | <a href="#biofilm">Biofilm | + | <a href="#biofilm">Biofilm-degrading Enzymes</a> |
<ul class="nav nav-stacked"> | <ul class="nav nav-stacked"> | ||
<li><a href="#secretion">Secretion Assaying</a></li> | <li><a href="#secretion">Secretion Assaying</a></li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <a href="#antibiofilm">Biofilm Degradation</a> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li><a href="#biofilmviability">Biofilm Viability Assay</a></li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 13 November 2015
Experiments
Introduction
Our enzymatic approach to the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) is centred on the design of a "pathogen killing" engineered microbial host containing three key features:
- Constant secretion of biofilm-degrading enzymes - degrading the biofilms of the pathogenic bacteria reduces their resistance towards antibiotics
- Production and intracellular accumulation of enzymes that can kill both the pathogenic bacteria and our engineered microbial host upon release into the extracellular medium
- A quorum sensing mechanism that triggers the release of the antibacterial enzymes in the presence of pathogenic bacteria
Due to constraints in time and resources, we focused our experimental efforts towards the development of proof-of-concepts for only the first two features.
Through our experimental work with secretion assays, biofilm assays, and cell-killing assays we were able to obtain preliminary in vitro data suggesting that the BioBrick parts which we designed to allow our microbial host to produce the relevant biofilm-degrading enzymes and bacteria-killing enzymes are indeed able to function as expected, exerting antibiofilm and bactericidal activity against bacterial strains closely related by species and/or genus to the pathogens involved in catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
Bacterial Strains and Growth Cultures
E. coli DH5α was used for all cloning purposes. The E. coli strains MG1655 and RP437 ∆FliC, as well as the multi-effector knockout BSL-1 strain of Y. enterocolitica, IML421asd, were used as expression hosts. Cultures for cloning were grown in antibiotic-supplemented Lysogeny Broth (LB) at 37°C. The E. coli expression host cultures were grown in antibiotic-supplemented Lysogeny Broth (LB) at 37°C, while cultures of Y. enterocolitica IML421asd were grown in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) media supplemented with diaminopimelic acid (DAP) and the appropriate antibiotic at 30°C.
Bacterial cultures were grown overnight (16-20 hours) to stationary phase before being subcultured for characterization experiments.
Plasmid Construction & Gene Cloning
Each gene sequence for our parts was directly synthesized pre-fused with 1) a sequence coding for a hexahistidine tag downstream of it, and 2) the BioBrick prefix and suffix sequences containing the EcoRI/XbaI and SpeI/PstI restriction sites attached upstream and (further) downstream of it respectively through IDT. The sequences were amplified using PCR and inserted into the pSB1C3 BioBrick standard vector backbone before subsequently being cloned into E. coli DH5α for plasmid storage and submission to the Registry.
For gene expression studies, our parts, contained in the pSB1C3 backbone, were extracted via Miniprep. The NcoI restriction site was introduced upstream of each of our gene sequences (except BBa_K1659501 and BBa_K1659601) via PCR to facilitate their insertion into the arabinose-inducible pBAD/HisB commercial expression vector, and the insert-containing expression vectors were subsequently cloned separately into the standard laboratory E. coli K-12 strain MG1655 as well as a chemotaxis knockout strain E. coli RP437 ∆FliC.
In the later stages of experimentation, BBa_K1659003[pBAD] was also cloned into Y. enterocolitica IML421asd for further characterization of gene expression.
Biofilm-degrading Enzymes
According to the design requirements, our genetic constructs coding for biofilm-degrading enzymes need to achieve the following:
- Trigger the production of biofilm-degrading enzymes and facilitate the secretion of said enzymes from the expression hosts
- Ensure that the enzymes, after secretion into the extracellular medium, are still correctly folded such that they retain their enzymatic biofilm-degrading function
The parts which we characterized for this section of the design are BBa_K1659211 (DsbA-DspBx) and BBa_K1659301 (DsbA-DNase).
Secretion Assaying
Stationary cultures of MG1655 DsbA-DspBx[pBAD] and MG1655 DsbA-DNase[pBAD] were subcultured into fresh media at a 1:20 ratio and enzyme secretion was induced for 4 hours using L-arabinose. Subsequent purification of protein from the cell-free supernatant and visualization using SDS-PAGE confirms that proteins of the expected size are present in the supernatant and hence most likely successfully secreted by the respective engineered bacterial strains.
Left figure: Lane D = DsbA-DspB, ~45 kDa; Right figure: Lane C = DsbA-DNase, ~22 kDa
Biofilm Degradation
To study the effects of the secreted enzymes on E. coli biofilms, we conducted two types of experiments:
- Biofilm viability assays which investigated whether the secretion of the biofilm-degrading enzymes can prevent the gene expression hosts, which are E. coli strains themselves, from forming biofilms.
- Biofilm inhibition assays which investigated whether the enzyme-secreting cells can inhibit control cells which do not secrete the enzymes from forming biofilms.
Biofilm viability assay