Difference between revisions of "Team:Bordeaux/Practices"
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
<h5 align="center" >The relation to living and its simplification</h5> | <h5 align="center" >The relation to living and its simplification</h5> | ||
− | <p align="justify">With the emergence of synthetic biology, the definition of living may be modified. Indeed, in this field, researchers can generate or modify the genome of an existing organism, insert a whole artificial genome in an existing organism or create a new artificial organism. We can wonder if these modifications made by humans will not have an impact in the nature of the organism. Can we consider that an organism is living if it has been totally or partially created artificially? Synthetic biology regards the “objects” which are created as living beings because they are built from the cell, the basic unit of life. They have the property of self-organization and identical or similar self-replication to those of natural living beings. So we can considerate that they are “alive”. | + | <p align="justify">With the emergence of synthetic biology, the <b>definition of living</b> may be modified. Indeed, in this field, researchers can generate or modify the genome of an existing organism, insert a whole artificial genome in an existing organism or create a new artificial organism. We can wonder if these modifications made by humans will not have an <b>impact in the nature of the organism</b>. Can we consider that an organism is living if it has been totally or partially created artificially? Synthetic biology regards the “objects” which are created <b>as living beings</b> because they are <b>built from the cell</b>, the basic unit of life. They have the property of <b>self-organization</b> and identical or similar <b>self-replication</b> to those of natural living beings. So we can considerate that they are “alive”. |
− | + | ||
− | <br>With these "new" organisms, | + | <br>With these "new" organisms, a living being may be <b>considerate as simple and easy to create</b>. Once decoding the DNA of a organism, synthetic biologist is able to do everything with a bacteria, a yeast or animals bigger, thinking that are like <b>"machines"</b>. We can wonder if we can considerate life as a tool and find the <b>limit between an ethical scientific project and an unethical scientific project</b>.</p> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p align="justify">In conclusion, these ethical considerations make us think about the ethical aspects of our project Cured Vine. | <p align="justify">In conclusion, these ethical considerations make us think about the ethical aspects of our project Cured Vine. | ||
− | <br>First, it is important to us that our project was related with transparency, so that uninitiated people can apprehend our scientific approach. Our Wiki, in free access on the WEB, allows us to clearly and concisely expose all the thinking steps which governed our Cur’dVine project. It also allows us to share our knowledge and results to as many people as possible. New iGEM teams or other researchers could use our results to continue our project. | + | <br>First, it is important to us that our project was related with <b>transparency</b>, so that uninitiated people can apprehend our scientific approach. Our <b>Wiki</b>, in free access on the WEB, allows us to clearly and concisely expose all the thinking steps which governed our Cur’dVine project. It also allows us to <b>share our knowledge and results</b> to as many people as possible. New iGEM teams or other researchers could use our results to continue our project. |
− | <br>Also, our implication in annex projects such as Cap Sciences, making street interviews about GMO's or high school presentations of synthetic biology, makes democratizing synthetic biology to the general public. All these actions incited us to think about the ethical questions that the general audience would wonder. | + | <br>Also, our implication in annex projects such as Cap Sciences, making street interviews about GMO's or high school presentations of synthetic biology, makes democratizing synthetic biology to the general public. All these actions incited us to <b>think about the ethical questions</b> that the general audience would wonder. |
− | <br>That help us to consider his profits and risks. Without being paranoiac, we have to think of all potential dangers that may create our molecule. | + | <br>That help us to <b>consider his profits and risks</b>. Without being paranoiac, we have to think of all potential dangers that may create our molecule. |
The ethical aspects of our project are strongly link to safety, that's why more details will be in the next section.</p> | The ethical aspects of our project are strongly link to safety, that's why more details will be in the next section.</p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p class="reference" align="left"> <b>Literature Cited: </b> </p> | ||
+ | <p class="reference" align="left"><i>[1] : 5e avis sur la biologie de synthèse. Comité consultatif commun d'éthique pour la recherche agronomique. INRA - CIRAD.(2014)</i></p> | ||
+ | <p class="reference" align="left"><i>[2] : La révision des lois de bio-éthique. | ||
+ | <a href="http://www.vie-publique.fr/actualite/faq-citoyens/bioethique/" target="_blank">Vie Publique</a>(2010)</i></p> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 19:03, 11 August 2015