Difference between revisions of "Team:Oxford/Test/Notebook"

Line 590: Line 590:
 
                                     </div>
 
                                     </div>
 
                                     <div id="1-5-gel">
 
                                     <div id="1-5-gel">
                                          
+
                                         <h4></h4>
 +
                                        <div class="image image-right">
 +
                                            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4e/Ox_Gel-layout-1.png" />
 +
                                            <p>Gel layout</p>
 +
                                        </div>
 +
                                        <p>
 +
                                            10µl of blue gel loading dye was added to each tube of digested plasmids. 20µl from the contents of each tube were then loaded into a 30-well agarose gel according to the following schematic:
 +
                                        </p>
 
                                     </div>
 
                                     </div>
 +
                                    <p>
 +
                                        (*the pSB-1C3 well has pSB-1C3 with abijk insert)
 +
                                    </p>
 +
                                    <p>
 +
                                        The ladder well has 10µl of 2-Log Ladder added into it.
 +
                                    </p>
 +
                                    <p>
 +
                                        A potential difference of 120V was applied across the gel for 40 minutes before it was stained with ethidium bromide for 30 minutes.
 +
                                    </p>
 +
                                </div>
 +
                                <div id="1-5-analysis">
 +
                                    <h4>Analysis of Results</h4>
 +
                                    <div class="image image-left">
 +
                                        <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/85/Ox_26_6_15_analysis.jpg" />
 +
                                        <p>Analysis</p>
 +
                                    </div>
 +
                                    <p>
 +
                                        The first three lanes produced expected results: pBAD33 and pBAD/HisB being “blank” plasmid backbones, the pSB-1C3-abijk lane giving two bands corresponding to similar sizes (being pSB-1C3 and abijk insert respectively).
 +
                                    </p>
 +
                                    <p>
 +
                                        All the other lanes seem to be showing only products in the 2kb range, which corresponds roughly to the size of the pSB-1C3 backbone, but the sizes are not uniform. Nonetheless, we know that the plasmid extraction step was carried out correctly as it did yield products approximating what we were looking for.
 +
                                    </p>
 +
                                    <p>
 +
                                        If it was a matter of the ligation step carried out on 23/06 failing entirely, we should be expecting a uniform row of backbone bands. Instead, there are minor but noticeable size variations between each band which cannot be successfully explained by failed digestion/ligation. It is thus speculated that the pSB-1C3 stock we received from iGEM HQ had suffered from varying extents of DNA degradation such that the restriction enzyme cut sites on their ends were no longer.
 +
                                    </p>
 
                                 </div>
 
                                 </div>
 
                             </div>
 
                             </div>
Line 657: Line 689:
 
                                             <li><a href="#1-5-quantification">Plasmid Quantification</a></li>
 
                                             <li><a href="#1-5-quantification">Plasmid Quantification</a></li>
 
                                             <li><a href="#1-5-digest">Plasmid Digest</a></li>
 
                                             <li><a href="#1-5-digest">Plasmid Digest</a></li>
 +
                                            <li><a href="#1-5-gel">Gel Electrophoresis of Digested Plasmids</a></li>
 +
                                            <li><a href="#1-5-analysis">Analysis</a></li>
 
                                         </ul>
 
                                         </ul>
 
                                     </li>
 
                                     </li>

Revision as of 22:10, 18 August 2015

Notebook

Cloning

Week 1

Day 1

Preparation of Stock Solutions

1. gBlocks

The gBlocks ordered from IDT arrived in the form of vials of 200\(\mu\)g solid DNA powder.

(refer to BioBricks page for information on DNA sequences)

The gBlocks were made into 10ng/µl stock solutions in Milli-Q water for storage:

mass/ng conc/ng\(\mu\)l-1 final volume\(\mu\)l
200 10 20

2. Primers

The forward and reverse primers ordered from IDT came in 32.4nmol and 34.3nmol of solid respectively.

    Sequences
  • Forward - CTTTTTTGCCGGACTGC
  • Reverse - ATGATTTCTGGAATTCGC

The primers were made into 100µM stock solutions in Milli-Q water for storage:

amt/10-9mol conc/10-6M final volume/10-6L
32.4 100 324
34.3 100 343

Preparation of Reaction Solutions

1. gBlocks

2\(\mu\)l of each stock solution were diluted in Milli-Q water to achieve final solution volumes of 20\(\mu\)l to make 1ng/\(\mu\)l-1

2. Primers

2\(\mu\)l of each stock solution were diluted in Milli-Q water to achieve final solution volumes of 20\(\mu\)l to make 10\(\mu\)M reaction solutions.(The solutions are labelled as "Prefix primer" and "suffix primer" in eppendorf tubes in the fridge)

Polymerase Chain Reaction

25µl reactions were run according to the PCR protocol here

* The final concentrations of the primers were noted as they are needed to determine the annealing temperatures for the primers, which can be done using NEB’s online tool here.

** Add components in order of decreasing volume for maximum ease-of-pipetting.

*** When reaction mixture is being made up, all components as well as the mixture itself are to be kept on ice, as the Master Mix is a high-fidelity polymerase that will recognize the primers as being incorrectly base-paired and be able to hydrolyse the primers if kept at room temperature.

**** Use Q5 enzyme in the cold room to avoid defrosting and freezing the original stock of Q5 enzyme. This could decrease the activity of Q5 enzyme. Bring ice bucket to the cold room to bring Q5 into the bench.

***** Make sure that the primer and small amounts of DNA and primer doesn’t stick onto the side of the tube or the tip.

The reaction mixture tubes were positioned in an Eppendorf Mastercycler nexus X2 and the PCR program was run.

* DNA denaturation can be performed at 98℃ because of the high thermal stability of the Q5 polymerase

** A PCR takes 20-30 seconds to extend a sequence by 1kb, and since our longest sequence is ~2kb the extension time was determined to be 60s per cycle.

Gel Electrophoresis of PCR-Amplified gBlocks

An agarose gel was prepared according to the agarose prepartion protocol.

DNA preparation:

The contents of the PCR tubes need to be stained with a loading dye to help visualize its migration.

To each 25\(\mu\)l of content in each PCR tube, 10\(\mu\)l of blue loading dye was added.

Day 2

Gel Electrophoresis of PCR-Amplified gBlocks (continued from 22/06)

gBlock sizes for reference

Lane 1: 10\(\mu\)l of 2-Log Ladder

Lanes 2-15: 20\(\mu\)l of DNA and loading dye mixture prepared on 22/06

A potential difference of 120V was applied across the electrodes (the higher the voltage, the faster the gel will run but the poor the separation will be; DNA separation is typically done in the 120-140V range) for 80 minutes. As long as DNA has passed ⅔ of the column or purple dye have passed purple area of the gel, the gel is ready to get into the EtBr.

The gel was then stained and the bands were visualized; protocol

Results

PCR Results

The 7 bands corresponding to expected DNA sizes were excised using a razor blade for cleaning and extraction. The other sequences, along with J which only showed a very weak band, will be re-PCRed under modified conditions at a later date.

The excised gel chunks were transferred to centrifugation tubes.

Extraction of DNA(PCR product) from Agarose Gel

The extraction was performed using the E.Z.N.A. Gel Extraction Kit made by Omega Biotek, according to the Spin Protocol.

The excised agarose chunks needed to be dissolved in a minimum of 1mL of XP2 Binding Buffer per gram of gel. The heaviest chunk of gel weighed 0.16g and as such 160µl of buffer was added to each tube.

* As the tubes were spun with their lids open, they were placed such that lids pointed away from the direction of spinning.

Restriction Digest of Extracted PCR product

Restriction digest was performed using EcoRI-HF (5’) and SpeI (3’) restriction enzymes.

NEB’s Double Digest Finderwas invoked and it was determined that CutSmart Buffer would be used for the digest.

The buffer was completely defrosted and shaken before use.

There is a recommended digestion protocol on NEBCloner. 50µL reaction mixtures were set up with component volumes as recommended, except for the DNA where all 30µL of the extraction mixture (in elution buffer) were used in the digest. There would be up to 50ng of DNA in each tube of extraction mixture (from the gel bands).

Incubation at 37℃ was also done for 2 hours (ThermoMixer program 3) instead of the recommended 5-15 minutes, with shaking at 300rpm.

Restriction Enzyme Digest of the iGEM HQ linearised pSB-1c3

125ng of pSB-1C3 was dissolved in 5mL Milli-Q water.

The digest was performed using the modified NEBCloner protocol.

* We did not add phosphatase because it is assumed that with different sticky ends the vector cannot religate

DNA ‘Cleanup’ using EZNA enzymatic reaction kit

Upon completion of restriction digest incubation, the gBlocks and the plasmid backbones were purified again using the E.Z.N.A. Gel Extraction Kit. PCR products and plasmid backbones need to be purified in order to remove remaining impurities including agarose gel and restriction enzymes. At the elution step, the gBlock inserts were eluted using 30µL elution buffer whereas the plasmid backbone was eluted using 50µL of it.

DNA Quantification using NanoDrop

1\(\mu\)L water and tissue were first used to clean the stage. A blank reading was made using 1\(\mu\)L of elution buffer, and 1\(\mu\)L of each sample was measured for concentration:

Sample Concentration/ng\(\mu\)l
C 11.3
D 3.5
E 0.8
H 0.9
J 1.6
L 7.7
N 3.6
pSB-1C3 1.6

Ligation of gBlock Sequences with pSB-1C3 Backbone

Ligation was completed; protocol

Preparation of Competent E. coli Cells

A sample of E. coli DH5ɑ stored at -80℃ was defrosted and inoculated in 5mL of LB in a 125mL conical flask (volume of LB 10% of flask volume so as to achieve sufficient aeration). The culture was left to grow overnight at 37℃.

Re-PCR of DNA Sequences

Two sets of sequences A,B,F,G, I, J, K, and M were PCRed using the same protocol as 22/06, with one set using a 55℃ annealing temperature and another using 50℃ annealing temperature.

Day 3

Re-PCR of DNA Sequences

Refer to protocol from 1.0

PCR Results

The amplified sequences A, B, F, G, I, K, J, and M were loaded with blue dye and run on agarose gel as per standard protocol

Sequences G and J showed bands corresponding to the expected sizes at both 50℃ and 55℃ annealing temperatures.

The bands were excised and extracted according to standard protocol (E.Z.N.A. Gel Extraction).

Plasmid recovery

The concentration of pSB1C3 plasmid recovered on 23/06 according to the NanoDrop was low (1.6ng/µl). To obtain more plasmids, we restriction digested a construct made by last year’s, pSB1C3 + abijk, to recover the pSB-1C3 content from the construct.

Set up the following reaction mixture:

Component Volume/µl
DNA (pSB1C3 + insert) 5
EcoR1-HF 1
SpeI 1
Cutsmart buffer 2
Water 11

During the incubation, set up 1% agarose gel by putting 1g powder agarose in 100ml; 1% gel is more efficient at separating larger fragments

Results

  1. Incubate the mix above for 2hrs at 37℃
  2. Incubate for 30mins at 95℃ to inactivate restriction enzymes (Inactivation temperature of SpeI is 80℃, and EcoR1-HF is 65℃)
  3. Cool and spin (there will be condensation at the top of the eppendorf)
  4. Add 1µl CIP (phosphatase) and incubate for 30mins at 37℃
  5. Add loading dye
  6. Load each DNA on the gel
  7. Stain in EtBr for 30 + 20 mins (staining not very clear after 30 mins)

Extraction of “sticky” pSB1C3 (recovered from 2014 pSB1C3+abijk) from Gel

E.Z.N.A. Gel Extraction

Gel weight:

0.53g ⇒ 0.53mL Binding Buffer

30µL of elution buffer used

Repeat PCR with higher DNA concentration (for the sequences that previously did not yield clear bands)

Sequences A, B, F, G, I, J, K and M have gone through a second round of PCR as they previously failed to yield clear enough bands, and ethidium bromide staining shows that G and J have been successfully isolated as a result.

A, B, F, I, K, L and M still have not had successful PCR runs, as such an alternative PCR protocol with higher DNA concentration was attempted on them instead:

Reagent Volume/µl
gBlock Template (1ng/µl) 5
Forward Primer 1.25
Reverse Primer 1.25

* A total of 5ng gBlock as opposed to 1ng at 58℃ annealing temperature present in reaction mixture; rest of the protocol is same as prescribed

Results

Alternative protocol does not work.

Gel extraction of G and J

Standard E.Z.N.A. Gel Extraction protocol followed.

Gel weights:

J - 0.34g ⇒ 0.4mL Binding Buffer

G - 0.3g ⇒ 0.4mL Binding Buffer

30µL of elution buffer used.

Restriction Digest of G and J

A restriction digest was then performed on the extracted DNA.

NanoDrop Quantification

  • J: 2.7ng/\(\mu\)l
  • G: 1.7 ng/\(\mu\)l
  • pSB-1C3: 1.4ng/ul - there is 8-9ul of this left in the freezer in drawer 4, labelled with Psb1c3 EcoRI, SpeI and 24/06/2015

Ligation

Ligation perform according to protocol.

Transforming E. coli cells with Plasmid DNA

Competent e.coli cells were first prepared, according to the protocol here.

Sample C,D,E,H,J,L and N to be transformed, acoording to the protocol here.

Day 4

Growth and Culture of Bacteria

For the protocol please click here.

Plates incubated overnight show that vectors corresponding to C,D,E,H,J,L and N were taken up [however, later we find that ligation had failed, and so gBlocks C,D,E,H,J,L and N were never inserted]. There are at least 5-7 colonies for each biobrick.

Choose three colonies from each plate. The colony should not be too small or too large and should be reasonably spaced from the others.

Separately incubate each colony in test tubes overnight.

This process would significantly increase the amount of plasmids containing biobricks that we want. Plasmids can be extracted later.

Transformation of J and G (24/06 PCR Product) into competent E. coli cells

Competent cells are already made in stocks and can be found in the -80℃ freezer: we don’t need to prepare them again. J and G comes from repeat PCR done in Day 3.

Primer Design

Since A, B, F, G, I, K, M have repeatedly failed to be PCR-amplified, longer primers were designed to replace the old primers for the PCRing of these gene sequences.

Primers that would give the sequences new restriction sites to allow their insertion into pBAD33 and pBAD/HisB expression vectors were also designed.

Day 3

Plasmid Extraction

For the plasmid extraction protocol see here.

pSB1C3 shipping vector containing gBlocks from Day 1, as well as blank pSB-1C3 shipping vector, pBAD/HisB expression plasmids, and pBAD33 expression plasmids were extracted from overnight cultures of E. coli DH5 using E.Z.N.A. Plasmid DNA Mini Kit I.

(refer to pages 10-12for Mini Kit protocol. Some special notes:

  • All optional steps were carried out except equilibration step.
  • After centrifugation in step 2, the tubes were pulsed before the excess supernatant was removed through pipetting.
  • Steps 6 and 7 (involving solutions II and III need to be carried out in quick succession (adhering to the short incubation time) to ensure good results. It is advisable to do these two steps in pairs as in step 6 the tubes need to be tightly capped once solution II is added.
  • The precipitate formed in following step 7 does not pellet well after centrifugation in step 8, and hence the suspension needs to be removed immediately to prevent resuspension.
  • The inversion in step 6 needs to be done gently so that genomic DNA of the bacteria are not extracted along with the desired plasmid DNA.

Plasmid Quantification(

1µl of the each of the extracted plasmids were dropped onto the NanoDrop machine for concentration quantification. The results are as below:

DNA c/ngμl-1 DNA c/ngμl-1
pBAD/HisB 36.4 mccS (H1) 61.5
pBAD33 34.4 mccS (H2) 129.6
pSB1C3 142.1 DspB+DsbA (J1) 38.8
lsr + GFP (C2) 122.9 DspB+DsbA (J2) 46.3
lsr + GFP (C3) 40.3 DspB+DsbA (J3) 41.9
lsr + Holin (D1) 40.2 Art175+YebF (L1) 64.6
lsr + Holin (D2) Art175+YebF (L2)
lsr + Holin (D3) 44.1 Art175+YebF (L3) 43.2
DNase+DsbA (E1) 77.4 Art175 + Fla (N1) 103.5
DNase+DsbA (E2) 43.4 Art175 + Fla (N2) 48.8
DNase+DsbA (E3) 40.7 Art175 + Fla (N3) 134.7

Plasmid Digest

The plasmids were digested using restriction enzymes EcoRI-HF and PstI (NEB) at 37℃ for 90 minutes. For the protocol see here.

Gel layout

10µl of blue gel loading dye was added to each tube of digested plasmids. 20µl from the contents of each tube were then loaded into a 30-well agarose gel according to the following schematic:

(*the pSB-1C3 well has pSB-1C3 with abijk insert)

The ladder well has 10µl of 2-Log Ladder added into it.

A potential difference of 120V was applied across the gel for 40 minutes before it was stained with ethidium bromide for 30 minutes.

Analysis of Results

Analysis

The first three lanes produced expected results: pBAD33 and pBAD/HisB being “blank” plasmid backbones, the pSB-1C3-abijk lane giving two bands corresponding to similar sizes (being pSB-1C3 and abijk insert respectively).

All the other lanes seem to be showing only products in the 2kb range, which corresponds roughly to the size of the pSB-1C3 backbone, but the sizes are not uniform. Nonetheless, we know that the plasmid extraction step was carried out correctly as it did yield products approximating what we were looking for.

If it was a matter of the ligation step carried out on 23/06 failing entirely, we should be expecting a uniform row of backbone bands. Instead, there are minor but noticeable size variations between each band which cannot be successfully explained by failed digestion/ligation. It is thus speculated that the pSB-1C3 stock we received from iGEM HQ had suffered from varying extents of DNA degradation such that the restriction enzyme cut sites on their ends were no longer.