Difference between revisions of "Team:SPSingapore/home"
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
$(document).ready(function() { | $(document).ready(function() { | ||
$( "#accordionPart" ).accordion({ | $( "#accordionPart" ).accordion({ | ||
+ | heightStyle: "fill", | ||
+ | collapsible: true, | ||
+ | active: 'none', | ||
+ | autoHeight: false, | ||
+ | navigation: true | ||
+ | }); | ||
+ | }); | ||
+ | $(document).ready(function() { | ||
+ | $( "#accordionHumanPractice" ).accordion({ | ||
heightStyle: "fill", | heightStyle: "fill", | ||
collapsible: true, | collapsible: true, | ||
Line 682: | Line 691: | ||
transform: translate(-50%, -50%); | transform: translate(-50%, -50%); | ||
} | } | ||
− | </style> | + | #bodyWiki #skrollr-body #safety p strong { |
+ | font-size: 18px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | #bodyWiki #skrollr-body #human_practice h5 { | ||
+ | font-size: 24px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | #bodyWiki #skrollr-body #human_practice em { | ||
+ | font-size: 12px; | ||
+ | color: #625A59; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </style> | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
Line 2,662: | Line 2,681: | ||
<!--Human Practice section--> | <!--Human Practice section--> | ||
− | <div class="content content-full bigDiv" id="human_practice" style = "height: | + | |
− | + | <div class="content content-full bigDiv" id="human_practice" style = "height: 700px; overflow:scroll"> | |
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f1/SPSingapore_Text_HumanPractice.png" width="40%" alt="human practice"></p> | ||
+ | <p>[some introduction here]</p> | ||
+ | <div id="accordionHumanPractice"> | ||
+ | <h3>Workshop</h3> | ||
+ | <div> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/86/SPSingapore_Workshop_Microscope1.jpg" width="400" height="300" alt="píc"></p> | ||
+ | <p><em>One of the participants taking a closer look at GFP-tagged E. coli under our very own SPS microscope.</em> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p>The SPS iGEM Team of 2015 hosted a genetic engineering workshop for students from the Faculty of Science on 5th August 2015, in the Active Learning Room and the SPS Wet Lab. The workshop aimed to equip science students with an understanding of both the techniques of synthetic biology, and its risks and rewards. Participants were given the opportunity to be immersed in both the theoretical and wet lab components of synthetic biology.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Students were first guided through the concepts of genetic engineering, and the available wet lab tools and techniques used. After some light refreshments, they then got a chance to try their hands at designing their very own gene vectors with a fun set of theoretical puzzles.</p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/ec/SPSingapore_Workshop_2.jpg" width="400" height="300" alt="píc"> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <p><em>One of the workshop facilitators explaining the process of constructing a genetic vector.</em></p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/SPSingapore_workshop_3.jpg" width="400" height="300" alt="píc"> | ||
+ | <p><em>Participants and facilitators hard at work figuring out genetic puzzles</em></p> | ||
+ | <p>After lunch, the participants performed Fusion PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and performed bacterial transformation in the SPS Wet Lab. They also had a look at green fluorescent protein (GFP) expressed in <em>E. coli</em>, as an example of one of the methods that are commonly used to quantify protein expression.</p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/77/SPSingapore_workshop_4.jpg" width="400" height="300" alt="píc"> | ||
+ | <p><em>Participants beginning PCR in the SPS Wet Lab!</em></p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/cf/SPSingapore_workshop_5.jpg" width="400" height="300" alt="píc"> | ||
+ | <p><em>Loading a gel is hard work – participants ran a DNA gel to confirm if their PCR reaction was successful</em></p> | ||
+ | <p>All in all, both the workshop participants and facilitators spent an enjoyable day both learning and sharing about genetic engineering. The SPS iGEM Team of 2015 would like to thank all participants for spending their day with us! We would also like to thank Science Dean’s Office for their kind sponsorship, as well as the SPS staff and SPS community for their support.</p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e0/SPSingapore_workshop_6.jpg" width="400" height="300" alt="píc"> | ||
+ | <p><em>A final group photograph with some of the facilitators and workshop participants</em></p> | ||
+ | <p><strong>Video</strong></p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <h3>Interview</h3> | ||
+ | <div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div class="gap gap-50" style="background-image:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/06/SPSingapore_Background_Safety.JPG); height: 300px"></div> | <div class="gap gap-50" style="background-image:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/06/SPSingapore_Background_Safety.JPG); height: 300px"></div> | ||
<!--safety section--> | <!--safety section--> | ||
− | <div class="content content-full bigDiv" id="safety" style = "height: 500px"> | + | <div class="content content-full bigDiv" id="safety" style = "height: 500px; overflow:scroll"> |
− | + | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0f/SPSingpore_Text_Safety.png" width="30%" alt="safety"> | |
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p><strong>Safety in our Project </strong></p> | ||
+ | <p>Biosafety in our project involves minimising the risks to the researchers working in the laboratory, as well as the general public in future medical applications based off our research. </p> | ||
+ | <p><strong>Safety when handling biological organisms </strong></p> | ||
+ | <p>Non-pathogenic strains of E. coli K-12 strains BL21 and dH5α from Life Technologies were used for bacterial cloning of plasmids and expression of proteins of interest. These strains are Risk group 1 and were handled in a BSL2 Biosafety cabinet. The E. coli strain carrying the Biobrick BBaK299812 (containing parts derived from Risk group 2 organisms) was handled as a Risk Group 2 agent. Mammalian cell line HEK293T is classified under Risk group 2, and was also cultured in a BSL2 Biosafety cabinet.</p> | ||
+ | <p> <strong>Safety in Project Design </strong></p> | ||
+ | <p>In our project, we aim to engineer non-pathogenic E. coli as a vector to deliver a potential drug into the tumour core. We use the Biobricks Part BBa_K299812 (http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K299812), which contains the invasin gene from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and the listerolysin O gene from Listeria monocytogenes. The Invasin protein allows for bacteria to enter mammalian cells, while Listerolysin O is a pore-forming protein that enable bacteria to escape the endosome. These two proteins are involved in pathogenesis of their respective bacterial species. </p> | ||
+ | <p>The Invasin and Listerolysin proteins enable our E. coli to enter mammalian cells, and escape the endosome, where they can subsequently deliver an encoded therapeutic to kill the tumour cell. To ensure that these proteins are only expressed under the conditions of the tumour microenvironment, the invasin and listerolysin proteins will be placed under the control of an anaerobic promoter, and a quorum sensing system. </p> | ||
+ | <p><strong>Safety in Our Lab </strong></p> | ||
+ | <p>All our team members have undergone Chemical, Biological and Fire Safety Training from the Office of Safety, Health and Environment (OSHE http://www.nus.edu.sg/osh/), the department in charge of Laboratory and Work Safety at the National University of Singapore</p> | ||
+ | <p> For each protocol used for our experiments, we have a separate risk assessment. Please refer to our ‘protocols’ page for more information. </p> | ||
+ | <p>Our laboratory is equipped with biological and chemical spill kits, and all members of our iGEM Team are trained to handle Biological and Chemical Spills. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our laboratory is classified as Biosafety Level 2, according to the classification by the Wolrd Health Organisation (WHO) and the Genetic Modification Advisory Committee of the government of Singapore (http://www.gmac.gov.sg/).</p> | ||
+ | <p> Bacterial work and Mammalian cell culture are performed in separate BSL2 Biosafety Cabinets, while DNA work is done on the bench. No cytotoxic reagents are used in our laboratory; Sybr Safe DNA stain is used rather than Ethidium Bromide. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Liquid biological waste is decontaminated using 10% Bleach, while Solid biological waste is sent for incineration in a local incineration plant devoted to medical waste (Sembcorp http://www.sembcorp.com/en/business-on-site-services-solid_waste_management.aspx). </p> | ||
+ | <p><strong>Safety Requirements for iGEM Participation </strong></p> | ||
+ | <p>For the fulfillment of requirements for safety from the iGEM foundation, we have submitted the ‘About our lab’ safety forms (https://2015.igem.org/Safety/About_Our_Lab?team_id=1804) and the ‘Final Safety form (Yihan will complete this later to the deadline as currently can’t confirm what we are submitting to parts registry. Just put in first)’ </p> | ||
+ | <p>We have also performed a check-in (https://2015.igem.org/Safety/Check_In) for the Biobricks Part (Bba_k299812 http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K299812), which contains the invasin gene from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and the listerolysin O gene from Listeria monocytogenes. </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div class="gap gap-50" style="background-image:url(navigation/project.jpg); height: 300px"></div> | <div class="gap gap-50" style="background-image:url(navigation/project.jpg); height: 300px"></div> |
Revision as of 02:21, 20 August 2015
Kenneth Lim Kun Ming Research Interest: Bioinformatics, Genetic analysis Random fact: Is apparently Schrˆdinger's Biologist Clarice Hong Kit Yee Research Interest: genetics, RNA, cancer Past research projects: (can't rmb, tell you later) Current project: Differential roles of SALL4A and SALL4B in HCC
Wong Chi Yan Research Interest: Microbiology, molecular biology, proteomics Past research project: Genetic studies on Salmonella biofilms Current project: Role of fumarase and cysteine dehydrogenase in DNA damage response Random fact: Likes statistics and playing volleyball :) Yeo Xin Yi Research Interests: Neurobiology, Neurosciences Past research projects: Role of STAT in neuroinflammation and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease Current research projects: Synaptic plasticity threshold in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, Role of WNK1 in neuronal survival and development Random fact: Blah ~ Tan Yi Han Research Interests: Pathogens, Immunology, Synthetic biology Past research projects: Genetic studies on plant pathogenic fungi, Drug screening for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Current project: Characterisation of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from liver abscess Random fact: Knits and bakes in spare time. =)
Hee Yanting
Research Interests: RNA, genomics, epigenetics Past research projects: microRNA as a potential therapeutic strategy for colorectal cancer, Characterising LPA1 antagonists using calcium imaging Current project: The role and targeting of EZH2 in lymphoma Random fact: Plays the erhu and self-learning cello and classical guitar
Adrian Tan Hong Ji Research Interest: Genetic Engineering, Cancer, Immunology Random fact: 500 Hours in Terraria Soong Yun Ting Research Interests: Proteomics, Past research projects: Genetic studies on Salmonella biofilms Current project: Identification of protein players in metastasis Random fact: Plays the harmonica Nguyen Duy Research Interest: Pharmacoinfomatics, Bioinformatics, Neurosciences Past research project: Genetic linkage analysis of asthma Current project: Neurodegeneration of Drosophila Melanogaster. Random fact: 0 hour in Terraria |
Leslie Gapter Dr. Leslie is trained as a molecular biologist and her dissertation focused on breast development and tumorigenesis. Leslie joined NUS in 2005 and her past research has focused on analyzing botanical products for breast and prostate cancer treatment. In 2008, Leslie became a full time scientific writer at the Mechanobiology Institute, Singapore, before moving into her current position as a Lecturer in 2010. Leslie teaches 'The Cell' module, which examines the universal mechanics and functions of cells from an integrated science perspective, for the Special Program in Science. |
Linda J Kenney Dr Kenney is a Professor of Microbiology at the University of Illinois-Chicago. Her laboratory studies two-component systems in bacteria that control gene expression at a single cell and nanometer level. |
Stuti Desai She joined the Kenney group in May, 2012 with a strong urge to amalgamate her doctoral training in studying silent genetic systems in enterics to decipher the behavior of bacteria under various environmental challenges. She obtained her doctorate from the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, under the guidance of Prof Subramony Mahadevan. She studied Biochemistry for my Master's degree and Chemistry, Physics and Zoology for her Bachelor's degree at the Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Baroda, India. |
Description
For description
Experiment and Protocol
For experiment and protocol
Result
For result
Design
For design
Team part
For Team part
Basic part
For basic part
Composite part
For composite part
Part collection
For part collection
[DONE] pLac-GFP tester plasmid
[PAUSED] HEK293
Invasin + Listeriolysin [YanTing, YunTing]
Maintenance
esaGFP [Adrian, Clarice, Kenneth]
FNRgfp [YiHan, ChiYan]
|
|
---|
Yi Han
Received 2 bacterial stab cultures, EsaR/I plasmid from addgene (CHL) and BBa_K299812 from iGEM HQ.
Streaked out on plates with amp.
Adrian
Transformed:
+Kit plate 1 9N Ba_K763002 chl
+Kit plate 4 13L BBa_E0040 amp
DNa was received in powder form in plates, and resuspended in 10ul ultrapure H2O respectively. Plates were stored in -20/
Yi Han
Plates cracked in incubator as they dried from lack of humidity.
Transfer to small incubator with beaker of water for humidity no single colonies for inv plasmid -> streak again.
Wrong antibiotic for EsaR/I plasmid-> streak out again
Yi Han
Inoculate single colony of invasin plasmid carrying bacteria in 3mL LB+amp
Transformation of 13L repeated with 1ul of DNA.
No colonies grew for 13L on all plates ->adjust incubator, make new media
Miniprep of inoculated bacteria for invasin plasmid, incubate sample in 37degC for 1h 20min
RE of invasin plasmid | RE control |
---|---|
Rsal 1ul | Rsal 0 ul |
EcoRI 1 ul | EcoRI 0 ul |
INv plasmid 7.5ul | Inv plasmid 7.5 ul |
H2O 35.5 ul | H2O 37.5 ul |
NEB buffer 4.5 ul | Buffer 4.5 ul |
Repeat transformation of 13L with 1ul
Xin Yi and Yi Han
Miniprep of EsaR/I plasmid for 4 colonies
Restriction digest for EsaR with XbaI/BamHI
RE reaction |
---|
5ul plasmid |
5ul buffer |
1ul XbaI |
1ul BamHI |
Add H2O to 50ul |
Xin Yi
Sent EsaR clone 4 and INv-4 for sequencing.
YFP and GFP transformation results - no colonies for YFP
The GFP transformation repeated with 100ng of plasmid was sucessful.
4 colonies of gfp plasmid were inoculated in 3mL LB+amp and grown overnight.
Miniprep of gfp plasmids
RE digest with EcoRI and RsaI
RE digest indicated a very faint smaller band for colonies 2-4, and hence these were likely to be positive clones
Yanting
Inoculated 3mLS of Inv-4 and EsaR-4 plasmid carrying bacteria into 100mL LB+ appropriate Antibiotic
Cell culture-> HEK293 cells revived from freezing down appeared detached.
Yi Han + Yanting
Storage of bacterial glycerol stocks for Inv-4, EsaR4 in 25% glycerol
Yanting: grew HEK293T cells in T25 glask
Gel extract to clean up gfp plasmids which loading dye had accidentally been added to.
Yi Han
Miniprep of gfp plasmids, preparation of samples for sequencing
Yi Han
All gfp plasmids had a correct sequence
Yunting kept glycerol stocok for all, and inoculation of 3mL of gfp3 into 100mL LB+amp for midiprep
Yi Han + Yunting
Midiprep of gfp plasmid PCR of gfp with KpnI-gfp and XhoI-gfp primers
Yunting + Duy
Nanodrop of gfp product-> 595.5ng/ul
RE digest of EsaR vector with KpnI/XHoI
Gel electrophoreseis at 1000V for 30min
Gel extraction: 3.9ng/ul and 6.9ng/ul for Esa fragment and GFP --> low yield
Yunting
Gel extraction using Promega binding solution to melt gel, followed by thermo scientific kit
Adrian
Gel extraction optimisation
Hypothesised that the Binding buffer has a problem/DNA does not bind to column
1: 2X promega binding buffer volume
2: Increase incubation time for binding to 5min
Switch binding buffer to that of thermo scientific PCR purification kit
Use sodium acetate if available? TO facilitate stronger binding to column
Results
1: ~10ng/ul
2: ~9ng/ul
not succesful
further optimisation-> warm buffer, incubate for 5min
elute in 30/20ul smaller volumes
Yihan
1: Thermoscientific miniprep columns with 2XThermoscientific binding buffer
2: Thermoscientific PCR purification kit 2X buffer
3: Promega kit 2X buffer
Yihan
PCR (mastermix: 8)
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
PCR buffer | 10 ul * 8 = 8-ul |
primers | 0.8ul, 0.8ul |
DNA polymerase | 4ul |
dH2O | 61.75 * 8 = 494ul |
Templates | 5.55*7 = 38.75ul |
Digest more plasmid (Esa plasmid)
4 rxns ( KpnI/XhoI digest) 50ul each
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
Buffer | |
KpnI |
2ul |
XhoI |
2ul |
DNA |
34.8ul |
H2O |
141.2ul |
Yihan
PCR
RP_XhoI_GFP and FP_KpnI_GFP with GFP midiprep
For 15 reactions with control .: Mastermix * 17
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
PCR buffer |
170ul |
primers |
1.7ul, 1.7ul |
dNTP |
34 ul |
DNA polymerase |
8.5 ul |
dH2O |
66.3*17 = 1127.1ul |
templates |
17ul |
total |
1360ul |
PCR protocol “GFP 1” (32 cycles)
GFP PCR product -> 448ng/ul
Gel extraction
Qiagen gel extraction kit at MBI
Esa gel band from 14/6
Nanodrop: 16.4 ng/ul, 260/280 = 2.60
Plasmid construction
-
RE digest (KpnI, XhoI)
-
3 Replicates of the following
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
DNA |
2.6ul |
Buffer |
5ul |
H2O |
41.5ul |
KpnI |
0.5ul |
XhoI |
0.5ul |
Ligation (2x reaction) 40ul
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
10X T4 DNA ligase buffer |
4ul |
Vector DNA (16ng/ul) |
100ng -> 6.25ul |
insert DNA |
75nl -> 12 ul |
T4 DNA Ligase |
2ul |
H2O |
16ul |
Note: ALL digested DNA in tube labeled lacGFP.ligation was used
Nanodrop of ligation: 1114.0ng/ul. 260/280 = 3.7
Transformation
Transformation of ligated esa-GFP plasmid into DH5\alpha cells
DH5\alpha ,<- unlabelled brown vial inside DH5\alpha box at -80
Plates spread at 11:40h
LB + chloroamphenicol
+4x (100ul)
+10x (40ul)
+20x (20ul)
+LB - 20x (20ul)
remaining transformed cells (~220ul) are kept at 4C
--> labeled as placGFP in brown tube
Oservation: only 4x placGFP plate has colonies (7)
spread one new LB + chlor plate with 200ul of transformed bacteria
picked 6 colonies to grow for miniprep in LB + chl liq media
Conclusion:
+protocol works
+optimization for increase vol needed
cloning of synparts in amp vector
+comes as 4mg dry DNA
+40ul of DI/RNAse free H20
+for transformation, 150ml on wed
Unknown
Miniprep of placGFP followed by RE digest (Kpn, XhoI): 50 ul total
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
Buffer |
2.5ul |
KpnI |
<ILLEGIBLE> |
XhoI |
<ILLEGIBLE> |
DNA |
10 |
H2O |
12025 |
Colony PCR for synparts
+ Failed
+ No specific <illegible> produced+ Might need optimization
Yihan
RE digest (XhoI, KpnI) of esa and GFP
Yunting
Gel electrophoresis (100V, 40min)
+ Lane 2: gpf: no bands
+ Lane 3: 100bp ladder
+ Lane 4: blank
+ Lane 5: esa: 2 bands
+ Lane 6: 1kb ladder
+ Lane 7:blank
<Picture of gel>
Optimizing gel extract protocol
+ RE GFP from PCR (directly RE)
+ promega agarose 1% gel
+ add NaAC in binding buffer
Result:
+ yield for cut plasmid was 12.8ng/ul
+ GFP was 8.6ng/ul
Ligation reaction 6 reactions
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
Buffer |
12ul |
Vector |
30ul |
Insert |
30ul |
+ 6x ligation result transformed into competent DH5\alpha 20 ul, 50ul, 100ul plated on LB + chl
Yunting
Ligation of GFP tester plasmid.
Performed 4x ligation using RE- digested esa and GFP (CY, 22/6). Ligation rxn at room temperature for 30min instead of 10min.
Included vector-only and insert-only controls.
Stored in -20deg.
Will run gel tmr. Insert only control should be same size as gfp product. Same for the other control. Can try to plate vector only to see re-ligation??
Nanodrop:
PlacGFP - 642.8ng/ul. 260/280=3.89
Vector ctrl - 756.6ng/ul. 260/280=4.11
Insert ctrl - 557 ng/ul. 260/280=3.86
Yanting
Ran 0.8% pre-cast gel at 100V for 45min.
10ul of each sample to 2ul of loading dye.
Gel lanes:
100bp; uncut esa (used esa4 from -20);
pLacGFP; vector ctrl; insert ctrl; 1kb.
[YH] Re-run gel. 35ul of each sample. No bands.
<insert gel picture>
RE of esa and Gfp pcr product.
Gel electrophoresis.
Cast a thick 1% gel (60ml) with combined wells. [Don't need to cast thick gel next time, takes too long to melt]
Gel run at 100V, 45min. Lanes: 100bp, esa, gfp 1&2, 1kb
Image after cutting is also saved.Gel extraction of RE esa & gfp.
Used Promega kit, loaded both gfp bands into one column. Eluted with 30ul water for 5min before centrifugation.Nanodrop:
Esa- 37.7ng/ul. 260/280= 1.83
Gfp - 25.1ng/ul. 260/280= 1.84
Overnight ligation
6x ligation:
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
Buffer |
6ul |
Vector (37.7ng/ul) |
50ng = 7.8ul |
Insert (25.1ng/ul) |
37.7 ng = 6.6ul |
H2O |
87.6ul |
Ligase |
6ul |
[Chi Yan + Yunting] Midiprep of EsaR plasmid
[Yihan Yunting] Gel electrophoresis of inv colony PCR
insert picture gel
[Xinyi] Colony pcr for placgfp for >18 colonies
insert gel picture
[Adrian] Gfp expression observed using gfp filter with the SPS microscopeYanting
Subculture of HEK 293
P4 -> p5
Grow/split into 150mm dish for freezing on sat(20/6)
-->30ml DMEM + 1ml cells
90mm dish for maintenance (buffer)
-->10ml DMEM + 30ul cells
Cells combined from 3 90mm dishes
Yanting
Freezing of HEK293
P6
Cells from a 150 mm dish and 90mm dish
Adrian
Prepared restreak of inv/hly plasmid from original stab culture
Yanting and Yunting
Colony PCR of invasin
Picked out 8 colonies (marked 1-8) from BBa_K299812 plate stored at 4deg (Adrian, 12/7).
Colony PCR using prefix suffix primers for first 4 rxn and universal primers VP & VF2 for last 4 rxn. Used thermocycler "Colony" protocol.
Also constituted dNTP w 2.5mM of each atcg triphosphate.
Yanting
100V at 30min. Ladder, 4 prefix suffix rxn, 4 universal primers rxn. Saved as “7.15_inv colony”.
When I ran for longer (after storing gel at 4deg), the bands were longer but the 250bp marker as well as the primer-dimers are pretty close to dye front.
Yunting
Placed BBa_K299812 plate in incubator for overnight growth.
Yanting and Yunting
Colony PCR of 8 colonies (marked A-H) from BBa_K299812 plate, and also spotted on a save plate. Both plates placed back in incubator.
Primer conc=0.5 uM, template DNA dissolved in 10ul h20.
Thermocycler “colony_inv” protocol, with adjusted extension time and annealing time&temp from standard “colony” protocol.
100V for 34min.
Tubes 1-2: FP-prefix, RP-suffix.
3-4: FP-VF2, RP-VR.
5-6: FP-prefix, RP_Inv_M2.
7-8: RP-suffix, FP_Inv_M1.
No template control with FP-prefix, RP-suffix.
[Note: RP_M2 = FP_M2. Check future uses agn seq on the primer master file. Just in case, the sequence used in this expt is INV_FP_M2->GCTCATTATAGTCCGCGAAATCACG].
Gel image saved as “7.17_inv colony.sgd” (handphone pic below).Results: Tubes 3&4 with universal primers VF2 VR have a band between 4&5kb - Inv+LLO is 4.1kb, probably are positive colonies.
Tubes 1&2, 5&6 have bands <750bp as well as primer dimers (but the annealing temperature was calculated for prefix suffix primers not universal ones…I’ll try thermo-gradient thermocycler protocol next time).
Expected band size for 5&6 (FP-prefix, RP_Inv_M2 (ends 1928)) = 1.9kb.
No bands for tubes 7&8. Expected band size for 7&8 (RP-suffix, FP_Inv_M1 (starts 1046)) = 2.2kb.
Yihan
Inoculation of positive colonies in liquid culture. 3mL and shaking incubation.
Yunting
Miniprep of positive colonies from 30h liquid culture.
Eluted in 50ul elution buffer and stored at -20.
C= 225.9ng/ul. 260/280=1.86
D= 297.7ng/ul. 1.87
Yunting
Colony PCR with thermogradient: 14rxn
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
H2O |
70ul |
dNTP |
14ul |
MgCl2 |
35ul |
Taq |
3.25ul |
primers (forward + reverse) |
14ul*2 |
Template DNA |
14ul |
C/D-1,2: Col3.
C/D-3,4: Col12.
D-5,6: Col 9.
D-7,8: Col 10.
Negative control (no template): Col 8.
Gel ran for 80V, 1h.
D-1,2: VF2, VR.
D-3,4: FP-prefix, RP-suffix.
D-5,6: FP-prefix, FP_M2.
D-7,8: FP-prefix, FP_invF.
C-1,2: VF2, VR.
C-3,4: FP-prefix, RP-suffix.
Results Notes:
Too much template DNA (~250ng). Separate the universal primers (to avoid differing extension time).
Yanting
RE digest of inv/hyl plasmid with EcoRI and PstI for 2 hours at 37oC.
Lane 1-4: 1kb ladder, 100bp ladder, RE of colony C, RE of colony D.
Size is correct: 4kb main band (inv+hly part) and 2kb (plasmid backbone). These plasmid DNA should have the part.
Yanting and Yunting
Colony PCR, used with temperature gradient to vary annealing temperature. 10rxn
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
5x buffer | 50ul |
H2O |
127.5ul |
dNTP |
50ul |
MgCl2 |
10ul |
Taq |
3.25ul |
primers (forward + reverse) |
14ul*2 |
Template DNA |
14ul |
100V for 45min (can run for longer).
Result:
Lane 1: 1kb ladder; lane 2: 100bp ladder;
lane 3-7: FP prefix + RP suffix (5 repeats with increasing annealing temperatures) has 2 bands ~800 bp & 100-200bp (probably non specific bands, will lower # of cycles in future, use higher annealing temp, lower annealing time).
Expected size of inv+hly part is 4.1kb.
lane 8-9: VF + M2 has a thick band 800-900bp.
Expected size is 600+130bp (VF adds ~130bp compared to FP_prefix) .: doesn’t seem to be correct….
lane 10-11: VF + inv F has no bands. Expected is at least 200bp (bcos universal primers).
lane 12: VR + inv F seems to have a small band <100bp. Non specific amplification?
Expected is 1.5+0.1 kb (from VR).
Yanting
RE with XbaI and PstI
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
Restriction enzyme | 2ul |
Buffer | 5ul |
DNA (4x of miniprep=74.5ng/ul) | 13.4ul |
H2O | 29.6ul |
Incubate at 37degC for 2.5h (1130-1400)
Results: Gel loaded 1kb ladder, uncut, RE digested. 100V for 1h.
Plasmid doesn't have XbaI site - RE digested DNA is a linear 6kb band.
Yunting
Cast a big gel. Stored in 4 deg. [Used up 26/6]
Pre-cast two 0. 8% gels. Stored in 4deg. [Used up on 24 & 25/6]
Chi Yan and Yunting
Midiprep of esaR plasmid.
Airdry ON.
Transformation of ligated FNRgfp plasmid into dH5alpha
Cleaned waterbath, de-iced the fridge.
Today, we also did a spring cleaning for the lab
Adrian
BBPrefix_esaRBS PCR
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
H2O |
221ul |
Buffer |
80ul |
MgCl |
32ul |
dNTP |
32ul |
Forward Primer_Biobrick Prefix |
16ul |
ORP_esaRBS_fragsyn |
16ul |
synpart_BBP_esaRBS |
1ul |
gotaq |
2ul |
total |
400ul |
success-> PCR purification
esaRBS_GFP_BBsuffix
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
H2O |
237ul |
Buffer |
80ul |
MgCl2 |
32ul |
dNTP |
32ul |
Reverse primer_BB_suffix |
?? |
ORP_esaRS_GFP |
16ul |
Plac_GFPPLASMID |
1ul |
gotaq |
2ul |
failed -> troubleshooting-> new OFP_esaRBBS_GFP
Redid 30/6 with new primers
success with new primers-> fusion pcr
PCR with inv primers (adrian’s primers)
Clarice
Fusion PCR with esaRBS, GFP
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
H2O |
104.07ul |
Buffer |
40ul |
MgCl2 |
16ul |
dNTP |
16ul |
Forward primer_BB_prefix |
8ul |
Reverse primer_BB_prefix |
8ul |
400ng esaRBS |
2.13ul |
400ng esaRBSgfp |
4.8ul |
gotaq |
1ul |
Total |
200ul |
annealing temp 50degC
Gel electrophoresis: looks correct-> PCR Purification
RE digest of esaRBS+GFP
Reagent | Insert | Vector |
---|---|---|
Buffer | 2ul | 2ul |
EcoRI/PstI | 1ul | 1ul |
Template(2ug) | 5ul | 4ul |
dH2O | 11ul | 12ul |
total | 20ul | 20ul |
Clarice
COlny PCR with different colonies (15 colonies)
FP_BB_Prefix and RP_BB_Suffix
Success
Clarice
Colony PCR successful - inouclated colony 2,3,4,12 in 3mL LB
PCR-FNRsynpart BBP
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
dH2O | 221ul |
Buffer | 80ul |
MgCl2 | 32ul |
dNTPs | 32ul |
FP_RNE_PromoterBBP | 16ul |
GFP_FNR_Prom_GFP | 16ul |
synpart FNR | 1ul |
gotaq | 2ul |
Clarice
Verify minipreppped esaGFP plasmid
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
Buffer | 2ul |
EcoRI | 1ul |
Pst1 | 1ul |
Plasmid | 5ul |
dH2O | 11ul |
total | 20ul |
Clarice
Transformatin of EsaGFP plasmid (30ul BL21 + 5ul ligation reaction)
plate O/NYihan
Ran gel of gfp plasmid EcoRI/PstI, took out gel slice for vector - 4kb
Gel extraction:
+gfpvector->38.7ng/ul fragment-> direction purification 226.4ng/ul
+LIgation reaction (5:1) 6X
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
300ng vector | 7.8ng/ul |
531.2ng of insert | 2.4ul |
Buffer | 12ul |
Enzyme | 6ul |
H2O | 91.8ul |
ligate for 2 hours at 16 hours transform, plate, grow ON
Yihan
No colonies-> ligation did not work
Recalcualte ligation reaction (3:1),7x
350ng vector->9ul vector
446.3ng insert-> 2ul 7ul
ligase 110
H2O
12ul buffer
Yihan and Clarice
colonies for EsaGFP
grew Colony PCR for 14 colonies
Unsuccessful-> no bands observed
Yihan
Trying out an idea for workshop
Trial for blue/white screen
Streak out pGFPuv and pGEMT on plate with amp added spread 40ul of 0.1M IPTG and 30ul of 5%xgal, dried and on plate without amp
Yihan
Ran gel with FNR Pcr and gfp pcr
size of pcr product was correct but gel picture was not saved
FNR Product was pcr purified
Plasmid extraction for colony 2,3,4 of esaGFP - > 2,3 were sent for sequencing and primers did not bind, chromatogram was messed up.
Fusion PCR for FNRGFP:
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
dH2O | 218ul |
10X buffer | 80ul |
MgCl2 | 23ul |
dNTP | 32ul |
Template FNR PCR (40ng) | 3ul |
gfp PCR (400ng) | 1ul |
FP_BB_Suffix | 16ul |
RP_BB_Suffix | 16ul |
gotaq | 2ul |
Chi yan
Gel was run for fusion pcr size was correct
Clarice RE digest:
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
PstI | 1.5ul |
EcoRI | 1.5ul |
Buffer | 4ul |
Template | 3ul |
H2O | 20ul |
Total | 40ul |
Chi yan
Ran gel for gfpp plasmid
gel purificaiton and extraction of 4kb fragment
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
ligation reaction (2X) | 40ul |
Buffer | 4ul |
100ng of DNA vector | 3.4ul |
157ng insert | 16ul |
enzyme | 2ul |
H2O | 14.6ul |
Yihan
no colonies for FNRgfp plasmid
Inv plasmid verification
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
buffer | 1ul |
EcoRI | 0.5ul |
invasin plasmid | 0.5ul |
dH2O | 8ul |
Total | 10ul |
Gel extraction RE digest of EsaR-GFP plasmid
Reagent | Ligation | Control |
---|---|---|
Vector (45ng) | 1ul | 1ul |
Insert | 1ul | 1ul |
Buffer | 1ul | 1ul |
dH2O | 6ul | 7ul |
ligase | 1ul | 1ul |
Transformation of FNRgfp anaerobe jar
E. coli grew in both conditions p putida-> some growth in anaerobe chamber proper streak plate in aerobic conditions
packet runs out after 16hours
Yihan and Yunting
LIgation for FNRgfp (4X)
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
200ng Gfp plasmid | 4.36ul |
297ng insert (7:1) | 10.3ul |
Buffer | 53.34ul |
T4 ligase | 4ul |
Trial run of anaerobe chamber:
+ open sachet to decrease O2 at 3.30pm
+ takes 2.5h to activate
place streak plate of p putida a strict aerobe and e coli, facultative aerobe in chamber at 30deg C to grow O/N
P. putida is an abligate aerobe and if chmaber works ,it will not grow
E. coli should grow in both conditions
controls grown outside chamber
Yihan
FNRgfp-> no colonies after transformation
religation (4X reaction)
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
200ng GFP plasmid | 4.4ul |
2125ng of insert | 8ul |
T4 ligase | 4ul |
H2O | 55.6ul |
transformation of FNR gfp into 20ul of BL21
Yihan
No colonies grew
Ran a gel, FNRgfp pcr, gfp pcr, fnr, 100bp ladder
Chi Yan
RE digest of FNR-GFP fusion PCR with EcoRI and PstI
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
EcoRI | 1ul |
PstI | 1ul |
Buffer | 5ul |
FNR-GFP from 12/7 in RIP box 1ug | 2.5ul |
H2O | 40.5ul |
Total | 50ul |
Direct purification using Promega kit
Overnight ligation (4X reaction)
Reagent | Amount |
---|---|
200ng of GFP plasmid | 4.4ul |
400ng of insert (5:1) | ? |
T4 ligase | 4ul |
T4 ligase buffer | 8ul |
H2O | ? |
200ng of gfp plasmid (4.4ul)
400ng of insert (5:1) (?ul)
4ul T4 ligase
8ul T4 ligase buffer
? H2O
Yihan
Ncbi search in BL21 genome revealed that it does have FNR transcriptional regulator
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP010816.1
In dH5alpha as well
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/945908
However no direct data on our specific strains of dH5alpha and BL21
[some introduction here]
Workshop
One of the participants taking a closer look at GFP-tagged E. coli under our very own SPS microscope.
The SPS iGEM Team of 2015 hosted a genetic engineering workshop for students from the Faculty of Science on 5th August 2015, in the Active Learning Room and the SPS Wet Lab. The workshop aimed to equip science students with an understanding of both the techniques of synthetic biology, and its risks and rewards. Participants were given the opportunity to be immersed in both the theoretical and wet lab components of synthetic biology.
Students were first guided through the concepts of genetic engineering, and the available wet lab tools and techniques used. After some light refreshments, they then got a chance to try their hands at designing their very own gene vectors with a fun set of theoretical puzzles.
One of the workshop facilitators explaining the process of constructing a genetic vector.
Participants and facilitators hard at work figuring out genetic puzzles
After lunch, the participants performed Fusion PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and performed bacterial transformation in the SPS Wet Lab. They also had a look at green fluorescent protein (GFP) expressed in E. coli, as an example of one of the methods that are commonly used to quantify protein expression.
Participants beginning PCR in the SPS Wet Lab!
Loading a gel is hard work – participants ran a DNA gel to confirm if their PCR reaction was successful
All in all, both the workshop participants and facilitators spent an enjoyable day both learning and sharing about genetic engineering. The SPS iGEM Team of 2015 would like to thank all participants for spending their day with us! We would also like to thank Science Dean’s Office for their kind sponsorship, as well as the SPS staff and SPS community for their support.
A final group photograph with some of the facilitators and workshop participants
Video
Interview
Safety in our Project
Biosafety in our project involves minimising the risks to the researchers working in the laboratory, as well as the general public in future medical applications based off our research.
Safety when handling biological organisms
Non-pathogenic strains of E. coli K-12 strains BL21 and dH5α from Life Technologies were used for bacterial cloning of plasmids and expression of proteins of interest. These strains are Risk group 1 and were handled in a BSL2 Biosafety cabinet. The E. coli strain carrying the Biobrick BBaK299812 (containing parts derived from Risk group 2 organisms) was handled as a Risk Group 2 agent. Mammalian cell line HEK293T is classified under Risk group 2, and was also cultured in a BSL2 Biosafety cabinet.
Safety in Project Design
In our project, we aim to engineer non-pathogenic E. coli as a vector to deliver a potential drug into the tumour core. We use the Biobricks Part BBa_K299812 (http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K299812), which contains the invasin gene from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and the listerolysin O gene from Listeria monocytogenes. The Invasin protein allows for bacteria to enter mammalian cells, while Listerolysin O is a pore-forming protein that enable bacteria to escape the endosome. These two proteins are involved in pathogenesis of their respective bacterial species.
The Invasin and Listerolysin proteins enable our E. coli to enter mammalian cells, and escape the endosome, where they can subsequently deliver an encoded therapeutic to kill the tumour cell. To ensure that these proteins are only expressed under the conditions of the tumour microenvironment, the invasin and listerolysin proteins will be placed under the control of an anaerobic promoter, and a quorum sensing system.
Safety in Our Lab
All our team members have undergone Chemical, Biological and Fire Safety Training from the Office of Safety, Health and Environment (OSHE http://www.nus.edu.sg/osh/), the department in charge of Laboratory and Work Safety at the National University of Singapore
For each protocol used for our experiments, we have a separate risk assessment. Please refer to our ‘protocols’ page for more information.
Our laboratory is equipped with biological and chemical spill kits, and all members of our iGEM Team are trained to handle Biological and Chemical Spills. Our laboratory is classified as Biosafety Level 2, according to the classification by the Wolrd Health Organisation (WHO) and the Genetic Modification Advisory Committee of the government of Singapore (http://www.gmac.gov.sg/).
Bacterial work and Mammalian cell culture are performed in separate BSL2 Biosafety Cabinets, while DNA work is done on the bench. No cytotoxic reagents are used in our laboratory; Sybr Safe DNA stain is used rather than Ethidium Bromide. Liquid biological waste is decontaminated using 10% Bleach, while Solid biological waste is sent for incineration in a local incineration plant devoted to medical waste (Sembcorp http://www.sembcorp.com/en/business-on-site-services-solid_waste_management.aspx).
Safety Requirements for iGEM Participation
For the fulfillment of requirements for safety from the iGEM foundation, we have submitted the ‘About our lab’ safety forms (https://2015.igem.org/Safety/About_Our_Lab?team_id=1804) and the ‘Final Safety form (Yihan will complete this later to the deadline as currently can’t confirm what we are submitting to parts registry. Just put in first)’
We have also performed a check-in (https://2015.igem.org/Safety/Check_In) for the Biobricks Part (Bba_k299812 http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K299812), which contains the invasin gene from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and the listerolysin O gene from Listeria monocytogenes.