Difference between revisions of "Team:Bordeaux/Attributions"

Line 83: Line 83:
 
<br>Thanks to:
 
<br>Thanks to:
 
<br>- Aurore DE RACHE, Amina BEDRAT, Nassima GUEDDOUDA and Oscar MENDOZA from Jean-Louis Mergny’s Group to lend us their spectrophometer, their NanoDrop instruments and their Fluorescence Reader.
 
<br>- Aurore DE RACHE, Amina BEDRAT, Nassima GUEDDOUDA and Oscar MENDOZA from Jean-Louis Mergny’s Group to lend us their spectrophometer, their NanoDrop instruments and their Fluorescence Reader.
 +
<br>- Martin TEICHMANN's group to lend us incubators and the pHmeter
 
<br>- Natacha PEREBASKINE from Axel INNIS’ group, for the safety formation and for the lending of their Nanodrop instruments
 
<br>- Natacha PEREBASKINE from Axel INNIS’ group, for the safety formation and for the lending of their Nanodrop instruments
 
<br>- Myriam MEDERIC for her hard work  
 
<br>- Myriam MEDERIC for her hard work  

Revision as of 15:34, 20 August 2015

IGEM Bordeaux 2015


Attributions

The iGEM Bordeaux team has created the Cur’d Vine project thanks to the original idea of Marie CECILE who proposed to work on Downy Mildew since the beginning of brainstorming sessions of the team.

During the internship, all of the designs, constructs, and experiments are made by us but the synthesis of DNA was made by IDT technologies. Our protocols are based on many publications (all cited in each protocols files) or generously given by our host lab. Between June to August, nine students stayed at lab and worked on two specified studies; one on bacteria and one on yeast.

On yeast work, Derek McCUSKER, PhD Group Leader, CNRSIBGC - UMR 5095 (CNRS-UBS) helped us by explaining the homologous repair to express the FKS1 gene and on the design of primers for this gene. Denis DUPUY PhD Group Leader of INSERM/Université Bordeaux Segalen (U869); ARN: Régulations naturelle et artificielle" (ARNA) ; our supervisor ; led us for the Gibson chew back assembly technique and Jonathan MILLET, Denis DUPUY’s PhD student, gave us some advices for PCR troubleshooting. On bacteria work, Camilla PARROT team member of INSERM / Université Bordeaux Segalen (Unit 869) NA: Natural and Artificial Regulation” (ARNA) led by Martin TEICHMANN, helped to optimize our purification of curdlan. Lionel BEAUREPAIRE, INSERM engineer, gave many advices on clonage.

Concerning our wiki, it was based on Evry's 2014 team wiki. We decided to adapt their code for our wiki. Our project logo and the comic were designed by Caroline GAGNANT, our schoolmate of the Université de Bordeaux. On problem and description sections, figures are made by Emilie GOUNIN. On Ethics section, M. Jacques FAUCHER’s interview helped us to understand the utility of ethics committees.

Aknowlegments

During our entire project, many people helped us to accomplish our project Cur’d Vine. First, we want to thank the European Institute of Chemistry and Biology that permits us to make every brainstorming sessions in its room. Denis DUPUY, our supervisor who gives us many judicious advices and Jonathan MILLET who succeeded to coexist with many team members of iGEM Bordeaux during all this summer.

Our team had to use several machines which not belong to our lab. That’s why we have to disturb many times the neighbor labs. We hope that they enjoyed our cake as gift. ;)
Thanks to:
- Aurore DE RACHE, Amina BEDRAT, Nassima GUEDDOUDA and Oscar MENDOZA from Jean-Louis Mergny’s Group to lend us their spectrophometer, their NanoDrop instruments and their Fluorescence Reader.
- Martin TEICHMANN's group to lend us incubators and the pHmeter
- Natacha PEREBASKINE from Axel INNIS’ group, for the safety formation and for the lending of their Nanodrop instruments
- Myriam MEDERIC for her hard work
- Camilla PARROT for her daily support

Moreover, we want to thank Didier THORAVAL, teacher and researcher of "Laboratoire de Biogenèse Membranaire" gave us many resources for our work on yeast. Without this help, yeast work will never start. Also, we are grateful that M. McIntosh helped us by answering to our questions on Curdlan.

For the sponsoring, many people had gratefully given us a donation for our team, so we honoured to thank Anonymes, Marie BACK, Hiba BENMOHAMED, Savandara BESSE, Daniel COUTAREL, Jean DESCARPENTRIE, Denis DUPUY, Isabelle DUTOUR, Thomas FAVRAUD, Valérie GABELICA, Valérie GAGNANT, Brice KAUFFMANN, Charlie KOFFI, Corentin KOEHLER, Pierre-Philippe LACLAU, Zohra LEPROVOST, Charlotte MAILLOT, Lauriane NATHOU, Angélica SAINZ and Linh Dan TRAN.



At the end, thanks to all other people who supported our project on social media (Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin and Youtube). Your interest had always touched us and we hope that we will support again for 2016 iGEM competition!


Register for iGEM, have a great summer, and attend the Giant Jamboree.✔

Complete Judging form.✔

Create a Team Wiki.✔

Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree.✔

Create a page on your team wiki with clear attribution of each aspect of your project. This page must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services.✔

Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines). You may also document a new application of a BioBrick part from a previous iGEM year, adding that documentation to the part main page.

EN FRANCAIS documenter au moins une biobrick utile pour le projet et le soumettre dans le registry iGEM. Pour avoir ce critère il est possible de documenter une biobrick existante pour lui donner une nouvelle application. (a regarder ceux qui ont aussi bossé sur le curdlan en 2013)

Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected. Document the characterization of this part in the Main Page section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry. This working part must be different to the part documented in bronze medal criteria

Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry. Your part must be different to the submission for Bronze medal criteria #6 (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines.

iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, and intellectual property rights. Demonstrate how your team has identified, investigated and addressed one or more of these issues in the context of your project. Your activity could center around education, public engagement, public policy issues, public perception or other activities (See the human practices hub for more information and examples of previous teams exemplary work).

Valider experimentalement au moins une biobrick et montrer que la construction marche bien. Documenter la caractérisation de cette part dans la section Main page de cette part. Cette part doit être différente de la part documentée pour le critère bronze (???)
Soumettre cette part dans le iGEM parts registry et il faut suivre les iGEM registry guidlines
Demontrer comment votre équipe a identifié, s'est renseigné et s'est consacré à une des problématiques (Ethique, durabilité, justice social, sécurité, safety, droits intellectuels (vois le human practices hub)

iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, and intellectual property rights. Expand on your silver medal activity by demonstrating how you have integrated the investigated issues into the design and/or execution of your project OR demonstrate an innovative human practices activity that relates to your project (this typically involves educational, public engagement, and/or public perception activities; see the human practices hub for information and examples of previous teams comprehensive and innovative activities).

Convince the judges you have helped any registered iGEM team from a high-school, different track, another university, or institution in a significant way by, for example, mentoring a new team, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, modeling/simulating their system or helping validate a software/hardware solution to a synbio problem.

Improve the function OR characterization of an previously existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year of the iGEM competition) and enter this information in the Registry. Please see the Registry help page on how to document a contribution to an existing part. This part must not come from your 2015 part range.

Demonstrate a functional prototype of your project. Your prototype can derive from a previous project (that was not demonstrated to work) by your team or by another team. Show this system working under real-world conditions (biological materials may not be taken outside the lab).

En plus de la médaille de silver. Demontrer comment on a intégré le human practices dans la mise en place de notre projet et ou son execution (modifier notre projet en fonction de ce qu'on a observé) et/ou monter une partie/activité innovante de human practices en lien avec le projet (voir human practice hub)
Convaincre les juges que l'on a aidé une autre équipe iGEM
Améliorer la fonction ou la caractérisaition d'une biobrick existante et le rentrer dans le registry qui n'a pas de lien avec notre projet 2015




Next Page: Our Biobricks